Tag: organizational culture

Measuring Human Resource costs (HR costs, also called Human Resource costing), is a key component of HR accounting. In this article, we’ll explain what Human Resource costing is, why you should measure costs, how to do it and why just measuring Human Resource costs is not enough.

Reasons

• Predict future costs
• Monitor departmental costs
• Calculate a return of investment (ROI)
• Measure impact and overall success

Remuneration: Remuneration costs include basic pay, dearness allowance, city compensatory allowance, house rent allowance, conveyance allowance, etc. However, these are paid remuneration costs. Organizations are also required to cater for deferred benefits to employees. Certain statutory payments to employees are also accounted under this head, like, contribution to provident fund, pension fund, medical benefits, payment for holiday, sickness, bonus, etc. To retain and attract talent, organizations may also give various fringe benefits to their employees. Even the latest practice to provide stock options to employees involves certain opportunity cost to the organization. The best practice is to delineate such cost elements and arrange the same in the form of a spread sheet. Element-wise cost trends then can be studied over the years and also can be bench-marked with other comparable organizations to understand the nature of variance and to enforce control, wherever necessary.

Recruitment: Recruitment cost is also another major cost head for HR. Right from developing job specifications to describing job requirements, it includes costs of  recruitment, promotion (through advertising), head hunting, evaluation, interviewing, induction and orientation. A well defined job specification minimizes the search for the right fit and consequent costs. If recruitment plans are to meet short-tern-requirements, it may be better to outsource than go in for direct recruitment. There are many specialized manpower agencies, which make people with required skill sets available on contractual terms. Similarly, internal hiring also needs to be explored vis-a-vis external hiring. Internal hiring involves restructuring and relocation costs, a clear policy on ‘promotion from within’ (wherever recruitment is made for the higher posts), etc. A detailed study on cost of hiring is necessary to explore an alternative recruitment process.

Training Costs: Training costs include, cost for induction period, cost of remuneration for the trainee and trainer, cost of travel for the trainee and the trainer, if any, cost of training materials, imputed cost of machines and equipments, used during the training, cost for development of training modules, cost of training evaluation, cost of material wastage during training, if any, cost of production loss for the trainee and the trainer (if he is within the organization, for in-house training), etc. To accurately ascertain cost of training, it is necessary to develop a checklist or a worksheet, delineating all direct and indirect costs of training. There are various methods of training delivery, which we have discussed in previous posts: Different employee training & development methods. Relative benefits and costs of each such method also need to be weighed to understand the most cost-efficient system. Any training on skill renewal needs to be weighed in terms of expanded skill cycle of the trainees. If the trainees are in the higher age bracket or due to retire within a short span, then offering them voluntary retirement (VR) may be more cost effective than putting them on training for skill renewal and skill change.

Relocation Costs: Many organizations have their policies on periodic relocation of employees as part of their restructuring exercise. This is more appropriate for those who have their units in multiple locations. Such decisions from organizational point of view, involve cost related to disturbance allowance, cost of possible litigation, cost of housing, cost of travel, etc. Many departmental undertakings and public sector units thoughtlessly relocate their employees adding costs to the exchequer. Hence relocation decisions must be cost effective or else this will defeat the purpose, straining organizational viability.

Separation Costs: Relocation also induces separation. There may be other reasons for separation, which may be either for organizational initiative or for individual employees’ reasons. Since separation requires replacement, immediate cost effect is on loss of production. Other costs of separation are redundancy benefits (if separation is organization induced), ex-gratia payments (if any), etc. Since separation follows immediate liquidation of fringe benefits, savings of the organization on this course also need to be considered to compute the actual costs.

Personal Overhead Costs: Personnel overhead costs spread over personnel record keeping, costs for maintaining Human Resources Information Systems (HRIS), cost of personnel decisions and overall costs for maintaining personnel department (salary of the people working in this department). Outsourcing personnel services to a great extent can reduce such cost burden. However, its relative merits and demerits need to be studied.

Support Costs: Some of the employee support services are statutory, while others are offered voluntarily by the organizations. For computing support costs, therefore, it is necessary to distribute these under two different heads and then study their impact. Medical welfare, canteens, safety, security, insurance (medi-claim, etc.), death benefits, parking space costs, etc. are some of the statutory costs for employee support services. While house journal, club membership, music at workplace, long service awards, suggestion schemes, library services, holiday homes, etc., are examples of voluntary support services for employees. Since, employee support services have direct effect on employee motivation, cost curtailment decisions must have reference to this aspect.

Diversity hiring is hiring based on merit with special care taken to ensure procedures have reduced biases related to a candidate’s age, race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, and other personal characteristics that are unrelated to their job performance.

A diversity recruitment strategy defines goals, accountabilities, action items and success measures for attracting, engaging, assessing and hiring diverse talent to drive business success. It is often part of a larger diversity and inclusion strategy, developed to ensure a workforce reflects a company’s customer base and the communities where it operates, and to capitalize on the benefits that can come from a diverse range of backgrounds, experiences and perspectives.

Confusion over diversity hiring sometimes lies in the mistaken perception that the goal of diversity recruitment is to increase workplace diversity for the sake of diversity.

The goal of diversity hiring is to identify and reduce potential biases in sourcing, screening, and shortlisting candidates that may be ignoring, turning off, or accidentally discriminating against qualified, diverse candidates.

Businesses have started to recognize diversity in the workplace as a business strategy that maximizes productivity, creativity and loyalty of employees while meeting the needs of their clients or customers. If a company is only as good as their employees, then it stands to reason that a great deal of energy should be devoted to hiring the most talented individuals. By branching out to a diverse workforce, employers have access to a greater pool of candidates thereby improving the odds of hiring the best person. In a competitive marketplace, an organization that puts people first regardless of their race, religion, gender, age, sexual preference, or physical disability has an advantage over the other players.

There are more job openings than people looking for work, companies are facing the tightest labor market in almost 50 years, and workforce demographics are changing fast. Employers are stepping up their game to compete and win valued talent, but it’s a candidate’s market and their demands are high when it comes to workplace diversity.

Goals might look something like this:

• Drive and measure the impact diversity and inclusion has on business results.
• Increase diversity at every level of our organization to better reflect our customer base and the communities we serve.
• Recognize, maximize and reward behaviors that foster a diverse and inclusive culture.

Reconsider Job Requirements

Job specifications may include equal employment opportunity statements, but people who write them often don’t think about factors that influence the chances of certain candidates applying.

Bias at the Sourcing Stage

Bias can enter the search and sourcing process whether you’re male or female, white or black, Latino or Asian, European or American. Case in point: Campbell said an analysis of data from the estimated 80,000 recruiters worldwide who use his platform found that when recruiters search for candidates on LinkedIn, regardless of role, they’re more likely to look at male profiles.

In every profession and at every level of seniority, Campbell said, recruiters end up looking at twice as many male as female profiles.

Train to Spot Bias in Screening

Screening is arguably where most bias comes into play, Campbell said. Unconscious bias training can help. Research has shown that hiring managers, whether male or female, rate male candidates as more competent and hirable than identical female candidates for STEM positions.

Work to Ensure a More Balanced Slate

Whether the priority is more diversity based on race, gender, ethnicity or some other dimension, it pays to have a diverse interview slate. A company looking to hire more women may not want to bring in the top four candidates if they’re all men, but swap the top two out for women.

There are several steps that organizations can and should take to promote a diverse work environment:

Create a diversity policy and publicize it.

Your policy should set formal goals and strategies pertaining to creating an equal opportunity environment. Once your policy is in place it should be made public both internally and externally.

Write job descriptions as to not exclude anyone.

Your job description should clearly be written for all types of applicants and should in no way discriminate.

Publicize job openings in different venues to attract a diverse workforce.

Look beyond obvious recruitment methods and venues for good people. There are many sites online that help facilitate equal opportunity employment and include: Yahoo!, En Espanol, Diversity Inc, America’s Job Bank, The Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, the Society of Women Engineers, the National Society of Black Engineers, and the Black Executive Exchange program.

Be aware of current legislation.

Staying current on the latest discrimination legislation will help you avoid potential litigation.

Once the appropriate steps are taken, learning how to manage the diverse workforce will take some time. It requires education, sensitivity and awareness of how individuals from different cultures handle communication, business etiquette, and relate to management. Promoting workforce diversity requires HR recruitment of competent and qualified employees and the accommodation of individual needs within the context of the work team and the organization.

Get more diversity into your hiring funnel

When hiring managers are pressuring your recruiters to hire critical positions as quickly as possible, it can be easy to forget about adding diversity in your funnel. A data-driven recruiter continuously monitors the funnel to see whether diversity increases or decreases as candidates move through the pipeline.

Keep track of your post-hire data

How your diverse hires fare long-term at your organization reveals important insights about your hiring practices. How long these employees stay at the company, how they perform, and how soon they receive promotions can tell you about the quality of your diverse hires.

Induction is a reasoning method by which a law or a general principle would be inferred via observing specific cases. The inductive approach emphasizes on observation and deriving conclusions through observation. It generally moves from specific to general, since the researcher generalizes his limited observations of specific circumstances to general conditions. In accounting, the inductive approach begins by observing the financial information of the companies and progresses towards constructing accounting generalizations and principles out of those observations and reoccurring relations.

In deductive approach, in order to achieve a consensus, the structure of logical reasoning needs to be quite formal. However, in inductive approach, the accounting practice can turn into accounting principles. Accounting standard setters, extracted the conceptual framework via the best practices which in turn have been identified based on the assumed objectives of financial reporting. At the same time, attention was paid to the conceptual integrity, because the framework has been developed descriptively, although the objective was to make an imperative framework for providing guidelines to set and interpret accounting standards.

Deductive Approach

This approach involves developing a theory from elementary proposals, premises and assumptions which results in accounting principles that are reasonable conclusions about the subject. The theory is verified by determining whether its results are acceptable in practice. Edwards and Bell are deductive theorists and historical cost accounting was also derived from a deductive approach.

The deductive approach constitutes developing of an assumption based on the existing theories and forming a research plan to test the assumption (Wilson, 2010). The deductive approach can be explained using the assumption driven from theory. In other words, the deductive approach includes deducing the results from the premises. When a deductive method is applied for a research project, the author formulates a set of hypotheses that need to be tested and next, using a relevant methodology, tests the hypothesis. Deductive reasoning has specific characteristics that needs be understood. If the premises of deductive reasoning are accepted, then, the conclusion must necessarily be accepted. In a deductive reasoning, the contents of the result are implicitly stated in the premises, making such argument a non-ampliative one. If new premises are added to the argument, then the conclusion must still follow. A deductive argument is either valid or invalid and there is no degree of validity. There is no choice or decision in applying such argument and no judgment is necessary for getting the result and conclusion.

Inductive Approach

For this approach we start with observed phenomena and move towards generalized conclusions. The approach requires experimental testing, i.e. the theory must be supported by sufficient illustrations/observations that support the derived conclusions. Fairly often the logical and inductive approaches are mixed as researchers use their knowledge of accounting practices. As Riahi-Belkaoui states: General propositions are formulated through an inductive process, but the principles and techniques are derived by a deductive approach. He also observes that when an inductive theorist, collaborates with a deductive theorist, a hybrid results showing compromise between the two approaches.

Inductive approach begins with specific observations and the conclusions are generalized. In inductive approach, after selecting a number of observations correctly, one can generalize the conclusion to all or groups of similar conditions and situations. These generalizations need to be tested, some of which might be verified and some rejected. Accordingly, all of the principles which are derived based on inductive reasoning are theoretically falsifiable. In the induction process, the researcher as an observer, should honestly, without any prejudgments and biases, and with an impartial mind, register what they observe. Then these observations form a basis on which theories and laws are constructed which make up the scientific knowledge. Inductive researchers also believe that one can logically generalize the observations into general and inclusive rules and the scientific assumptions get verified and ratified.

According to the inductive approach, at the end of research and as a result of observations, theories are constructed. The inductive approach includes looking for a pattern based on the observations and developing a theory for those patterns through hypotheses. In inductive research, no theory is applied at the beginning of the research and the researcher enjoys complete freedom in terms of determining the course of research. Particularly, there is no assumption at the early stages of research and the researcher is not sure about the kind and the nature of findings as research is not finished yet. In inductive reasoning the researcher uses the observations in order to construct an abstract or to describe the circumstances being.

The main advantage of the inductive method is that there is no necessity for any pre-fabricated framework or model. Obviously, while principles are generalized they should be verified through a logical method (deductive approach). The inductive approach towards science has been criticized concerning some aspects. The main issue of the inductive method can be the researchers’ being influenced by their limited knowledge of the relations and the data of the research. Some claim that induction as a principle is falsifiable because it is based on human observations.

An effective internal control structure includes a company’s plan of organization and all the procedures and actions it takes to:

• Ensure compliance with company policies and federal law.
• Protect its assets against theft and waste.
• Ensure accurate and reliable operating data and accounting reports.
• Evaluate the performance of all personnel to promote efficient operations.

Companies protect their assets by:

Segregation of employee duties Segregation of duties requires that someone other than the employee responsible for safeguarding an asset must maintain the accounting records for that asset. Also, employees share responsibility for related transactions so that one employee’s work serves as a check on the work of other employees.

Assignment of specific duties to each employee When the responsibility for a particular work function is assigned to one employee, that employee is accountable for specific tasks. Should a problem occur, the company can quickly identify the responsible employee.

Rotation of employee job assignments Some companies rotate job assignments to discourage employees from engaging in long-term schemes to steal from them. Employees realize that if they steal from the company, the next employees assigned to their positions may discover the theft.

Use of mechanical devices Companies use several mechanical devices to help protect their assets. Check protectors (machines that perforate the check amount into the check), cash registers, and time clocks make it difficult for employees to alter certain company documents and records.

Record Keeping. Companies should maintain complete and accurate accounting records. One or more business documents support most accounting transactions. These source documents are an integral part of the internal control structure. For optimal control, source documents should be serially numbered.

Employees. Internal control policies are effective only when employees follow them. To ensure that they carry out its internal control policies, a company must hire competent and trustworthy employees. Thus, the execution of effective internal control begins with the time and effort a company expends in hiring employees. Once the company hires the employees, it must train those employees and clearly communicate to them company policies, such as obtaining proper authorization before making a cash disbursement. Frequently, written job descriptions establish the responsibilities and duties of employees. The initial training of employees should include a clear explanation of their duties and how to perform them.

Legal requirements. In publicly held corporations, the company’s internal control structure must satisfy the requirements of govt. law.

The components of internal control are:

Risk assessment. After the entity sets objectives, the risks (such as theft and waste of assets) from external and internal sources must be assessed. Examining the risks associated with each objective allows management to develop the means to control these risks.

Control environment. The control environment is the basis for all other elements of the internal control structure. The control environment includes many factors such as ethical values, management’s philosophy, the integrity of the employees of the corporation, and the guidance provided by management or the board of directors.

Control activities. To address the risks associated with each objective, management establishes control activities. These activities include procedures that employees must follow. Examples include procedures to protect the assets through segregation of employee duties and the other means we discussed earlier.

Monitoring. After the internal control structure is in place, the firm should monitor its effectiveness so that it can make changes before serious problems arise. In testing components of the internal control structure, companies base their thoroughness on the risk assigned to those components.

Information and communication. Information relevant to decision making must be collected and reported in a timely manner. The events that yield these data may come from internal or external sources. Communication throughout the entity is important to achieve management’s goals. Employees must understand what is expected of them and how their responsibilities relate to the work of others. Communication with external parties such as suppliers and shareholders are also important.

The internal control environment includes five factors.

Competence of the entity’s people: Competence is the knowledge and skills necessary for particular functions. So does an organization set up the tone of hiring only competent employees? First, management determines the knowledge and skills required for each position, then establishes the job descriptions for these positions. Furthermore, there is a well-designed hiring process and performance review process to ensure that new hires and employees are competent to perform their assigned tasks and assist the organization in achieving their objectives.

Integrity and ethical value: Many organizations seek a high level of integrity and ethical value. But how do organizations obtain them? Usually, those organizations have a clear Code of Conduct and/or Conflict of Interests policies. They periodically communicate these polices to employees to promote honesty and integrity. In addition, some organizations adopt business best practices and emphasize internal controls, which is also clear evidence that the organizations are striving to integrate the integrity and ethical value into the daily business operations.

Management’s Philosophy and Operating style: Management may not achieve its business objectives if it does not introduce and maintain a philosophy and operating style that supports the business objectives and strategies. Management’s philosophy and operating style include management’s attitudes towards the organization objectives, the approaches to minimize the business risks and attitude toward internal controls over financial reporting. For example, if management sets up an unrealistic financial goal and aggressively persuades employees to achieve the goal, what will happen? The chance of misstatement in financial statements becomes higher.

Direction provided by the board of directors: An effective Board of Directors and Audit Committee provide an important oversight function and, because of management’s ability to override controls, they play an important role in the control environment, helping to set a positive tone at the top. For private companies, often there is no Audit Committee. However, to have the Board of Directors is very important for private companies as well. It oversees the organization’s plans and performance, provides management directions with experiences, and oversees the organization’s internal control function.

Authority and Responsibility: The control environment is greatly influenced by the extent to which individuals recognize that they will be held accountable. Accountability plays a critical role in carrying out internal controls in an organization. Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) hold management in an organization accountable for financial reporting to ensure financial reporting is accurate and timely. In the organization, management holds employees accountable for all activities and business practices to ensure the organization is in compliance with SOX. To have an accurate, effective and timely financial reporting system, management must ensure that adequate reporting relationships and authorization hierarchies are in place.