Contract is defined in Section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, as “an agreement enforceable by law.” This definition underscores two fundamental aspects that constitute a contract under the Act: an agreement and its enforceability by law.
Contract is a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties that creates mutual obligations. It forms the foundation of most business transactions and personal agreements, ensuring that promises made between parties are binding and can be enforced by law. In simple terms, a contract is a promise or set of promises, for which the law provides a remedy if breached. The Indian Contract Act, 1872 governs the law of contracts in India and defines a contract as “an agreement enforceable by law.” This means that not every agreement is a contract; only those that meet certain legal requirements are considered valid and enforceable.
To understand the meaning of a contract, it is important to first understand the difference between an agreement and a contract. An agreement is any understanding or arrangement between two or more parties. However, not all agreements are legally enforceable. For example, a casual agreement between friends to meet for lunch is not a contract because it lacks the intention to create legal relations. A contract, on the other hand, is an agreement that is backed by legal obligation. This means that if one party fails to fulfill their part of the agreement, the other party has the right to seek legal remedies, such as compensation or performance.
An agreement itself is defined as “every promise and every set of promises, forming the consideration for each other.” Essentially, an agreement is formed when one party makes a proposal or offer to another party, and that other party signifies their assent to that proposal. Thus, at its core, an agreement is composed of at least two elements – an offer (or proposal) and an acceptance of that offer.
For an agreement to transform into a contract, it must be enforceable by law. This enforceability vests an agreement with legal obligations, implying that if one party fails to honor their part of the agreement, the other party has the right to seek redress or enforcement through the court system. Not all agreements are contracts because not all of them are recognized by law as having legal enforceability. For instance, social or domestic agreements (like a promise to give a gift) usually do not constitute enforceable contracts because the law does not generally intend to govern such private agreements.
Features of a Contract:
A contract is an agreement enforceable by law. According to Section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a contract is defined as “an agreement enforceable by law.” For an agreement to become a valid contract, certain essential features must be present. These features ensure that the contract is legally binding and can be enforced in a court of law.
A valid contract begins with a lawful offer by one party and lawful acceptance by the other. There must be a clear offer (or proposal) as per Section 2(a), which is communicated to the offeree, and an acceptance (Section 2(b)) that is absolute and unconditional. Without proper offer and acceptance, no binding agreement is formed.
- Intention to Create Legal Relations
There must be an intention on both sides to enter into a legally binding relationship. Social or domestic agreements, such as promises between family members, are usually not considered contracts because they lack this intention. Commercial agreements, however, are presumed to have legal intention unless otherwise specified.
Section 2(d) defines consideration as something in return, such as an act, abstinence, or promise. For a contract to be valid, there must be lawful consideration exchanged between the parties. The consideration must be real, legal, and not illusory, although it need not be adequate.
According to Section 11, parties must be competent to contract. This means they must be of the age of majority, of sound mind, and not disqualified by law. Contracts made with minors, persons of unsound mind, or disqualified individuals are void.
Section 14 emphasizes that consent must be free, meaning it is not affected by coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake. If the consent is obtained through these improper means, the contract is either void or voidable depending on the circumstances.
The object or purpose of the contract must be lawful (Section 23). Agreements made for illegal activities, immoral purposes, or those opposed to public policy are void. For example, contracts related to gambling or smuggling are unenforceable.
- Certainty and Possibility of Performance
The terms of the contract must be certain and not vague (Section 29). Ambiguous or uncertain agreements are void. Additionally, the contract must be capable of being performed. If the act is impossible at the time of making the agreement, it is void (Section 56).
- Not Expressly Declared Void
A valid contract should not fall under the categories of agreements expressly declared void by the Act. For example, agreements in restraint of trade (Section 27), restraint of marriage (Section 26), or wagering agreements (Section 30) are all void.
While most contracts can be oral or written, certain contracts must follow specific legal formalities, such as being in writing, registered, or witnessed, depending on their nature (e.g., contracts related to the sale of immovable property).
Classification of Contract
Contract under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 may be classified on the basis of validity, formation, and performance. This classification helps in understanding the legal status, enforceability, and nature of obligations created by an agreement.
1. Classification on the Basis of Validity
(a) Valid Contract
Valid contract is an agreement which satisfies all the essential elements of a contract as laid down under Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. These elements include free consent, lawful consideration, lawful object, competency of parties, and lawful agreement. A valid contract is legally enforceable in a court of law and creates binding obligations on the parties. For example, a lawful agreement to sell goods for a price between competent parties constitutes a valid contract.
(b) Void Contract
Void contract is a contract which was valid when it was made but becomes void due to certain reasons such as impossibility of performance, change in law, or death of a party. According to Section 2(j), a contract which ceases to be enforceable by law becomes void. For instance, a contract to perform an act that later becomes illegal due to a change in law is a void contract.
(c) Void Agreement
Void agreement is an agreement which is not enforceable by law from the very beginning. Such agreements lack one or more essential elements of a valid contract. Agreements with unlawful consideration, unlawful object, or agreements made with incompetent parties are void. For example, an agreement made with a minor is void ab initio and has no legal effect.
(d) Voidable Contract
A voidable contract is one which is enforceable at the option of one or more parties but not at the option of the other. As per Section 2(i), contracts formed by coercion, undue influence, fraud, or misrepresentation are voidable at the option of the aggrieved party. Until the aggrieved party avoids the contract, it remains valid and enforceable.
(e) Illegal Contract
An illegal contract is one which is expressly or impliedly prohibited by law. Such contracts are void and also make the collateral transactions illegal. Agreements involving crimes, fraud, or immoral acts fall under this category. For example, a contract for smuggling goods is illegal and unenforceable.
(f) Unenforceable Contract
Unenforceable contract is one which is valid in substance but cannot be enforced due to technical defects such as absence of writing, stamp, or registration. These contracts can become enforceable once the defect is removed. For example, an unstamped agreement which requires stamping is unenforceable until properly stamped.
2. Classification on the Basis of Formation
(a) Express Contract
An express contract is one in which the terms of the contract are expressly stated either in writing or orally. The intention of the parties is clearly communicated. For example, a written agreement to lease a house for a fixed rent is an express contract.
(b) Implied Contract
An implied contract is formed by the conduct or behavior of the parties rather than explicit words. The existence of the contract is inferred from circumstances. For instance, when a passenger boards a bus and pays the fare, an implied contract arises between the passenger and the transport authority.
(c) Quasi Contract
A quasi contract is not a contract in the real sense but is imposed by law to prevent unjust enrichment. It arises without the consent of parties and is based on the principle of equity. For example, when a person mistakenly pays money to another, the recipient is legally bound to return it.
3. Classification on the Basis of Performance
(a) Executed Contract
An executed contract is one in which both parties have completely performed their respective obligations. Once performance is complete, the contract is said to be executed. For example, cash sale of goods where goods are delivered and payment is made immediately.
(b) Executory Contract
An executory contract is one in which the obligations of one or both parties remain to be performed in the future. For example, a contract to deliver goods after one month is an executory contract until performance is completed.
(c) Unilateral Contract
Unilateral contract is one in which one party has performed his obligation, while the other party’s obligation remains outstanding. For instance, a reward contract where one party promises to pay a reward on the performance of a specific act.
(d) Bilateral Contract
Bilateral contract is one in which both parties have outstanding obligations to perform. Most commercial contracts fall under this category. For example, a contract of sale where the seller agrees to deliver goods and the buyer agrees to pay the price at a future date.
Importance of Contract
- Defines Legal Obligations
Contracts clearly define the legal obligations and duties of each party involved. By setting out the rights and responsibilities in written or verbal form, they reduce uncertainty and misunderstandings. Both parties know exactly what is expected of them, ensuring smoother performance and reducing the risk of disputes. This clarity also enables businesses and individuals to plan better and align their actions according to agreed terms, creating a sense of legal security.
- Ensures Enforceability by Law
One of the key roles of a contract is to make agreements legally enforceable. Without a valid contract, promises or understandings are mere social or moral obligations that may not be recognized in court. Contracts provide a formal structure where parties can seek legal remedies in case of a breach. This enforceability acts as a safeguard, ensuring that if one party fails to perform, the other can claim compensation or specific performance.
- Protects Parties’ Interests
Contracts are essential because they protect the interests of both parties involved. By clearly stating the terms, conditions, payment details, timelines, and penalties, a contract ensures neither party is exploited or misled. It helps balance power between parties, especially in commercial settings, where one side might otherwise dominate negotiations. The legal backing provided by contracts makes sure that agreed terms are honored, thus safeguarding investments, efforts, and trust.
- Facilitates Smooth Business Transactions
In the business world, contracts play a vital role in facilitating smooth and efficient transactions. Whether it’s hiring employees, purchasing goods, leasing property, or securing loans, contracts provide a formal structure for operations. By setting expectations and timelines, they reduce operational risks, promote accountability, and help avoid disputes. Businesses rely on contracts to build long-term relationships with clients, suppliers, and partners, enabling sustained growth and success in competitive markets.
- Provides Legal Remedies in Case of Breach
If a contract is breached, the aggrieved party has access to legal remedies such as damages, compensation, or specific performance. This is critical because it ensures that parties are held accountable for their promises. Without contracts, it would be difficult to claim legal recourse when someone fails to deliver on their commitments. Thus, contracts act as a protective tool, providing parties with the assurance that they will not suffer losses unfairly.
- Builds Trust and Professional Relationships
Contracts help build trust between individuals and businesses by formalizing commitments. When terms are documented and agreed upon, both parties feel secure that their interests are protected, promoting confidence and long-term partnerships. This is particularly important in professional dealings where reputation matters. A well-drafted contract signals seriousness, professionalism, and reliability, which strengthens relationships and paves the way for future collaborations or repeat business.
- Assists in Risk Management
Contracts are a critical tool in managing risks. They outline what happens if unexpected events occur, such as delays, non-performance, or unforeseen circumstances (like force majeure). By detailing liabilities, warranties, indemnities, and dispute resolution mechanisms, contracts help parties anticipate and prepare for potential risks. This proactive approach reduces exposure to financial and reputational damage, ensuring that parties can navigate challenges without unnecessary conflict or losses.
- Supports Economic and Legal Order
At a broader level, contracts contribute to the functioning of a stable economic and legal order. They ensure that private agreements are honored and disputes are resolved within a structured legal framework. This encourages businesses and individuals to engage in transactions confidently, knowing they operate in a predictable system. The enforcement of contracts promotes trade, investment, and economic development, playing a fundamental role in the smooth functioning of modern economies.
Essentials of Valid Contract:
The Indian Contract Act, 1872, outlines several essential elements that must be present for an agreement to be considered a valid contract enforceable by law. These essentials ensure that the contract is formed on a lawful basis and the interests of both parties are protected under legal provisions.
A contract initiates with a clear and definite offer by one party (offeror) and an unambiguous acceptance of that offer by the other party (offeree). The acceptance must match the terms of the offer exactly, leading to the mutual consent of both parties to enter into the contract.
Consideration refers to something of value that is exchanged between the parties involved in the contract. It can be an act, abstinence, or promise and must be lawful. A contract without consideration is void unless specified exceptions apply.
The parties entering into a contract must have the legal capacity to do so. According to the Act, the parties must be of legal age (majority), of sound mind, and not disqualified from contracting by any law to which they are subject.
For a contract to be valid, the consent of the parties involved must be free and not obtained through coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake. If consent is obtained through any of these means, the contract may become voidable at the option of the party whose consent was not free.
The object of the agreement and the agreement itself must be lawful. This means that it should not be forbidden by law, should not defeat the provisions of any law, should not be fraudulent, should not involve or imply injury to the person or property of another, and should not be considered immoral or opposed to public policy.
The terms of the agreement must be clear and certain, or capable of being made certain. Additionally, the agreement must not be for an act impossible in itself. Agreements to do an impossible act are void from the beginning.
Although a contract can be oral or written, certain types of contracts must comply with specific legal formalities such as being in writing, registered, or made under a seal to be enforceable. For example, contracts related to the sale of immovable property must adhere to the formalities required by law.
The parties must intend for their agreement to result in a legal relationship. Generally, social or domestic agreements are not considered contracts because there is usually no intention to create legal relations.
Offer (or Proposal):
An offer or proposal is the starting point of any contract. According to Section 2(a) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, an offer is when one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing something, with a view to obtaining the assent of the other person to such act or abstinence. In simpler terms, it is a clear expression by one party (the offeror) of their readiness to be bound by certain terms if the other party (the offeree) accepts those terms. Without an offer, there can be no agreement and hence no contract.
For a valid contract to be formed, the offer must meet several essential features:
An offer must be properly communicated to the offeree. This means the offeree must know about the offer before they can accept it. Without proper communication, the offeree cannot decide whether to accept or reject the proposal. For example, if A offers to sell his car to B, but B has no knowledge of the offer, B cannot accept it. Communication ensures that both parties are on the same page and helps avoid confusion or misunderstanding.
The offer must be definite, certain, and unambiguous. It should clearly specify what the offeror is proposing, including terms such as price, quantity, quality, or any other essential elements. Vague or uncertain offers, such as “I might sell you my car someday,” do not create a legal obligation because they leave too much room for interpretation. A clear offer helps the offeree understand what is expected and what they are agreeing to.
- Intention to Create Legal Relations
An offer must show the offeror’s clear intention to be legally bound by the agreement once accepted. This means casual statements, jokes, or vague invitations do not amount to offers because they lack the intention to create legal obligations. For example, saying “I’ll sell you my car if I feel like it” is not a valid offer because it does not express a clear, serious intention to contract. The seriousness of intention helps differentiate between social conversations and actual business offers.
Offers can be express or implied. An express offer is made in clear words, either spoken or written — for example, “I offer to sell you my bike for ₹10,000.” An implied offer, on the other hand, is inferred from the conduct or circumstances, without spoken or written words. For instance, when a passenger boards a bus, there is an implied offer by the transport service to carry the passenger for a fee. Both express and implied offers are equally valid under the law.
Types of Offer (or Proposal):
An express offer is when the proposal is clearly stated in words — either spoken or written. There’s no ambiguity because the offeror directly communicates their willingness to enter into a contract. For example, a job offer letter or a seller’s verbal price quote are express offers. This type of offer ensures that both parties clearly understand the terms, making it easier to assess acceptance and enforceability.
An implied offer arises from the conduct or circumstances, even though no words are spoken or written. The offeror’s actions or behavior indicate their willingness to enter into a contract. For example, when a passenger boards a bus, the bus company implies an offer to carry the passenger for a fare. Implied offers are important in daily life where formal communication may not always happen but intentions are clear.
A general offer is made to the public at large, meaning anyone who fulfills the conditions can accept it. For example, a company announces a reward for anyone who finds and returns a lost item. The offer does not target a specific person but applies generally. When someone performs the required act, they effectively accept the offer, creating a binding contract between the person and the offeror.
A specific offer is directed to a particular person or a group of persons. Only that individual or group can accept it. For example, if a seller offers to sell goods specifically to one buyer, no one else can accept that offer. A specific offer ensures clarity about who the offeror is willing to contract with, and acceptance must come from the intended offeree to create a valid agreement.
A cross offer occurs when two parties make identical offers to each other, in ignorance of the other’s offer. For example, if A offers to sell his car to B for ₹1 lakh and, at the same time, B offers to buy A’s car for ₹1 lakh without knowing A’s offer, these are cross offers. However, cross offers do not constitute acceptance; they are treated as independent offers until one is accepted.
A counter offer is made when the offeree, instead of accepting the original offer, responds with a modified or new offer. For example, if A offers to sell goods for ₹10,000 and B replies that he will buy them for ₹8,000, B’s response is a counter offer. This effectively rejects the original offer, and no contract exists unless the original offeror accepts the new terms proposed.
- Standing or Continuing Offer
A standing or continuing offer is one that remains open for acceptance over a period of time. It is commonly used in supply contracts where the offeror agrees to supply goods or services as and when ordered during the contract period. Each time the offeree places an order, it counts as acceptance. This type of offer promotes long-term commercial relationships and is useful in repetitive business transactions.
A conditional offer is one that is subject to specific terms or conditions that must be fulfilled for the contract to come into force. For example, an offer to sell land may be conditional upon getting government approval. If the condition is not met, the offer lapses. Conditional offers provide a safeguard to the offeror, ensuring they are only bound if particular circumstances or requirements are satisfied.
Acceptance:
Acceptance is defined in Section 2(b) of the Act as the act of assent to an offer. It signifies the offeree’s agreement to the terms of the offer and results in a contract provided other conditions of contract formation are met.
These are the following Conditions for Acceptance of Contract:
- Absolute and Unconditional: Acceptance must be absolute and unqualified, exactly matching the terms of the offer (the “mirror image rule”).
- Communicated: It must be communicated to the offeror in a prescribed manner, or if no manner is prescribed, in some usual and reasonable manner.
- Within Time: If the offer specifies a time for acceptance, it must be accepted within that time frame; otherwise, the acceptance must be within a reasonable time.
Types of Acceptance:
Express acceptance is when the offeree explicitly communicates agreement to the offer using spoken or written words. For example, if A offers to sell his bike to B and B says, “I accept your offer,” this is express acceptance. It leaves no doubt about the intention to accept the offer, making it easy to establish a binding contract. Express acceptance ensures clarity and is commonly used in formal business agreements.
Implied acceptance occurs through conduct or behavior rather than spoken or written words. For example, if a customer picks up goods at a self-service store and proceeds to the checkout, they are implying acceptance of the store’s offer to sell. The actions of the offeree indicate agreement even if nothing is said. Implied acceptance is significant in everyday transactions where formal communication isn’t always practical but intentions are clear.
Conditional acceptance happens when the offeree agrees to the offer but attaches certain conditions or modifies the original terms. For example, if A offers to sell his car for ₹2 lakh, and B says, “I accept if you include new tires,” this is conditional acceptance. It is essentially a counteroffer and does not create a binding contract unless the original offeror agrees to the new conditions. It modifies the original terms.
- Absolute and Unqualified Acceptance
This type of acceptance occurs when the offeree agrees to all the terms of the offer without adding, changing, or questioning any part. It is also known as a “mirror image” acceptance because it perfectly matches the offer. For example, if A offers to sell goods for ₹10,000 and B simply says, “I accept,” this is absolute acceptance. It creates a valid contract because both parties are in complete agreement.
- Acceptance by Performance
Sometimes acceptance is given not by words but by performing the terms of the offer. For example, if a company offers a reward to anyone who returns a lost item, and someone returns it, they have accepted the offer by performance. This type of acceptance is common in unilateral contracts where the offeror promises something in return for a specific act. The act itself signals acceptance, making it enforceable.
Generally, silence does not constitute acceptance under Indian law. However, in some special situations, if prior dealings or the nature of the transaction justifies it, silence can amount to acceptance. For example, if A regularly supplies goods to B and B usually accepts by just keeping the goods without objection, silence may be treated as acceptance. But this is rare and depends heavily on the surrounding circumstances and prior conduct.
- Acceptance by Post or Mail
Acceptance communicated through post or mail is governed by the postal rule, which states that acceptance is complete when the letter of acceptance is properly posted, not when it is received by the offeror. For example, if B mails a letter accepting A’s offer, the contract is formed when B posts the letter, even if A has not yet received it. This protects the offeree and ensures certainty in distant transactions.
- Acceptance by Electronic Means
In the modern digital age, acceptance can also occur via electronic methods like emails, online forms, or electronic signatures. For example, clicking “I Agree” on a website’s terms and conditions amounts to electronic acceptance. The Indian Information Technology Act, 2000, recognizes electronic contracts, and such acceptances are considered valid and binding. This type of acceptance is crucial in today’s e-commerce and digital transactions where physical presence or documents are not required.
Revocation
Both an offer and acceptance can be revoked, but revocation must occur before a contract is constituted:
According to Section 5 of the Act, an offer can be revoked at any time before the communication of acceptance is complete as against the offeror, but not afterwards.
Similar to the offer, acceptance can also be revoked, but the revocation must reach the offeror before or at the time when the acceptance becomes effective.
Consideration:
Consideration is a core concept in contract law, serving as one of the essential elements for forming a valid contract. Under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, consideration is detailed in Section 2(d), which defines it as follows:
“When, at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or to abstain from doing, something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise.”
Consideration involves something of value that is exchanged between the parties to a contract. It is what one party receives, or expects to receive, in return for fulfilling the contract. This “something” can be an act, abstinence from an act, or a promise to do or not do something.
The act or abstinence forming the consideration must be done at the request or with the consent of the promisor. If it is done at the instance of a third party or without the promisor’s request, it does not constitute valid consideration.
According to Indian law, consideration does not necessarily have to move from the promisee to the promisor. It can be provided by some other person, which differentiates Indian contract law from other jurisdictions where consideration must move from the promisee.
Consideration must have some value in the eyes of the law, though it need not be adequate. The sufficiency of the consideration is for the parties to decide at the time of agreement and not for the court to determine. However, consideration must be real and not vague or illusory.
The consideration or the object for which the consideration is given must be lawful. It should not be something that is illegal, immoral, or opposed to public policy.
Exceptions to the Rule of Consideration
The Indian Contract Act specifies certain situations where an agreement is enforceable even without consideration. These exceptions are covered under sections 25 and 185 of the Act:
Agreements made out of natural love and affection between parties standing in a near relation to each other, which are expressed in writing and registered under the law.
A promise to compensate, wholly or in part, a person who has already voluntarily done something for the promisor.
A promise in writing to pay a debt barred by the limitation law.
Contractual capacity:
Contractual capacity refers to the legal ability of a party to enter into a contract. Under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, not all individuals or entities have the capacity to contract. The Act specifies certain criteria that determine whether individuals possess the necessary legal capacity to be bound by contractual obligations. The sections of the Act dealing with the capacity to contract highlight that for a contract to be valid, the parties involved must be competent to enter into a contract.
Criteria for Competency:
According to Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a person is competent to contract if they meet the following criteria:
The person must have attained the age of majority, which is 18 years in India, according to the Majority Act, 1875. However, if a guardian is appointed for a minor, or if the minor is under the care of a court of wards, the age of majority is extended to 21 years.
The person must be of sound mind at the time of making the contract. A person is considered to be of sound mind if they are capable of understanding the contract and forming a rational judgment as to its effect upon their interests. A person who is usually of unsound mind but occasionally of sound mind can make a contract when they are of sound mind. Conversely, a person who is usually of sound mind but occasionally of unsound mind cannot make a contract when they are of unsound mind.
The person must not be disqualified from contracting by any law to which they are subject. Certain individuals and entities, such as insolvents, foreign sovereigns, and diplomats, may have restrictions or immunities that affect their capacity to enter into contracts.
Implications of Incapacity
Contracts entered into with minors (persons under the age of 18, or 21 in certain cases) are void ab initio, which means they are considered void from the outset. However, a minor can be a beneficiary of a contract, and certain provisions protect minors’ rights in contracts for necessities.
Similar to contracts with minors, contracts made by persons of unsound mind are void. However, if it can be shown that they were of sound mind at the time of contracting and understood the implications of their actions, the contract may be valid.
The law protects contracts for the supply of necessaries to individuals incapable of contracting. According to Section 68 of the Act, if a person incapable of entering into a contract, or anyone whom they are legally bound to support, is supplied with necessaries suited to their condition in life, the person who has furnished such supplies is entitled to be reimbursed from the property of the incapable person.
Free Consent:
Free consent is a fundamental concept in contract law, ensuring that parties enter into agreements voluntarily and with a clear understanding of their terms. Under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, free consent is crucial for the validity of a contract. Section 14 of the Act defines free consent as consent that is not caused by coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake. If the agreement is entered into under any of these conditions, it may not be considered a contract entered into with free consent.
Coercion involves committing, or threatening to commit, any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code, or the unlawful detaining, or threatening to detain, any property, to the prejudice of any person, with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement. It is equivalent to duress in common law. A contract entered into under coercion is voidable at the option of the party subjected to it.
Undue influence occurs when the relations between the two parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other. In cases of undue influence, the contract is voidable at the option of the influenced party. The law presumes undue influence in certain relationships, such as between parent and child, trustee and beneficiary, etc.
Fraud involves making a representation that is known to be false, or without belief in its truth, or recklessly, careless about whether it is true or false, with the intent to deceive another party. The deceived party, upon discovering the fraud, may choose to treat the contract as voidable.
Misrepresentation is a false statement of fact made innocently, which induces the other party to enter into the contract. Unlike fraud, misrepresentation does not involve intentional deceit. A contract made under misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the party misled by the misrepresentation.
Mistakes can be of two types: mistake of fact and mistake of law. A mistake of fact occurs when both parties to an agreement are under an illusion about a fact essential to the agreement. A contract is not voidable because it was caused by a mistake as to any law in force in India; but a mistake as to a law not in force in India has the same effect as a mistake of fact. A mutual mistake of fact renders the agreement void.
by