Important terminologies of Cost Accounting

Direct Cost

Direct costs can be easily identified as per the expenditure on cost objects. So, for example, if we pick how much expenditure a business has had on purchasing the raw materials inventory, we will be able to directly point out.

Indirect Cost

In the case of indirect costs, the challenge is that we can’t identify the costs as per the cost object. So, for example, if we try to understand how much rent is given for sitting the machinery in a place, we won’t be able to do it because the rent is paid for the entire space, not for a particular place.

The essential difference between direct costs and indirect costs is that only direct costs can be traced to specific cost objects. A cost object is something for which a cost is compiled, such as a product, service, customer, project, or activity. These costs are usually only classified as direct or indirect costs if they are for production activities, not for administrative activities (which are considered period costs).

Prime Cost

Prime costs are a firm’s expenses directly related to the materials and labor used in production. It refers to a manufactured product’s costs, which are calculated to ensure the best profit margin for a company. The prime cost calculates the direct costs of raw materials and labor that are involved in the production of a good. Direct costs do not include indirect expenses, such as advertising and administrative costs.

Prime cost = Direct raw materials + Direct labour

Production Cost

Production costs refer to all of the direct and indirect costs businesses face from manufacturing a product or providing a service. Production costs can include a variety of expenses, such as labor, raw materials, consumable manufacturing supplies, and general overhead.

Direct Labor Costs

Direct labor consists of the fully burdened cost of all labor directly involved in the production of goods. This usually means those people working on production lines or in work cells. Other types of production labor are recorded within the category of factory overhead costs.

Direct Material Costs

Direct materials consists of those materials consumed as part of the production process, including the cost of normal scrap that occurs as part of the process.

Factory Overhead Costs

Factory overhead consists of those costs required to maintain the production function, but which are not directly consumed on individual units. Examples are utilities, insurance, materials management salaries, production salaries, maintenance wages, and quality assurance wages.

Administration Cost

Administrative expenses refer to the costs incurred by a company or organization that include, but are not limited to, the salaries and benefits of the administrative workers within the company or organization, as well as rent and managerial compensation. Also known as General and Administrative expenses, the costs are categorized separately from Sales & Marketing and Research costs.

  1. Administrative Expenses
  • Managerial team
  • IT team
  • Executive compensation
  • Rent of equipment and buildings
  1. Non-Administrative Expenses
  • Manufacturers
  • Developers
  • Engineers
  • Sales Team

Selling and Distribution Cost

The term ‘distribution‘ is widely used in relation to the whole operation of getting goods into the hands of the consumer, and thus covers the two functions of sales promotion and delivery. The expression ‘distribution costs’, however, may be considered as relating only to delivery.

Selling Costs: The cost incurred in promoting sales and retaining customers. Selling expenses are those expenses which are incurred to promote sales and service to customers. Thus, selling overhead includes Salesmen’s Salaries, Commission, Travelling expenses, Cost of advertisement, Posters, Cost of price list and catalogue, Debt collection charges, Bad debts, Free gift, Showrooms expenses, After-sale service, Legal expenses for recovering debt, etc.

Distribution Costs: The cost of the process which begins with making the packed product available for dispatch and ends with making the reconditioned returned empty package available for re-uses. Distribution expenses, on the other hand, are those which are incurred for warehousing and storage, packing for goods sent and making the goods available for delivery to customers. So, in broader sense of the item, distributions expenses include- Cost of storing, Cost of warehousing, Cost of packing, Cost of delivery, and Cost of preparation of challan.

Fixed Cost

In accounting and economics, fixed costs, also known as indirect costs or overhead costs, are business expenses that are not dependent on the level of goods or services produced by the business. They tend to be recurring, such as interest or rents being paid per month. These costs also tend to be capital costs. This is in contrast to variable costs, which are volume-related (and are paid per quantity produced) and unknown at the beginning of the accounting year. Fixed costs have an effect on the nature of certain variable costs.

For example, a retailer must pay rent and utility bills irrespective of sales. As another example, for a bakery the monthly rent and phone line are fixed costs, irrespective of how much bread is produced and sold; on the other hand, the wages are variable costs, as more workers would need to be hired for the production to increase. For any factory, the fix cost should be all the money paid on capitals and land. Such fixed costs as buying machines and land cannot be not changed no matter how much they produce or even not produce. Raw materials are one of the variable costs, depending on the quantity produced.

Fixed cost is considered an entry barrier for new entrepreneurs. In marketing, it is necessary to know how costs divide between variable and fixed costs. This distinction is crucial in forecasting the earnings generated by various changes in unit sales and thus the financial impact of proposed marketing campaigns. In a survey of nearly 200 senior marketing managers, 60 percent responded that they found the “variable and fixed costs” metric very useful. These costs affect each other and are both extremely important to entrepreneurs.

Variable Cost

A variable cost is a cost that varies in relation to either production volume or the amount of services provided. If no production or services are provided, then there should be no variable costs. If production or services are increasing, then variable costs should also increase.

Types of Variable Costs

Direct materials are considered a variable cost. Direct labor may not be a variable cost if labor is not added to or subtracted from the production process as production volumes change. Most types of overhead are not considered a variable cost.

Semi-variable Cost

In such mixed cost, the fixed part will occur irrespective of the production level; even in the case of zero production activities, a fixed cost will still occur. However, the variable part of such costs is dependent on the level of production work carried by the entity and increases in proportion to the production levels. That means that semi-variable costs can be calculated by adding the fixed costs and the variable costs (based on the level of production).

Period Cost

Period costs are costs that cannot be capitalized on a company’s balance sheet. In other words, they are expensed in the period incurred and appear on the income statement. Period costs are also called period expenses.

Product Cost

Product cost refers to the costs incurred to create a product. These costs include direct labor, direct materials, consumable production supplies, and factory overhead. Product cost can also be considered the cost of the labor required to deliver a service to a customer. In the latter case, product cost should include all costs related to a service, such as compensation, payroll taxes, and employee benefits.

Product cost appears in the financial statements, since it includes the manufacturing overhead that is required by both GAAP and IFRS. However, managers may modify product cost to strip out the overhead component when making short-term production and sale-price decisions. Managers may also prefer to focus on the impact of a product on a bottleneck operation, which means that their main focus is on the direct materials cost of a product and the time it spends in the bottleneck operation.

Product Cost Calculation

The cost of a product on a unit basis is typically derived by compiling the costs associated with a batch of units that were produced as a group, and dividing by the number of units manufactured. The calculation is:

Product unit cost = (Total direct labor + Total direct materials + Consumable supplies + Total allocated overhead) ÷ Total number of units

Explicit Cost

Explicit cost is valuable if you’re trying to create long-term strategic goals for a company or simply assessing its profitability. Learning how this metric varies from implicit costs can help you understand, determine and establish the total economic cost. Explicit costs can be easily determined and invaluable for decision-making in a business or department.

Important

Calculating profit: Once a company pays all its explicit costs, the profit is the remaining monetary value on the general ledger.

Performing long-term strategic planning: Explicit cost helps calculate a company’s profitability. It’s a key metric for long-term strategic planning because it allows a business to predict its profits for a specific period.

Implicit Cost

In economics, an implicit cost, also called an imputed cost, implied cost, or notional cost, is the opportunity cost equal to what a firm must give up in order to use a factor of production for which it already owns and thus does not pay rent. It is the opposite of an explicit cost, which is borne directly. In other words, an implicit cost is any cost that results from using an asset instead of renting it out, selling it, or using it differently. The term also applies to foregone income from choosing not to work.

Implicit costs also represent the divergence between economic profit (total revenues minus total costs, where total costs are the sum of implicit and explicit costs) and accounting profit (total revenues minus only explicit costs). Since economic profit includes these extra opportunity costs, it will always be less than or equal to accounting profit.

Although implicit costs are non-monetary costs that usually do not appear in a company’s accounting records or financial statements, they are nonetheless an important factor that must be considered in bottom-line profitability. Implicit costs distinguish between two measures of business profits accounting profits versus economic profits.

  • Accounting profits are a company’s profits as shown in its accounting records and financial statements (such as its income statement). However, accounting profits, which are calculated as total revenues minus total expenses, only reflect actual cash expenses that a company pays out – its explicit costs.
  • Economic profits take into consideration both explicit and implicit costs. Therefore, while a company may show a positive net accounting profit, it may actually be a losing economic enterprise when its implicit costs are factored into the profitability equation

Historical Cost

Historical cost is the price paid for an asset when it was purchased. Historical cost is a fundamental basis in accounting, as it is often used in the reporting for fixed assets. It is also used to determine the basis of potential gains and losses on the disposal of fixed assets.

Historical Cost Adjustments

According to the accounting standards, historical costs require some adjustment as time passes. Depreciation expense is recorded for longer-term assets, thereby reducing their recorded value over their estimated useful lives. Also, if the value of an asset declines below its depreciation-adjusted cost, one must take an impairment charge to bring the recorded cost of the asset down to its net realizable value. Both concepts are intended to give a conservative view of the recorded cost of an asset.

Other Types of Costs

Historical cost differs from a variety of other costs that can be assigned to an asset, such as its replacement cost (what you would pay to purchase the same asset now) or its inflation-adjusted cost (the original purchase price with cumulative upward adjustments for inflation since the purchase date).

Historical cost is still a central concept for recording assets, though fair value is replacing it for some types of assets, such as marketable investments. The ongoing replacement of historical cost by a measure of fair value is based on the argument that historical cost presents an excessively conservative picture of an organization.

Current Cost

Current cost is the cost that would be required to replace an asset in the current period. This derivation would include the cost of manufacturing a product with the work methods, materials, and specifications currently in use. The concept is used to generate financial statements that are comparable across multiple reporting periods.

Future or Predetermined Cost

A futures contract is a legal agreement to buy or sell a particular commodity asset, or security at a predetermined price at a specified time in the future. Futures contracts are standardized for quality and quantity to facilitate trading on a futures exchange.

The buyer of a futures contract is taking on the obligation to buy and receive the underlying asset when the futures contract expires. The seller of the futures contract is taking on the obligation to provide and deliver the underlying asset at the expiration date.

These costs are computed in advance of the actual spending. And it usually includes all specifications with regards to the cost in question. In manufacturing firms, they are estimated for raw materials, labor and Overheads. When the actual costs are included during the period, the actual is compared with the predetermined to get the variance. A favorable variance means the actual cost is lower while an unfavorable variance implies that the actual cost was higher.

The term is also used in standard costing. In this situation, the standard cost is said to be the predetermined cost which is then compared with the actual cost. Variance is used to understand the cost item. So that adjustments can be made.

Using predetermined cost improves management efficiency. It also reduces the cost of production. Furthermore, it serves as a key performance indicator. A manager spending above the predetermined cost may imply that he or she is not performing well in terms of managing the entity’s finance.

Opportunity Cost

The opportunity cost of a particular activity is the value or benefit given up by engaging in that activity, relative to engaging in an alternative activity. More simply, it means if you chose one activity (for example, an investment) you are giving up the opportunity to do a different option. The optimal activity is the one that, net of its opportunity cost, provides the greater return compared to any other activities, net of their opportunity costs. For example, if you buy a car and use it exclusively to transport yourself, you cannot rent it out, whereas if you rent it out you cannot use it to transport yourself. If your cost of transporting yourself without the car is more than what you get for renting out the car, the optimal choice is to use the car yourself.

Formula and Calculation of Opportunity Cost

Opportunity Cost = FO−CO

Where:

FO=Return on best forgone option

CO=Return on chosen option

Precautions for installing effective cost accounting system

A cost accounting system is used by manufacturers to record production activities using a perpetual inventory system. In other words, it’s an accounting system designed for manufacturers that tracks the flow of inventory continually through the various stages of production.

Precautions

The Technical Details

Technical operations of the concern and whether production is more important than selling or vice versa should be kept in mind. Obviously more attention must be paid to the more significant factor.

Objects:

What are the objects which the management wants to achieve and what sort of information does it need for the achievement of its objectives? Information about costs meant for fixing prices would be quite different from that intended to reveal efficiencies or inefficiencies in operations or that required to make decisions on a rational basis.

The Product

The nature of product should be considered to decide type of cost system. For example, if materials used are insignificant, an elaborate system of materials control will not be necessary.

Type of Materials

The type of materials available and the timing of their supplies together with the storage problem, should also be taken into consideration.

Factors

Factors that are or are not amenable to control should be considered. Attention has to be paid to controllable factors. For instance, if a particular method of packing is prescribed by law, it is no use trying to think of an alternative.

Type of Labour

The type of labour which is required and the methods of their remuneration should also be kept in mind.

Management

The character of management itself and the decision-making process should also be taken into account. Modern managements usually need detailed information. The information flows will have to be designed with reference to the sources and end uses of the information. For example, if decisions are taken by a person who refuses to divulge any information, the system must keep this in view.

Business Peculiarities

Any peculiarities of the business, that there may be, must be kept in view. For instance, if purchases of particular item are to be made only from one particular source or firm, the costing system need not build an adequate purchase procedure; it should concentrate on the proper use of the concerned item.

Use of Financial Books

The possibility of using financial books and procedures should also be kept in mind. As stated above, cost accounting is to be treated as an investment and, therefore, all existing useful procedures, books and records should be used. For example financial accounts need adequate record of purchases and wages. With a little change, these can be made to serve the needs of Cost Accounting also. As far as possible, cost records and financial books should be well coordinated, even fully integrated.

Choice of Unit

The choice of the unit regarding which costs have to be obtained should also be considered. For example, in case of steel, costs are ascertained per tonne of steel and in case of cotton textiles, the unit is kg. of yarn or cloth. In case of motor transport the cost will be found per bus-kilometre or passenger-kilometre or sometimes tonne-mile. These are known as units of cost and it is necessary to choose a proper unit neither too big nor too small.

Full Discussion

Above all, the system should be designed after a full and frank discussion with all those who will be involved.

Antitrust Law

Anti-Competitive Agreements (Section 3)

An agreement includes any arrangement, understanding or concerted action entered into between parties. It may or may not be in writing. Anti-competitive agreements under competition law are broadly classified into two categories, the Anti-competitive Horizontal Agreement and Anti-competitive Vertical/Agreement.

Anti-Competitive Horizontal Agreements-Section 3(3)

Horizontal Agreements are those agreements where enterprises engaged in identical or similar trade of goods or services. When enterprises collude amongst each other to distort competition in the markets, such agreement is presumed to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition and thus, shall be void. The following four categories of such agreements amongst competitors are presumed to have AAEC-

  • Agreement to fix price;
  • Agreement to limit production and/or supply;
  • Agreement to allocate markets;
  • Bid rigging or collusive bidding.

However, such presumption is rebuttable.

Vertical Agreements-Section 3(4) Vertical Agreements are those agreements which are entered into by enterprises at different stages or levels of production, distribution, supply, storage etc. Such vertical restrains include:

  • Tie-in arrangement;
  • Exclusive supply/distribution arrangement;
  • Refusal to deal; and
  • Resale price maintenance.

Imposition of reasonable conditions as may be necessary for protection of intellectual Property Right (IPR) which are listed under Section 3(5), is generally not to be treated as volatile of the Act.

They are however, subject to scrutiny by the Commission to decide whether such conditions are reasonable and necessary to protect IPR.

Abuse of Dominant Position (Section 4)

Dominance refers to a position of strength which enables an enterprise to operate independently of competitive force in the market or to affect its competitors or consumers in its favour. Dominant position of an enterprise itself is not prohibited; however, if the enterprise by virtue of having dominant position in the relevant market abuses its dominance then the same stands prohibited. Abuse of dominant position impedes fair competition between firms exploits consumers and makes it difficult for the other players in the market to compete with the dominant undertaking. Abuse of dominant position covers:

  • Imposing unfair condition or price, including predatory pricing;
  • Limiting production/market or technical or scientific development
  • Denying market access, and
  • Making conclusion of contracts subject to conditions, having no nexus with such contracts; and
  • Using dominant position in one relevant market to gain advantages in another relevant market.

Anti-competitive agreements and other conduct

Scheme of the Competition Act

The Competition Act is based on the “effects doctrine” and grants the CCI jurisdiction over any agreement, abuse of a dominant position or combination that takes place outside of India as long as such agreements, conduct or combination have or are likely to have an AAEC in India. This is a significant development in the new competition law regime since the erstwhile MRTP Commission did not have extra-territorial jurisdiction.

Anti-competitive agreements

The Competition Act seeks to regulate two kinds of agreements:

(a) Anti-competitive agreements between/amongst competitors (horizontal agreements)

(b) Anti-competitive agreements between enterprises or persons at different stages or levels of the production chain (vertical agreements).

Under the Competition Act, certain kinds of horizontal agreements (described in the next subsection) are presumed to cause an AAEC in India. The presumption does not mean that all alleged horizontal agreements are necessarily anti-competitive; it remains open to the parties entering into such an agreement to provide evidence that their agreement does not result in an AAEC and rebut the presumption. On the other hand, such presumption does not apply to vertical agreements. Vertical agreements are usually permitted unless it is established that they cause, or are likely to cause, an AAEC within India. The Competition Act provides an exhaustive list of horizontal agreements that are presumed to cause an AAEC in India, as well as an inclusive list of vertical agreements that may be prohibited depending upon their effect on conditions of competition within India.

Cartel conduct

The Competition Act sets out a list of horizontal agreements that are presumed to cause an AAEC within India. In other words, once it is established that such an agreement exists and the agreement results in any of the conduct listed, the CCI may, on the basis of the presumption that they cause an AAEC, seek to prohibit them. These four types of agreements, which are also known as “cartel” arrangements, are set out in this list:

  • Price-fixing agreements, i.e., agreements between competitors, which directly or indirectly have the effect of fixing or determining purchase or sale prices;
  • Agreements between competitors, which seek to limit or control production, supply or markets;
  • Market-sharing agreements between competitors irrespective of the form that they may take; this includes market sharing by way of product allocation, allocation of geographic markets or source of production; and
  • Bid-rigging agreements, i.e., agreements between competitors, which have the effect of eliminating or reducing competition for bids or adversely affecting or manipulating the process of bidding.

Mergers and Acquisitions

Any combination, whether a merger, an acquisition, or an amalgamation, must adhere to the provisions of Section 5 and Section 6 of the Act and needs prior approval from the CCI. The two requirements are the filing of such mergers and combinations and the de minimise test. The Act also gives jurisdiction to the CCI over all the combinations, even those outside the country.  A notification prior to the combination is required within 30 from the board of directors showing approval in the case of mergers and amalgamations or within 30 of the execution of such an agreement which shows the intention to acquire a business if it is an acquisition. The failure will pave the way for an investigation as authorised by the Act to the CCI.

However, Schedule 1 of the combination regulations provides certain exemptions where a pre-notification to CCI is not necessary. These are:

  • Acquisition made only as an investment and where the acquirer does not hold 25% of the shares or more directly or indirectly,
  • Acquisition of additional shares which is not more than 5 % in a financial year and where the acquirer holds more than 25% but less than 50% of the shares or voting rights prior to or after such acquisition.
  • An acquisition where the acquirer already holds more than 50% of the shares of the company to be acquired except where the transaction is from joint control to sole control.
  • Renewed tender where the notice has already been filed with the Commission.
  • Acquisition of raw materials, stock-in-trade, spares etc. in the course of business.
  • Acquisition by a person in the same group except if the business is jointly controlled and they do not belong to the same group.
  • A merger or amalgamation where one has more than 50% of shares in another and the transaction is not from joint control to sole control.

Penalties and liabilities under the Competition Act, 2002

The Act also provides provisions for penalties and gives the CCI the power to impose such penalties. In the case of anti-competitive agreements, it can fine up to 10% of the average turnover of the last 3 financial years. For cartel agreements, the fine is equal to the profits made in 3 continuous years of such agreement. It can also order desist or ask to modify the agreements. The Act also provides penalties for non-compliance with the order of the Commission under Section 42 and false information under Section 44 of the Act. The Act also empowers CCI to impose lesser penalties under Section 46 of the Act.

Employment Law

Indian labour law refers to law regulating labour in India. Traditionally, the Indian government at the federal and state levels has sought to ensure a high degree of protection for workers, but in practice, this differs due to the form of government and because labour is a subject in the concurrent list of the Indian Constitution. The Minimum Wages Act 1948 requires companies to pay the minimum wage set by the government alongside limiting working weeks to 40 hours (9 hours a day including an hour of break). Overtime is strongly discouraged with the premium on overtime being 100% of the total wage. The Payment of Wages Act 1936 mandates the payment of wages on time on the last working day of every month via bank transfer or postal service. The Factories Act 1948 and the Shops and Establishment Act 1960 mandate 15 working days of fully paid vacation leave each year to each employee with an additional 7 fully paid sick days. The Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017 gives female employees of every company the right to take 6 months’ worth of fully paid maternity leave. It also provides for 6 weeks’ worth of paid leaves in case of miscarriage or medical termination of pregnancy. The Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation and the Employees’ State Insurance, governed by statutory acts provide workers with necessary social security for retirement benefits and medical and unemployment benefits respectively. Workers entitled to be covered under the Employees’ State Insurance (those making less than Rs 21000/month) are also entitled to 90 days’ worth of paid medical leaves. A contract of employment can always provide for more rights than the statutory minimum set rights. The Indian parliament passed four labour codes in the 2019 and 2020 sessions. These four codes will consolidate 44 existing labour laws.

The list of major HR functions and Legal provisions governing them

  • Recruitment and Selection
  • Training and Development
  • Employee appraisal
  • Compensation of rewarding
  • Healthy, Safety and Welfare measures
  • Maintaining Industrial relationships, Code of conduct and Discipline.

Recruitment and selection

In case of public employment; article 16(1) of the Indian Constitution guarantees equality of opportunity to all citizens” in matters relating to employment” or “appointment to any office” under the state. According to Article 16(2), no citizen can be discriminated against, are to be ineligible for any employment or office under the state, on the grounds only of religion, race, caste, six, descent, place of birth or residence or any of them.

Adherence to the rule of equality in public employment is a being feature of our Constitution and the rule of law is its core. the recruitment rules are to be framed with a view to give equal opportunity to all the citizens of India entitled for being considered for recruitment in vacant posts. The word ‘equality’ in Article 16(1) means equality as between member of the same class of employees and not equality between members of separate, independent classes. Therefore article 16 does not bar a reasonable classification of employees are reasonable test for selection.

Equality of opportunity of employment means selection. Equality of opportunity of employment means equality as between member of the same class of employees and not equality between members of separate, independent, classes.

The Child Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Act, 1986 and Article (24) of the Indian Constitution says that No child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed.

Performance appraisal of employee

Performance appraisal of employees aimed at knowing employee efficiency or a deficit in his work and conduct. On the basis of performance appraisal, employee’s suitability to the job is assessed the purpose of his confirmation, promotion and even further retention in the service. In case of adverse reports against an employee that it should be communicated to him with a view to inform him regarding the deficiency in his work and conduct and effort him an opportunity to make, and improve in his work and further justification. To make it clear that it is again as the principles of natural justice to directly remove an employee from the job without informing him about his/her deficiencies and give an opportunity to rectify him/herself to the satisfaction level of employer.

Compensation and rewarding

There are different labour laws governing the compensation and rewarding of an employee. They are as follows

Payment of wages Act 1936

The object of this act is to provide payment of wages to employees in time without any delay, without unreasonable deduction from the wages, if any deductions to be made by employer, those should be reasonable and in accordance with this act and procedure for payment of wages.

Justified deductions can be made from wages according to the Act

  • [Section 7] Deductions which may be made from wages
  • [Section 8] Fines
  • [Section 9] Deductions for absence from duty
  • [Section 10] Deductions for damage or loss
  • [Section 11] Deductions for services rendered
  • [Section 12] Deductions for recovery of advances
  • [Section 12A] Deductions for recovery of loans
  • [Section 13] Deductions for payments to co-operative societies and insurance schemes

Workmen compensation Act 1923

The object of  Workmen compensation Act 1923 is to provide compensation to the workman who meet with an accident in the course of employment, causing injury and making him partially or totally disabled or sometimes causing death. Conditions when employer is not liable to pay compensation to the employee who met with an accident in the course of employment.

Payment of bonus Act 1965

The object of this act is about compulsory payment bonus to employee whose salary of wage is not exceeding Rs.21000/-, irrespective of profit or loss of the business.

Minimum amount of bonus payable to employees is 8.33% [section 10]

Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972

The object of this act is about compulsory payment of gratuity to any employee who has completed five years of continuous service at the time of his retirement, resignation or on his death or disablement due to accident or disease. Provided that the completion of continuous service of 5 years shall not be necessary where the termination of the employment of any employee is due to death or disablement.

Gratuity = Monthly salary X  15 X Number of years of service / 26

Monthly salary= last month drawn salary by the employee.

26 = total number of working days in a month.

15 = number of days in half of the month.

Equal Remuneration Act, 1976

Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme, 1952.

Healthy, Safety and Welfare measures

Factories Act, 1948

Factors Act, 1948 is the law that governs healthy, safety and welfare measures of an employee in factories mentioned under this act.

  • Healthy measures- [section 11 to 20]
  • Safety of employees – [section 21 to 40B]
  • Welfare of employees – [section 42 to 50]
  • Working hours – [section 51 to 66]
  • Leave with wages – [section78 to 84]

Industry relationships and discipline of employees

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Industrial dispute act 1947 governs strikes by the employees, lockout by employer, layoff, retrenchment and other disputes between employer and employee, employee and employee, and employer and employer

  • Strikes (Industry)
  • Lockouts (Industry)
  • Lay Offs / Laid off and Retrenchment

Immigration Law

Articles 5 to 11 of Part II of the Indian Constitution deals with citizenship, defining a citizen as a person of Indian ancestry or a family member having Indian ancestry. Article 10 deals with the continued citizenship of foreigners in India, subject to any further laws adopted by the legislature. The Indian constitution recognizes just one citizenship across the country and does not allow for multiple citizenship.

It also states that a foreign citizen can get Indian citizenship through the Naturalization procedure (after having lived in India for at least 14 years) and foreigner registration with the FRRO (Foreigners Regional Registration Officer) or FRO (Foreigners Registration Officer). The Indian law follows jus sanguinis (citizenship by blood) as opposed to jus soli (citizenship by birth).

Immigrant rules and restrictions:

Certain laws have been enacted to streamline the process of foreigners obtaining citizenship, including:

  • Foreigners entering India are obliged to get visas from India Missions under the Passport (Entry in India) Act, 1920.
  • The statute also specifies which papers must be submitted during their lawful journey in order to be admitted to the nation.
  • The Foreigners Statute, 1946 – This act governs foreigners’ admission and stay within Indian boundaries till they leave.
  • The Foreigners Registration Act of 1939 and the Foreigners Registration Rules of 1992. Certain foreigners who remain longer than their visa period is required to register with the Registration Officer.

Types of Visa

The proper Indian diplomatic consular or passport authority i.e. Indian Embassy/High Commission located in various countries issue different types of visa to foreign nationals depending upon their proposed activities in India.

Below is an illustrative list of visas granted in order to enter India basis the purpose to visit India:

Sl. No. Type of Visa Eligibility
1 Transit Visa Granted to a foreign national for the sole purpose of enabling the foreigner to travel through India to a destination outside India.
2 Tourist Visa Granted to a foreign national whose sole objective of visiting India is recreation, sight-seeing, casual visit to meet friends or relatives, attending a short-term yoga programme, short duration medical treatment including treatment under Indian systems of medicine etc. and no other purpose/activity.
3 Medical Visa Granted to a foreign national whose sole purpose is to seek medical treatment in established/recognized/specialized hospitals/treatment centres in India.

The same is also granted to the by stander of the medical patient.

4 Student Visa Granted to a foreigner whose sole objective is to pursue on-campus, full time (structured) courses (including English and other language courses and vocational education) at educational institutions (Central/State Government Educational Institutions & Private Educational Institutions) duly recognized by statutory regulatory body and have acquired statutory authorization to conduct the course(s) complying with GST regulations.

The same is also granted to a foreign research scholar as well as a foreigner intending to pursue internship in Indian companies, educational institutions and NGOs subject to specified conditions.

5 Entry Visa Granted to a foreigner (Indian Citizen/Person of Indian Origin)/foreign national for specified purposes.
6 Conference Visa Granted to a foreigner whose sole objective of visiting India is to attend a conference/seminar or workshop being held in India to discuss a particular subject or for a seminar or workshop on a specific subject.
7 Mountaineering Visa Granted to foreigners for participating in mountaineering activities.
8 Journalist Visa Granted to (a) a foreigner who is a professional journalist, photographer, documentary film producer or director (other than of commercial films), a representative of a radio and/or television organization, travel writer/travel promotion photographer etc., (b) professional journalist working for an association or a company engaged in the production or broadcast of audio news or audio visual news or current affairs programmes through the print media, electronic or any other mode of mass communication, (c) correspondent/columnist/cartoonist/editor/owner of the association or company referred in (a)/(b) above.
9 Film Visa Granted to a foreigner for shooting of a feature film/reality TV show and/or commercial TV serials.
10 Missionary Visa Granted to a foreigner whose sole objective of visiting India is Missionary work not involving proselytization.
11 Employment Visa Granted to a foreign national who is a highly skilled and/or qualified professional and is not be granted (i) for jobs for which qualified Indians are available and (ii) for routine, ordinary or secretarial/clerical jobs.

Employment visa is also granted to a foreign national coming to India for execution of projects in the power and steel sectors subject to the specified conditions.

12 Business Visa Granted to a foreign national who wish to visit India to establish an industrial/business venture or to explore possibilities to set up an industrial/business venture.

Business visa is also granted to foreigners who are members of sports teams.

Registration of foreigners in India:

  • Foreigners travelling for a lengthy period (more than 180 days) on a student visa, work visa, research visa, or medical visa must register with the Indian Missions/FRRO/FRO within 14 days of arrival, with the exception of Certain sorts of nationalities are restricted from participating in this procedure.
  • Foreigners entering India on any form of visa other than the ones listed above are not need to register unless they plan to stay in India for more than 180 days. In such circumstances, registration must be completed well before the 6-month term expires.
  • Foreigners above the age of 16 are needed to register with the relevant Registration Officer in person or through an authorized agent. Minors under the age of 16 do not need to register.
  • Foreign visitors with an Entry(X) visa, such as dependent visas and business visas, who plan to stay for more than 180 days must also register.
  • Visitors with journalist visas and other visas that do not have any specific endorsements must register with the FRROS/FRO. The visas applied for registration will be stamped at all Indian missions.

Conditions for an Invention to be patented

The Patent is granted by the sovereign of the country for the Invention claimed by the inventors which gives him/her territorial rights for excluding others from making, using, selling, and offering to sell or for importing. To get the granted Patent, which is essential for the enforceability, every country has its criteria to judge the invention. Usually, Novelty, Inventive Step/Non-Obviousness and Industrial Applicability are the common criteria for judging an invention.

Conditions:

Inventive Step:

The invention must have some creative input from the inventor. It should be something which is not expected by the person skilled in the art. If an inventor is solving some technical problem by inventing something and if the person skilled in the art who is from the same field is providing the same solution by using his acquired knowledge or by taking teaching, suggestion or motivation, in that case the technical solution provided by the inventor will not be considered as inventive in nature.

Novelty:

The invention must create new knowledge or product or process. It should not be anticipated by the document, granted Patent, published Patent, non-Patent literature or in any form which is already available in the public domain. It must be different from what is already known.

Industrial Application:

Patents are granted to ensure that the inventor can exploit his/her invention freely, without the fear of competition. In this context, it is necessary that the invention is capable of being used and has industrial application. An invention should be used or manufactured in the form of a product or process.

Non-Patentable Subject matter:

In addition, an Invention must relate to the patentable subject matter. Every country has its criteria to judge the Patentable subject matter. In India, the list of non-Patentable subject matters is specifically mentioned.

For example: Frivolous invention or anything which is contrary to the natural laws, mere discovery, abstract theory, discovery of living or non-living things, discovery of new form of known substance, mere admixture, mere arrangement or re-arrangement, method of horticulture/agriculture, surgical process, mathematical/ business method, algorithm or computer program per se, mere scheme or rule, topology of integrated circuit, literary or artistic work, presentation of information, traditional knowledge or an invention related with atomic energy are not Patentable subject matter.

Remedies available to the Patent owner for Infringement of Patent Rights

Patent rights give the patent owner exclusive authority to make, use, sell, or distribute the patented invention for a specified period. In India, when any person uses a patented invention without the consent of the patent holder, it is considered a patent infringement under the Indian Patents Act, 1970. The patent owner has legal remedies to protect their rights, which may be enforced through civil litigation. The courts in India can grant various forms of relief such as injunctions, damages, account of profits, delivery-up, and seizure of infringing goods. These remedies aim to stop further infringement and compensate for the losses.

  •  Injunction

An injunction is the most common and immediate remedy available to a patent owner. It is a court order directing the infringer to cease the unauthorized use of the patented invention. There are two types of injunctions—interim (temporary) and permanent. An interim injunction is granted during the pendency of the trial to prevent ongoing damage. A permanent injunction is issued after the court establishes infringement and grants final relief. Indian courts consider factors like prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable harm before granting an injunction. This remedy helps the patent owner stop further illegal exploitation of the invention.

  • Damages

The patent owner is entitled to claim monetary damages for the loss suffered due to the infringement. Damages aim to put the patent holder in the financial position they would have been in had the infringement not occurred. Courts may assess damages based on lost profits, reasonable royalties, or loss of goodwill. In India, punitive damages are not commonly awarded in patent cases unless bad faith or wilful infringement is established. The burden of proving the quantum of loss lies on the plaintiff. If the patentee is unable to demonstrate actual loss, the court may still award nominal damages.

  • Account of Profits

Instead of damages, a patent owner may choose to claim an account of profits. This remedy requires the infringer to disclose and pay all profits earned through unauthorized use of the patent. Unlike damages, which compensate for the loss to the patentee, account of profits focuses on the gain made by the infringer. This is an equitable remedy, meaning the court has discretion whether to grant it. A patent owner must choose between damages or account of profits—not both. The remedy ensures that the infringer does not unjustly benefit from someone else’s innovation and discourages willful violations of patent rights.

  • Seizure or Delivery-up of Infringing Goods

Another remedy available to the patent owner is seizure, forfeiture, or destruction of infringing goods, materials, or equipment used in manufacturing the infringing products. The court may order the delivery-up of these items to the patent owner to prevent further infringement. This remedy is especially useful in commercial-scale violations where infringing goods are widely circulated in the market. It helps clean the market of illegal products and safeguards the patentee’s market share and reputation. This remedy also serves as a deterrent against future violations by removing all tools or outcomes of the infringement from the possession of the violator.

  • Anton Piller Orders

The Anton Piller order is a form of search and seizure order granted by the court to prevent the destruction of infringing evidence. It allows the patent owner to enter the premises of the alleged infringer without prior notice and seize documents, samples, or devices related to the infringement. This remedy is granted in cases where there is a real danger that the defendant may destroy vital evidence. Though rarely granted, this remedy is powerful and ensures that justice is not obstructed due to lack of evidence. It reflects the seriousness of intellectual property protection under Indian civil law.

  • Groundless Threats Action

Sometimes, a person may threaten others with legal action for patent infringement without any valid legal basis. The Indian Patents Act allows any person aggrieved by such groundless threats to approach the court for relief. The court may declare that the threats are unjustified and issue an injunction to restrain the threatening party. This provision protects businesses from undue harassment and ensures that patent rights are not misused to curb fair competition. However, the patentee may escape liability under this provision by proving the validity of the patent and actual infringement by the alleged party.

  • Criminal Liability

Although patent infringement is largely a civil wrong in India, criminal remedies may be applicable in certain cases involving counterfeit patented goods. For example, under other laws such as the Indian Penal Code, criminal charges may be invoked if the infringer commits cheating, forgery, or fraud in the course of patent infringement. While the Patents Act itself does not prescribe criminal punishment for infringement, the affected party can approach the authorities if the infringement involves deception of consumers or forgery of documentation. However, this is rare, and most disputes are settled through civil suits and equitable remedies.

Competition Appellate Tribunal

The Competition Appellate Tribunal is a statutory organization established under the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 to hear and dispose of appeals against any direction issued or decision made or order passed by the Competition Commission of India under sub-sections (2) and (6) of section 26, section 27, section 28, section 31, section 32, section 33, section 38, section 39, section 43, section 43A, section 44, section 45 or section 46 of the Competition Act, 2002. The Appellate Tribunal shall also adjudicate on claim for compensation that may arise from the findings of the Competition Commission of India or the orders of the Appellate Tribunal in an appeal against any findings of the Competition Commission of India or under section 42A or under sub-section (2) of section 53Q of the Act and pass orders for the recovery of compensation under section 53N of the Act.

The Central Government has set up the Appellate Tribunal on 15th May, 2009 having its Headquarter at New Delhi. Hon’ble Dr. Justice Arijit Pasayat, former Judge of Supreme Court, has been appointed as the First Chairperson of the Appellate Tribunal. Besides, the Chairperson, the Appellate Tribunal shall consist of not more than two Members to be appointed by the Central Government. The Chairperson of the Appellate Tribunal shall be a person, who is, or has been a Judge of the Supreme Court or the Chief Justice of a High Court. A Member of the Appellate Tribunal shall be a person of ability, integrity and standing having special knowledge of, and professional experience of not less than twenty-five years in, competition matters, including competition law and policy, international trade, economics, business, commerce, law, finance, accountancy, management, industry, public affairs, administration or in any other matter which in the opinion of the Central Government, may be useful to the Appellate Tribunal. The Chairperson or a Member of the Appellate Tribunal shall hold office for a term of five years and shall be eligible for re-appointment. Provided that no Chairperson or other Member of the Appellate Tribunal shall hold office after he has attained the age of sixty-eight years or sixty-five years respectively.

Every appeal shall be filed within a period of 60 days from the date on which a copy of the direction or decision or order made by the Competition Commission of India is received and it shall be in the prescribed form and be accompanied by the prescribed fees. The Appellate Tribunal may entertain an appeal after the expiry of the period of 60 days if it is satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not filing it within that period.

The Appellate Tribunal shall not be bound by the procedure laid down in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), but shall be guided by the principles of natural justice and, subject to the other provisions of this Act and of any rules made by the Central Government. The Appellate Tribunal shall have, for the purposes of discharging its functions under the Act, the same powers as are vested in a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908). Every order made by the Appellate Tribunal shall be enforced by it in the same manner as if it were a decree made by a court in a suit pending therein. If any person contravenes, without any reasonable ground, any order of the Appellate Tribunal, he shall be liable for a penalty of not exceeding rupees one crore or imprisonment for a term up to three years or with both as the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi may deem fit.

Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT)

Prior to 2007, if a party was not satisfied with the decision of the Competition Commission of India (CCI), It had to file an appeal in the Supreme Court of India, thereby increasing the pendency of cases in the Court. However, after the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007, the Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT) was established. It provided the provided the parties with a proper channel for appeal and changed the hierarchy of appeal. After the establishment of the Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT), the appeal from Competition Commission of India lies in front of the Appellate Tribunal and a further appeal goes to the Supreme Court.

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)

However, the establishment of Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT) was found not to be as effective as it was hoped would be. There were a number of conflicts between CCI and COMPAT related to their sharing of power. The result of this conflict was that in 2017 an amendment was made through which the provision of Part XIV of Chapter VI of the Finance Act, 2017 came into operation. After such amendment the Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT) ceased to exist. In place if it the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) was constituted.  Accordingly, Sections 2(ba) and 53A of the Competition Act and Section 410 of the Companies Act, 2013 have been appropriately amended and various other provisions of the Competition Act dealing with the Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT) have been omitted.

Previously, all appeals against specified orders of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) would lie to the Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT) whereas the National Competition Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dealt with, inter alia, appeals arising out of orders of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) under the Companies Act, 2013 as well as the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Filing an appeal

The Section 53B of the Competition Act, 2002 provides for ‘Appeal to Appellate Tribunal’.

Clause 1 of Section 53B

Section 53B(1) states that:

“The Central Government or the State Government or a local authority or enterprise or any person, aggrieved by any direction, decision or order referred to in clause (a) of section 53A may prefer an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal.”

This clause of Section 53B provides for the persons who can file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal. According to it, when any direction, decision or order is passed as per Section 53A of the Act, the Central Government or the State Government or a local authority or enterprise or any person, if aggrieved, can file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal.

Clause 2 of Section 53B

Section 53B(2) states that:

“Every appeal under Sub-section (1) shall be filed within a period of sixty days from the date on which a copy of the direction or decision or order made by the Commission is received by the Central Government or the State Government or a local authority or enterprise or any person referred to in that sub-section and it shall be in such form and be accompanied by such fee as may be prescribed:

Provided that the Appellate Tribunal may entertain an appeal after the expiry of the said period of sixty days if it is satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not filing it within that period.”

This clause of Section 53B provides for the time limit within which the appeal shall be filed. According to this section, every appeal shall be filed within a period of sixty days from the date on which a copy of the direction or decision or order made by the commission is received by specified parties. It is also provided that the Appellate Tribunal if satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal shall be allowed to file the appeal after the expiry of the said period i.e., 60 (sixty) days.

Accounting for Capital Reduction

Accounting for Capital Reduction involves recording adjustments in the company’s books to reflect a decrease in share capital. It typically includes journal entries to reduce the nominal value of shares, write off accumulated losses, eliminate fictitious assets like goodwill or preliminary expenses, or return excess funds to shareholders. The amount reduced from capital is transferred to a Capital Reduction Account, which is then used to adjust losses or overvalued assets. Once all adjustments are complete, any remaining balance in the Capital Reduction Account is transferred to Capital Reserve. These accounting treatments ensure that the balance sheet reflects the true financial position of the company after reconstruction.

Below is a structured Table Format for journal entries and adjustments in capital reduction:

Scenario

Journal Entry Explanation
1. Reduction by Canceling Unpaid Capital

Debit: Share Capital A/c (Unpaid Portion)

Credit: Capital Reduction A/c

Extinguishes liability on partly paid shares.
2. Writing Off Accumulated Losses

Debit: Share Capital A/c

Credit: Profit & Loss (Accumulated Losses) A/c

Adjusts capital to absorb past losses.
3. Paying Off Surplus Capital

Debit: Share Capital A/c

Credit: Bank A/c

Returns excess capital to shareholders in cash.
4. Revaluation of Assets Debit: Asset A/c (Increase)

Credit: Capital Reduction A/c

(or)

Debit: Capital Reduction A/c

Credit: Asset A/c (Decrease)

Updates asset values before capital adjustment.
5. Transfer to Capital Reserve Debit: Capital Reduction A/c

Credit: Capital Reserve A/c

Surplus from reduction is reserved for future use.
6. Settlement with Creditors Debit: Creditors A/c

Credit: Capital Reduction A/c

Debt is reduced as part of reconstruction.

Legal Provisions for Reduction of Share Capital under Companies Act, 2013

Reduction of Share Capital is a significant restructuring activity undertaken by a company to either adjust its capital structure, return surplus capital to shareholders, or write off accumulated losses. Under the Companies Act, 2013, the process is strictly regulated to protect shareholders’ interests and ensure compliance with the law. The legal provisions regarding the reduction of share capital are primarily governed by Section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013, and associated rules.

Meaning and Purpose of Capital Reduction

The reduction of share capital refers to the process by which a company reduces its issued, subscribed, and paid-up share capital. This process is typically undertaken for various purposes:

  • Adjusting the company’s capital structure due to losses.
  • Returning surplus capital to shareholders that is no longer needed for the business.
  • Canceling unissued shares or reducing the nominal value of shares.
  • Writing off accumulated losses to present a healthier balance sheet.
  • Discharging shareholders who do not participate fully in the company’s growth.

Reduction of capital can be carried out in various ways, such as:

  • Canceling or extinguishing the liability of unpaid capital.
  • Reducing the face value of shares.
  • Buying back shares, and subsequently canceling them.
  • Canceling any paid-up capital that is no longer needed.

Section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013

This section lays down the legal framework for reducing the share capital of a company. Here are the key provisions:

1. Special Resolution

  • The reduction of share capital can only be initiated if a special resolution is passed by the shareholders in a general meeting. A special resolution requires at least 75% of the votes cast to be in favor of the resolution.
  • The resolution must clearly specify the details of the reduction, the reason for it, and its effect on the company’s capital structure.

2. Approval of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)

  • After passing the special resolution, the company must seek the approval of the NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal).
  • The company must file an application with the NCLT, including the special resolution and detailed justification for the capital reduction.
  • The tribunal will carefully examine the application to ensure that the reduction is not prejudicial to the company’s creditors or shareholders.

3. Notice to Creditors and Objections

  • Before approving the reduction, the NCLT will direct the company to notify its creditors. This is done to ensure that creditors’ interests are not adversely affected by the reduction.
  • Creditors have the right to object to the reduction if they believe that it will impact their claims or financial position.
  • If creditors object, the NCLT may ask the company to settle the objections, provide security for their debts, or pay off the debts before proceeding with the reduction.

4. Court’s Order and Registration

  • Once the NCLT is satisfied with the company’s application and resolves any objections raised by creditors, it will pass an order approving the reduction of share capital.
  • The NCLT may impose conditions while granting the approval to safeguard the interests of shareholders and creditors.
  • After obtaining the NCLT’s approval, the company must file a certified copy of the tribunal’s order with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) within 30 days.
  • The reduction of capital takes effect only after the order is registered with the ROC.

5. Publication of the Order

The company is required to publish the order approving the reduction of share capital in a newspaper, as directed by the NCLT. This ensures transparency and informs all stakeholders of the change in the company’s capital structure.

Forms of Capital Reduction

Reduction of share capital can take various forms under the Companies Act, 2013:

Capital reduction refers to the reorganization of a company’s share capital by decreasing its issued, subscribed, or paid-up capital with the approval of the Tribunal (NCLT) under the Companies Act. It is adopted when the existing capital structure becomes unsuitable due to losses, overcapitalization, or surplus funds.

The common forms of capital reduction are explained below:

1. Reduction of Liability on Uncalled Capital

In this form, the company cancels the unpaid portion of share capital that shareholders are liable to pay in the future.
For example, a ₹10 share with ₹6 paid-up may be converted into a ₹6 fully paid share. Shareholders are relieved from the obligation to pay the remaining ₹4.

This method is used when the company realizes that it does not require the remaining capital from shareholders. It reduces financial burden on members and improves investor confidence.

2. Cancellation of Paid-up Capital Not Represented by Assets

When a company suffers continuous losses, part of the paid-up share capital is no longer represented by real assets. In such cases, the company cancels that portion of capital.

Example: A ₹10 share fully paid may be reduced to ₹6 fully paid to eliminate accumulated losses.

This is the most common method of capital reduction and helps clean the balance sheet by writing off debit balance of Profit & Loss A/c, goodwill, and other fictitious assets.

3. Reduction by Returning Excess Capital to Shareholders

Sometimes a company has surplus funds which are not required for business operations. The company may return a portion of the paid-up share capital to shareholders.

Here, shareholders receive cash or other assets, and the nominal value of shares is reduced accordingly.

This method prevents over-capitalization and increases return on capital employed, thereby improving financial efficiency.

4. Reduction of Face Value of Shares

Under this form, the nominal value (face value) of shares is reduced.

Example:
Shares of ₹100 each are reduced to ₹50 each.

The number of shares remains the same, but the paid-up capital decreases. The amount reduced is used to write off losses or overvalued assets.

5. Consolidation and Subdivision (Reorganization of Shares)

Although technically a capital reorganization, it may accompany capital reduction.

  • Consolidation: Small shares are combined into larger denomination shares (e.g., five ₹10 shares into one ₹50 share).

  • Subdivision: One large share is split into smaller shares (₹100 share into ten ₹10 shares).

This helps in better marketability of shares and smoother trading.

6. Reduction by Compromise or Arrangement with Creditors

In some reconstruction schemes, creditors agree to accept a lower payment than the actual amount due. The sacrifice made by creditors forms part of the capital reduction process.

This usually occurs when the company is in financial distress and wants to avoid liquidation. Both shareholders and creditors share the loss to revive the company.

7. Reduction through Surrender of Shares

Shareholders voluntarily surrender a portion of their shares to the company. The surrendered shares are cancelled and the share capital is reduced.

This generally occurs during internal reconstruction, where members cooperate to improve the company’s financial position.

Restrictions and Prohibitions

The reduction of share capital is subject to certain restrictions. A company that is in default of repaying deposits or interest thereon cannot reduce its share capital unless it rectifies the default. Capital reduction must not result in the company holding shares in itself, as this would violate the provisions regarding the prohibition of owning treasury shares.

Impact of Capital Reduction

1. Cleaning of Balance Sheet

Capital reduction helps in eliminating fictitious and intangible assets such as preliminary expenses, underwriting commission, discount on issue of shares/debentures, and accumulated losses. These items are written off against the reduced capital.

As a result, the balance sheet reflects the true financial position of the company. It removes inflated figures of capital and presents realistic asset values, thereby increasing reliability of financial statements.

2. Adjustment of Accumulated Losses

Companies suffering heavy losses often carry a debit balance in the Profit and Loss Account. Through capital reduction, this loss is adjusted against share capital.

After adjustment, the company starts with a clean financial record, which is important for future profitability. It allows the company to declare dividends in the future once profits are earned because past losses no longer appear in the books.

3. Reduction in Share Capital

The most direct effect is the decrease in paid-up share capital. Either the face value of shares is reduced or the number of shares is cancelled.

This reduces the company’s capital base. Although total capital decreases, the capital becomes more realistic and proportionate to the company’s assets and earning capacity.

4. Effect on Shareholders

Shareholders may experience a reduction in the nominal value of shares or the number of shares they hold. Sometimes they may also receive repayment of excess capital.

Although their investment value may reduce on paper, shareholders benefit in the long run because the company becomes financially stable and capable of earning profits and paying dividends.

5. Effect on Market Value of Shares

After capital reduction, the company’s financial statements appear healthier. Investors gain confidence as the company no longer shows heavy losses.

Consequently, the market value of shares often improves. A smaller but stronger capital base generally increases earnings per share (EPS), which positively influences share prices.

6. Impact on Creditors

Creditors’ interests are protected by law during capital reduction. The Tribunal ensures that their claims are either paid or secured before approval.

Once capital reduction is completed, creditors feel more secure because the company’s financial structure becomes stable and the risk of insolvency decreases.

7. Improvement in Profitability Ratios

Reduction of capital decreases the denominator in profitability calculations such as Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) and Earnings Per Share (EPS).

With the same level of profits and lower capital, these ratios improve significantly. Better ratios attract investors and enhance the company’s financial reputation.

8. Prevention of Overcapitalization

Overcapitalization occurs when a company has more capital than required for its operations. Capital reduction eliminates surplus capital.

This ensures efficient utilization of funds and increases operating efficiency. The company can now operate with an optimum level of capital suited to its business activities.

Non-compliance and Penalties

If a company reduces its capital without following the legal provisions, it will be considered void and illegal. Any directors or officers involved in such a reduction may face penalties, including fines or imprisonment, as per the Act.

error: Content is protected !!