Ind AS 2 prescribes the accounting treatment for inventories, addressing the amount of cost to be recognised as an asset and carried forward until related revenues are recognised. It provides guidance on determining cost and its subsequent recognition as an expense, including any write-down to net realisable value, along with the cost formulas used to assign costs to inventories. Inventories are assets held for sale in the ordinary course of business, in the process of production for such sale, or in the form of materials/supplies to be consumed in production or rendering of services. The standard ensures inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value, preventing overstatement of assets and profits.
Objectives of Inventories (IND AS 2):
1. Prescribing Accounting Treatment for Inventories
The primary objective of Ind AS 2 is to prescribe the accounting treatment for inventories, providing clear guidance on how inventory costs should be recognised as assets and carried forward in the balance sheet until the related revenues are recognised in the statement of profit and loss. This ensures a consistent matching of costs with revenues across accounting periods, preventing arbitrary or inconsistent inventory valuation practices across entities. By standardising treatment, the objective supports faithful representation of an entity’s financial position and performance, ensuring inventory-related figures in financial statements are prepared on a uniform and comparable basis.
2. Determining the Cost of Inventories
A key objective of Ind AS 2 is to provide practical guidance on determining the cost of inventories, encompassing all costs of purchase, costs of conversion, and other costs incurred in bringing inventories to their present location and condition. This includes clear rules on which costs qualify for inclusion (such as import duties, direct labour, and production overheads) and which costs must be excluded (such as abnormal wastage, storage costs, and selling costs). By establishing precise cost determination principles, the standard eliminates ambiguity and subjectivity that could otherwise lead to inconsistent or manipulated inventory valuations across different entities and industries.
3. Prescribing Cost Formulas for Assigning Costs
Ind AS 2 aims to prescribe acceptable cost formulas—such as specific identification, First-In-First-Out (FIFO), and weighted average cost—for assigning costs to inventories where individual item costs cannot be practically tracked. This objective ensures that entities apply a systematic and rational method consistently for similar inventories, rather than arbitrarily choosing whichever formula minimises tax liability or maximises reported profit in a given period. Standardised cost formulas enhance comparability of financial statements both within an entity across periods and across different entities within the same industry, supporting more reliable analysis by investors, creditors, and other stakeholders.
4. Ensuring Measurement at Lower of Cost and Net Realisable Value
A central objective of Ind AS 2 is to ensure inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value, thereby preventing overstatement of assets and profits when the utility of inventory declines below its original cost. This objective embodies the prudence principle, requiring write-downs whenever inventories are damaged, become wholly or partially obsolete, or their selling prices decline. By mandating this conservative valuation approach, the standard protects users of financial statements from being misled by inflated asset values that do not reflect genuine future economic benefit expected from the inventory held.
5. Guiding Subsequent Recognition of Inventory Costs as Expense
Ind AS 2 seeks to establish clear principles for the subsequent recognition of inventory cost as an expense, including the amount of any write-down to net realisable value and any reversal of such write-down. When inventories are sold, their carrying amount is recognised as an expense (cost of goods sold) in the period the related revenue is recognised, ensuring proper matching. This objective ensures that expense recognition timing aligns with revenue recognition, preventing distortion of periodic profit figures and ensuring that the statement of profit and loss accurately reflects the true cost of generating reported sales revenue.
Scope of Inventories (IND AS 2):
1. General Applicability to All Inventories
Ind AS 2 applies to accounting for all inventories except those specifically excluded under the standard. It covers inventories held by manufacturing, trading, and service-rendering entities, including raw materials, work-in-progress, finished goods, and stores and spares held for consumption in production. The standard applies uniformly across industries, ensuring that whether an entity is engaged in manufacturing, retail, or wholesale trade, the same fundamental principles of cost determination, valuation, and expense recognition apply. This broad applicability ensures consistency in inventory accounting across diverse business models, subject only to the specific exclusions the standard itself identifies.
2. Exclusion – Work in Progress under Construction Contracts
Ind AS 2 does not apply to work in progress arising under construction contracts, including directly related service contracts, which are instead governed by Ind AS 115 (Revenue from Contracts with Customers). Construction contracts typically involve long-term projects where revenue and costs are recognised over time based on percentage of completion or other appropriate methods, rather than following the lower of cost and net realisable value approach used for typical inventories. This exclusion recognises that construction-type work-in-progress has distinct revenue recognition characteristics fundamentally different from inventories held for sale in the ordinary course of business operations.
3. Exclusion – Financial Instruments
Financial instruments, as defined under Ind AS 32 and accounted for under Ind AS 109, are excluded from the scope of Ind AS 2. Although some entities may hold financial instruments as part of their trading activities, these are governed by separate recognition and measurement principles specific to financial instruments, including fair value considerations, rather than the cost-based inventory valuation approach. This exclusion ensures that instruments such as shares, bonds, and derivatives held for trading purposes are accounted for under the more appropriate financial instruments framework, which better captures their unique risk and valuation characteristics compared to physical inventory items.
4. Exclusion – Biological Assets Related to Agricultural Activity
Ind AS 2 excludes biological assets related to agricultural activity and agricultural produce at the point of harvest, which fall instead under Ind AS 41 (Agriculture). Biological assets, such as livestock or standing crops, are generally measured at fair value less costs to sell rather than at historical cost, reflecting their unique biological transformation characteristics that distinguish them from conventional inventories. However, once agricultural produce is harvested, it is measured at fair value less costs to sell at the point of harvest, and this amount becomes the “cost” for subsequent application of Ind AS 2 principles thereafter.
5. Exclusion – Measurement of Inventories by Commodity Broker-Traders
Ind AS 2 does not apply to the measurement of inventories held by commodity broker-traders, who measure their inventories at fair value less costs to sell. Such inventories are principally acquired with the purpose of selling in the near future and generating a profit from fluctuations in price or broker-traders’ margins, rather than from manufacturing or normal trading operations. Since fair value less costs to sell more accurately reflects the economic substance of broker-trading activities than historical cost-based inventory valuation, this specific exclusion allows a more relevant measurement basis suited to the unique nature of commodity broker-trading operations.
6. Exclusion – Certain Producer Inventories Measured at Net Realisable Value
Ind AS 2 permits, but does not require, exclusion from its cost-based measurement principles for inventories held by producers of agricultural and forest products, agricultural produce after harvest, and minerals and mineral products, to the extent that these are measured at net realisable value in accordance with well-established practices in those industries. Where such inventories are measured at net realisable value, changes in that value are recognised in profit or loss for the period of change. This exception acknowledges established industry practices where market-based valuation more meaningfully reflects the economic reality of these specific inventory types.
Recognition of Inventories (IND AS 2):
1. Recognition as an Asset
Inventories are recognised as an asset in the balance sheet when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with them will flow to the entity, and their cost can be measured reliably. This applies to raw materials, work-in-progress, finished goods, and stores and spares held for use in production or rendering of services. Recognition as an asset continues as long as the inventory remains unsold or unconsumed, being carried forward in the balance sheet at the lower of cost and net realisable value until the point at which the related revenue from its sale is recognised in the statement of profit and loss.
2. Recognition as an Expense When Sold
When inventories are sold, their carrying amount is recognised as an expense (typically termed cost of goods sold) in the period in which the related revenue is recognised. This ensures the matching principle is upheld, whereby the cost of generating revenue is recognised in the same period as the revenue itself, rather than in the period the inventory was originally purchased or produced. This recognition occurs regardless of when cash is actually received from the customer, since revenue recognition under Ind AS 115 governs the timing, and inventory expense recognition follows accordingly in the same period.
3. Recognition of Write-Down to Net Realisable Value
The amount of any write-down of inventories to net realisable value, and all losses of inventories, are recognised as an expense in the period the write-down or loss occurs. This happens when inventories are damaged, become wholly or partially obsolete, or their selling prices have declined such that cost exceeds net realisable value. Recognition of the write-down as an expense (rather than adjusting the asset silently) ensures the loss in value is transparently reflected in the statement of profit and loss for the period in which the diminution in value actually occurred, upholding the prudence principle.
4. Recognition of Reversal of Write-Down
The amount of any reversal of a write-down of inventories, arising from an increase in net realisable value, is recognised by reducing the amount of inventories recognised as an expense in the period in which the reversal occurs. Such reversal is limited to the extent of the original write-down, so inventories are never restated above their original historical cost. This recognition ensures that if circumstances causing an earlier write-down (such as a decline in selling price) no longer exist or clear evidence of increased net realisable value emerges, the earlier conservative estimate is appropriately corrected in profit or loss.
5. Recognition of Costs Allocated to By-Products and Joint Products
When a production process results in more than one product being produced simultaneously, such as in joint production processes yielding both a main product and by-products, and the costs of conversion for each product are not separately identifiable, these costs are allocated between the products on a rational and consistent basis, such as relative sales value. By-products that are immaterial in value are often measured at net realisable value, and this amount is deducted from the cost of the main product, ensuring recognised inventory costs reflect a reasonable, consistently applied allocation methodology across joint outputs.
6. Recognition of Certain Costs as Expenses in the Period Incurred
Certain costs are excluded from the cost of inventories and recognised as expenses in the period incurred, rather than being included in inventory carrying amounts. These include abnormal amounts of wasted materials, labour, or other production costs; storage costs unless necessary in the production process before a further production stage; administrative overheads not contributing to bringing inventories to their present location and condition; and selling costs. This recognition treatment prevents inefficiencies or non-production-related expenditures from inflating inventory values, ensuring only costs genuinely necessary to bring inventories to saleable condition are capitalised as part of inventory cost.
Measurement of Inventories (IND AS 2):
1. General Measurement Rule – Lower of Cost and Net Realisable Value
Inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value. This fundamental rule ensures that inventories are not carried in the balance sheet at amounts exceeding what is expected to be realised from their sale or use, embodying the prudence concept in financial reporting. Cost represents the expenditure incurred in bringing inventories to their present location and condition, while net realisable value represents the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less estimated costs of completion and estimated costs necessary to make the sale, ensuring assets are not overstated on the balance sheet.
2. Cost of Purchase
The cost of purchase comprises the purchase price, import duties and other taxes (other than those subsequently recoverable from taxing authorities, such as GST input credit), and transport, handling, and other costs directly attributable to the acquisition of finished goods, materials, and services. Trade discounts, rebates, and other similar items are deducted in determining the cost of purchase. This ensures that only the net economic sacrifice made to acquire inventory is capitalised, preventing inflation of inventory value through inclusion of recoverable taxes or exclusion of legitimate discounts that effectively reduce the entity’s actual acquisition cost.
3. Cost of Conversion
The cost of conversion of inventories includes costs directly related to units of production, such as direct labour, and a systematic allocation of fixed and variable production overheads incurred in converting materials into finished goods. Fixed production overheads are allocated based on normal production capacity, while variable production overheads are allocated based on actual use of production facilities. Unallocated overheads arising from abnormally low production or idle plant are recognised as an expense in the period incurred, rather than being capitalised into inventory cost, preventing inefficiencies from being deferred and misrepresented as inventory value.
4. Allocation of Fixed Production Overheads Based on Normal Capacity
Fixed production overheads are those indirect costs of production that remain relatively constant regardless of production volume, such as depreciation and maintenance of factory buildings and equipment, and management and administrative costs of the factory. These are allocated to units of production based on the normal capacity of production facilities—the expected average production over several periods under normal circumstances. In periods of abnormally high production, the amount of fixed overhead allocated to each unit is decreased, so inventories are not measured above cost, while unabsorbed overheads from low production are expensed rather than capitalised.
5. Other Costs Included in Cost of Inventories
Other costs are included in the cost of inventories only to the extent they are incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition. Examples include non-production overheads or costs of designing products for specific customers, where such costs are necessary and directly attributable. Borrowing costs may also be included in specific circumstances permitted under Ind AS 23, such as when inventories require a substantial period to bring to a saleable condition (qualifying assets). Costs not meeting this direct attributability criterion are excluded and expensed as incurred instead of being capitalised.
6. Costs Excluded from the Cost of Inventories
Certain costs are specifically excluded from the cost of inventories and recognised as expenses in the period incurred. These include abnormal amounts of wasted materials, labour, or other production costs; storage costs, unless necessary in the production process before a further production stage; administrative overheads that do not contribute to bringing inventories to their present location and condition; and selling costs. This exclusion ensures inventory carrying amounts reflect only costs genuinely necessary and attributable to production, preventing inefficiencies, storage delays, or marketing-related expenditures from artificially inflating the reported value of inventory assets.
7. Cost of Inventories of a Service Provider
Where a service provider has inventories, these are measured at the costs of production, consisting primarily of the labour and other costs of personnel directly engaged in providing the service, including supervisory personnel, and attributable overheads. Labour and other costs relating to sales and general administrative personnel are not included but are recognised as expenses in the period incurred. Profit margins or non-attributable overheads that are often factored into service provider prices are excluded from the measurement of service-related inventory costs, ensuring only direct cost components are capitalised rather than embedded profit elements.
8. Cost Formulas – Specific Identification
The cost of inventories of items that are not ordinarily interchangeable, and goods or services produced and segregated for specific projects, must be assigned using specific identification of their individual costs. This method attributes specific costs to identified items of inventory, making it appropriate for items such as high-value machinery, custom-made goods, or unique projects where each unit is distinguishable from others. Specific identification is generally inappropriate for large numbers of ordinarily interchangeable items, since selecting particular items to remain in inventory could otherwise be used to manipulate reported profit through arbitrary selection of which costs to match against revenue.
9. Cost Formulas – FIFO and Weighted Average Cost
For inventory items that are ordinarily interchangeable, cost is assigned using either the First-In-First-Out (FIFO) or Weighted Average Cost formula. Under FIFO, items purchased or produced first are assumed to be sold first, leaving the most recently acquired items in closing inventory. Under Weighted Average Cost, the cost of each item is determined from the weighted average of the cost of similar items at the beginning of the period and the cost of similar items purchased or produced during the period. An entity must use the same cost formula for all inventories having similar nature and use.
10. Measurement Using Techniques – Standard Cost and Retail Method
Techniques such as standard cost or the retail method may be used for measuring cost if the results approximate actual cost. Standard costs consider normal levels of materials, labour, efficiency, and capacity utilisation and are regularly reviewed and revised in light of current conditions. The retail method is often used in the retail industry for measuring inventories of large numbers of rapidly changing items with similar margins, where cost is determined by reducing the sales value of inventory by an appropriate percentage gross margin, provided the resulting figure reasonably approximates actual cost.
Disclosures under Ind AS 2 (Inventories):
1. Accounting Policies Adopted for Measuring Inventories
Financial statements must disclose the accounting policies adopted in measuring inventories, including the cost formula used (such as FIFO or weighted average). This disclosure allows users to understand the basis on which inventory values have been determined and to assess the comparability of reported figures with other entities that may use different cost formulas. Since the choice of cost formula can materially affect reported inventory values and cost of goods sold—particularly during periods of price volatility—transparent disclosure of the methodology applied is essential for users to interpret financial statements accurately and make informed comparisons across reporting periods and entities.
2. Total Carrying Amount and Classification of Inventories
The total carrying amount of inventories must be disclosed, classified into categories appropriate to the entity, such as raw materials and consumables, work-in-progress, finished goods, and stores and spares. This classification provides users with insight into the composition of inventories and stages of production, helping assess operational efficiency, production cycle length, and liquidity of inventory holdings. Disaggregating inventory into meaningful categories, rather than presenting a single aggregate figure, enables more meaningful analysis of an entity’s inventory management practices and the relative proportion of resources tied up at different stages of the production or sale process.
3. Carrying Amount of Inventories Carried at Fair Value Less Costs to Sell
Where applicable, the carrying amount of inventories carried at fair value less costs to sell, such as those held by commodity broker-traders, must be separately disclosed. This distinguishes such inventories from those measured under the conventional lower of cost and net realisable value approach, alerting users to the different measurement basis applied and its implications for volatility in reported values. Since fair value-based inventories may fluctuate with market prices more directly than cost-based inventories, this disclosure helps users understand the potential sources of variability in the entity’s reported financial position and performance.
4. Amount of Inventories Recognised as an Expense
The amount of inventories recognised as an expense during the period—commonly reflected as cost of goods sold—must be disclosed, either on the face of the statement of profit and loss or in the notes. This figure enables users to assess gross margin trends and evaluate the relationship between inventory costs and sales revenue over time. Some entities disclose operating costs applicable to revenues using a classification based on the nature of expenses instead, in which case cost of goods sold need not be separately disclosed, provided consistent expense classification is maintained.
5. Amount of Write-Down of Inventories Recognised as Expense
The amount of any write-down of inventories recognised as an expense during the period must be disclosed, providing users with visibility into losses arising from inventory obsolescence, damage, or declining selling prices. This disclosure highlights the extent to which reported cost of goods sold includes non-routine write-down charges rather than purely ordinary cost of sales, allowing users to distinguish between recurring operational costs and one-off inventory impairments when analysing trends in profitability and assessing the quality and sustainability of reported earnings across different reporting periods.
6. Amount of Reversal of Write-Down Recognised as Reduction in Expense
The amount of any reversal of a write-down that is recognised as a reduction in the amount of inventories recognised as an expense during the period must be disclosed, along with the circumstances or events that led to such reversal. This ensures transparency regarding situations where earlier conservative estimates of net realisable value were subsequently revised upward due to improved market conditions or other factors. Disclosing the reversal separately prevents users from misinterpreting improved current-period profitability as arising from genuine operational improvement rather than the correction of a prior period’s inventory write-down.
7. Circumstances Leading to Reversal of Write-Down
Ind AS 2 requires disclosure of the circumstances or events that led to the reversal of a write-down of inventories, providing qualitative context alongside the quantitative reversal amount. This narrative disclosure helps users understand whether the reversal reflects a genuine, sustainable recovery in market conditions or selling prices, or merely a one-time, isolated event unlikely to recur. Such contextual explanation is essential for users attempting to distinguish between structural improvements in the entity’s business environment and temporary or non-recurring factors, thereby supporting more accurate assessment of future earnings potential and inventory valuation reliability.
8. Carrying Amount of Inventories Pledged as Security for Liabilities
The carrying amount of inventories pledged as security for liabilities must be disclosed, informing users of the extent to which inventory assets are encumbered and not freely available to satisfy other claims or obligations of the entity. This disclosure is particularly relevant to creditors and lenders assessing the entity’s overall asset base available as collateral and its true unencumbered liquidity position. Without this disclosure, users might overestimate the inventory resources genuinely available to meet general obligations, since pledged inventories carry restrictions that limit the entity’s ability to freely dispose of or utilise them in the ordinary course of business.
Problems of Inventories (IND AS 2):
A company has 1,000 units of inventory. The cost per unit is ₹500. At the end of the year, the estimated selling price is ₹480 per unit and the estimated selling expenses are ₹20 per unit. Calculate the value of inventory under Ind AS 2.
Solution:
| Particulars |
Amount |
| Cost per unit |
₹500 |
| Selling price per unit |
₹480 |
| Less: Selling expenses |
₹20 |
| Net Realisable Value per unit |
₹460 |
| Number of units |
1,000 |
| Total Cost |
₹5,00,000 |
| Total NRV |
₹4,60,000 |
Under Ind AS 2, inventory is valued at the lower of cost and NRV.
Therefore:
Inventory Value = ₹4,60,000
Inventory Write Down = ₹5,00,000 − ₹4,60,000 = ₹40,000
Journal Entry:
| Particulars |
Debit |
Credit |
| Inventory Write Down / Expense A/c Dr. |
₹40,000 |
|
| To Inventory A/c |
|
₹40,000 |
Thus, inventory will be shown in the Balance Sheet at ₹4,60,000.
by