Business Communication BMS Notes – Page 177

Indian Financial System Functions

by indiafreenotes25/01/202123/08/20252

Encourage Savings:

Financial system promotes savings by providing a wide array of financial assets as stores of value aided by the services of financial markets and intermediaries of various kinds. For wealth holders, all this offers ample choice of portfolios with attractive combinations of income, safety and yield.

With financial progress and innovations in financial technology, the scope of portfolio choice has also improved. Therefore, it is widely held that the savings-income ratio is directly related to both financial assets and financial institutions. That is, financial progress generally insures larger savings out of the same level of real income.

As stores of value, financial assets command certain advantages over tangible assets (physical capital, inventories of goods, etc.) they are convenient to hold, or easily storable, more liquid, that is more easily encashable, more easily divisible, and less risky.

A very important property of financial assets is that they do not require regular management of the kind most tangible assets do. The financial assets have made possible the separation of ultimate ownership and management of tangible assets. The separation of savings from management has encouraged savings greatly.

Savings are done by households, businesses, and government. Following the official classification adopted by the Central Statistical Organization (CSO), Government of India, we reclassify savers into, household sector, domestic private corporate sector, and the public sector.

The household sector is defined to comprise individuals, non-Government, non-corporate entities in agriculture, trade and industry, and non-profit making organisations like trusts and charitable and religious institutions.

The public sector comprises Central and state governments, departmental and non departmental undertakings, the RBI, etc. The domestic private corporate sector comprises non-government public and private limited companies (whether financial or non-financial) and corrective institutions.

Of these three sectors, the dominant saver is the household sector, followed by the domestic private corporate sector. The contribution of the public sector to total net domestic savings is relatively small.

Risk Function

The financial markets provide protection against life, health, and income risks. These guarantees are accomplished through the sale of life, health insurance, and property insurance policies.

Mobilisation of Savings:

Financial system is a highly efficient mechanism for mobilising savings. In a fully-monetised economy this is done automatically when, in the first instance, the public holds its savings in the form of money. However, this is not the only way of instantaneous mobilisation of savings.

Other financial methods used are deductions at source of the contributions to provident fund and other savings schemes. More generally, mobilisation of savings taken place when savers move into financial assets, whether currency, bank deposits, post office savings deposits, life insurance policies, bill, bonds, equity shares, etc.

Transfer Function

A financial system provides a mechanism for the transfer of resources across geographic boundaries.

Allocation of Funds:

Another important function of a financial system is to arrange smooth, efficient, and socially equitable allocation of credit. With modem financial development and new financial assets, institutions and markets have come to be organised, which are replaying an increasingly important role in the provision of credit.

In the allocative functions of financial institutions lies their main source of power. By granting easy and cheap credit to particular firms, they can shift outward the resource constraint of these firms and make them grow faster.

On the other hand, by denying adequate credit on reasonable terms to other firms, financial institutions can restrict the growth or even normal working of these other firms substantially. Thus, the power of credit can be used highly discriminately to favour some and to hinder others.

Reformatory Functions

A financial system undertaking the functions of developing, introducing innovative financial assets/instruments services and practices and restructuring the existing assets, services, etc, to cater to the emerging needs of borrowers and investors.

Key Points

Issuing and gathering of deposits.
Supply of loans from the collected pool of money.
The undertaking of financial transactions.
Boosting the growth of stock markets and other financial markets.
Setting up the legal commercial substructure.
Provision of monetary and consultative services.
Permits portfolio adaptation for existing assets.
Allotment of chance and risk.
It forges a connection between depositors and investors.
Boosts depth and breadth of finances by increasing its horizon.
It is responsible for capital creation.
Adds time value to assets and money.
To set up an entire payment structure and system.
Allocate and dissipate the economic resources.
To maintain the economic stability in the country and the markets.
To create markets that can judge the investment performance.

Weaknesses of Indian Financial System

by indiafreenotes25/01/202123/08/20250

In order to meet the growing requirements of the Government and the industries, many innovative financial instruments have been introduced. Besides, there has been a mushroom growth of financial intermediaries to meet the ever-growing financial requirements of different types of customers. Hence, the Indian financial system is more developed and integrated today than what it was 50 years ago. Yet, it suffers from some weaknesses as listed below:

Dominance of development banks in industrial finance:

The industrial financing in India today is largely through the financial institutions set up by the government. They get most of their funds from their sponsors. They act as distributive agencies only. Hence, they fail to mobilise the savings of the public. This stands in the way of growth of an efficient financial system in the country.

Lack of co-ordination among financial institutions:

There are a large number of financial intermediaries. Most of the financial institutions are owned by the government. At the same time, the government is also the controlling authority of these institutions. As there is multiplicity of institutions in the Indian financial system, there is lack of co-ordination in the working of these institutions.

Unhealthy financial practices:

The dominance of development banks has developed unhealthy financial practices among corporate customers. The development banks provide most of the funds in the form of term loans. So there is a predominance of debt in the financial structure of corporate enterprises. This predominance of debt capital has made the capital structure of the borrowing enterprises uneven and lopsided. When these enterprises face financial crisis, the financial institutions permit a greater use of debt than is warranted. This will make matters worse.

Inactive and erratic capital market:

In India, the corporate customers are able to raise finance through development banks. So, they need not go to capital market. Moreover, they do not resort to capital market because it is erratic and inactive. Investors too prefer investments in physical assets to investments in financial assets.

Monopolistic market structures:

In India some financial institutions are so large that they have created a monopolistic market structures in the financial system. For instance, the entire life insurance business is in the hands of LIC. The weakness of this large structure is that it could lead to inefficiency in their working or mismanagement. Ultimately, it would retard the development of the financial system of the country itself.

High Rate of Interest:

There is a possibility of the high-interest rate charged by several financial institutions in the financial system of our country. Various institutions due to their monopolistic structure in the market may charge high or unfair interest rates.

Other factors:

Apart from the above, there are some other factors which put obstacles to the growth of Indian financial system. Examples are:

a. Banks and Financial Institutions have high level of NPA.

b. Government burdened with high level of domestic debt.

c. Cooperative banks are labelled with scams.

d. Investors confidence reduced in the public sector undertaking etc., e. Financial illiteracy.

Profits Prior to Incorporation and Accounting Treatment

by indiafreenotes24/01/202112/10/20260

Profits Prior to Incorporation refer to the profits earned by a business during the period before a company is legally incorporated. This situation arises when an existing business is acquired by a newly formed company, and the company takes over the business from a date earlier than its incorporation. The profits earned before incorporation are treated as capital profits, not revenue profits, because the company did not legally exist during that period. Such profits are generally transferred to the Capital Reserve Account and are not available for distribution as dividends.

Profit or loss prior to incorporation refers to the profit or loss earned by a business during the period before it is legally registered as a company. This period starts from the date of purchase of the business and ends on the date of incorporation. Since the company does not legally exist during this time, such profit or loss is not considered an operating result of the company. Profit prior to incorporation is treated as capital profit and transferred to Capital Reserve. Loss prior to incorporation is treated as capital loss and written off against capital profits or goodwill. This concept is important in corporate accounting to separate capital and revenue items clearly.

Allocation of Profit in the Pre-Incorporation Period

Allocation of profit in the pre incorporation period refers to the process of dividing total profit of a business between the period before incorporation and after incorporation. When a business is purchased from an earlier date and the company is incorporated later, profits of the whole period are first calculated. These profits are then allocated on time basis or sales basis. Expenses like rent, salaries, and depreciation are usually divided on time basis. Gross profit is generally divided on sales ratio because it depends on turnover. Certain expenses such as directors remuneration, debenture interest, and preliminary expenses are charged only to post incorporation period. Profit prior to incorporation is treated as capital profit and transferred to Capital Reserve. Loss prior to incorporation is treated as capital loss and written off. Profit after incorporation is revenue profit and transferred to Profit and Loss account. Proper allocation is necessary to show true financial position and comply with accounting principles.

Pre-Incorporation and Post-Incorporation Trading Horizons

Pre-incorporation and post-incorporation trading horizons refer to the two periods used to calculate and distinguish the profits earned by a business before and after a company’s legal incorporation. The pre-incorporation period covers the relevant trading period before incorporation, while the post-incorporation period begins after incorporation and continues until the end of the accounting period. This distinction is particularly important when a company acquires an existing business with effect from a date earlier than its incorporation. It helps determine the appropriate allocation and accounting treatment of profits and expenses.

1. Pre-Incorporation Trading Period

The pre-incorporation trading period refers to the period between the agreed date from which the business is taken over and the date of the company’s legal incorporation. During this period, the existing business continues its trading activities and may earn profits or incur losses. The profits attributable to this period are generally treated as capital profits rather than revenue profits of the company. They are ordinarily transferred to the Capital Reserve Account and are not generally available for dividend distribution. The purchase agreement and accounting records determine the appropriate treatment.

2. Post-Incorporation Trading Period

The post-incorporation trading period begins on the date the company is legally incorporated and continues until the end of the relevant accounting period. During this period, the company operates as a legally established entity and earns profits or incurs losses through its business activities. Profits earned during this period are generally treated as revenue profits and reported in the Statement of Profit and Loss. After considering applicable adjustments and legal requirements, these profits may contribute to retained earnings and potential dividend distributions.

Example of Trading Horizons

Suppose a company purchases an existing business with effect from 1 January and is incorporated on 1 April. The accounting year ends on 31 December. The pre-incorporation trading period is three months, from January to March, while the post-incorporation trading period is nine months, from April to December. Therefore, the time ratio is 3:9 or 1:3. If total rent for the year is ₹48,000 and accrues evenly, ₹12,000 is allocated to the pre-incorporation period and ₹36,000 to the post-incorporation period.

Time Ratio

The time ratio represents the proportion of time covered by the pre-incorporation and post-incorporation periods. It is commonly used to allocate expenses such as rent, insurance, salaries, and depreciation when these expenses accrue evenly over time. For example, if the pre-incorporation period is three months and the post-incorporation period is nine months, the time ratio is 3:9, or 1:3. This ratio helps divide common expenses fairly between the two periods when no more appropriate basis is available.

Sales Ratio

The sales ratio is used to divide income and expenses that vary with sales, such as gross profit, selling commission, and certain sales-related expenses. It is calculated by comparing the sales made during the pre-incorporation period with those made during the post-incorporation period. For example, if sales are ₹2,00,000 before incorporation and ₹6,00,000 afterward, the sales ratio is 1:3. Using this ratio provides a more reasonable allocation of sales-related items than the time ratio.

Steps to Determine Pre-Incorporation Profits of a Company

Step 1. Identify the Relevant Dates

The first step is to identify the date from which the company takes over the existing business and the date of its legal incorporation. The period before incorporation is known as the pre-incorporation period, while the period afterward is the post-incorporation period. The purchase agreement must be examined to determine the effective acquisition date. Correct identification of these dates is essential for calculating profits accurately and applying the appropriate accounting treatment to each period.

Step 2. Calculate the Total Period

The total accounting period covered by the financial records must be determined. It generally extends from the beginning of the accounting year or the specified starting date to the end of the relevant financial period. This period is divided into pre-incorporation and post-incorporation periods. For example, if the business is acquired on 1 January and the company is incorporated on 1 April, the pre-incorporation period is three months. Accurate period calculation supports the proper allocation of income and expenses.

Step 3. Calculate the Time Ratio

The time ratio is calculated by comparing the duration of the pre-incorporation period with the duration of the post-incorporation period. It is generally used to allocate expenses that accrue evenly over time, such as rent, insurance, and certain administrative salaries. For example, if the pre-incorporation period is three months and the post-incorporation period is nine months, the time ratio is 3:9, simplified to 1:3. This ratio helps distribute common expenses fairly between both periods.

Step 4. Calculate the Sales Ratio

The sales ratio is determined by comparing sales made during the pre-incorporation period with sales made during the post-incorporation period. It is commonly used to allocate gross profit and sales-related expenses when appropriate. For example, if pre-incorporation sales are ₹2,00,000 and post-incorporation sales are ₹6,00,000, the sales ratio is 1:3. Separate sales records for each period help calculate the ratio accurately. This method ensures that sales-related items are apportioned according to actual business activity.

Step 5. Prepare the Trading Account

A Trading Account is prepared to calculate the gross profit or gross loss for the entire accounting period. Net sales are compared with the cost of goods sold, considering opening inventory, purchases, direct expenses, and closing inventory. After determining the total gross profit, it is divided between the pre-incorporation and post-incorporation periods using the sales ratio or another suitable basis. This step establishes the gross profit attributable to each period before deducting indirect expenses and other relevant charges.

Step 6. Allocate Indirect Expenses

Indirect expenses must be divided between the pre-incorporation and post-incorporation periods using suitable allocation methods. Time-based expenses, such as rent and insurance, are generally apportioned according to the time ratio. Sales-related expenses, including selling commission, may be allocated using the sales ratio. Expenses directly attributable to a particular period should be charged entirely to that period. Proper allocation ensures that each period bears an appropriate share of expenses and helps determine the profit earned before incorporation accurately.

Step 7. Calculate Pre-Incorporation Profit or Loss

After allocating gross profit, income, and expenses, the profit or loss for the pre-incorporation period is calculated separately. Relevant expenses are deducted from the gross profit allocated to that period, and any directly attributable income or expense is adjusted accordingly. The post-incorporation result is calculated in the same manner. This separation identifies the profit earned before the company legally came into existence. Accurate calculation is important because pre-incorporation profits and post-incorporation profits receive different accounting treatments.

Step 8. Record the Accounting Treatment

The final step is to record the pre-incorporation profit or loss appropriately in the company’s accounts. Pre-incorporation profits are generally treated as capital profits and transferred to the Capital Reserve Account, subject to the applicable accounting framework and acquisition terms. They are ordinarily unavailable for distribution as dividends. Post-incorporation profits are treated as revenue profits and reported through the Statement of Profit and Loss. Proper classification ensures that the company’s financial statements present its profits and reserves accurately and transparently.

Causes of Profits Prior to Incorporation

1. Purchase of an Existing Business

Profits prior to incorporation arise when a newly formed company purchases an existing business with effect from a date before its legal incorporation. During this period, the business continues its operations and earns profits. Under the purchase agreement, the company may be entitled to these profits from the agreed acquisition date. Since the profits relate to a period before the company legally came into existence, they are generally treated as capital profits and transferred to the Capital Reserve Account.

2. Agreement to Acquire Business Retrospectively

A company may enter into an agreement to acquire an existing business from a retrospective date. Although the company is incorporated later, the purchase agreement may provide that the business’s results from an earlier date belong to the company. Consequently, profits earned between the agreed acquisition date and the incorporation date are classified as pre-incorporation profits. This arrangement is a common reason for such profits and requires proper examination of the purchase agreement and relevant accounting records.

3. Continuation of Business Operations

An existing business may continue its normal operations while the promoters complete the legal formalities for establishing a company. During this period, the business may generate revenue from sales, services, or other commercial activities. When the newly incorporated company takes over the business from an earlier agreed date, the profits attributable to the period before incorporation are identified separately. This continuation of operations can therefore result in profits prior to incorporation that require appropriate accounting treatment.

4. Profitable Trading Activities

Profits may arise before incorporation because the existing business earns more revenue than the expenses incurred during the relevant period. Sales of goods, provision of services, and other ordinary business activities can generate positive operating results. When the business is subsequently acquired by a company under an arrangement effective from an earlier date, the profits earned before incorporation must be separated from those earned afterward. The pre-incorporation portion is generally considered capital profit rather than ordinary revenue profit of the company.

5. Favourable Market Conditions

Favourable market conditions may contribute to profits before incorporation. High customer demand, increased selling prices, improved product availability, or reduced competition can increase the earnings of an existing business. If the business is acquired by a company with effect from a date before incorporation, profits generated during the earlier period may be classified as pre-incorporation profits. These profits arise from the business environment and trading performance, although their accounting classification depends on the acquisition arrangement and the period to which they relate.

6. Efficient Management of the Existing Business

An existing business may earn profits before incorporation because of effective management and efficient use of resources. Proper cost control, productive employees, efficient purchasing, and effective inventory management can improve profitability. If a newly incorporated company takes over this business from a date preceding incorporation, the profits attributable to the earlier period must be calculated separately. Such profits are generally treated as capital profits because they were earned before the company legally came into existence, subject to the applicable accounting framework.

7. Benefits from Existing Assets and Goodwill

An established business may already possess valuable assets, customer relationships, brand recognition, and goodwill that support its earnings. These advantages can help the business generate profits before it is transferred to a newly incorporated company. Where the acquisition agreement makes the company’s entitlement effective from an earlier date, the profits earned during the pre-incorporation period are identified separately. The existence of assets and goodwill helps explain the business’s earning capacity, although these items do not automatically create pre-incorporation profits.

8. Delay in Legal Incorporation Formalities

Sometimes, promoters negotiate the purchase of an existing business before completing the company’s registration formalities. The business may continue trading while incorporation documents are prepared, approvals are obtained, and legal requirements are fulfilled. If the eventual acquisition agreement specifies an effective date before incorporation, profits earned during the relevant period may be classified as pre-incorporation profits. The delay in incorporation is therefore a possible contributing circumstance, but the actual classification depends on the contractual terms and the accounting facts.

Allocation of Loss in the Pre-Incorporation Period

Allocation of loss in the pre incorporation period means distribution of total loss of the business between the period before incorporation and after incorporation. When a company purchases a running business from an earlier date and is incorporated later, losses of the entire period are first determined. These losses are then divided between pre incorporation and post incorporation periods. Gross loss is generally apportioned on sales basis as it depends on turnover. Common expenses like rent, wages, and depreciation are divided on time basis. Certain expenses such as directors remuneration and preliminary expenses are charged only to post incorporation period. Loss prior to incorporation is treated as capital loss and adjusted against capital reserve or goodwill. Loss after incorporation is treated as revenue loss and transferred to Profit and Loss account.

Accounting Treatment of Profit or Loss prior to Incorporation

Treatment of Profit Prior to Incorporation

Profit prior to incorporation is treated as capital profit. It is not transferred to Profit and Loss Account.

Journal Entry

Particulars	Debit ₹	Credit ₹
Profit and Loss A/c Dr	Amount	–
To Capital Reserve A/c	–	Amount

Treatment of Loss Prior to Incorporation

Loss prior to incorporation is treated as capital loss. It is written off against capital profits or goodwill.

Journal Entry

Particulars	Debit ₹	Credit ₹
Capital Reserve or Goodwill A/c Dr	Amount	–
To Profit and Loss A/c	–	Amount

Insolvency of a Partner

by indiafreenotes24/01/202111/10/20260

Insolvency of a partner occurs when a partner is unable to pay their personal debts and is declared insolvent under the applicable law. In partnership accounting, insolvency becomes important when the firm is dissolved and a partner cannot contribute the amount required to settle their share of the firm’s losses. The insolvent partner’s inability to pay may affect the settlement of accounts among the remaining solvent partners. The treatment of the deficiency depends on the partnership agreement and the applicable legal provisions. Under traditional partnership accounting principles, the deficiency of an insolvent partner may be distributed among the solvent partners according to the rules applicable to the firm, including the Garner v. Murray rule where relevant. Therefore, insolvency of a partner requires careful calculation of capital balances, realisation losses, available assets, and the amounts payable by each partner. Proper accounting ensures that the firm’s liabilities are settled and the remaining partners’ responsibilities are determined correctly.

Numerical Problems on Insolvency of Partners

Problem 1: Calculation of an Insolvent Partner’s Deficiency

A, B, and C share profits and losses in the ratio of 3:2:1. After all dissolution adjustments, their capital balances are A ₹60,000, B ₹40,000, and C ₹30,000. C is insolvent and can contribute only ₹10,000 from personal resources.

Required: Calculate C’s unpaid capital deficiency.

Solution:

C’s capital deficiency = ₹30,000

Less: Amount contributed = ₹10,000

Unpaid deficiency = ₹30,000 − ₹10,000 = ₹20,000

Therefore, C’s unpaid deficiency is ₹20,000. Its treatment depends on the partnership agreement and applicable insolvency accounting rules.

Problem 2: Garner v. Murray Rule

A, B, and C share profits and losses equally. Their last agreed capitals are A ₹90,000, B ₹60,000, and C ₹30,000. After dissolution adjustments, C has a debit capital balance of ₹24,000 and cannot contribute anything. Assume the Garner v. Murray rule applies and there is no contrary agreement.

Required: Calculate the deficiency to be borne by A and B.

Solution:

Total unpaid deficiency = ₹24,000

Last agreed capitals of solvent partners:

A = ₹90,000

B = ₹60,000

Capital ratio = ₹90,000 : ₹60,000 = 3 : 2

A’s share = ₹24,000 × 3/5 = ₹14,400

B’s share = ₹24,000 × 2/5 = ₹9,600

Total = ₹14,400 + ₹9,600 = ₹24,000.

Thus, A bears ₹14,400 and B bears ₹9,600.

Problem 3: Deficiency Partly Met by Personal Contribution

P, Q, and R are partners sharing profits and losses equally. After dissolution adjustments, R has a debit capital balance of ₹45,000. R contributes ₹15,000 from personal resources. Assume the Garner v. Murray rule applies. The last agreed capitals of P and Q are ₹80,000 and ₹40,000 respectively.

Required: Calculate the deficiency borne by P and Q.

Solution:

R’s debit capital balance = ₹45,000

Less: Personal contribution = ₹15,000

Unpaid deficiency = ₹30,000

Capital ratio of P and Q = ₹80,000 : ₹40,000 = 2 : 1

P’s share = ₹30,000 × 2/3 = ₹20,000

Q’s share = ₹30,000 × 1/3 = ₹10,000

Therefore, P bears ₹20,000 and Q bears ₹10,000.

Problem 4: Insolvency with Different Capital Balances

X, Y, and Z are partners. Their last agreed capitals are X ₹1,20,000, Y ₹80,000, and Z ₹40,000. After dissolution adjustments, Z has an unpaid deficiency of ₹36,000. Assume the Garner v. Murray rule applies and no contrary agreement exists.

Required: Distribute Z’s deficiency between X and Y.

Solution:

Capital ratio of X and Y = ₹1,20,000 : ₹80,000 = 3 : 2

X’s share = ₹36,000 × 3/5 = ₹21,600

Y’s share = ₹36,000 × 2/5 = ₹14,400

Total deficiency distributed = ₹21,600 + ₹14,400 = ₹36,000.

Hence, X bears ₹21,600 and Y bears ₹14,400.

Treatment of Insolvent Partner’s Capital Deficiency

1. Meaning of Capital Deficiency

Capital deficiency arises when a partner’s capital account shows a debit balance after all necessary dissolution adjustments. It indicates that the partner owes an amount to the firm but cannot contribute the full amount required. This situation commonly occurs when realisation losses and other adjustments reduce the partner’s capital below zero. The deficiency must be identified accurately because it affects the final settlement of accounts and may increase the financial burden on the remaining solvent partners.

2. Calculation of the Deficiency

The deficiency is calculated after transferring assets and liabilities to the Realisation Account, recording realisation expenses, and distributing the resulting profit or loss among partners. Other required adjustments are also recorded according to the partnership agreement. If the insolvent partner’s capital account shows a debit balance, the amount of that balance represents the initial deficiency. Any recoverable contribution from the partner’s personal estate is considered before determining the final unpaid amount.

3. Recovery from Personal Estate

An insolvent partner may contribute some amount towards the debit balance from available personal resources. The amount actually recoverable depends on the partner’s financial circumstances and the applicable insolvency process. This contribution reduces the outstanding deficiency and helps settle the firm’s accounts. If the partner cannot contribute anything, the entire debit balance remains unpaid. The amount recovered and the remaining deficiency should be clearly recorded to ensure accurate accounting and transparency during dissolution.

4. Application of the Partnership Agreement

The partnership agreement is an important source of guidance when dealing with an insolvent partner’s capital deficiency. It may contain provisions regarding the distribution of losses, partners’ capital contributions, and settlement of accounts upon dissolution. Such provisions should be examined before applying default accounting principles. Any applicable legal requirements must also be considered. Following the relevant agreement and law helps determine the appropriate treatment of the deficiency and reduces the possibility of disputes among partners.

5. Application of Garner v. Murray Rule

Where applicable, the Garner v. Murray rule provides a method for distributing the unpaid deficiency of an insolvent partner among solvent partners. Under the traditional rule, the deficiency is allocated according to the solvent partners’ last agreed capitals rather than their profit-sharing ratio. The rule is generally considered when the partnership agreement does not provide a different valid method. Its application must be assessed in light of the relevant jurisdiction, legal requirements, and partnership arrangements.

6. Adjustment of Solvent Partners’ Capital

When the deficiency is allocated to solvent partners, their capital accounts are adjusted by the amounts they must bear. Each partner’s share is calculated using the applicable ratio and recorded appropriately in the capital accounts. These adjustments affect the final balances payable to or recoverable from the solvent partners. Accurate calculations are essential because an incorrect allocation can result in an unfair settlement and errors in the final accounts of the dissolved firm.

7. Recording in Final Accounts

The treatment of an insolvent partner’s deficiency must be reflected properly in the dissolution accounts. The Realisation Account records the profit or loss arising from realisation, while the partners’ capital accounts reflect their respective shares and other adjustments. Any recoverable amount contributed by the insolvent partner is recorded through the appropriate cash or bank and capital accounts. These records help explain how the deficiency arose, how much was recovered, and how the unpaid balance was settled.

8. Final Settlement and Verification

The final stage involves verifying the capital balances, contributions, deficiency allocation, and payments made during dissolution. The accountant should ensure that all entries agree with the partnership agreement and the applicable accounting rules. The final balances should show the amounts payable to or recoverable from each partner. Proper verification improves accuracy and helps prevent disputes. It also provides a clear record of how the insolvent partner’s unpaid obligation affected the final settlement of the partnership firm.

Application of the Garner v. Murray Rule

The Garner v. Murray rule is a traditional principle of partnership accounting used to deal with an insolvent partner’s capital deficiency during dissolution. Where applicable, the deficiency that remains after considering any contribution from the insolvent partner is distributed among solvent partners according to their last agreed capitals. This differs from the normal sharing of business profits and losses, which generally follows the profit-sharing ratio. The rule provides a method for completing the settlement of capital accounts.

1. Conditions for Application

The rule is generally considered when a partner becomes insolvent, has a debit balance in their capital account, and cannot contribute the full amount required. The partnership agreement must be examined to determine whether it provides a different method for distributing the deficiency. The rule should not be treated as universally applicable in every jurisdiction or situation. The relevant legal position and circumstances of dissolution must be considered before applying the traditional accounting principle.

2. Determination of Capital Balances

The accountant first determines the appropriate last agreed capital balances of the solvent partners. These balances provide the basis for calculating their respective shares of the unpaid deficiency under the rule. The relevant figures must be identified carefully because capital accounts may be fixed or fluctuating, and dissolution adjustments may affect the figures used. The accountant should follow the applicable accounting convention and partnership arrangements rather than automatically using the original capital contributions.

3. Calculation of Unpaid Deficiency

The insolvent partner’s capital account is prepared after recording the firm’s realisation profit or loss and other necessary adjustments. If the account shows a debit balance, the partner’s available contribution is deducted to determine the amount that remains unpaid. This final unpaid deficiency is the amount to be distributed among solvent partners under the rule, where applicable. Accurate calculation is essential because it determines the additional burden allocated to each solvent partner.

4. Distribution in Capital Ratio

The unpaid deficiency is divided among the solvent partners in proportion to their last agreed capitals, assuming the Garner v. Murray rule applies. Each partner’s share is calculated by multiplying the total deficiency by that partner’s capital divided by the total capital of the solvent partners. The resulting amounts are recorded in their capital accounts. This method allocates the deficiency according to the relevant capital ratio rather than the usual profit-sharing ratio.

5. Numerical Illustration

Suppose A and B are solvent partners with last agreed capitals of ₹80,000 and ₹40,000. C is insolvent and leaves an unpaid deficiency of ₹18,000. Assume the Garner v. Murray rule applies and there is no contrary agreement.

Capital ratio of A and B = ₹80,000 : ₹40,000 = 2 : 1.

A’s share = ₹18,000 × 2/3 = ₹12,000.

B’s share = ₹18,000 × 1/3 = ₹6,000.

Therefore, A bears ₹12,000 and B bears ₹6,000. The total deficiency distributed is ₹18,000.

6. Accounting Treatment

After calculating the amounts borne by solvent partners, the appropriate entries are made in their capital accounts according to the accounting method used. The entries should reflect the allocation of the insolvent partner’s unpaid deficiency and ensure that the final capital balances are correctly determined. The accountant must also ensure that cash contributions, payments, and other dissolution adjustments are recorded consistently. This supports an accurate and transparent settlement of the firm’s affairs.

7. Limitations and Practical Considerations

The Garner v. Murray rule is a traditional accounting principle and should be applied only after checking the partnership agreement and applicable law. A valid agreement may prescribe a different method for dealing with insolvency. Legal rules and accounting practices can also vary by jurisdiction. Therefore, accountants should verify the relevant requirements before using the rule. Proper application helps ensure that the allocation of an insolvent partner’s deficiency is justified and consistent with the governing arrangements.

Importance of Insolvency Rules in Partnership Dissolution

1. Fair Distribution of Deficiency

Insolvency rules provide a systematic method for dealing with the unpaid capital deficiency of a partner who cannot meet their obligations. They help determine how the remaining deficiency should be treated and, where applicable, distributed among solvent partners. This promotes a more orderly settlement of accounts. By following the partnership agreement and relevant accounting principles, the firm can reduce uncertainty and ensure that the deficiency is allocated using an appropriate and clearly explained method.

2. Protection of Solvent Partners

When one partner becomes insolvent, the remaining partners may face additional financial responsibilities during dissolution. Insolvency rules help determine how much of the unpaid deficiency each solvent partner may have to bear. This allows the partners to understand the financial consequences of dissolution and supports a consistent approach to settlement. The rules do not eliminate all risks, but they provide a recognised framework for allocating the deficiency in accordance with the applicable agreement and accounting principles.

3. Accurate Preparation of Accounts

Insolvency rules are important for preparing accurate dissolution accounts. The accountant must calculate the insolvent partner’s debit balance, determine any contribution available, and record the remaining deficiency correctly. The necessary adjustments must then be reflected in the partners’ capital accounts and other relevant accounts. Proper accounting ensures that the final balances are reliable and that the financial effect of insolvency is not overlooked. It also makes the dissolution process easier to review and verify.

4. Reduction of Disputes

Disputes may arise when solvent partners disagree about how an insolvent partner’s unpaid balance should be distributed. Insolvency rules provide a consistent basis for resolving this accounting issue. When the partnership agreement and applicable legal principles are followed, partners can better understand the method used and the amounts allocated to them. Clear calculations and supporting records reduce misunderstandings and can help prevent unnecessary disagreements during the final settlement of the dissolved firm.

5. Systematic Settlement of Accounts

The dissolution of a partnership involves realising assets, paying liabilities, recording expenses, and settling partners’ capital balances. Insolvency rules help accountants deal systematically with the additional difficulty created when a partner cannot pay their debit balance. By identifying the deficiency and applying the appropriate method of treatment, the accountant can complete the settlement process in an organised manner. This supports accurate final accounts and helps ensure that the firm’s financial affairs are properly concluded.

6. Clarity in Financial Responsibilities

Insolvency rules help clarify the financial responsibilities of partners during dissolution. They explain how an unpaid capital deficiency should be treated and, where the applicable rule requires it, how the burden is shared among solvent partners. This clarity is important because the normal profit-sharing ratio may not be the ratio used for distributing an insolvent partner’s deficiency under the Garner v. Murray rule. Understanding the distinction helps partners assess their responsibilities and follow the correct accounting treatment.

7. Support for Legal and Accounting Compliance

The treatment of an insolvent partner’s deficiency must be consistent with the partnership agreement and the legal provisions applicable to the dissolution. Insolvency rules help guide the accountant in selecting an appropriate method and recording the resulting adjustments. However, the Garner v. Murray rule should not be applied automatically where an agreement or applicable law provides otherwise. Checking the governing requirements helps ensure that the final settlement is handled properly and that accounting records reflect the relevant obligations.

8. Transparency and Accountability

Proper application of insolvency rules improves transparency by showing how the unpaid deficiency was calculated and how it affected the solvent partners. Supporting calculations and correctly prepared capital accounts allow partners to examine the final settlement and understand the basis of each adjustment. This improves accountability and provides a clear record of the firm’s dissolution. Accurate documentation can also assist in resolving questions that arise later regarding the allocation of losses and the final amounts payable to partners.

Causes of Insolvency of a Partner

1. Continuous Business Losses

Continuous losses in a partnership business may weaken a partner’s financial position and reduce their invested capital. When sales decline, expenses increase, or profits remain insufficient, the partner may experience difficulty meeting personal financial obligations. If the partner depends mainly on business income, prolonged losses can affect loan repayments and other commitments. Consequently, the partner may become unable to pay debts when they become due, potentially leading to insolvency.

2. Excessive Borrowings

Excessive borrowing is another important cause of insolvency. A partner may obtain loans from banks, financial institutions, or private lenders to finance business activities or personal requirements. When the amount borrowed becomes excessive compared with income and available assets, repayment becomes difficult. High interest expenses and regular instalments may further increase the financial burden. If the partner cannot repay outstanding debts within the required period, their financial condition may deteriorate and result in insolvency.

3. Poor Financial Management

Poor financial management can contribute significantly to a partner’s insolvency. Improper budgeting, unnecessary expenditure, inadequate financial planning, and ineffective investment decisions may create a shortage of funds. A partner who fails to monitor income, expenses, and liabilities may accumulate debts beyond their repayment capacity. Furthermore, a lack of emergency savings can make financial difficulties more serious. When available resources become insufficient to meet outstanding obligations, the partner may face insolvency.

4. Failure of Business Investments

A partner may invest personal savings in business ventures, property, shares, or other investment opportunities. If these investments fail to generate expected returns or lose their market value, the partner may suffer substantial financial losses. Borrowing money to finance unsuccessful investments can increase the burden further. When the partner cannot recover the invested amount or meet related financial commitments, their financial position may become unstable. Such investment failures can ultimately contribute to insolvency.

5. Heavy Personal Liabilities

Personal liabilities may cause insolvency when a partner has substantial financial obligations unrelated to the partnership business. These obligations may include housing loans, vehicle loans, education expenses, medical bills, and other personal debts. If the partner’s income and personal assets are insufficient to meet these commitments, repayment difficulties may arise. The situation can become more serious when several liabilities become payable simultaneously. Consequently, the partner may become unable to satisfy creditors and may face insolvency.

6. Economic Recession

Economic recession can adversely affect a partner’s financial stability. During an economic slowdown, customer demand may decline, businesses may experience lower sales, and investment values may fall. A partner who depends on business profits or investment income may struggle to maintain regular payments. Inflation, rising interest rates, and unemployment within the family may create additional pressure. When these economic conditions continue for an extended period, the partner’s debts may exceed available financial resources, increasing the possibility of insolvency.

7. Misuse of Funds

Misuse of funds may weaken a partner’s financial position and create difficulties in meeting obligations. Excessive personal spending, speculative activities, irresponsible borrowing, or the diversion of funds towards unproductive purposes can reduce available resources. If a partner uses borrowed money without considering repayment capacity, financial problems may increase. Similarly, poor control over personal expenditure can prevent the accumulation of savings. When the partner cannot meet outstanding debts from available income and assets, insolvency may arise.

8. Unexpected Financial Emergencies

Unexpected financial emergencies can cause serious difficulties even for a partner with previously stable finances. Accidents, medical emergencies, natural disasters, legal claims, or sudden loss of income may require substantial expenditure. If the partner lacks sufficient savings, insurance coverage, or alternative sources of funds, these unexpected costs may result in additional borrowing. The accumulated financial burden can make debt repayment difficult.

Maintenance of Capital Accounts, Fixed Capital Method vs. Fluctuating Capital Method

by indiafreenotes23/01/202110/10/20260

Capital Accounts are accounts maintained to record the capital contributed by partners to a partnership firm and changes in their capital balances over time. These accounts reflect each partner’s investment, additional capital contributions, withdrawals, and other adjustments arising from business operations. Capital accounts help determine the amount of capital belonging to each partner at a particular date. In partnership accounting, capital accounts are generally maintained using either the Fixed Capital Method or the Fluctuating Capital Method, depending on the firm’s accounting policy and partnership agreement.

Maintenance of Capital Accounts

The maintenance of capital accounts refers to the systematic recording of capital contributions and changes in the capital balances of partners in a partnership firm. It includes recording initial capital, additional investments, drawings, interest on capital, salaries, commissions, profits, and losses according to the partnership agreement. Proper maintenance helps determine each partner’s financial interest in the firm. It also ensures accurate accounting records, transparency, and accountability. In partnership accounting, capital accounts are generally maintained under the Fixed Capital Method or the Fluctuating Capital Method, depending on the firm’s accounting policy.

1. Fixed Capital Method

Under the Fixed Capital Method, a separate capital account and current account are maintained for each partner. The capital account records the partner’s permanent capital contribution and changes arising from additional capital introduced or permanent capital withdrawn. Routine adjustments, including interest on capital, salary, commission, drawings, interest on drawings, and share of profit or loss, are generally recorded in the current account. Consequently, the capital account balance remains unchanged unless permanent capital changes occur. This method provides a clear distinction between long-term investment and regular financial transactions.

2. Fluctuating Capital Method

Under the Fluctuating Capital Method, only one capital account is generally maintained for each partner. All transactions affecting the partner’s capital balance are recorded in this account. Credit entries include additional capital, interest on capital, salary, commission, and share of profit. Debit entries include drawings, interest on drawings, share of loss, and permanent capital withdrawals. Therefore, the capital balance changes throughout the accounting period. This method is comparatively simple because separate current accounts are not generally required. However, accurate classification of transactions is necessary to determine each partner’s closing capital balance.

3. Recording Capital Contributions and Drawings

The maintenance of capital accounts requires proper recording of initial capital contributions, additional investments, and withdrawals made by partners. When a partner introduces cash or other accepted assets as capital, the partner’s capital account is credited. When permanent capital is withdrawn, the capital account is debited. Under the fixed capital method, ordinary personal drawings are generally recorded in the current account, whereas under the fluctuating capital method, they are recorded in the capital account. Supporting documents, such as receipts, bank statements, and vouchers, help maintain accurate and reliable accounting records.

4. Recording Interest, Remuneration, Profits, and Losses

Capital accounts must reflect the financial adjustments specified in the partnership deed. These include interest on capital, partners’ salaries, commissions, interest on drawings, and shares of profits or losses. Under the fluctuating capital method, these items are recorded directly in the capital accounts. Under the fixed capital method, routine adjustments are generally recorded in current accounts. Interest and remuneration must be provided for by the agreement or applicable legal rules. Proper recording ensures the fair distribution of profits and losses and helps determine the correct financial position of every partner.

5. Preparation and Verification of Closing Balances

At the end of the accounting period, the capital accounts are reviewed to determine each partner’s closing capital balance. Under the fluctuating capital method, opening capital and credit entries are added, while drawings, losses, and other debit entries are deducted. Under the fixed capital method, the permanent capital balance is adjusted only for permanent capital changes, while routine transactions are reflected in the current account. The balances should be checked against the ledger, supporting documents, and financial statements. Accurate closing balances support the preparation of the balance sheet and provide reliable information about partners’ capital interests.

Fixed Capital Method vs. Fluctuating Capital Method

The Fixed Capital Method and the Fluctuating Capital Method are two approaches used for maintaining partners’ capital accounts in partnership accounting. They differ mainly in how capital contributions, drawings, interest, remuneration, and profits or losses are recorded.

1. Fixed Capital Method

Under the Fixed Capital Method, a separate Capital Account and Current Account are maintained for each partner. The capital account records the partner’s permanent capital contribution and changes resulting from additional capital introduced or permanent capital withdrawn. Routine adjustments, such as interest on capital, salary, commission, drawings, interest on drawings, and share of profit or loss, are generally recorded in the current account. Therefore, the capital account balance usually remains constant throughout the accounting period unless permanent capital changes occur.

2. Fluctuating Capital Method

Under the Fluctuating Capital Method, only one Capital Account is generally maintained for each partner. All transactions affecting the partner’s capital balance are recorded in this account. These include additional capital, drawings, interest on capital, salary, commission, interest on drawings, and share of profit or loss. As these transactions occur, the capital account balance increases or decreases. Consequently, the closing capital balance fluctuates from period to period, depending on the financial transactions and adjustments recorded.

Example of Both Methods

Suppose Partner A introduces capital of ₹1,00,000. During the year, A receives a share of profit of ₹20,000 and withdraws ₹10,000 for personal use.

Fixed Capital Method: The Capital Account remains at ₹1,00,000. The Current Account is credited with ₹20,000 profit and debited with ₹10,000 drawings, giving a credit balance of ₹10,000.
Fluctuating Capital Method: The Capital Account records ₹1,00,000 opening capital, ₹20,000 profit, and ₹10,000 drawings. The closing capital balance is ₹1,10,000.

Key Differences Between Fixed and Fluctuating Capital Methods

Basis	Fixed Capital Method	Fluctuating Capital Method
Accounts Maintained	Capital and Current Accounts	Usually only Capital Account
Capital Balance	Generally remains fixed	Changes regularly
Additional Capital	Capital Account	Capital Account
Permanent Withdrawal	Capital Account	Capital Account
Drawings	Current Account	Capital Account
Interest on Capital	Current Account	Capital Account
Interest on Drawings	Current Account	Capital Account
Partner’s Salary	Current Account	Capital Account
Commission	Current Account	Capital Account
Share of Profit	Current Account	Capital Account
Share of Loss	Current Account	Capital Account
Record Keeping	Requires two accounts per partner	Requires one account per partner
Closing Balance	Capital and Current Account balances are separate	All adjustments appear in capital balance
Identification of Permanent Capital	Easier	Requires examination of transactions
Complexity	Comparatively detailed	Comparatively simple

Retirement and Death of a Partner

by indiafreenotes23/01/202123/08/20250

A partner may ascertain to either withdraw or retire from the enterprise due to certain reasons such as his bad health, his age, change in enterprise’s nature of a business, etc., In the Partnership at Will, a partner might retire at any time. Retirement leads to a reconstitution of an enterprise where the partners’ contribution ratio and the profit-sharing ratio change. The retiring partner is given his share of capital, revaluation profit or loss and goodwill.

Death or insolvency of a partner is the outcome in the reconstitution of an enterprise when the remaining partners desire to continue the enterprise. In case of bankruptcy or insolvency, all dues are paid to the bankrupt partner and partnership agreement is terminated as per the law a bankrupt is ineffectual to get into an agreement or a contract. In the case of decease, all dues are being paid to the legal successor of the deceased partner.

Treatment of Reserves, Accumulated Profits and Accumulated Losses in the Case of Death of a Partner

Reserves, Existing Goodwill, accumulated profits/losses appearing in the Balance Sheet of the firm at the time of death of a new partner belong to all partners including the retiring or deceased partner. Hence these should be distributed among all the partners in their old profit-sharing ratio.

Following Journal Entries Are Required to Be Passed:
(1) Distribution of Existing Goodwill	All Partners’ Capital A/c Dr. To Goodwill A/c
(2) Distribution of Reserves	Reserve fund/General Reserve A/c Dr. To All Partners’ Capital A/c
(3) Distribution of Accumulated Losses	All Partners’ Capital A/c Dr. To Profit & Loss A/c
(4) Distribution of Accumulated Profits	Profit & Loss A/c Dr. To All Partners’ Capital A/c

The Retirement of an Existing Partner

A partner may decide to retire or withdraw from the firm due to reasons such as his age, his bad health, change in firm’s nature of a business, etc. In case of Partnership at Will, a partner may retire at any time. Retirement amounts to a reconstitution of a firm where the number of partners, their capital contribution ratio and also the profit sharing ratio changes. The retiring partner is paid his share of capital, goodwill and revaluation profit or loss.

For example, A, B, and C are partners in the firm sharing profits in the ratio of 3:2:1. A chooses to retire and B and C decide to share the future profits equally. This is a reconstitution of the firm where the number of partners and their profit-sharing ratio both have changed.

Death or Insolvency of a Partner:

Death or insolvency of a partner also results in the reconstitution of the firm when the remaining partners wish to continue the firm. In case of insolvency, all dues are paid to the insolvent partner and partnership agreement is aborted because as per the law an insolvent is incompetent to enter into a contract or an agreement.

In case of death, all dues are paid to the legal heir of the deceased partner.

The accounting treatment in the occurrence of death of a partner is:

Similar to that, when a partner retires and that in case of deceased partner his belonging is transferred to his legal enforcers and settled in a similar way as that of the partner who retires
However, there is one primary distinction, the retirement usually takes place during the closure of an accounting period or financial year, the death of a partner may take place any time
Therefore, in the case of a partner, his rights shall also incorporate his share of gains or loss, interest on drawings (if any), interest on capital from the last date of the Balance Sheet to the date of his death of these, the main issue associates to the computation of profit for a moderate period
Since, it is contemplated burdensome to close the books and outline final a/c, for the period, the dead partner’s share of profit may be computed on the ground of previous year’s gain (or aggregate of past few years) or on the base of sales

(a) Linking Death of a Partner with Retirement of a Partner
(a) Common accounting treatment in case of Retirement of a Partner and Death of a Partner:	(Assuming retirement to be on the date of Balance Sheet) Partners Capital Balance Existing goodwill Partner’s share in the present value of Firm’s Goodwill Revaluation Profit or Loss Reserves, Surplus and Fictitious Assets Drawings made by the partner Asset/Liability taken over by a partner Partner’s Loan given on Assets side or Liabilities side
(b) Special accounting treatments required in case of Death of a Partner only:	Salary/Commission to a Partner Interest on Capital Interest on Drawings Interest on Loan Share in current year’s Profits
Accounting treatments at the time of Death of a Partner is an extension of the Retirement of a Partner. In the above-mentioned list, treatment of category ‘A’ items is exactly the same both for retirement & death. There will be no effect of date of death. But for the treatment of category ‘B’ items date of death plays a very important role.
(B) Calculation of Category ‘b’ Items:
i. Salary to the deceased partner:	Monthly Salary x Time Period Commission as per the agreement for this period only (if any). # Time Period = Period from the date of last Balance Sheet to the date of Death {This period can be in months, weeks or days.}
(B) Calculation of Category ‘b’ Items:	Capital Balance as per the last Balance Sheet x Rate of Int./100× Time Period/12
iii. Interest on Drawings	We’ll use the rules of Interest on Drawings learned earlier and of course, keep in mind the ‘Time Period’.
iv. Interest on Loan	Amount of Loan as per the last Balance Sheet x Rate of Int./100× Time Period/12
v. Share in Current Year’s Profits	To compute the deceased partner’s share in estimated profits there are following two approaches/basis: Time Basis: Under this approach his profit share for the current year is computed on the basis of last year’s profit or last few years’ average profits. Formula: Last Year’s Profit × Time Period/12 × Deceased Partner’s Share Or Average Profits × Time Period/12 × Deceased Partner’s Share Turnover Basis– In this case, his profit share for the current year is estimated using last year’s sales and last year’s profits. Formula: Step 1. Compute Profits % of last year: Last Year’s Profit/Last Year’s Sales × 100 Step 2. Firm’s estimated profit till the date of death: Current Year’s Sales up to the date of death × Profit % Step 3. Decease Partner’s share Firm’s Profit as per Step 2 × Deceased Partner’s ratio

Partnership Accounts

by indiafreenotes23/01/20211

There are several distinct transactions associated with a partnership that are not found in other types of business organization. These transactions are:

Contribution of funds. When a partner invests funds in a partnership, the transaction involves a debit to the cash account and a credit to a separate capital account. A capital account records the balance of the investments from and distributions to a partner. To avoid the commingling of information, it is customary to have a separate capital account for each partner.
Contribution of other than funds. When a partner invests some other asset in a partnership, the transaction involves a debit to whatever asset account most closely reflects the nature of the contribution, and a credit to the partner’s capital account. The valuation assigned to this transaction is the market value of the contributed asset.
Withdrawal of funds. When a partner extracts funds from a business, it involves a credit to the cash account and a debit to the partner’s capital account.
Withdrawal of assets. When a partner extracts asset other than cash from a business, it involves a credit to the account in which the asset was recorded, and a debit to the partner’s capital account.
Allocation of profit or loss. When a partnership closes its books for an accounting period, the net profit or loss for the period is summarized in a temporary equity account called the income summary account. This profit or loss is then allocated to the capital accounts of each partner based on their proportional ownership interests in the business. For example, if there is a profit in the income summary account, then the allocation is a debit to the income summary account and a credit to each capital account. Conversely, if there is a loss in the income summary account, then the allocation is a credit to the income summary account and a debit to each capital account.
Tax reporting. In the United States, a partnership must issue a Schedule K-1 to each of its partners at the end of its tax year. This schedule contains the amount of profit or loss allocated to each partner, and which the partners use in their reporting of personal income earned.

Capital Accounts of Partners:

A partnership organisation maintains accounts of its transactions in the same manner as a Sole Trader ship. Since partnership has two or more partners, separate capital account for each partner has to be maintained. Usually every partner contributes something in cash or in kind to provide funds for the running of a business. The amount of contribution is mutually settled and need not necessarily be equal.

The sum of the contributions represents the capital of the firm. The partnership deed usually mentions the method of maintaining capital accounts of partners. There are two methods by which capital accounts are maintained i.e., Fixed Capital and Fluctuating Capital.

Fluctuating Capital:

Fluctuating Capital is one which changes from year to year. There is only one account for each partner in case 6of fluctuating capital system. All entries relating to introduction of fresh capital, interest on capital, salary, commission, share of profit etc. are credited to the capital account and similarly capital account is debited with drawings, interest on drawing, losses etc.

All entries for all items are passed through his capital accounts; as such, the amounts of his capital at the end of the year will be different from what it was at the beginning of the year. The balance of the capital goes on fluctuating year after year and is known as Fluctuating Capital.

In the absence of the contract to the contrary, capital accounts are fluctuating. Partner’s drawings are, however, recorded in his Drawings Account which will be closed at the end of the year, by transferring to the capital accounts.

Loan Account:

Where advance is made by a partner, credit is given to him by opening his separate Loan Account and not through his capital account. In the absence of agreement to the contrary, the Partnership Act provides that interest at 6% p.a. shall be allowed on such loan, irrespective of profits. Interest on such advance or loan should be credited to Loan Account or Current Account.

Unless the Partnership Deed expressly lays down that the partners Capital Accounts shall be kept fixed, they are treated as fluctuating.

Fixed Capital:

When the partners agree to keep their capital at their original figures, year after year, they are said to have fixed capitals. They continue to appear at their original figures unless contribution is made by way of additional capital or refund is allowed of the surplus capital, if any. Under the fixed capital, separate CURRENT ACCOUNT of each partner is opened.

This current account will be credited at the end of every year with his:

(a) Share of profits,

(b) Interest on capital and

(a) Drawings

(b) Interest on Drawings and

The current account may show credit and debit balance at the end of the year. If they show Credit balances, they appear on the liability side of the Balance Sheet of the firm along with Fixed Capitals. If the Current Accounts show Debit balances, they appear on the asset side of the Balance Sheet.

A Debit Balance of the Current account implies that the concerned member has overdrawn his Current account and owes that amount to the firm. A Credit balance of the Current account represents the amount which a partner is entitled to draw but has not actually drawn.

In some cases, interest is allowed on the credit balance and charged to the debit balance; if so entries are passed through respective partners Current accounts.

Drawings:

The Partnership Deed may allow partners to withdraw money or goods from the business to meet their private requirements. The amount of withdrawals at each interval need not be equal. To avoid congestion entries in Capital or Current Account, in respect of withdrawals, a separate Drawing Account is opened for each partner.

The amount drawn at each time is debited therein. At the closing date, the Drawings Account is closed by transferring it to Capital Account, if Capital Account is fluctuating, or to Current Account, if the Capital Account is fixed. But the Current Account is not transferred to Capital Account.

Interest on Drawings:

Interest on Drawings also depends upon the Partnership Deed. There are many cases, where Capitals bear interest but Drawings are not Chargeable with interest. Generally, Partnership Deed stipulates the maximum amount that each partner is permitted to withdraw, without paying interest.

If any partner exceeds the limit, he has to pay interest on Drawings. Where the withdrawals of the partners are unequal, partner’s accounts are equitably adjusted through the mechanism of interest on drawings.

To the firm it is an income and therefore the Capital or Current Accounts of the partners are debited and Interest on Drawing Account is credited. Interest on Drawings is a loss to the partners. To make calculation of the interest on Drawings, three things must be present – the interest rates the amount and the period.

Interest on Capital:

Interest on Capital is usually allowed by an agreement between the partners. The Partnership Act is silent on this point that is, no interest on capital is allowed. Interest on capital is generally allowed on capitals so that the partner who contributes more than the proportionate capitals is properly compensated.

If partners contribute equal amounts of capital and share profits equally, no need arises for any interest to be allowed on capital. Where capital contributions are equal but the profit sharing ratios are unequal, a partner, with a lower share of profit, stands to lose. Besides, where capitals are unequal but profit sharing ratios are equal, a partner with large capital contribution is affected financially.

Interest on capital tends to balance capital account equitably, without allowing any partner to enjoy an unfair advantage over the others. Interest on capital is a loss or expense to the firm and thus debited to Interest on capital account and finally transferred to Profit and Loss Appropriation Account. And it is an income or gain to the partners and their Capital Account or Current Account is credited with the amount of interest.

Commission to Partners:

Under the partnership law all partners are supposed to devote their time to the affairs of the firm but in practice many partners may not devote any time and some of the partners may have to carry on the entire work of the firm. Thus, a percentage of profit is paid to a partner for the special work or service done. This commission may be payable before charging such commission or after charging such commission.

Profit and Loss Appropriation Account:

The Profit and Losses of the partnership are divisible equally or in any other manner agreed upon by the partners. In case of partnership accounting, it is usual that adjustments relating to Interest on Capital Interest on Drawings, Salary, Commission, Share of profits etc. to be made through the Profit and Loss Appropriation Account.

Admission of a Partner, Calculation of New Profit-Sharing Ratio and Sacrificing Ratio

by indiafreenotes23/01/202110/10/20260

Admission of a partner refers to the process of introducing a new person into an existing partnership firm with the consent of the existing partners. The new partner contributes capital, brings additional skills, and shares the responsibilities, profits, and losses of the business according to the partnership agreement. Under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, a new partner can be admitted only with the consent of all existing partners, unless the partnership agreement provides otherwise. Admission changes the firm’s partnership structure and may require adjustments to capital accounts, goodwill, assets, and liabilities.

Reasons for Admission of a Partner

1. Additional Capital

One of the major reasons for admitting a new partner is to obtain additional capital for business operations. An expanding partnership firm may require funds to purchase machinery, acquire assets, increase inventory, or meet daily expenses. The existing partners may not have sufficient personal resources to finance these requirements. By admitting a new partner, the firm receives additional investment without necessarily depending on external borrowing. This improves its financial position, supports business expansion, reduces financial pressure, and provides greater flexibility in managing future investment opportunities and operational needs.

2. Business Expansion

A partnership firm may admit a new partner to support business expansion and increase its market presence. Expansion may involve opening new branches, entering different geographical markets, introducing new products, or increasing production capacity. These activities require additional funds, managerial support, and business expertise. An incoming partner can contribute resources and participate in implementing expansion plans. The admission also distributes responsibilities among more individuals, making it easier to manage a growing organisation. Therefore, admitting a partner can help the firm achieve growth objectives and strengthen its competitive position.

3. Specialised Knowledge and Skills

A firm may admit a new partner who possesses specialised knowledge, professional qualifications, or technical skills that the existing partners lack. Modern businesses often require expertise in accounting, marketing, technology, finance, production, or legal matters. A knowledgeable partner can improve decision-making, introduce better working methods, and solve complex business problems. Such expertise may reduce dependence on external consultants and improve operational efficiency. By combining different abilities, the partnership can develop innovative strategies, improve the quality of its services, and respond more effectively to changing business requirements and customer expectations.

4. Better Management and Administration

The admission of a new partner can improve management and administration by distributing business responsibilities among more individuals. When a firm grows, existing partners may struggle to supervise every activity, including finance, marketing, production, and employee management. A new partner can take responsibility for particular departments or functions according to their experience. This division of work improves coordination, strengthens supervision, and supports faster decision-making. Better management can also reduce the workload of existing partners, minimise operational difficulties, and help the firm maintain productivity while handling increasingly complex business activities.

5. Sharing Business Risks

Admitting a new partner can help distribute business risks and responsibilities among a larger group of partners. Every business faces uncertainties arising from competition, changing demand, rising costs, economic conditions, and operational problems. A new partner may contribute additional financial resources and participate in managing these challenges. This can strengthen the firm’s ability to respond to unexpected difficulties. However, the allocation of profits, losses, and responsibilities depends on the partnership agreement and applicable law. Sharing responsibilities may improve business resilience and reduce the pressure placed on individual partners.

6. Access to New Markets and Customers

A partnership firm may admit a new partner to gain access to new markets, customers, and business networks. The incoming partner may have established relationships with suppliers, distributors, investors, or customers in different locations or industries. These connections can help the firm identify new opportunities, promote its products, and increase sales. A partner familiar with local market conditions may also provide useful information about customer preferences and competitors. Such advantages can strengthen the firm’s marketing activities, broaden its customer base, improve its reputation, and support sustainable business development.

7. Improvement in Business Reputation

A new partner with a strong professional reputation, business experience, or established credibility may improve the firm’s goodwill and public image. Customers, suppliers, financial institutions, and other stakeholders may develop greater confidence in a firm associated with a respected individual. This improved confidence can support business relationships, attract new customers, and facilitate access to commercial opportunities. A reputable partner may also introduce better professional standards and strengthen ethical business practices. Consequently, admitting such a partner can enhance the firm’s market standing and contribute to its long-term growth and stability.

8. Continuity and Long-Term Development

A firm may admit a new partner to ensure business continuity and long-term development. Existing partners may wish to reduce their workload, prepare for retirement, or introduce someone capable of assuming greater responsibilities in the future. A new partner can contribute fresh ideas, updated knowledge, and renewed enthusiasm for business activities. Proper planning can support a smooth transfer of responsibilities and preserve valuable customer and supplier relationships. Admission may also help the firm develop succession arrangements, maintain operational stability, and establish a stronger foundation for future growth and sustainable performance.

New Profit-Sharing Ratio

New profit-sharing ratio is the ratio in which all partners agree to share the profits and losses of a partnership firm after the admission of a new partner. When a new partner joins, they receive a share of future profits, which generally reduces the profit shares of the existing partners. The new ratio is determined according to the partnership agreement and mutual consent. It is important for distributing future profits, calculating partners’ capital interests, and determining the adjustments required during the admission process.

Formula for Calculating the New Profit-Sharing Ratio

The new profit-sharing ratio depends on the terms agreed upon by the partners. When the incoming partner receives a share from the existing partners in an agreed proportion, the remaining share is distributed accordingly. The general formula is:

New Share = Old Share − Share Sacrificed

Alternatively, if the new partner’s share and the proportion of sacrifice are specified, the remaining profit share can be calculated and allocated among the old partners. The total of all partners’ new profit shares must always equal 1 or 100%.

Sacrificing Ratio

Sacrificing ratio is the ratio in which existing partners surrender a portion of their profit shares in favour of the incoming partner. It measures the reduction in each existing partner’s share due to the admission. This ratio is important for distributing the incoming partner’s goodwill contribution among the sacrificing partners. A partner who sacrifices a larger share generally receives a greater proportion of goodwill compensation. The sacrificing ratio is calculated by comparing each existing partner’s old profit share with their new profit share.

Formula for Calculating the Sacrificing Ratio

The sacrificing ratio is calculated by subtracting each existing partner’s new profit share from their old profit share.

Sacrificing Ratio = Old Share − New Share

The sacrifices of the existing partners are then expressed as a ratio and simplified to the smallest whole numbers, where possible. This calculation identifies how much of the profit share each existing partner has given up. The sacrificing ratio is especially useful when goodwill is brought into the business by the incoming partner, because the goodwill amount is generally credited to the sacrificing partners in this ratio.

Calculation When the New Partner Acquires a Share from Existing Partners in an Agreed Ratio

Sometimes, the incoming partner acquires their share from existing partners in a specified proportion. In such cases, the existing partners sacrifice their profit shares according to that agreed ratio.

Example: A and B share profits in the ratio of 3:2. C is admitted for a $1/5$ share, which A and B sacrifice in the ratio of 2:1.

C’s share = $1/5$

A’s sacrifice = $1/5 \times 2/3 = 2/15$

B’s sacrifice = $1/5 \times 1/3 = 1/15$

A’s new share = $3/5 – 2/15 = 7/15$

B’s new share = $2/5 – 1/15 = 1/3$

C’s share = $1/5$

New profit-sharing ratio = 7:5:3

Sacrificing ratio = 2:1

Calculation When the Incoming Partner Acquires a Share Equally from Existing Partners

If the incoming partner acquires an equal portion of their share from all existing partners, each old partner sacrifices the same amount of profit share.

Example: A and B share profits equally. C is admitted for a $1/4$ share, acquired equally from A and B.

Old share of A = $1/2$

Old share of B = $1/2$

C’s share = $1/4$

Each partner’s sacrifice = $1/4 \div 2 = 1/8$

A’s new share = $1/2 – 1/8 = 3/8$

B’s new share = $1/2 – 1/8 = 3/8$

C’s new share = $1/4$

New profit-sharing ratio = 3:3:2

Sacrificing ratio = 1:1

Calculation When the New Partner’s Share Is Taken from One Existing Partner

Sometimes, only one existing partner sacrifices a share to admit the incoming partner. In this situation, the other existing partners retain their original profit shares.

Example: A and B share profits in the ratio of 3:2. C is admitted for a $1/5$ share, entirely acquired from A.

A’s new share = $3/5 – 1/5 = 2/5$

B’s new share = $2/5$

C’s new share = $1/5$

Therefore, the new shares are $2/5 : 2/5 : 1/5$.

New profit-sharing ratio = 2:2:1

Sacrificing ratio = 1:0

A sacrifices $1/5$, while B makes no sacrifice. Therefore, goodwill compensation, if applicable, is allocated to A alone.

Fixed and Flexible exchange rate

by indiafreenotes22/01/202115/12/20221

Functions of Foreign Exchange Market

Transfer Function: Foreign exchange market transfers purchasing power between the countries involved in the transaction.

This function is performed through credit instruments like bills of foreign exchange, bank drafts and telephonic transfers.

Credit Function: Foreign exchange market provides credit for foreign trade.

Bills of exchange, with maturity period of three months, are generally used for international payments.

Thus, credit is required for this period to enable the importer to take possession of goods, sell them and obtain money to pay off the bill.

Hedging Functions: Hedging in an important function of foreign exchange market.

When exporter and importers enter into an agreement to sell and buy gods on some future date at the current prices and exchange rate, it is called hedging.

Fixed exchange rate system:

The system in which the foreign exchange rate is officially fixed by the government/monetary authority and not determined by markets forces.

Under fixed exchange rate system: Each country keeps the value of its currency fixed in terms of some external standard.

This external standard can be gold, silver, other precious metal, another country’s currency, or even some internationally agreed unit of account.

In earlier times, exchange rates of all major countries were fixed according to the Gold Standard.

A fixed exchange rate, sometimes called a pegged exchange rate, is a type of exchange rate regime in which a currency’s value is fixed or pegged by a monetary authority against the value of another currency, a basket of other currencies, or another measure of value, such as gold.

There are benefits and risks to using a fixed exchange rate system. A fixed exchange rate is typically used to stabilize the exchange rate of a currency by directly fixing its value in a predetermined ratio to a different, more stable, or more internationally prevalent currency (or currencies) to which the currency is pegged. In doing so, the exchange rate between the currency and its peg does not change based on market conditions, unlike in a floating (flexible) exchange regime. This makes trade and investments between the two currency areas easier and more predictable and is especially useful for small economies that borrow primarily in foreign currency and in which external trade forms a large part of their GDP.

Merits:

(i) It ensures stability in exchange rate which encourages foreign trade.

(ii) It contributes to the coordination of macro policies of countries in an interdependent world economy.

(iii) Fixed exchange rates prevents capital outflow.

(iv) It prevents speculation in foreign exchange market.

(v) Fixed exchange rates are more conductive to expansion of world trade because it prevents risk and uncertainty in transactions.

Demerits:

(i) There is a fear of devaluation in situation of excess demand.

Central Bank uses its reserves to maintain fixed exchange rate.

But when reserves are exhausted and excess demand still persists, government is compelled to devalue domestic currency.

If speculators believe the exchange rate cannot be held for log, they buy foreign exchange in massive amount causing deficit in BOP. This may lead to larger devaluation.

This is the main flaw of fixed exchange rate system.

(ii) Benefits of free markets are deprived.

(iii) There is always possibility of undervaluation or overvaluation.

Disadvantages of Fixed Exchange Rate

Developing economies commonly use a fixed rate structure to curb inflation and provide a stable system. A secure environment enables importers, exporters, and investors to plan without having to worry about currency movements.

A fixed-rate structure, however, limits the ability of a central bank to change interest rates as required for boosting economic growth. Often, a fixed rate system prevents market fluctuations when a currency is over or undervalued. Effective management of a fixed-rate system also needs a large pool of reserves, when it is under pressure, to support the currency.

An unsustainable official exchange rate can also trigger a parallel, unofficial, or dual exchange rate to grow. A large gap between official and unofficial rates will draw hard currency away from the central bank, which can result in shortages of forex and periodic devaluations. These can be more detrimental for an economy than the daily adjustment of a floating currency regime.

Flexible (fixating) Exchange Rate:

Flexible exchange rate is the rate which is determined by forces of supply and demand in the foreign exchange market. There is no official (govt.) Intervention. Here the value of a currency is left completely free to be determined by market forces of demand and supply of foreign exchange.

In macroeconomics and economic policy, a floating exchange rate (also known as a fluctuating or flexible exchange rate) is a type of exchange rate regime in which a currency’s value is allowed to fluctuate in response to foreign exchange market events. A currency that uses a floating exchange rate is known as a floating currency, in contrast to a fixed currency, the value of which is instead specified in terms of material goods, another currency, or a set of currencies (the idea of the last being to reduce currency fluctuations).

In the modern world, most of the world’s currencies are floating, and include the most widely traded currencies: the United States dollar, the euro, the Swiss franc, the Indian rupee, the pound sterling, the Japanese yen, and the Australian dollar. However, even with floating currencies, central banks often participate in markets to attempt to influence the value of floating exchange rates. The Canadian dollar most closely resembles a pure floating currency because the Canadian national bank has not interfered with its price since it officially stopped doing so during 1998. The US dollar is a close second, with very little change of its foreign reserves. By contrast, Japan and the UK intervene to a greater extent, and India has medium-range intervention by its national bank, the Reserve Bank of India

Merits:

(i) Deficit or surplus in BOP is automatically corrected.

(ii) There is no need for government to hold any foreign reserve.

(iii) It helps in optimum resource allocation.

(iv) It frees the government from problem of balance of payment.

(v) Flexible exchange rate increases the efficiency in the economy by achieving best allocation of resources.

Demerits:

(i) It encourages speculation leading to fluctuation in exchange rate.

(ii) Wide fluctuations in exchange rate can hamper foreign trade and capital movement between countries.

(iii) It generates inflationary pressure when prices of imports go up due to depreciation of the currency caused by deficit in BOP.

(iv) It discourages investment and international trade.

Determination of Exchange Rate (Flexible Exchange Rate System)

Rate of exchange is determined by the interaction of then force of demand and supply.

let us understand the various sources of demand and supply of foreign exchange.

Demand for Foreign Exchange Demand (outflow) for foreign exchange arises due to the following reasons

Import of Goods and Services: foreign exchange is demanded to make the payment for imports of goods and services.
Tourism: When Indian tourists go abroad, they need to have foreign currency with them to meet their expenditure abroad. So, foreign exchange is needed to undertake foreign tour.

Unilateral Transfers sent abroad: Foreign exchange is required for making unilateral transfers like sending gifts to other countries.
Purchase of Assets in Foreign Countries: Foreign exchange in needed to make payment for the purchase of assets (like land, building, share, bonds etc.) in foreign countries.
Speculation: Demand for foreign exchange arises when people want to make gains from appreciation of the currency.

Managed flexibility in exchange rate

by indiafreenotes22/01/202115/12/20221

Managed floating rate system refers to a system in which foreign exchange rate is determined by market force and central bank is a key participant to stabilize the currency in case of extreme, appreciation or depreciation.

Under Managed floating rate system, also called dirty floating, central banks to buy and sell foreign currencies in an attempt to moderate exchange rate movement whenever they feel that such actions are appropriate.

Against the two extremes of rigidly fixed and freely flexible exchange rates, a system of controlled or managed flexibility is suggested on practical considerations into the exchange rate regime.

The focus on intermediate regime between fixed and floating exchange rate is desirable for a prudency to eliminate the drawbacks and capture the advantages of both extreme systems.

Under the managed or controlled flexibility of exchange rate system, the scope of the range of flexibility around fixed par values is determined by the country as per its economic need and the prevailing trend in the international monetary system.

Managed floating exchange rate system is essentially based on the par value concept under the IMF guidelines.

Managing or controlling exchange rates requires the country to intervene in the foreign exchange market time to time in view of the emerging BOP disequilibrium.

Categories

Adjustable Peg System:

Under the Bretton Woods System, the exchange rates of different currencies were pegged in terms of gold or the U.S. dollar at the rate of $ 35 per ounce of gold. The nations were allowed to change the par values of their currencies when faced with a ‘fundamental’ disequilibrium.

Crawling Peg System:

The crawling peg system was popularised in mid-sixties by such prominent economists as William Fellner, J.H. Williamson, J. Black, J.E. Meade and C.J. Murphy. This system is a compromise between the extremes of freely fluctuating exchange rates and perfectly stable exchange rates. It was devised in order to avoid the disadvantage of relatively large changes in par values and possibly destabilising speculation associated with the system of adjustable peg.

In case of the Bretton Woods adjustable peg, sudden and large changes in exchange rates have to be made. These are clearly undesirable and should be avoided.

Policy of Managed Floating:

The exchange rates may continue to fluctuate, even if speculation is stabilising, on account of the variations that take place in the real sectors of the economy. The fluctuations in exchange rate tend to have an adverse effect upon the flow of international trade and investments. The Smithsonian Agreement made on December 18, 1971 provided for the widening of margin of fluctuations from 1 percent on each side of the exchange parity to 2.25 percent on each side of the par value of exchange.

Clean and Dirty Float Systems:

In connection with a system of managed float, it may be pointed out that a distinction is sometimes made between a clean float and dirty float.

(i) Clean Float:

In case of clean float, the rate of exchange is allowed to be determined by the free market forces of demand and supply of foreign exchange. The exchange rate is permitted to move up and down. The foreign exchange market itself corrects the excess demand or excess supply conditions without the intervention of monetary authority. Thus, the policy of clean float is identical to the policy of freely fluctuating exchange rates.

(ii) Dirty Float:

In case of a dirty float, the exchange rate is sought to be determined by the market forces of demand and supply for foreign exchange. However, the monetary authority intervenes in the foreign exchange market through the pegging operations either to smoothen or to eliminate the fluctuations altogether. It means even the long term trend in exchange rate is manipulated by the monetary authority. Such a policy of managed float is understood as the policy of ‘dirty float’.

Tag: Business Communication BMS Notes

Indian Financial System Functions

Like this:

Weaknesses of Indian Financial System

Like this:

Profits Prior to Incorporation and Accounting Treatment

Like this:

Insolvency of a Partner

Like this:

Maintenance of Capital Accounts, Fixed Capital Method vs. Fluctuating Capital Method

Like this:

Retirement and Death of a Partner

Like this:

Partnership Accounts

Like this:

Admission of a Partner, Calculation of New Profit-Sharing Ratio and Sacrificing Ratio

Like this:

Fixed and Flexible exchange rate

Fixed exchange rate system:

Flexible (fixating) Exchange Rate:

Like this:

Managed flexibility in exchange rate

Clean and Dirty Float Systems:

Like this:

University of Mumbai BMS Notes

Management, Concepts, Meaning, Objectives, Nature, Roles, Scope, Process and Significance

Research, Introduction, Meaning, Definition, Objective, Purpose, Types, Importance and Challenges

Cost Accounting, Meaning, Definitions, Objectives, Scope, Functions, Uses, Advantages and Limitations

Organizational Behaviour, Meaning, Definitions, Nature, Scope, Importance, Challenges and Opportunities

The Iroquois Creation Story by David Cusick

Autumn by John Clare

CRITICAL READING: Framing a Shot

WRITING: Book and Film Review

SPEAKING: Asking for and Giving Information

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Fixed exchange rate system:

Flexible (fixating) Exchange Rate:

Share this:

Like this:

Clean and Dirty Float Systems:

Share this:

Like this: