Features of Indian Economy

Indian economy refers to the financial system and production activities within the borders of India. It encompasses the goods and services produced, traded, and consumed within the country. India’s economy is diverse, with significant contributions from agriculture, manufacturing, and services sectors. It’s characterized by a large and growing population, substantial natural resources, and a rapidly expanding middle class. Over the years, India has undergone economic reforms aimed at liberalization, privatization, and globalization, which have led to increased foreign investment and economic growth. Challenges such as poverty, income inequality, infrastructure development, and bureaucratic hurdles persist, but India remains one of the fastest-growing major economies globally, with immense potential for further development and transformation.

Major Features of Indian Economy:

The Indian economy is one of the most dynamic and diverse economies globally, characterized by a blend of traditional practices and modern industries.

  • Mixed Economy

India follows a mixed economy model where both the public and private sectors coexist. The government plays a significant role in regulating industries, while private enterprises are encouraged to innovate and compete. This dual approach allows the economy to balance social welfare with economic efficiency. Public sector units manage essential services like railways and defense, whereas sectors like IT, retail, and telecommunications are driven by private enterprises. This combination promotes inclusive development while ensuring that key resources remain under government oversight for strategic and social purposes.

  • Agriculture-Dominated Economy

Agriculture remains a vital sector in India, employing over 40% of the population. Despite contributing a declining share to GDP (around 18%), it sustains rural livelihoods and provides raw materials for industries. India is one of the world’s top producers of rice, wheat, milk, and spices. However, the sector faces challenges like low productivity, fragmented landholdings, and dependency on monsoons. Government initiatives like PM-KISAN and e-NAM aim to enhance farmer income, ensure market connectivity, and promote sustainable agricultural practices.

  • Rapidly Growing Service Sector

The service sector is the largest contributor to India’s GDP, accounting for over 50% of economic output. This includes IT and software services, finance, education, tourism, and retail. The rise of global outsourcing has positioned India as a global hub for IT services and BPO operations. Metropolitan cities like Bengaluru, Hyderabad, and Pune lead this transformation. The sector attracts significant FDI and generates foreign exchange. The digital economy, fintech innovations, and e-commerce have further accelerated growth in services, contributing to employment and urban development.

  • Large Population Base

India has the second-largest population in the world, with over 1.4 billion people. This vast population is both a challenge and an asset. On one hand, it puts pressure on infrastructure, education, and healthcare. On the other, it offers a vast domestic market and a large labor force. A majority of the population is under the age of 35, offering a demographic dividend. Effective policy planning, skill development, and employment generation are crucial to harness this potential for sustained economic growth.

  • Low Per Capita Income

Despite being one of the largest economies by GDP, India’s per capita income remains low compared to developed nations. This disparity indicates widespread income inequality and a need for more inclusive economic policies. Regional imbalances and social disparities often reflect in income levels. While urban regions like Delhi and Mumbai enjoy higher incomes, rural areas continue to face poverty and underemployment. Government welfare schemes like MNREGA and Jan Dhan Yojana aim to address these issues and improve income distribution across regions.

  • Unequal Distribution of Wealth

India’s economy is characterized by significant income and wealth disparities. A small fraction of the population controls a large portion of national wealth, while millions remain below the poverty line. Urban-rural divide, caste barriers, and educational inequalities contribute to this imbalance. Wealth inequality is also seen across regions, with southern and western states often outperforming the northern and eastern ones. Inclusive policies, progressive taxation, and social welfare programs are essential to bridge this gap and ensure equitable economic development.

  • High Rate of Saving and Investment

India has traditionally maintained a high rate of savings, especially in households. These savings fuel investments in infrastructure, manufacturing, and services. Gross domestic savings contribute significantly to capital formation and economic growth. The rise of financial inclusion, digital banking, and mutual funds has further diversified investment options. Public and private investments in sectors like renewable energy, roads, and digital infrastructure are transforming the economic landscape. However, inefficient allocation and delays in project execution often limit the full benefits of such investments.

  • Underemployment and Unemployment

A persistent feature of the Indian economy is underemployment, especially in rural areas. Many people work in low-productivity jobs or are engaged in informal sectors without job security or social benefits. Urban unemployment among educated youth is also rising. Structural issues like skill mismatch, slow industrial growth, and automation exacerbate the problem. Government schemes like Skill India and Startup India aim to boost entrepreneurship and employability. Generating formal employment remains a top policy priority to improve living standards and reduce economic vulnerability.

  • Dominance of Informal Sector

A significant portion of India’s economy operates in the informal sector, which includes unregistered businesses and self-employed workers. This sector accounts for over 80% of employment but lacks regulation, job security, and social protections. While it provides livelihoods for millions, it also results in low productivity and limited tax revenues. The government is working to formalize the economy through digitalisation, MSME support schemes, and labor law reforms. Enhancing the productivity and stability of this sector is essential for inclusive growth.

  • Dependence on Imports and Trade Deficits

India relies heavily on imports for energy, electronics, and capital goods, leading to a consistent trade deficit. While exports in IT, pharmaceuticals, and textiles have grown, the value of imports often surpasses exports. This dependence makes the economy vulnerable to global price fluctuations, especially in crude oil. Government efforts to boost local manufacturing through schemes like “Make in India” and Production-Linked Incentives (PLI) aim to reduce import dependence and promote self-reliance. Expanding export markets is also a key strategic focus.

Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Sectors

The three-sector model in economics divides economies into three sectors of activity: extraction of raw materials (primary), manufacturing (secondary), and service industries which exist to facilitate the transport, distribution and sale of goods produced in the secondary sector (tertiary). The model was developed by Allan Fisher, Colin Clark, and Jean Fourastié in the first half of the 20th century, and is a representation of an industrial economy. It has been criticized as inappropriate as a representation of the economy in the 21st century.

According to the three-sector model, the main focus of an economy’s activity shifts from the primary, through the secondary and finally to the tertiary sector. Countries with a low per capita income are in an early stage of development; the main part of their national income is achieved through production in the primary sector. Countries in a more advanced state of development, with a medium national income, generate their income mostly in the secondary sector. In highly developed countries with a high income, the tertiary sector dominates the total output of the economy.

The rise of the post-industrial economy in which an increasing proportion of economic activity is not directly related to physical goods has led some economists to expand the model by adding a fourth quaternary or fifth quinary sectors, while others have ceased to use the model.

Primary Industry:

The primary sector is concerned with the extraction of natural resources or raw materials from the earth. The economic operations of a primary sector are usually dependent on the nature of that particular place. These industries create products that will be sold or supplied to the general public. A primary industry’s economic operations revolve around using the planet’s natural resources, such as vegetation, earth water, and minerals.

Mining, farming, and fishing are examples of primary industries. This extraction yields raw materials and staple foods, coal, wood, iron, and corn.

  • Genetic industry:

The genetic sector encompasses the development of raw materials that can be improved via human involvement in the manufacturing process. Agriculture, fisheries, forestry, & livestock management, are all genetic industries vulnerable to scientific & technological advancements in renewable resources.

  • Extractive industry:

The extractive industry produces finite raw materials that cannot be replenished through cultivation. Mineral ores are mined, the stone is quarried, and mineral fuels are extracted in the extractive industries.

The primary industry is often the most important sector in emerging countries. When we consider animal farming as an example, it is significantly more important in Africa than in any other country.

Secondary industry:

After primary industries have accumulated raw materials, secondary industries enter into the picture. The construction and manufacturing industries are primarily included in the secondary industry. The transition of raw materials into finished items is part of the secondary sector. For example, wood is used to make furniture, steel is used to make automobiles, and textiles are used to make clothing.

In order to manufacture products that will be marketed to the general public, secondary industries frequently use massive machinery in production plants. Even human power can be employed to package these items for distribution to retailers and other locations.

Most of these businesses generate a large amount of waste, which can result in significant environmental difficulties and pollution.

Secondary industry is divided into two categories:

  • Heavy industry:

Large-scale manufacturing often necessitates a significant capital investment in equipment and machinery. Heavy and massive items are among the features of the heavy industry. It caters to a vast and diverse market, which includes various manufacturing sectors.

This industry is primarily made up of construction, transportation, & manufacturing enterprises. Ships, petroleum processing, machinery production are among the most common operations in this heavy industry.

  • Light industry:

The light industry usually requires a relatively smaller quantity of raw materials, lesser power and smaller area. The items produced in light industries are minimal, and they are very easy to transport.

Home, personal products, food, beverages, electronics, and apparel are among the most common operations in this light industry.

Tertiary Industry:

Tertiary industries market secondary industries’ products to consumers. They are usually not involved in creating products but rather in the provision of services to the general public and other industries. The creation of different nature services, such as experiences, discussion, access, is the most significant feature of the tertiary sector.

The tertiary sector is divided into two categories.

  1. The first group consists of businesses that are into making money, such as those in the financial sector.
  2. The second group consists of the non-profit sector, which includes services such as public education.

The industries of the Tertiary sector include investment, finance, insurance, banking, wholesale, retail, transportation, real estate services; resale trade; professional, legal, hotels, personal services; tourism, restaurants, repair and maintenance services, police, security, defence services, administrative, consulting, entertainment, media, information technology, health, social welfare and so on.

Tertiary industry classifications

  • Telecommunications:

This is a field that deals with the transfer of signs, words, signals, messages, images, sounds, or information of any type across radio, the internet, and television networks.

  • Professional services:

The tertiary sector includes a variety of professions that need specialised knowledge and training in the arts & sciences. Engineers, architects, surgeons, attorneys, and auditors are among the licenced professionals in this sector.

  • Franchises:

It is a practice of selling the right to utilize a particular business model and brand for a set period.

Key differences between Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Sectors

Aspect Primary Secondary Tertiary
Nature Extraction Manufacturing Services
Raw Material Natural resources Intermediate goods N/A
Labor Manual Skilled Professional
Output Raw goods Finished goods Services
Value Addition Low Moderate High
Dependency Weather, Soil Supply chain Consumer demand
Technology Basic tools Machinery Information systems
Transport Simple Diverse Variable
Market Local Regional Global
Employment Agriculture Manufacturing Retail, Healthcare
Profit Margin Variable Stable High
Flexibility Limited Moderate High

 

Business Environment LU BBA 2nd Semester NEP Notes

Unit 1
Meaning, Definition and Significance of Business Environment VIEW
Environmental Matrix VIEW
Factor affecting Business Environment VIEW
Micro environment VIEW
Macro environment VIEW
Business Environment Scanning Techniques VIEW
SWOT VIEW
Environmental Threat and Opportunity Profile (ETOP) VIEW
Porter Five forces Model VIEW
Unit 2 Economic Systems
Capitalism Economy VIEW
Socialism Economy VIEW
Mixed Economy VIEW
Public Sector and Private Sector VIEW
Features of Indian Economy VIEW
Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Sectors VIEW
Relationship between Government and Business VIEW
Public, Private, Cooperative Sectors Meaning, Role and Importance VIEW
Unit 3
National Income and its Aggregates VIEW
Industrial Policy Overview and Role VIEW
New industrial Policy of India VIEW
Socio-economic implications of Liberalization VIEW
Socio-economic implications of Privatization VIEW
Socio-economic implications of Globalization VIEW
Trade Cycle VIEW VIEW
Inflation Analysis VIEW VIEW
Unit 4
Role of Government in Regulation and Development of Business VIEW
Monetary Policy VIEW VIEW
Fiscal Policy VIEW VIEW
Overview of International Business Environment VIEW VIEW
Trends in World Trade VIEW
EXIM Policy VIEW
WTO Objectives and Role in International Trade VIEW

Relationship between Government and Business Organization

Governments exert influence over business organizations by establishing regulations, laws, and rules that dictate their operations. These regulations are enforced through specialized agencies tasked with monitoring compliance in various aspects of business activity. For example, agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency, the Central Bank, the Food and Drug Administration, the Labour Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission oversee specific areas and ensure adherence to relevant laws.

In addition to direct regulation, governments also employ indirect methods to shape business behavior. Tax codes, for instance, are used to incentivize certain practices or discourage others. For instance, companies may receive tax benefits for implementing environmentally friendly waste management systems in their facilities. These indirect approaches, while not compulsory, serve as potent tools for influencing organizational policies and behaviors.

Responsibilities of Business towards Government:

  • Compliance with Laws and Regulations:

Businesses must adhere to all laws, regulations, and policies set forth by the government pertaining to their operations, such as taxation, labor laws, environmental regulations, and safety standards.

  • Payment of Taxes:

Businesses are responsible for accurately reporting their income and paying taxes to the government in a timely manner. This includes income tax, sales tax, property tax, and other applicable taxes.

  • Regulatory Compliance:

Businesses must ensure compliance with regulatory bodies and agencies relevant to their industry. This may involve obtaining licenses, permits, certifications, and adhering to industry-specific standards and guidelines.

  • Transparency and Accountability:

Businesses should maintain transparency in their dealings with the government, including providing accurate financial reports, disclosures, and information as required by regulatory authorities.

  • Cooperation with Government Initiatives:

Businesses may be called upon to collaborate with the government on various initiatives, such as economic development projects, infrastructure improvements, or public-private partnerships.

  • Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR):

Businesses should contribute positively to society and the community in which they operate. This includes initiatives related to philanthropy, environmental sustainability, ethical business practices, and social welfare programs.

  • Support for Public Policy:

Businesses may engage in advocacy efforts or provide input to government policymakers on issues relevant to their industry or the broader business environment.

Responsibilities of Government towards Business:

  • Policy Formation and Regulation:

One of the primary responsibilities of government towards business is the formulation of policies and regulations that govern economic activities. These policies cover areas such as taxation, trade, labor, environment, and industry standards. Governments establish regulations to ensure fair competition, protect consumer rights, maintain market stability, and promote sustainable business practices.

  • Legal Framework and Enforcement:

Governments create and enforce the legal framework within which businesses operate. This includes contract law, property rights, intellectual property protection, and corporate governance regulations. By providing a stable legal environment, governments help businesses mitigate risks and safeguard their investments.

  • Infrastructure Development:

Governments invest in infrastructure development, including transportation networks, communication systems, energy facilities, and public utilities. A well-developed infrastructure is essential for businesses to operate efficiently, access markets, and distribute goods and services effectively. Infrastructure investments also stimulate economic activity and attract private investment.

  • Access to Finance and Capital:

Governments facilitate access to finance and capital for businesses through various means, such as establishing banking regulations, providing loan guarantees, supporting venture capital initiatives, and promoting capital markets. Access to finance is critical for businesses to fund their operations, invest in expansion, and innovate.

  • Support for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs):

Governments often provide targeted support and incentives to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), recognizing their role as engines of economic growth and job creation. This support may include access to financing, technical assistance, business development services, and preferential treatment in government procurement.

  • Trade and Investment Promotion:

Governments engage in trade and investment promotion activities to facilitate international business transactions and attract foreign investment. This includes negotiating trade agreements, reducing trade barriers, providing export incentives, and promoting foreign direct investment through investment promotion agencies.

  • Research and Development (R&D) Support:

Governments invest in research and development initiatives to promote innovation and technological advancement. This may involve funding research institutions, providing tax incentives for R&D activities, and supporting collaborative R&D projects between businesses, universities, and government agencies.

  • Workforce Development and Education:

Governments invest in education and workforce development programs to ensure a skilled and adaptable labor force that meets the needs of businesses. This includes funding education and vocational training programs, promoting lifelong learning initiatives, and facilitating partnerships between businesses and educational institutions.

  • Consumer Protection and Product Safety:

Governments enact laws and regulations to protect consumers from unfair business practices, ensure product safety and quality standards, and provide mechanisms for redress in case of disputes. Consumer protection regulations build trust and confidence in the marketplace, benefiting businesses in the long run.

  • Environmental and Social Responsibility:

Governments promote environmental sustainability and corporate social responsibility (CSR) by setting environmental standards, implementing pollution control measures, and encouraging businesses to adopt sustainable practices. Government regulations and incentives play a crucial role in driving businesses towards responsible and sustainable behavior.

FERA v/s FEMA

FERA

The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act is an act of parliament that was introduced in 1973 with the aim of controlling and managing foreign payments, purchase of fixed assets to foreigners, and the export and import of currency from and in India.

FERA aimed to ensure that the economy was competitive by conserving India’s foreign reserves, which was inadequate despite the economy recording improvements.

The act is so elaborate and exhaustive such that it covers all citizens of India who are living inside or outside India.

FEMA

Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) is an expansion or improvement of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA). The primary purpose of FEMA is to regulate and facilitate foreign exchange while at the same time encouraging the development of forex market in the country.

The act covers all India’s resident including those living inside or outside the country. Moreover, any agency that is managed by a resident of India is also subjected to requirements of FEMA.

FERA

FEMA

Provisions FERA consisted of 81 sections, and was more complex FEMA is much simple, and consist of only 49 sections.
Features Presumption of negative intention ( Mens Rea ) and joining hands in offence (abatement) existed in FEMA These presumptions of Mens Rea and abatement have been excluded in FEMA
New Terms in FEMA Terms like Capital Account Transaction, current Account Transaction, person, service etc. were not defined in FERA. Terms like Capital Account Transaction, current account Transaction person, service etc., have been defined in detail in FEMA
Enactment Old New
Number of sections 81 49
Introduced when Foreign exchange reserves were low. Foreign exchange position was satisfactory.
Authorized Person Definition of ” Authorized Person” in FERA was a narrow one (2(b) The definition of Authorized person has been widened to include banks, money changes, off shore banking Units etc. (2 (c )
Meaning Of “Resident” As Compared with Income Tax Act There was a big difference in the definition of “Resident”, under FERA, and Income Tax Act The provision of FEMA, are in consistent with income Tax Act, in respect to the definition of term ” Resident “. Now the criteria of “In India for 182 days” to make a person resident has been brought under FEMA. Therefore, a person who qualifies to be a non-resident under the income Tax Act, 1961 will also be considered a non-resident for the purposes of application of FEMA, but a person who is considered to be non-resident under FEMA may not necessarily be a non-resident under the Income Tax Act, for instance a business man going abroad and staying therefore a period of 182 days or more in a financial year will become a non-resident under FEMA.
Punishment Any offence under FERA, was a criminal offence, punishable with imprisonment as per code of criminal procedure, 1973 Here, the offence is considered to be a civil offence only punishable with some amount of money as a penalty. Imprisonment is prescribed only when one fails to pay the penalty.
Quantum of Penalty The monetary penalty payable under FERA, was nearly the five times the amount involved. Under FEMA the quantum of penalty has been considerably decreased to three times the amount involved.
Appeal An appeal against the order of “Adjudicating office”, before ” Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board went before High Court The appellate authority under FEMA is the special Director ( Appeals ) Appeal against the order of Adjudicating Authorities and special Director (appeals) lies before “Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange.” An appeal from an order of Appellate Tribunal would lie to the High Court. (sec 17,18,35)
Right of Assistance during Legal Proceedings. FERA did not contain any express provision on the right of on impleaded person to take legal assistance FEMA expressly recognizes the right of appellant to take assistance of legal practitioner or chartered accountant (32)
Power of Search and Seize FERA conferred wide powers on a police officer not below the rank of a Deputy Superintendent of Police to make a search The scope and power of search and seizure has been curtailed to a great extent
Basis for determining residential status Citizenship More than 6 months stay in India
Violation Criminal offence Civil offence
Punishment for contravention Imprisonment Fine or imprisonment (if fine not paid in the stipulated time)

Exceptions to the Law of Demand

The Law of demand asserts that, all else being equal, as the price of a good or service rises, the quantity demanded typically decreases, and as the price falls, the quantity demanded increases. While this law is generally valid in most market situations, there are certain exceptions where the demand curve does not follow this standard behavior.

1. Giffen Goods

Giffen goods are a class of inferior goods that do not follow the law of demand. These goods typically see an increase in quantity demanded as their price rises and a decrease in quantity demanded when their price falls. This counter-intuitive phenomenon occurs because the income effect outweighs the substitution effect. Giffen goods are usually staple items that make up a large portion of the consumer’s budget, such as bread or rice in impoverished regions.

When the price of a Giffen good rises, consumers’ real income effectively decreases, causing them to buy more of the good despite its higher price, because they can no longer afford the more expensive alternatives. A classic example is the situation in some developing countries where, if the price of rice rises, poor consumers may cut back on other foods but buy more rice because it is still their most affordable option.

2. Veblen Goods

Veblen goods are a category of goods for which demand increases as the price rises, contradicting the law of demand. These are typically luxury goods or status-symbol items, such as designer clothing, high-end cars, or expensive watches. The higher price of these goods actually makes them more desirable because consumers perceive them as exclusive, prestigious, or a status symbol. The desire to signal wealth and status to others causes demand to rise when the price increases. Essentially, consumers view these goods as more valuable because they are expensive, which is why the law of demand does not hold in this case.

For example, as the price of a luxury brand like Rolex increases, some consumers might perceive the watch as more prestigious and, therefore, may desire it more, increasing the quantity demanded.

3. Speculative Bubbles

In certain markets, particularly in asset markets like real estate, stocks, or commodities, the law of demand may not apply due to speculative bubbles. A speculative bubble occurs when the price of an asset rises due to excessive demand driven by the belief that prices will continue to rise in the future. In such cases, an increase in price may actually lead to an increase in demand, as consumers or investors expect to profit from future price increases. People are willing to buy at higher prices with the expectation of selling at even higher prices later.

For example, during a housing bubble, rising home prices may cause more buyers to enter the market, as they believe the prices will continue to climb, and they want to secure a home before they become even more expensive.

4. Essential Goods (Necessities)

For essential goods or necessities, such as basic food items, healthcare, and utilities, the law of demand may not hold strongly, particularly for low-income consumers. When the price of these goods rises, consumers might not reduce their quantity demanded as expected because these goods are vital for survival. As these goods are non-substitutable and necessary for day-to-day living, consumers may continue to purchase them, even at higher prices, to meet their basic needs.

For example, if the price of basic medications increases, people with chronic conditions may still buy the medicine because it is necessary for their health, leading to inelastic demand, where the quantity demanded doesn’t change much with price fluctuations.

5. Price Expectations

In certain circumstances, future price expectations can cause an increase in demand when prices rise. If consumers expect that prices will increase further in the future, they may choose to purchase more of a good or service now, even if the price has already increased. This is particularly common with durable goods like cars or electronics. The expectation of future price hikes leads consumers to buy more at current prices to avoid higher costs later, thereby causing an increase in demand.

For instance, if a consumer expects gasoline prices to rise sharply in the near future, they might fill up their tanks even if the price has already increased, leading to higher demand at the higher price.

6. Dynamic Pricing and Popularity

In some markets, particularly those involving dynamic pricing, demand might increase when the price increases due to a boost in the perceived value of the product. This is often the case with concert tickets, airline tickets, or hotel bookings, where prices increase as the event or service gets closer. Higher prices in these cases may increase demand, as consumers perceive the product or event as being more exclusive or in limited supply.

For example, tickets for a popular concert may become more expensive as the date approaches, and this increase in price could actually spur demand as consumers want to secure tickets before they are sold out.

7. Psychological Pricing

Psychological pricing is another factor where demand may increase despite higher prices. This happens when products are priced in a way that creates a perception of greater value, such as pricing an item at $9.99 instead of $10. This small price difference can make the product seem like a better deal, encouraging consumers to buy more, even though the price has increased slightly. This behavior exploits consumer psychology and is often used in retail and marketing strategies.

Disinvestment policies of PSU in India

Disinvestment of Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) has been an essential part of India’s economic policy, particularly since the liberalization reforms of the early 1990s. Disinvestment involves the sale or liquidation of government-owned assets to raise funds, improve the efficiency of PSUs, reduce fiscal deficits, and promote private sector participation in the economy.

Historical Context and Evolution of Disinvestment Policies:

After independence, India adopted a mixed economic model, where the public sector played a significant role in industrial development, infrastructure, and social welfare. The government established PSUs to drive economic growth, create employment, and promote self-reliance. By the 1980s, however, the public sector began facing significant challenges, such as inefficiencies, overstaffing, and financial losses.

In response to these challenges, economic reforms in the 1990s marked a turning point for PSUs in India. The 1991 liberalization policies aimed to open up the economy, promote competition, and reduce the government’s role in commercial enterprises. As part of this process, the government introduced disinvestment as a way to reduce the fiscal burden of inefficient PSUs, mobilize resources, and promote a market-oriented economy.

Rationale Behind Disinvestment:

The disinvestment policies of PSUs in India were driven by several key objectives:

  • Fiscal Consolidation:

Government aimed to reduce its fiscal deficit by generating revenue through the sale of stakes in PSUs. By selling off shares, the government could raise funds without increasing taxes or cutting essential public expenditures.

  • Enhancing Efficiency and Competitiveness:

Private Sector is generally seen as more efficient and dynamic than the public sector. By transferring ownership or management control to private entities, the government hoped to improve the operational efficiency and competitiveness of PSUs.

  • Reducing Government Burden:

Several PSUs were financially non-viable and had become a financial burden on the government. Disinvestment allowed the government to reduce its liabilities and focus on more strategic sectors such as defense, health, and education.

  • Encouraging Private Sector Participation:

By reducing its role in non-strategic sectors, the government aimed to create more space for private sector investment. This move was expected to foster a more competitive environment and attract foreign direct investment (FDI).

  • Developing Capital Markets:

The sale of PSU shares helped deepen India’s capital markets by increasing the supply of quality stocks. Disinvestment in PSUs encouraged wider retail participation, improving transparency and corporate governance standards.

Types and Approaches to Disinvestment in India:

Disinvestment in India has taken several forms, depending on the objectives and market conditions.

  • Minority Stake Sale:

In this method, the government sells a small portion of its shares in a PSU without giving up management control. This approach allows the government to raise funds while retaining ownership. Examples include selling a minority stake in major PSUs like Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) and NTPC Limited.

  • Strategic Disinvestment:

In strategic disinvestment, the government sells a significant portion of its stake (usually more than 50%) and transfers management control to private investors. This approach is used for loss-making or non-core PSUs that require restructuring. Examples include the strategic sale of Air India to the Tata Group.

  • Initial Public Offering (IPO) and Follow-on Public Offering (FPO):

In this method, the government offers shares of a PSU to the public through an IPO or FPO, making it publicly listed on the stock exchange. Examples include the listing of PSUs like Coal India Limited and IRCTC.

  • Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs):

Government has also bundled shares of various PSUs into ETFs like the CPSE ETF (Central Public Sector Enterprises Exchange Traded Fund) and Bharat 22 ETF, allowing retail and institutional investors to invest in a diversified portfolio of PSU stocks.

  • Buybacks:

In a buyback, a PSU buys its own shares from the government, effectively reducing the government’s stake while providing funds directly to the exchequer. This approach has been used by companies like NTPC and Coal India to achieve disinvestment targets.

Challenges of Disinvestment in India:

While disinvestment has several benefits, it has also faced a range of challenges:

  • Political Opposition:

Disinvestment policies often face resistance from political groups, labor unions, and various stakeholders who view privatization as a threat to job security and social welfare. Opposition has sometimes delayed or hindered disinvestment processes.

  • Market Conditions:

The success of disinvestment often depends on favorable market conditions. Economic downturns, stock market volatility, and global uncertainties can reduce investor interest, affecting the government’s ability to achieve its disinvestment targets.

  • Valuation Issues:

Determining a fair valuation for PSUs has been a challenge, especially for strategic disinvestment. Undervaluation can result in losses for the government, while overvaluation may deter potential buyers.

  • Regulatory and Legal Hurdles:

Disinvestment processes are subject to complex regulatory and legal requirements, which can lead to delays and increase transaction costs. Ensuring compliance with securities laws, labor laws, and environmental regulations is often challenging.

  • Labor and Employment Concerns:

Disinvestment, particularly strategic sales, can lead to concerns over job security and employee benefits. Workers in PSUs are often apprehensive about the impact of privatization on their employment conditions, leading to strikes and protests.

Recent Trends in Disinvestment Policy:

In recent years, the Indian government has accelerated its disinvestment agenda with several notable developments and policy changes:

  • Aggressive Disinvestment Targets:

The government has set ambitious disinvestment targets in recent budgets, aiming to raise substantial funds through PSU stake sales. For example, the Union Budget for 2021-22 announced a target of ₹1.75 lakh crore through disinvestment.

  • Policy Shift to Strategic Sales:

The focus has shifted from minority stake sales to strategic disinvestment, particularly for non-strategic PSUs. Strategic sectors such as defense, atomic energy, and railways remain under government control, while non-core sectors are open to private participation.

  • Air India Sale:

The successful sale of Air India to the Tata Group in 2021 marked a significant milestone in India’s disinvestment journey. This sale indicated the government’s commitment to strategic disinvestment and provided a roadmap for other PSU divestments.

  • Introduction of New Public Sector Enterprise Policy:

In 2021, the government introduced a new policy to categorize PSUs into strategic and non-strategic sectors. PSUs in strategic sectors would have a limited presence, while all PSUs in non-strategic sectors would be considered for privatization.

  • Push for Privatization in Banking and Insurance:

Government announced plans to privatize two public sector banks and one general insurance company, indicating an expansion of disinvestment efforts beyond traditional industries.

Impact of Disinvestment on the Indian Economy:

  • Revenue Generation:

Disinvestment has provided significant revenue to the government, reducing the fiscal deficit and providing funds for social programs and infrastructure projects.

  • Improved Efficiency:

By involving the private sector, disinvestment has improved the operational efficiency, competitiveness, and profitability of several PSUs, contributing to economic growth.

  • Capital Market Development:

Disinvestment has expanded the Indian capital market by introducing PSU shares to retail and institutional investors, leading to greater transparency and better corporate governance.

  • Challenges in Employment:

While disinvestment enhances efficiency, it may lead to job losses and restructuring, impacting employees’ job security and welfare.

MPC (Monetary Policy Committee) Structure and Functions

The term ‘Monetary Policy’ is the Reserve Bank of India’s policy pertaining to the deployment of monetary resources under its control for the purpose of achieving GDP growth and lowering the inflation rate. The Reserve Bank of India Act 1934 empowers the RBI to make the monetary policy. We can say that the monetary policy stands for the control measures adopted by the Central Bank of a nation.

The Monetary Policy Committee is responsible for fixing the benchmark interest rate in India. The meetings of the Monetary Policy Committee are held at least 4 times a year (specifically, at least once every quarter) and it publishes its decisions after each such meeting.

Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) has been instituted by the Central Government of India under Section 45ZB of the RBI Act that was amended in 1934. MPC had its first meeting for two days on October 3 and October 4, 2016. The MPC is entrusted with the responsibility of deciding the different policy rates including MSF, Repo Rate, Reverse Repo Rate, and Liquidity Adjustment Facility. Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) has six members and the main objective of this body is to maintain the price stability and boosting up the growth rate of the country’s economy.

The committee comprises six members, three officials of the Reserve Bank of India and three external members nominated by the Government of India. They need to observe a “silent period” seven days before and after the rate decision for “utmost confidentiality”. The Governor of Reserve Bank of India is the chairperson ex officio of the committee. Decisions are taken by majority with the Governor having the casting vote in case of a tie. The current mandate of the committee is to maintain 4% annual inflation until 31 March 2021 with an upper tolerance of 6% and a lower tolerance of 2%.

The Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 was amended by Finance Act (India), 2016 to constitute MPC which will bring more transparency and accountability in fixing India’s Monetary Policy. The monetary policy are published after every meeting with each member explaining his opinions. The committee is answerable to the Government of India if the inflation exceeds the range prescribed for three consecutive quarters.

Functions:

The MPC is entrusted with the responsibility of deciding the different policy rates including MSF, Repo Rate, Reverse Repo Rate, and Liquidity Adjustment Facility.

Composition of MPC:

The committee will have six members. Of the six members, the government will nominate three. No government official will be nominated to the MPC.

The other three members would be from the RBI with the governor being the ex-officio chairperson. Deputy governor of RBI in charge of the monetary policy will be a member, as also an executive director of the central bank.

Objectives of the Monetary Policy:

The Chakravarty committee has emphasized that price stability, economic growth, equity, social justice, promoting and nurturing the new monetary and financial institutions have been important objectives of the monetary policy in India.

RBI tries always tries to reduce rate of inflation or keep it within a sustainable limit while on the other hand government of India focus to accelerate the GDP growth of the country.

Monetary Policy Objectives

As per the suggestions made by Chakravarty Committee, aspects such as price stability, economic growth, equity, social justice, and encouraging the growth of new financial enterprises are some crucial roles connected to the monetary policy of India.

  • While the Government of India tries to accelerate the GDP growth rate of India, the RBI keeps trying to bring down the rate of inflation within a sustainable limit.
  • In order to achieve its main objectives, the Monetary Policy Committee determines the ideal policy interest rate that will help achieve the inflation target in front of the country.

Fiscal Policy in India, Objectives, Components, Evolution, Challenges

Fiscal Policy in India refers to the government’s approach to taxation, spending, and borrowing to influence the nation’s economic conditions. Implemented through the Ministry of Finance, it plays a crucial role in achieving economic stability, controlling inflation, encouraging growth, and reducing income inequalities. Fiscal policy complements monetary policy, which is managed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), and together they aim to create a balanced and sustainable economy. Given the socio-economic complexities of India, fiscal policy serves as an essential tool to drive development while managing fiscal prudence and macroeconomic stability.

Objectives of India’s Fiscal Policy:

The objectives of fiscal policy in India are multifaceted, reflecting the diverse needs of the economy:

  • Promoting Economic Growth:

One of the primary objectives of fiscal policy is to stimulate economic growth by supporting infrastructure, industry, and social development projects. Through planned expenditure, the government can create employment, promote investments, and foster long-term economic growth.

  • Reducing Income Inequality:

Fiscal policy is used as a tool for wealth redistribution. Progressive taxation, subsidies, and welfare programs help reduce income inequality by supporting lower-income groups.

  • Maintaining Price Stability:

By adjusting its expenditure and tax policies, the government can influence demand and control inflation. In periods of high inflation, reducing spending can help cool down the economy, while increased spending can help during times of low inflation.

  • Managing Public Debt:

Fiscal policy ensures prudent borrowing to finance government expenditure without excessively burdening future generations with debt. By balancing its borrowing with revenue, the government maintains fiscal discipline.

  • Improving the Balance of Payments:

Through fiscal measures, the government can control imports and promote exports, helping to stabilize the country’s balance of payments. For instance, import duties can curb the import of luxury goods, reducing the trade deficit.

  • Promoting Employment:

Fiscal policy aims to create job opportunities by investing in sectors such as infrastructure, healthcare, and education. Government spending in these areas helps stimulate demand, creating employment opportunities in various sectors.

Components of India’s Fiscal Policy:

The fiscal policy of India can be broken down into three main components:

  1. Government Revenue (Taxation and Non-Tax Revenue):

    • Direct Taxes: Direct taxes, such as income tax and corporate tax, are the primary sources of government revenue. By adjusting tax rates and implementing tax reliefs, the government can influence consumer spending and investment levels.
    • Indirect Taxes: Indirect taxes, including the Goods and Services Tax (GST), are levied on goods and services consumed by individuals and businesses. The GST has unified India’s indirect tax structure, simplifying compliance and increasing revenue.
    • Non-Tax Revenue: Non-tax revenue sources, like dividends from public sector enterprises, fees, and fines, contribute to the government’s income without directly taxing the public.
  2. Government Expenditure:

    • Capital Expenditure: Capital expenditure is the spending on long-term assets such as infrastructure, education, and healthcare facilities. This type of spending generates employment and supports economic growth by building productive assets.
    • Revenue Expenditure: Revenue expenditure includes spending on operational needs, subsidies, salaries, pensions, and interest payments. Though it doesn’t contribute directly to asset creation, revenue expenditure is essential for the government’s daily operations.
  3. Borrowing and Debt Management:

When revenue from taxation and other sources is insufficient to meet expenditure needs, the government borrows funds. Borrowing is done through the issuance of government securities, bonds, and loans from domestic and international institutions. Effective debt management is crucial to avoid excessive public debt.

Tools of Fiscal Policy:

The Indian government utilizes several tools to implement fiscal policy:

  1. Taxation Policy:

The government can adjust tax rates to manage disposable income levels and influence demand. For instance, tax cuts increase consumer spending by putting more money in people’s hands, while tax increases reduce consumption to control inflation.

  1. Public Expenditure:

Expenditure on infrastructure, healthcare, education, and welfare programs is used to stimulate economic growth and provide essential services. For instance, increased spending in the rural sector can improve infrastructure and promote inclusive growth.

  1. Subsidies and Transfers:

The government provides subsidies on essentials like food, fuel, and fertilizers to help vulnerable sections of society. Transfer payments, like pensions and unemployment benefits, provide direct support to individuals without a return of goods or services, enhancing social security.

  1. Deficit Financing:

When revenue and borrowings are insufficient, the government may resort to printing money to finance its expenditure, though this is typically avoided due to the risk of inflation.

Evolution of India’s Fiscal Policy:

India’s fiscal policy has evolved significantly since independence, marked by several phases:

  1. Post-Independence Period (1947-1990):

Fiscal policy during the initial decades focused on self-sufficiency and industrialization. The government’s emphasis was on capital formation, with major investments in public sector enterprises to boost industrial development.

  1. Post-Liberalization Period (1991-2000s):

With economic liberalization in 1991, fiscal policy underwent a shift, focusing on opening the economy, reducing government deficits, and encouraging private sector participation. Fiscal consolidation became a priority, with the introduction of measures to control fiscal deficits and reduce public debt.

  1. Recent Reforms (2000s onwards):

In the 2000s, fiscal responsibility was formalized through the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act, which aimed to reduce fiscal deficits and ensure debt sustainability. The Goods and Services Tax (GST), implemented in 2017, further simplified the tax structure, boosting tax revenue and making the tax system more efficient.

Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act

FRBM Act, enacted in 2003, was a significant step towards fiscal discipline. It mandates limits on the government’s fiscal deficit and public debt to ensure sustainable fiscal management. The act aims to reduce the fiscal deficit to a target level, ensuring that the government operates within its means. However, during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic, fiscal deficit targets under the FRBM Act were temporarily relaxed to support the economy.

Challenges in India’s Fiscal Policy:

India faces several challenges in implementing its fiscal policy:

  • High Fiscal Deficit:

Despite efforts to control the fiscal deficit, it remains a concern due to substantial public spending and limited revenue. High deficits can lead to inflationary pressures and increase public debt.

  • Income Inequality:

Although fiscal policy aims to reduce income disparity, income inequality remains high. Effective redistributive policies and better targeting of subsidies are required to address this issue.

  • Tax Evasion:

Tax evasion and low tax compliance are significant issues, which hinder the government’s ability to generate adequate revenue for public welfare and development.

  • Subsidy Burden:

Subsidies, though necessary for social welfare, create a financial burden on the government. The subsidy framework needs periodic review to ensure efficiency and better targeting.

  • Dependence on Borrowing:

High levels of borrowing to finance government expenditure increase the public debt burden, affecting future fiscal sustainability and limiting resources for developmental expenditure.

Recent Trends and Fiscal Policy Responses:

In recent years, India’s fiscal policy has responded to changing economic conditions with a mix of reforms and stimulus measures:

  • COVID-19 Fiscal Response:

During the pandemic, the government launched the Atmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyan (Self-Reliant India Mission), focusing on providing fiscal stimulus, promoting local manufacturing, and supporting small businesses. Additionally, subsidies, cash transfers, and food assistance were provided to vulnerable populations.

  • Increased Capital Expenditure:

In recent budgets, there has been an increased emphasis on capital expenditure to support infrastructure development, which is expected to have a multiplier effect on the economy.

  • Digitization and Tax Reforms:

Efforts to digitize tax administration and implement GST have streamlined tax collection, enhancing revenue generation and reducing tax evasion.

Instruments of Fiscal Policy

Fiscal Policy refers to government actions concerning taxation and spending to influence a nation’s economy. It aims to stabilize economic fluctuations, foster growth, and manage inflation. Through fiscal policy, governments adjust tax rates and spending levels to achieve macroeconomic goals like controlling unemployment, stimulating demand, or curbing inflation. Expansionary fiscal policies involve cutting taxes or increasing government spending to boost economic activity during downturns, while contractionary policies involve raising taxes or reducing spending to cool down an overheated economy. Fiscal policy operates alongside monetary policy (controlled by central banks) as a crucial tool for managing economic conditions and promoting stability and growth.

  • Contra cyclical Budgetary Policy:

The policy of managed budgets implies changing expenditures with constant tax rates or changing tax rates with constant expenditures or a combination of the two. Budget management may be used to tackle depression and inflationary situations. Deliberate attempts are made under this policy to adjust revenues, expenditures and public debt to eliminate unemployment during depression and to achieve price stability in inflation.

Contra cyclical policy implies unbalanced budgets. An unbalanced budget during depression implies deficit spending. To make it more effective, the government may finance its deficits by borrowing from the banks. During periods of inflation, the policy is to have a budget surplus by curtailing government outlays.

The government may partly utilize the budget surplus to retire the outstanding government debt. The belief is that a surplus budget has deflationary effect on national income while a deficit budget tends to be expansionary. During depression when we need an increase in the flow of income, deficit budgets are desired. Conversely, in inflation when we need to check the overflow of income, surplus budgets are favoured.

However, following a contra cyclical budgetary policy is not an easy task. Predicting a recession or an inflationary boom is a difficult job. Adjusting the budget to the fast changing economic conditions is still more difficult especially when budget is a political decision to be taken after a good deal of delay and discussion. Therefore, emphasis has also to be laid on adjustment of individual items of the budget in order to make it more effective as a contra cyclical fiscal policy weapon.

  • Public Expenditure:

Public expenditure can be used to stimulate production, income and employment. Government expenditure forms a highly significant part of the total expenditure in the economy. A reduction or expansion in it causes significant variations in the total income. It can be instrumental in adjusting consumption and investment to achieve full employment.

During inflation, the best policy is to reduce government expenditure in order to control inflation by giving up such schemes as are justified only during deflation. While expenditures are reduced, attempts are made to increase public revenues to generate a budget surplus.

Though it is true that there is a limit beyond which it may not be possible to reduce government spending (say on account of political, and military considerations), yet the government can vary its expenditure to some extent to reduce inflationary pressures.

It is during depression that public spending assumes greater importance. A distinction is made between the concepts of public spending during depression, that is, the concepts of pump priming and the ‘compensatory spending’. Pump priming means that a certain volume of public spending will help to revive the economy which will gradually reach satisfactory levels of employment and output. What this volume of spending may be is not specific. The idea is that, when private spending becomes deficient, then a small dose of public spending may prove to be a good starter.

Compensatory spending, on the other hand, means that public spending is undertaken with the clear view to compensating for the decline in private investment. The idea is that when private investment declines, public expenditure should expand and as long as private investment is below normal, public compensatory spending should go on. These expenditures will have multiplier effects of raising the level of income, output and employment.

The compensatory public expenditure may take the forms of relief expenditure, subsidies, social insurance payments, public works etc.

Essential requisites of compensatory public spending are:

(1) It must have the maximum possible leverage effects;

(2) It must not be mutually offsetting;

(3) It must create economically and socially desirable assets. But pump priming expenditures are of limited relevance in advanced economies where the deficiency of investment is not merely cyclical but also secular.

  • Built-in-Stabilizers:

The fact that both taxes and transfer payments automatically vary with changes in income level is the basis of the belief in built-in-stabilizers. The term ‘stabilizers’ is used because they operate in a manner as counteracts fluctuations in economic activity. They are called ‘built-in’, because these come into play automatically as the income-level changes.

Taxes may act as a stabilizing influence upon the economic system if the tax structure is such that the amount of taxes collected by the government rises automatically with increases in national income, for in this case the effect will be to reduce the expansion of disposable income. From the stabilizing point of view, it means a slower rise in induced consumptions.

If the tax system is such that only the absolute amount of tax revenue but also the percentage of income paid in taxes increases with an increase in income, its stabilizing impact will be greater. That will happen if the rate structure of the tax system is progressive, that is, the effective rates rise as the level of income increases.

Similarly, the various forms of transfer payments also operate in a countercyclical fashion. Only such transfer payments have a stabilising effect as decrease in amount when income increases and increase when income declines.

For example, when employment is falling, payments to the unemployed automatically increase, thereby increasing the disposable income and vice-versa. It would be too much to presume that these stabilizers by themselves can smoothen fluctuations in income but most would agree that these are effective complements to discretionary actions aimed at stabilising the economy.

  • Taxation Policy:

The structure of tax rates has to be varied in the context of conditions prevailing in an economy. Taxes determine the size of disposable income in the hands of general public and therefore, the quantum of inflationary and deflationary gaps. During depression tax policy has to be such as to encourage private consumption and investment; while during inflation, tax policy must curtail consumption and investment.

During depression, a general reduction in corporate and income taxation has been favoured by economists like Prof. A H. Hansen, M. Kalecki, and R.A. Musgrave on the ground that this leaves higher disposable incomes with people inducing higher consumption while low corporate taxation encourages ‘venture capital’, thereby promoting more investment.

But there are others who express grave doubts about the supposed stimulating effect of taxation reliefs on investment. It has been argued that even a heavy reduction in taxes does not alter an entrepreneur’s decisions.

Mr. Kalecki expressed the view that the policy of reducing taxes for increasing consumption and stimulating private investment is not a practical solution of the unemployment problem because income-tax cannot be changed so often. The government will have to evolve a long-term fiscal policy.

  • Built-in-Flexibility:

One practical difficulty of public finance is of making the fiscal tools flexible enough for prompt and effective use. For example, the tempo of business activity may change suddenly manifesting itself in booms and slumps but fiscal tools cannot be geared all at once to meet such situations. To overcome such practical difficulties, built-in-flexibility has to be ensured in the fiscal tools.

A fiscal system has built-in-flexibility if a change in employment in the economy brings about a marked compensating change in the government’s revenues and expenditures. Unemployment insurance schemes have built-in-flexibility on both the spending and taxing sides.

As employment increases, the money spent on dolls is automatically reduced. Price support programmes, some kinds of excise duties, especially those levied on luxuries, also have built-in-flexibility to some extent.

However, built-in-flexibility may prove inadequate to cope with strong deflationary and inflationary pressures. Therefore, formula flexibility (or flexibility by way of executive discretion) is required.

A system of formula flexibility provides for specific changes in the tax structure and the volume of government spending as necessitated by certain clearly-recognised problems in business activity. It requires decision making on the part of the administration about the necessary changes which must be given effect to without delay.

Executive discretion implies the delegation to the chief executive the authority to order whatever changes he thinks fit in government spending and tax structure. These measures are required to supplement the built-in-flexibility of some schemes.

  • Public Works:

Public expenditures meant for stabilisation are classified into two types:

(i) Expenditures on public works such as roads, schools, parks, buildings, airports, post-offices, hospitals, canals and other projects.

(ii) Transfer payments, such as interest on public debt, pensions, subsidies, relief payment, unemployment insurance, social security benefits etc.

The expenditure on building up of capital assets is called capital expenditure and transfer payments are called current expenditure. It has been recommended that governments should keep ready with them a list of public works which may be taken up when the economy shows signs of recession.

Such a programme of public investment will tone up the general morale of businessmen for investing. The primary employment in public works programmes will induce secondary and tertiary employment. As soon as the economy is put on the expansion track, such programmes may be slackened and may be given up completely so that at any time public investment does not compete with private investment.

Public works programmes suffer from a few limitations and practical difficulties. It is unrealistic to expect that public works will fill all the investment gaps of the private sector of the economy. To be genuinely effective in promoting investment during depression, public works require proper timing, proper financing and general approval of business and investing opportunities.

  • Public Debt:

A sound programme of public borrowing and debt repayment is a potent weapon to fight inflation and deflation. Government borrowing can be in the form of borrowing from non-bank financial intermediaries, borrowing from commercial banking system, drawings from the central bank or printing of new money.

Borrowing from the public through the sale of bonds and securities which curtails consumption and private investment is anti-inflationary in effect. Borrowing from the banking system is effective during depression if banks have got excess cash reserves.

Thus, if unused cash lying with banks can be lent to the government, it will cause a net addition to the national income stream. Withdrawals of balances from treasury are inflationary in nature but these balances are likely to be so small as to be of little importance in the economic system. However, the printing of new money is highly inflationary.

During war, borrowing becomes necessary when inflationary pressures become strong. In a period of inflation, therefore, public debt has to be managed in such a way as reduces the money supply in the economy and curtails credit. The government will do well to retire debt through a budget surplus.

During depression, on the opposite, taxes are reduced and public expenditures are increased. Deficits are financed by borrowings from the public, commercial banks or the central bank of the country. The public borrowing of otherwise idle funds will have no adverse effect on consumption or on investment. When budgets are deficit, it is very difficult to retire debts.

Actually, it pays to accumulate debt during depression and redeem it during a period of expansion. Along with this, the monetary authority (the central bank) must aim at a low bank rate to keep the burden of debt low. Thus, ‘public debt becomes an important tool of anti-cyclical policy.

error: Content is protected !!