Areas covered by HR Audit: Pre-employment Requirements, Hiring Process, New-hire Orientation Process, Workplace policies and Practices

(1) Planning:

Planning is one of the major areas where human resource audit can be conducted. Planning of HR requirement and effectiveness of forecasting and scheduling can be ascertained through HR audit. It is to be seen whether the needs of HR were identified in time or not. If there is an indication through audit about inaccurate forecast, the efforts can be made to improve the forecasting techniques for accurate results in future. Through audit management knows whether there is surplus or shortage of manpower.

A review of recruitment and selection practices can be made to meet the future HR requirements. Better programmes and procedure can be adopted by way of cost benefit, budgets. The training programmes can be reviewed in terms of results obtained. Motivation of employees at all levels is the key aspect in HRM. Evaluation of employee motivation will show whether they feel at ease at work and have better prospect if they work hard.

HR auditors should evaluate the communication in the organisation which is one of the major criteria of failure or success. HR auditors should find out the causes of absenteeism, rate of accidents, labour turnover and can make suggestion to improve them. In respect of all these appropriate policies can be formulated by the management.

(2) Staffing and Development:

Staffing and development is yet another are a need to be evaluated with reference to results obtained, programmes and procedures adopted and policies framed. Staffing is done through recruitment and selection. Here the HR auditors need to evaluate the sources of recruitment and the number of persons hired by the organisation. The success of these programmes depends upon the contributions made by the hired persons in the achievement of organisational objectives.

Auditors have to see whether committed workforce is procured through recruitment and selection programmes. They can then make appraisal of recruitment and selection policies, practices and results. As for results are concerned they depend upon the effectiveness of H.R. policies and practices adopted by the enterprise. For conducting the audit of results the HR auditors need to adopt the methods such as questionnaires, checklists, personal data, and attitude and morale surveys productivity data, and costs, time.

The auditors should thoroughly check the records and statistics and should stress on their accurate maintenance. The information in respect of disciplinary actions, absentees, transfers and promotions are available in records. HR auditors have to examine the procedure and programmes adopted in respect of career and succession planning. The policy for staffing should be formulated in to achieve organisational goals. In this case cream should get due consideration that too without any discrimination.

As for training and development, proper policies need to be formulated by making the SWOT analysis of the existing staff and training and development programmes should be prepared to meet the organisational needs. The cost of training is increasing day by day.

Hence there must be evaluation of specified training and development programme. Auditors should see whether the best practice is adopted or not. They should evaluate the training results in terms of cost per trainee hour, average training hours per employee and revenues per employee per year etc. They can obtain the feedback from reports and records available in the organisation.

Another main element of conducting an HR audit needs to include the effectiveness of the HR department’s people management activities. Areas for auditing under people management include staff performance and employee morale, department organization, responsiveness to employees, day-to-day HR operations, the department’s HR strategies and more.

(3) Organizing:

Organisational structures are meant for facilitating coordination, communication and collaboration. HR auditors have to evaluate effectiveness of organisation structure in attaining the results. They can obtain feedback from the employees and from reports and records. They can check the jobs assigned to the individual employees, authority delegated to the subordinates, special task forces etc. H.R. auditors can also evaluate the policy formulated for encouraging employees to accept change. They can also verify effectiveness of three way communication.

(4) Commitment:

Enterprise wants committed employees. Efforts are taken by the management in this respect for motivating individual and groups of employees. HR auditors have to examine the results of motivation through increase in productivity, improvement in performance and costs. They also have to examine the programmes and procedures followed for job enrichment, wage and salary administration, fringe benefits, morale of employees. They have to verify the satisfaction level of employees through the HR policies adopted by the organisation. A satisfied employee is committed to the work.

(5) Administration:

HR auditors have to examine the style of leadership adopted by the management in dealing with the subordinates. Leadership may be authoritative or participative should be evaluated. One of the benchmark in this respect is delegation of authority.

Delegation is more in participative style. Auditors can assess the results of style of leadership adopted in getting the things done through others by inviting suggestion, going through grievances of the staff, disciplinary actions taken against the subordinates etc. Leadership results can also be visualized if auditors examine the union management relationship and the employees getting promotions.

The auditors also have to examine the position of collective bargaining and its procedure to assess the effectiveness of administration in the organisation. They have to look at the policy of the management in respect of collective bargaining and employee participation in decision making.

(6) Research and Innovation:

Research and innovation is yet another area of HR audit. Here several experiments are conducted and theories are put to test by the experts relating to quality design, marketing etc. Results obtained through this Endeavour can be evaluated on the basis of changes brought about, experiments made and reports and other similar publications.

Auditors can evaluate the results. They can also examine the programmes and procedures adopted for R and D efforts. The management’s policy in respect of R & D efforts can be examined by the auditors and necessary suggestions can be made by them in this regard.

Human Resource Audit and Business Linkages

Comprehensive:

An audit team must consider the business plan and its corporate strategies from the very beginning. The HRD auditor needs to take into account where the company intends to be after a definite period of time. The top level management needs to discuss these issues with the auditor. The auditor needs to examine the objective evidences such as long-term documents as well.

Thereafter, the auditor needs to assess the skill base required to perform the new roles and the current skill base of HRD staff in the company in relation to various roles and role requirements.

Following this, an auditor should verify the effectiveness of the existing HRD mechanisms in developing people and ensure that human competencies are available in adequate levels in the company. An HRD audit examines linkages with other systems. The HRD structure existing in the company should be adequate enough to manage the company’s HRD functions. Top management and senior managerial styles of managing people need to promote a learning culture.

The managerial styles should facilitate the creation of a learning environment. Auditors need to examine this difficult task.

Linkages with Other Systems:

There is a linkage between HR and other functions such as production management, maintenance management, total quality management, personnel policies, strategic planning, etc., in any organization. An audit examines these linkages between HRD and other systems. On the basis of evaluation, HRD auditors suggest future HRD strategies required by the company.

The suggestions further include:

(a) The structure the company needs to have for developing new competencies,

(b) The systems that need to be strengthened

(c) The ideal managerial styles and work culture conducive and compatible with HRD processes in the company. The managerial styles of the top management should also be emphasized.

Business-Driven:

HRD audit is business-driven and primarily focuses on fulfilling the objectives. Along with meeting objectives, HRD audit evaluates HRD strategy, structure, system, staff, skills and styles, and their appropriateness.

HRD audit is not a problem-solving exercise. HRD audit does not always provide solutions to organization-specific problems involving industrial relations, discipline, performance, etc. However, it throws some insights into the sources of the problem. It never gives feedback about any specific individu­als.

However, it gives feedback about the HRD department, the structure of the HRD departments, competency levels of the personnel manning, leadership styles, processes practiced, interrelationships of HRD system with systems, influence of the HRD on the other systems, etc.

HRD audit is one of the five systems used to measure the effectiveness of HR practices, the other systems being:

(a) Benchmarking

(b) HR accounting

(c) HR information system

(d) HR researches.

Business linkages of HRD are very crucial component of HRD effectiveness. HRD systems, competencies and the culture must be aligned with the business goals of the corporation. The alignment could be ensured through the direct linkages with customer satisfaction and employee motivation indices.

The HRD system should focus on the above dimensions. Questions like are the HRD systems aligned towards the important business goals of the corporation, and does the HRD staff reflect adequate understanding the commitment to the business goals of the organisation and are the HRD processes and culture suitable for achievement of goals need to be answered.

Human Resource Auditing as a tool of Human Resource Valuation

Human Resource Accounting (HRA) is the process of identifying, measuring, and communicating data about human resources. Flamhoitz (1974) defined HRA as ‘Accounting for people as an organizational resource. It involves measuring the costs incurred by business firms and other organizations to recruit, select, hire, train and develop human assets. It also involves measuring the economic value of people to the organization’.

HR valuation tells the potential investors about the human assets of a company. The investors can assess the returns from human assets which infect is the return they get from the people who are managing their investments. It also assures the customers the company that it has the requisite human capital reserves to service their demand. The employees of the company also feel assured when they come to know that they are counted as assets by the company and not expenses. HR valuation also serves as a tool for improved performance appraisal and man power assessment. It also helps the management in realizing the present value of its future commitment of providing employee compensation. It also helps the management in taking appropriate decision regarding the use of human assets. Managers get valuable feedback regarding the effectiveness of their HR policies and practices.

Human resource valuation means the identification and measurement of the value of human resources and then supplying this information to the interesting parties. It is sometimes also defined as a method of assigning value to the employees on the basis of their future economic services to the organization. The employees of value at the present worth of the services they are expected to render during their stay in the organization or a particular period of time.

(1) Monetary measures include:

(a) Historical cost method

It suggests capitalizing the expenditure of the firm incurred on recruitment and selection, training and development of the employees and treats them as the assets of the organization for the purpose of HR accounting. This method suffers from a limitation that the capitalization of costs does not reflect its true value. The total performance has to be judged in relation with the total cost associated with the HR to reflect its value.

(b) Replacement cost method

The cost of replacement of individual and the re-building cost of organization is assessed to reflect the HR asset value of the individuals and the organization. However this method may not reflect either the actual cost or the contribution associated with HR

(c) Opportunity cost method

This model envisages the computation of monetary value and the allocation of people to the most promising activity and thereby assesses the opportunity cost of main employees through competitive bidding among the investment centre.

(d) Economic value method

The value of human resource is evaluated on the basis of contribution they are likely to make in the organization during their stay with the organization. The payments made to the employees in the form of salary, allowances and benefits are estimated and discounted appropriately to arrive at the present economic value of the individual.

(2) Non-Monetary measures:

(a) Expected realizable value method

The elements of expected realizable value like the productivity, transferability and promote-ability are measure using personal research, appraisal techniques or other objective methods. The productivity is measured by objective indices and managerial assessment. The promote-ability and transferability are measured in terms of potential using psychometric tests and subjective evaluations.

(b) Discounted present value of future earnings

This method was use by Rencis Likert who proposed three sets of variables-casual, intermediate, output. These helped in measuring the effectiveness over a period of time. Casual variable include leadership style and behaviour, the intermediate variable are morale, motivation, commitment to goals etc. and these in turn affect the output variables like production, sales, profit etc.

Issues in Human Capital Measurement and Reporting

Issues in Human Capital Measurement

The Reality: People are Critical to Business Performance

Most business managers understand that the capabilities of their employees are the difference between “make or break” results. They are keenly aware that capable people position their company to compete with current competition while simultaneously creating the ability to go after new markets and innovative new products and services. They make an organization strong, agile and flexible, which gives a chief executive option. When the future is uncertain, options are what a chief executive needs most of all.

The Fantasy: Assets Can Be “Cost Reduced”

When these same executives sit down with “the numbers,” people look like a huge cost, which makes them a target for cost reductions. It is hard to know what exactly this cost consideration includes. Consider salaries, benefits, training, relocation, HR department and information technology expenses, plus the time managers spend in hiring, performance appraisals, disciplinary actions and employee development. Few companies actually know their total investment or the percentage these investments represent in their total operating expense. More importantly, what is the company getting for all that money? When this question can’t be answered, cost reductions are sure to follow. Yet if people are an asset, these costs are actually investments. Investments are made with the expectation of a return, which implies that the asset must have value. A “cost reduction” of an asset is called decapitalization. Companies that “downsize” may be decapitalizing and not even realize it.

Human Capital: The Real but Intangible Asset

Finance will tell us that people cannot be an asset. They are not owned or controlled by a company. This is true. However, people are the owners of their own human capital; the knowledge, skills, talent and enthusiasm that they invest in various aspects of their lives. Some of their human capital will be invested in their work. Therefore, the collective human capital investment people make in a company is an asset that meets all the criteria of an intangible asset a part of a company’s productive capability.

Managing by the Numbers

The “numbers” of financial accounting do not tell a business manager much about the investment or the value of human capital. These numbers can create serious distortions when making human capital investment decisions, causing managers to destroy shareholder value in the process of making the “numbers” look good. Managing “by the numbers” requires relevant measures. Most business managers know net income, revenues and earnings per share off the tops of their heads; they can recite return on equity and assets. Do they know the return on investment in human capital? Not likely. This is where ProOrbis’ expertise in human capital asset management and paradigm shifting methodology can transform the way large organizations view and value their human capital assets, leading to bigger and better returns on their investment and a more productive, sustainable organization.

Reporting

Human capital reports provides qualitative information on the employees, HR practices, trends in the company etc which can help the business grow. It covers aspects like organization structure, employee data, expertise & skills of the employees, salaries, policies etc. Human Capital Reporting is reporting of valuation of human resource inside company, which usually consists intangible values.

People inside organizations are becoming source of competitive advantage. As key talent become strategic advantage, human capital reporting is the way forward. Many companies have attempted to put valuation of human capital on their balance sheet. There is no framework to perform valuation of human capital. In such case, companies attempted their own methods for reporting in financial statements. This subjectivity creates lot of issues in the absence of no prescribe accounting standards.

Issues with Human Capital Reporting

  1. No mechanism to verify correct valuation in terms of accounting

We know that all the financial reports published by the companies are audited. Financial Audit ensures correct accounting practices are followed and brings out any fraudulent activities in accounting. For HCR, there is no such audit. Hence HCR not subjected to verification.

  1. Companies which initiated HCR as the good practice found themselves in financial trouble

Companies who reported their human capital could not maintain their own financial health. Because of this, HCR could not gain required attention to be followed as standard practice. HCR lost its value with sceptics of being used for accounting frauds. Human capital reporting needs to evolve through these issue to be best practice which would be aimed at highlighting the greater goal of potential of human resource the company has.

Rationale of Human Resource Valuation and Auditing

Organizations are increasingly finding it imperative to improve returns on investment, in order to stay competitive. Traditionally, accounting norms were viewed only from the financial perspective and were applied to all departments ranging from marketing, production, distribution, etc. HRM was limited to salary and administration and, while doing so, it was analysed from the perspective of provisioning and expenditure.

However, in today’s competitive scenario, it has become essential to analyse HRM activities and assess their contribution in a more systematic and methodical manner. The Indian industry has aggressively adopted various innovative systems, such as HR audit and balanced scorecard, with a macro perspective of balancing performance management across all organizations.

Human Resource (HR) Audit is not only a tool for evaluating the personnel activities of an organisation, but also an important aspect of the human resource management. It is a great deal of attention from Human Resource Practitioners.

It basically review the effectiveness of human resource practices. It gives feedback about HR functions not only to operating managers, but also the HR department about how very well operating managers are meeting their HR duties.

Therefore, audit is the key word, which control and check the Human Resource activities in a public organisation and an evaluation of how these activities support overall organisational strategy. In the opinion of Gray “The primary purpose of personnel audit is to assess how various units are functioning and how they have been able to meet the policies and guidelines which were agreed upon and to assist the rest of the organisation by identifying the gap between objectives, lay-out and results achieved. The end product of evaluation should be to formulate plans for corrections or adjustment.”

Systematic audit can help build strong rapport between the department and operating managers. Further, audit creates discipline in personnel staff and encourages them to move away from intuitive techniques to a more rigorous assessment of the likely benefits to be achieved.

This aims at the following:

  • Introducing the theoretical framework behind concepts such as HRA, HR audit and balanced scorecard.
  • Explaining the strategic framework behind their implementation in international vis-a-vis the Indian context.
  • Presenting case studies to drive home learning.

Rationale

A very famous watch-manufacturing company ventured into eye-care business. They needed, besides other staff, optometrists at every eye-care retail outlet, across the nation. A good optometrist is a vital link between the company and the customers. Many times it is the optometrist who coverts a potential to an actual customer.

The company had a very good hiring team in place and was confident that it would be able to hire very able personnel for their eye-care division as well. Their primary targets would be various students graduating from different optometrists colleges in India. They had been following these processes for quite some time for their watch-division.

The company went ahead with its plan of expansion. Later, when the hiring team visited the colleges to hire optometrists, to their dismay they found that most of these graduates were not employable. They had requisite knowledge but did not have very high level of skill that would be required in this profession.

They had hardly any time to train them now. Left with no option, they hired optometrists from competitors at a very high market price. Obviously the acquisition cost went-up that was least expected when the company was expanding into a new business.

In retrospect they should have ‘audited’ their hiring process in light of the new business and seen whether they needed to incorporate any changes. This would have forewarned them about the real state of talent demand and supply situation and they could have organized some pre-hiring training for the various graduating optometrists.

This way they would have not only been able to keep their hiring cost under control but would have also been successful in sowing a greater degree of loyalty among their new recruits. A timely audit would have saved the company a lot and made their process more efficient.

The rationale of the audit hence can be outlined as:

  1. Audit increases the efficiency of the HR team.
  2. It helps in saving a lot of cost.
  3. Helps in achieving internal and external benchmarking.
  4. Helps in compliance issues to various quality initiatives in the company.
  5. Helps in legal compliance.
  6. Improves managerial performance.
  7. Improves supervision and leadership at all levels of the organization.
  8. Helps to retrospect and reflect upon various practices from a practical stand-point.
  9. Audit extends HR business partner’s role and helps it make quantifiable contributions in business.
  10. Helps in making the HR department more effective and credible.

Valuation of Human Resources

A fundamental dichotomy in accounting practices is between human and non-human capital. As a standard practice, non-human capital is considered as assets and reported in the financial statements, whereas human capital is mostly ignored by accountants. The definition of wealth as a source of income inevitably leads to the recognition of human capital as one of the several forms of wealth such as money, securities and physical capital.

The term audit is normally associated with financial accounting and refers to the official examination and verification of a company’s financial and accounting records. HR audit is a similar concept in the field of Human Resource Management.

HR audit involves examining and reviewing the organization’s existing policies, procedures and practices regarding recruitment and selection, orientation and placement, training and development, job analysis and design, job evaluation, compensation, morale and motivation, employee health and safety, social welfare, industrial relations, etc.

According to Eric Flamholtz, “Human Resource Audit is a systematic assessment of the strengths, limitations, and developmental needs of its existing human resources in the context of organizational performance.”

Normally, in an organization, not all HR policies are formal and written; there are many informal policies, not officially documented. The HR audit involves the review of all the HR policies, procedures and practices currently adopted by the organization, irrespective of whether they are formal or informal.

The audit also helps to check that the company complies with the legal requirements and regulations regarding employees as laid down by the government of the country. By means of an audit, the company can determine its strengths and weaknesses in the area of HRM and plan accordingly to improve its processes and procedures related to the human resource function.

Human Resource Audit also called Personnel Management Audit is well practised in Western developed countries. In India, there is no lull audit like financial audit of the personnel or Human Resource activities in an organisation. Audit is evaluation, examination, review and verification of completed activities, to see whether they represent a true state of affairs of the activities in the department audited.

Human Resource audit refers to an examination and evaluation of policies, practices, procedures to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of the Human resource management and to verify whether the mission, objectives, policies, procedures, programmes have been followed, and expected results achieved. The audit also makes suggestions for future improvement as a result of the measurement of past activities.

It helps essentially in evaluating the various HR practices and processes in an organization against the set standards. ‘An HR audit involves devoting time and resources to taking an intensely objective look at the company’s HR policies, practices, procedures and strategies to protect the company, establish best practices and identify opportunities for improvement'(SHRM, India).

‘A Human Resources Audit is a comprehensive method (or means) to review current human resources policies, procedures, documentation and systems to identify needs for improvement and enhancement of the HR function as well as to ensure compliance with ever-changing rules and regulations’ (Strategic HR Inc.).

The HR audit shall include evaluating:

  • Selection
  • Job Analysis
  • Recruitment
  • Performance Management
  • Performance Appraisals
  • Performance Feedbacks
  • Competency Mapping
  • Training Process
  • Rewards Management
  • Benefits Management
  • Employee Relations
  • Workplace Safety
  • Best Practices
  • Compensation
  • Managerial performance
  • Supervisory Performance
  • Leadership at various levels
  • HR Business Partner Role
  • HR Strategic Initiatives
  • Legal HR issues.

(1) Historical Cost Method:

This method is based on costs incurred or recruitment, training, familiarization etc. It is developed by Rensis Likert. This is a very simple method based on traditional principles of accounting. Under this method an attempt is made to have a proper match between cost and revenue.

The plus point of this method is that the organization can show the value of human capital in its balance sheet and profit and loss account, the weak point of this method is that it fails to fulfill the need of developing a system of HRA based on systematic valuation of human resources.

(2) Replacement Cost Method:

Under this method the replacement cost of existing personnel is estimated. Replacement cost includes the cost of recruitment, training and opportunity cost for the intervening period. This serves the purpose of making valuation of human resources periodically. It helps in planning for human resources in future. The difficulty in this method is that the value differs from person to person making it difficult to find identical replacement of the present human assets.

(3) Economic Value Method:

The payment made to the human resources till their retirement are calculated and appropriately discounted to get their present economic value.

(4) Standard Cost Method:

This method is in improvement over replacement cost method. Under this method the standard costs of recruitment, training and development are developed and established every year to overcome complications in calculations. There costs represent the value of human resources for accounting. It is easy for implementation and control.

(5) Present Value Method:

Under this method the net contributions of employees to the earning of the organisation are discounted to have present value of human resources.

(6) Current Purchase Power Method:

In this method the historical costs are converted into current purchasing power of money with the help of index numbers.

(7) Opportunity Cost Method:

Under this method the value of human asset is determined in their alternative use or the next best alternative use. This value forms the basis for valuation of human asset of organisation. For calculation of opportunity cost bidding method is used. But it is difficult to decide bid or offer.

Approaches of Human Resource Audit

HR audit involves examining and reviewing the organization’s existing policies, procedures and practices regarding recruitment and selection, orientation and placement, training and development, job analysis and design, job evaluation, compensation, morale and motivation, employee health and safety, social welfare, industrial relations, etc.

According to Eric Flamholtz, “Human Resource Audit is a systematic assessment of the strengths, limitations, and developmental needs of its existing human resources in the context of organizational performance.”

Normally, in an organization, not all HR policies are formal and written; there are many informal policies, not officially documented. The HR audit involves the review of all the HR policies, procedures and practices currently adopted by the organization, irrespective of whether they are formal or informal.

The audit also helps to check that the company complies with the legal requirements and regulations regarding employees as laid down by the government of the country. By means of an audit, the company can determine its strengths and weaknesses in the area of HRM and plan accordingly to improve its processes and procedures related to the human resource function.

Human Resource Audit also called Personnel Management Audit is well practised in Western developed countries. In India, there is no lull audit like financial audit of the personnel or Human Resource activities in an organisation. Audit is evaluation, examination, review and verification of completed activities, to see whether they represent a true state of affairs of the activities in the department audited.

Human Resource audit refers to an examination and evaluation of policies, practices, procedures to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of the Human resource management and to verify whether the mission, objectives, policies, procedures, programmes have been followed, and expected results achieved. The audit also makes suggestions for future improvement as a result of the measurement of past activities.

There are mainly five approaches in the study of Human Resource Audit.

They are:

(i) The comparative approach

(ii) The outside consultant approach

(iii) The statistical approach

(iv) The compliance approach

(v) The management by objectives-MBO approach

(i) Comparative Approach:

In this approach, the auditors can collect and analyze data of their own company and also compare the data of different firm or company. After comparing the data of different companies, then the auditors choose the best one, which, is most suitable for the organisation. Thus, comparative approach helps the auditors to get best data.

(ii) Consultant Approach:

The organisation performance can improve only by an outside consultant. Consultant approach gives different types of ideas to the auditors which is most essential for comparative purposes in the organisation.

(iii) Statistical Approach:

In the statistical approach, certain statistical measures of performance are developed based on the company’s existing data. For examples-absenteeism and accident rates. These data help the auditors in assessing the positive and negative aspects of company’s performance.

(iv) Compliance Approach:

In the compliance approach, auditors review the past results and actions of the company’s policies and procedures. The check work of the auditors to go with the legal norms of the company’s policies and procedures.

(v) Management by Objectives (MBO) Approach:

The management by objectives approach deals with the specifications of goals against which performance is assessed. In this approach, managers set objective in their specific areas of responsibility.

The methods for evaluating and disseminating data take the form of:

(a) Comparison between time periods.

(b) Comparison of organisations.

(e) Trend lines, frequency distributions and statistical co-relations.

(d) Ratio analysis voluntary turnover rate

(e) Classification of data.

(j) Graphical or pictorial display.

Benefits and Limitations of Human Resource Audit

Organizations are increasingly finding it imperative to improve returns on investment, in order to stay competitive. Traditionally, accounting norms were viewed only from the financial perspective and were applied to all departments ranging from marketing, production, distribution, etc. HRM was limited to salary and administration and, while doing so, it was analysed from the perspective of provisioning and expenditure.

However, in today’s competitive scenario, it has become essential to analyse HRM activities and assess their contribution in a more systematic and methodical manner. The Indian industry has aggressively adopted various innovative systems, such as HR audit and balanced scorecard, with a macro perspective of balancing performance management across all organizations.

Human Resource (HR) Audit is not only a tool for evaluating the personnel activities of an organisation, but also an important aspect of the human resource management. It is a great deal of attention from Human Resource Practitioners.

It basically review the effectiveness of human resource practices. It gives feedback about HR functions not only to operating managers, but also the HR department about how very well operating managers are meeting their HR duties.

Benefits

Role Clarity of HR Functions: People working in HR department must be very clear about their roles and responsibilities. They should have a clear understanding that their priority should be in the interest of the organization says HR audit. The role transparency function is performed by HR audit to ensure they understand their role.

Promoting Critical Business Plans: Every organization follows certain strategic plans in order to achieve organizational goals. HR auditor’s responsibility is to convince management to disclose these plans to employees of the organization so that they can participate comfortably in the decision-making process of the company. The aim is for employees to contribute their point of view about these plans and involve themselves completely.

Analysis of HR Functions: An HR audit plays a very crucial role in analyzing the functioning of the HR department. It helps in evaluating the performance of the employees and developing their leadership qualities. If necessary, the HR audit also helps in re-designing the development system of the HR department.

Improving Organizational Competency: An HR audit helps in identifying the strength and weaknesses of the present administrative system. If there is any drawback in the functioning of the system, the HR audit tries to develop techniques by which productivity can be increased. These positive impacts are also visible in HRIS, working procedures, delegation and clarification of roles and responsibilities.

Limitations

Any audit is undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of systems and procedures. The HRD audit is not an exception. However, if the HRD audit is held due to the directives/fancies of the CEO, it can lead to negative results. For instance, initially the top management may be very supportive of the HRD audit process.

However, when the feedback is continuously negative, they may become hostile and sometimes even aggressive with the auditors. Quite often the failure of an HRD audit is on account of failure in the implementation of corrective action based on the feedback. There have been instances when the HRD audit is used for a negative purpose, such as victimizing the HR department and removing some of the HR employees.

HR Audit should be voluntary and should be proactively undertaken by the management. There should not be any compulsion to conduct HR Audit, in order to facilitate a fair and objective report generation.

An HRD audit does not give an evaluation of the individuals, but it essentially focuses upon units and systems. However, if consultants so desire, they can give a formal feedback to the individuals.

Lack of Objectivity:

Objectivity and other necessary skills are essential for managers who are doing audits so that the interpretation of the data collected can be done properly. The absence of objectivity hampers the audit. Many companies, on the other hand, hire outside auditors with HR auditing knowledge and skills.

Generally, experts themselves conduct an audit of the HR function. While auditing, the senior audit expert should be familiar with some of the common errors of interpretation, which may crop up while analyzing the outcome of employee opinion.

These include the following:

  • Making a single observation based on the report,
  • Assuming consensus based on the opinions of a limited group of individuals
  • Rejecting observations without conducting more study;
  • Interpreting reports as valuable without examining their implications; and
  • Complicating situations based on majority viewpoints while disregarding minority opinions.

Absence of Established Metrics:

 It is rare for HR audits to be evaluated based on established metrics or other performance standards in most organizations. This is one of the major problems for the organization. Therefore, senior managers are advised not to conduct audits without appropriate metrics and performance standards. Measures and performance standards can be established by b) framing a meaningful audit process

Managers consider audits to be a threat:

In some organizations, managers may have a feeling of fear about the HR audit. This is because managers think that they will be caught for doing wrong acts, if they have done any, and will definitely be punished for the wrong acts. An HR audit is used by some unethical managers to induce obedience in employees.

Organizations reduce this fear of audit by not considering audit scores to directly assess any manager’s performance. Manager7s assessment should be done considering the execution of corrective measures to reduce the wrong acts found during the HR audit. No punishment should be given, in any case, as a consequence of the HR audit.

Method of conducting HR Audit: Interview, Workshop, Observation, Questionnaire

The purpose of the audit is to reveal the strengths and weaknesses in the organization’s human resources system, and any issues needing resolution. The audit works best when the focus is on analyzing and improving the HR function in the organization. The HR audit itself is a diagnostic tool, not a prescriptive instrument.

It is most useful when an organization is ready to act on the findings, and to evolve its HR function to a level where it’s full potential to support the organization’s mission and objectives can be realized.

An organisation has tended to grow bigger, so have the staff departments along with line functions. A time comes when each of them becomes so big that one does not get a fair idea of how they are doing unless special effort is made and studies are undertaken. For the line functions, some indices are available.

In production, for instance, performance can be judged by how much was produced, to what extent schedules were adhered to, at what cost manufacturing was done, what was the unit cost, etc. These figures in themselves are important and they take added meaning when they are compared with, say previous year or years or with the planned and budgeted figures.

Similarly, marketing departments efficiency can be judged by the quantum of sales, sales vis-a-vis competitor’s sales, cost of sales, territories covered, new customers explored, old customers retained, etc.

In case of departments like HR such yardsticks are not readily available. Essentially they have to be evolved according to an organisation’s requirements. Today personnel departments have become big and employ sizable staff and specialists. As such, some kind of audit needs to be undertaken to secret in the functioning of the department. Hence, HR audit comes in the picture.

Method

HR audit is a tool to measure the level of human resources development system.

  1. Interview Method:

Top management and senior management (Line managers and employees) are interviewed by the HRD auditor. It is a structured interview designed to solicit information on the perspectives of respondents on the future growth plans and goals of the organization, organization culture, working style, career development, work flow system, leadership style, morale, motivation, vision, mission etc. In view of the time and resources constraints, HRD auditor uses sampling techniques to interview the employees.

  1. Questionnaire Method:

HRD auditor designs and administers structured questionnaire to assess the various dimensions of HR development. It is usual practice to test the reliability and validity of the instrument using appropriate statistical technique by conducting a pilot study. Then he has to choose the proper sample size. The questionnaire should accommodate questions reflecting the objectives of HRD audit. It is given to the sample respondents who have to record appropriate response.

  1. Observation Method:

HRD manager observes the employees in their natural environment i.e., workplace, canteen, training camps, residential colony to assess the suitability and conduciveness of environment for human resource development.

  1. Desk Research Method:

HRD manager collects and uses details relating to performance appraisal report, ethical practices, achievement records, welfare measures, suggestion scheme, career development, frequency of training programmes, feedback of participant trainees, methods used to ascertain training needs, safety practices, accident prevention, incentive and compensation system, etc. He analyses the facts and figures relating to aforesaid areas and arrives at appropriate findings.

This method does not involve interviewing the respondents through a questionnaire or an interview schedule. The entire information is gleaned from the relevant records of the organization.

  1. Workshop Method:

Employees are selected either through a sampling technique or through some other norms, for participation in a workshop conducted exclusively for HRD audit purpose. All the participants selected are divided into groups. Different dimensions of HRD are assigned to different groups for SWOT analysis. Then each group is required to prepare a report and make presentation on the themes assigned. The outcomes of the report of each group are deliberated deeply and suggestions are made to the organization. The whole exercise is moderated by the HRD auditor.

  1. Task Force Method:

A task force comprising different experts from various domains in the organization is constituted to identify, evaluate and recommend an appropriate solution to the HRD problems identified. HRD manager can work on the accepted recommendations for further development.

Need and Significance of Human Resource Audit

Human Resource Audit is a comprehensive method of objective and systematic verification of current practices, documentation, policies and procedures prevalent in the HR system of the organization. An effective HR audit helps in identifying the need for improvement and enhancement of the HR function. It also guides the organization in maintaining compliance with ever-changing rules and regulations. HR audit, thus, helps in analyzing the gap between ‘what is the current HR function’ and ‘what should be/could be the best possible HR function’ in the organization.

Though HR auditing is not mandatory like financial auditing, yet, organizations these days are opting for regular HR audits in order to examine the existing HR system in line with the organizations policies, strategies and objectives, and legal requirements. HR auditor can be internal or external to the organization. Generally, HR consulting firms render the service of external HR auditors.

Need

According to Yoder, the need for personnel audit is largely influenced by several conditions.

  • Organisational Structure: Continuing feedback is facilitated if an organisation has a personnel department.
  • The Number of Employees: Very small units, because of the very small number of persons they employ, require comparatively little in the way of a formal audit.
  • Communication and Feedback: An effective two-way communications system often reduces the need for a formal audit.
  • Status of an Industrial Relations Manager: If he participates in the top management plans, reports, discussions and decisions, the need for a formal audit may be less frequently felt.
  • Location and Dispersion: The need for a formal audit is directly related to the number of isolated plants.
  • Administrative Style: The greater the delegation of authority and decentralisation of power, the greater the value of a regular and formal audit.

Significance

In modern times, personnel and industrial relations audits have been widely accepted as tools with which managers can control the programmes and practices of the personnel and industrial relations department.

  • The changing role of the government, which intervenes more often and more extensively now, to control manpower management by an organisation with a view to protecting the interests of the employees, providing them with better working conditions and ensuring their economic security.
  • A change in managerial philosophy and theory, as a result of which a management now feels that employees’ participation in the activities of an organisation, and their identification with it, have a tremendous influence on the working of that organisation.
  • The rising wages, changes in the skills of technical and professional workers, and the increasing expenditure incurred on the industrial relations department these are the factors which have influenced and encouraged the trend in favour of a personnel audit.
  • The increasing role played by trade unions and their strength, as a result of which they often question managerial competence in industrial relations.
error: Content is protected !!