Absorption of Factory Overheads

12th May 2021 1 By indiafreenotes
  1. Standard Rate:

This method is adopted by those industries which adopt standard Costing technique. The standard overheads and standard base is set on the basis of past experience and necessary adjustments are made based on the factors which affect it. The standard overhead is divided by a standard base, gives a standard rate of overhead absorption.

The following formula is used for the purpose:

Overhead Rate = Standard overhead for a Period / Standard base for the period

  1. Rate Per Unit of Output:

Under this method, the overheads are absorbed on the basis of number of units produced. The overhead absorption rate is obtained by dividing the overheads to be absorbed by the number of units produced.

It is expressed in the form of formula as follows:

Overhead Rate = Overhead to be absorbed / No. of units produced

Suitability:

This method is suitable where the finished goods are identical in nature.

Advantages:

It is the simplest method among all the methods.

Disadvantages:

  1. This method is not suitable where different varieties of finished products are manufactured.
  2. If historical overhead rate of recovery is adopted it involves considerable delay in computing the overhead rate as one has to wait for the completion of production for the given period.

Machine Hour Rate:

This method refers to the overheads incurred for running a machine for one hour. This rate is ascertained by dividing the amount of factory overhead apportioned to a machine by the number of machine hours for the concerned period.

Expressed in the form of a formula:

Machine hour rate = Factory Overhead/ No. of Machine Hours

Suitability:

This method is most suited where machines are used predominantly for production purpose.

Advantages:

  1. This is most scientific, accurate and logical method of overhead absorption.
  2. It helps in knowing the existence and extent of idle time of machines.
  3. This method takes into account time factor and hence gives accurate results.
  4. It helps in comparing the efficiency and cost of operating different machines.
  5. It helps management in choosing between manual labour and machines.

Disadvantages:

  1. This method is not suitable in manual labour-based factories.
  2. It involves maintenance of additional records for noting down the machines hours operated.

Labour Hour Rate:

Under this method, overheads are absorbed on the basis of direct labour hours worked. The overhead rate is obtained by dividing the overheads to be absorbed by the number of direct labour hours.

The following formula can be used for its calculation:

Overhead Rate = Production Overhead / Direct Labour Hours

Suitability:

This method is most suitable where manual labour is engaged in the factory.

Advantages:

  1. This method gives full consideration to time factor.
  2. This is not affected by the methods of wage payment (i.e., time rate or piece rate method)
  3. This method gives accurate results.

Disadvantages:

  1. This method requires additional clerical work and separate records are necessary for recording direct labour hours.
  2. This method is not desirable where machines are used to a great extent.

Prime Cost Percentage Rate:

This method is based on the assumption that both materials and labour give rise to factory overheads and thus total of the two i.e., material and labours should be taken as the base for absorption of factory overheads. In other words, this method is a combination of the material cost and labour cost methods.

Under this method overhead rate is calculated by dividing the production overheads by Prime Cost.

Overhead Rate = ( Factory Overheads/Prime Cost) * 100

Suitability:

This method is suitable where direct material cost and direct labour cost are equally important and overheads are related to both.

Advantages:

  1. It is simple to understand and easy to operate.
  2. Information regarding materials and wages are readily available and there is no need to keep separate account for them.
  3. This method gives satisfactory result because it takes into account direct material cost and direct labour cost.

Disadvantages:

  1. Under this method, equal importance is given to both material cost and labour cost, though most of the overheads are closely related to labour cost.
  2. Where material cost is predominant element of cost, the method ignores time factor.

Direct Labour Cost Percentage Rate:

This is the oldest method of overhead absorption and still it is more popularly used. Under this method, the overhead to be absorbed is divided by direct labour cost and the quotient is expressed in the form of percentage.

It is calculated with the help of following formula:

Overhead Rate = (Production Overhead/Direct Labour Cost) * 100

Suitability:

  1. Where labour cost forms a high proportion to total cost of production.
  2. Where skill of labour does not differ widely.
  3. Where the wage rate does not fluctuate widely.

Advantages:

  1. The method is simple to understand and easy to operate.
  2. It gives stable results as labour rates are more constant than material prices.
  3. Under this method special consideration is given to time factor, as higher the charge to a job for wages, the longer will have been the time spent on that job.
  4. This method can be adopted with advantage where rates of workers are same, where workers are more or less of equal skill and where uniform types of works are performed.

Disadvantages:

  1. This method is not suitable, where machines are used at a great extent.
  2. As it ignores time factor, this method is not suitable in those industries where piece rate system of wage payment is adopted.
  3. Where the work is done by both skilled and unskilled workers, the method is not suitable. If works are done by unskilled workers overheads incurred will be more.
  4. No distinction is made between work done by skilled and unskilled workers.
  5. It also does not distinguish between production of hand workers and that of machine workers. Machines give rise to certain overheads like depreciation, power etc. which should be charged only to the work done on machines.

Percentage on Direct Material Cost:

Under this method, the amount of overheads to be absorbed by cost unit is determined by the cost of direct materials consumed in producing it. This rate is ascertained by dividing the total overheads by the total cost of direct materials consumed in the department and multiplied by 100.

Overhead Rate = (Production/Factory Overheads/ Direct material Consumed) * 100

Suitability:

  1. Where only one variety of the product is manufactured.
  2. Where the materials used are common for different jobs or process or products.
  3. Where the prices of the raw materials remain stable.
  4. Where material costs constitute highest proportion to total cost.

Advantages:

  1. This method is simple and easy to operate because cost of direct materials is readily available and no additional records are required to be maintained for this purpose.
  2. This method gives fairly accurate rates where material prices do not fluctuate widely and where output is uniform.

Disadvantages:

  1. Most of the factory overheads are not directly related to direct materials cost. So the method is not logically correct and hence gives misleading results.
  2. This method fails to take into account the jobs performed by skilled and unskilled workers. A job which is performed by unskilled workers requires more amount of overheads. This method also fails to distinguish the jobs done by manual labour and machines.
  3. This method does not take time factor into account. Most of the overheads are related to time element. A job which requires a longer period to complete may need more of overheads than a job which is completed in a shorter period of time.
  4. This method is quite illogical and inaccurate because overheads are in no way related to the cost of materials consumed. The amount of overheads does not change because the work is being done on copper instead of iron. Both metals are quite different in prices and by applying the same percentage for both will be obviously incorrect.