Distinctions Between Private and Public Companies

Private Ltd. Company

A Private Limited Company is a joint stock company, incorporated under The Indian Companies Act, 2013 or any other previous act. The maximum number of members is 200, excluding the current employees and the ex-employees who were the members during their employment or continues to be the member after the termination of employment in the company.

The company restricts the transfer of shares and prohibits invitation to the public for the subscription of shares and debentures. It uses the term ‘private limited’ at the end of its name.

Public Ltd. Company

A Public Limited Company or PLC is a joint stock company formed and registered under The Indian Companies Act, 2013 or any other previous act.

There is no defined limit on the number of members the company can have. Also, there is no restriction on the transferability of the shares. The company can invite the public for the subscription of shares or debentures, and that is why the term ‘Public Limited’ gets added to its name.

Difference Public Company:

  1. Ownership: Owned by the State Government or Central Government or both.
  2. Objective/Motive: To promote public welfare.
  3. Social Objectives: They are launched to achieve social objectives like development of backward regions, creation of employment opportunities, etc.
  4. Forms of Organisation: Departmental undertakings, Statutory Corporation and Government Companies.
  5. Management: Managed by bureaucrats; hence efficient.
  6. Financial Resources: Huge financial resources; no problem in expansion and growth.
  7. Accountability: Accountable to the public through Parliament.
  8. Political Interference: Comparatively more Political Interference.
  9. Government Control: They are subject to strict financial control by the government.
  10. Distribution of Income: Equitable distribution of income.

Difference Private Company:

  1. Ownership: Owned by private individuals.
  2. Objective/Motive: To maximize profits.
  3. Social Objectives: Social objectives are not very important.
  4. Forms of Organisation: Sole proprietorship, partnership, joint Hindu family business, cooperative societies and joint stock company
  5. Management: Managed by professional managers; hence efficient.
  6. Financial Resources: Limited financial resources; less scope for expansion.
  7. Accountability: Accountable to the owners.
  8. Political Interference: Less political interference
  9. Government Control: They are not subject to strict financial control by the government.
  10. Distribution of Income: Concentration of wealth in few hands.

Private Company

Public Company

Meaning A private company is a company which is owned and traded privately. A public company is a company which is owned and traded publicly
Minimum members 2 7
Maximum members 200 Unlimited
Minimum Directors 2 3
Suffix Private Limited Limited
Start of business After receiving certificate of incorporation. After receiving certificate of incorporation and certificate of commencement of business.
Statutory Meeting Optional Compulsory
Issue of prospectus / Statement in lieu of prospectus Not required Obligatory
Public subscription Not allowed Allowed
Quorum at AGM 2 members must present in person. 5 members must present in person.
Transfer of shares Restricted Free

Limited Liabilities Partnership (LLP) Act 2008, Introduction, Meaning, Objectives, Characteristics / Features, Merits and Demerits

The Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) Act, 2008 was enacted by the Indian Parliament to combine the benefits of a partnership firm and a company. It provides partners with limited liability while allowing flexible internal structure like a partnership. The Act aims to encourage small and medium businesses, startups, professionals, and entrepreneurs to operate in a formal, legally recognized framework without the stringent compliance requirements of a company.

Meaning of LLP

A Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) is a body corporate and a legal entity separate from its partners. It has perpetual succession, meaning its existence is not affected by changes in partnership. Partners enjoy limited liability, i.e., they are not personally responsible for the firm’s debts beyond their agreed contribution. An LLP can own property, sue, and be sued in its name. It combines the flexibility of a partnership with the limited liability protection of a company, making it attractive for professionals, startups, and small businesses.

Objectives of Limited Liability Partnership (LLP)

  • Promote Entrepreneurship

One of the main objectives of the LLP Act, 2008 is to encourage entrepreneurship in India. LLP provides a flexible legal framework that allows entrepreneurs to start and run businesses with limited liability, without facing the complexities of company law. It enables small and medium enterprises, startups, and professional firms to legally operate with ease. This objective strengthens business creation and innovation, facilitating economic growth while protecting personal assets of partners.

  • Provide Limited Liability Protection

LLP ensures that partners have limited liability, which means their personal assets are protected from the firm’s debts beyond their capital contribution. This objective reduces personal financial risk and encourages individuals to invest in business without fear of unlimited liability. Limited liability increases confidence among partners, enabling them to undertake ventures and business contracts safely while focusing on growth and profitability without risking personal wealth.

  • Combine Partnership Flexibility with Corporate Advantages

LLPs are designed to combine the flexibility of partnership with the benefits of a corporate structure. Partners can manage the firm directly without a formal board, while enjoying legal recognition and perpetual succession. This objective makes LLPs ideal for professionals and SMEs, as it allows easier management, decision-making, and operational efficiency. It also simplifies compliance compared to companies, offering a hybrid business structure that balances governance and operational freedom.

  • Facilitate Legal Recognition and Credibility

LLPs aim to provide legal recognition to businesses, ensuring they are treated as separate legal entities. This recognition enables LLPs to enter contracts, own property, and sue or be sued in their name. Legal status increases credibility with banks, investors, clients, and suppliers. The objective enhances trust in business dealings and allows LLPs to operate formally in markets, improving access to credit, business opportunities, and growth potential.

  • Encourage Professional and SME Participation

The LLP Act targets professional firms and small businesses. Professions like law, accounting, architecture, and consulting can operate as LLPs with reduced compliance compared to companies. Small and medium enterprises benefit from easier registration, flexibility, and limited liability. This objective ensures that diverse sectors can participate formally in the economy, bringing transparency, accountability, and structured governance to professional and SME activities.

  • Simplify Compliance and Regulatory Requirements

Another objective of LLP is to reduce compliance burdens compared to private or public companies. Annual filings, account statements, and statutory returns are simpler and less expensive. This encourages businesses to operate legally without facing extensive paperwork, auditing, or administrative hurdles. Reduced compliance helps startups and SMEs focus on operations, innovation, and growth while maintaining transparency and statutory accountability.

  • Ensure Perpetual Succession

LLPs are structured to have perpetual succession, meaning their existence is independent of changes in partners, including retirement, death, or admission of new partners. This objective ensures business continuity and stability, protecting the interests of creditors, investors, and employees. It also allows the LLP to operate long-term, making it a reliable business entity compared to traditional partnerships where death or retirement may dissolve the firm.

  • Promote Transparency and Accountability

LLPs aim to enhance transparency and accountability in business operations. Maintaining statutory accounts, annual returns, and declarations ensures stakeholders can verify the financial and operational status of the firm. This objective protects partners, investors, creditors, and clients, fostering trust in LLPs. Transparency also facilitates regulatory compliance, dispute resolution, and ethical business practices, making LLPs a credible alternative to unregistered partnerships or informal business structures.

Characteristics / Features of Limited Liability Partnership (LLP)

  • Separate Legal Entity

An LLP is a distinct legal entity separate from its partners. It can own property, enter into contracts, and sue or be sued in its own name. The separation ensures that the LLP’s assets and liabilities are independent of partners’ personal assets. This characteristic provides legal recognition and protection, making the firm a credible business entity while safeguarding partners from personal financial liability, except to the extent of their agreed contribution.

  • Limited Liability

Partners in an LLP enjoy limited liability, which means their personal assets are not at risk for the debts or obligations of the firm beyond their capital contribution. This protects partners from financial risk, encourages investment, and fosters entrepreneurship. Limited liability distinguishes LLPs from traditional partnerships, where partners have unlimited liability, making it an attractive option for professionals, SMEs, and startups seeking legal protection and business security.

  • Perpetual Succession

LLPs have perpetual succession, meaning the firm continues to exist regardless of changes in partners, such as retirement, death, or admission of new partners. The legal entity remains intact, ensuring business continuity. This characteristic provides stability and protects the interests of creditors, clients, and investors. Perpetual succession allows the LLP to operate long-term without disruption, unlike traditional partnerships where dissolution occurs upon changes in partnership composition.

  • Flexibility in Management

LLPs allow flexible internal management, similar to traditional partnerships. Partners can decide the organizational structure, operational roles, profit-sharing ratios, and responsibilities in the LLP agreement. Unlike companies, there is no requirement for a board of directors or rigid governance structures. This flexibility enables quick decision-making, cost-effective management, and adaptability, making LLPs suitable for professional firms, startups, and SMEs where agile management is important.

  • Minimum Compliance Requirements

Compared to companies, LLPs have simplified compliance and regulatory obligations. Annual filings, accounts, and statutory declarations are easier and less expensive. The compliance framework under the LLP Act is designed to reduce administrative burdens while maintaining transparency. This characteristic encourages formal registration and operations among small businesses and professionals, enabling them to benefit from legal recognition without extensive legal or financial obligations.

  • Partners as Agents

In an LLP, partners can act as agents of the firm, authorized to enter into contracts and conduct business on behalf of the LLP. However, unlike traditional partnerships, personal liability is limited, and the LLP itself is responsible for business obligations. This characteristic ensures operational efficiency, as partners can manage daily business activities while the LLP’s separate legal status protects personal assets.

  • Capital Contribution by Partners

Partners are required to contribute capital to the LLP, which determines their liability and share in profits. The LLP agreement specifies the amount, form, and terms of contribution. Capital contribution forms the financial backbone of the LLP, allowing business operations and investments. It also defines liability limits, ensuring clarity and protection for both partners and creditors while maintaining operational transparency.

  • Corporate and Partnership Hybrid Nature

LLPs combine characteristics of companies and partnerships, offering the limited liability of a company and the flexibility of a partnership. This hybrid nature makes LLPs ideal for professional firms, startups, and SMEs seeking operational freedom with legal protection. The structure encourages entrepreneurship, transparency, and efficient management, bridging the gap between traditional partnerships and corporate entities while providing regulatory advantages without excessive compliance burdens.

Merits / Advantages of Limited Liability Partnership (LLP)

  • Limited Liability Protection

The most significant merit of an LLP is that partners enjoy limited liability, meaning their personal assets are protected from the firm’s debts beyond their capital contribution. This encourages entrepreneurs and professionals to invest without fear of losing personal wealth. Limited liability distinguishes LLPs from traditional partnerships and allows for greater risk-taking and business expansion, making the structure attractive to SMEs, startups, and professional firms.

  • Separate Legal Entity

An LLP is a separate legal entity distinct from its partners. It can own property, enter into contracts, and sue or be sued in its own name. This legal recognition provides credibility to the firm, ensures continuity despite changes in partnership, and protects partners’ personal assets. It allows the LLP to operate formally in the market, facilitating business transactions, contracts, and investment opportunities.

  • Perpetual Succession

LLPs enjoy perpetual succession, meaning the firm continues to exist regardless of changes in partners, including retirement, death, or admission of new partners. This ensures stability and operational continuity. Creditors, clients, and investors benefit from this feature as the firm remains legally intact and capable of honoring obligations. Perpetual succession enhances long-term planning and sustainable growth of the business.

  • Flexibility in Management

LLPs offer flexible management as partners can directly manage operations without a formal board or strict corporate hierarchy. The LLP agreement allows partners to decide profit-sharing ratios, roles, responsibilities, and operational procedures. This flexibility enables faster decision-making, cost-effective management, and adaptability, which is especially useful for small and medium enterprises, startups, and professional services.

  • Ease of Formation and Compliance

Compared to companies, LLPs require less compliance and simpler registration procedures. Annual filings, statutory returns, and financial statements are mandatory but less complex, reducing administrative and legal burdens. This merit makes LLPs attractive for entrepreneurs, SMEs, and professionals who want a formal structure with legal recognition but without the extensive paperwork and costs associated with companies.

  • Credibility with Stakeholders

Being a legally recognized entity, LLPs enjoy higher credibility with banks, investors, suppliers, and clients. This increases the firm’s ability to raise funds, enter into contracts, and participate in government tenders. Credibility enhances business opportunities and trust among stakeholders, making LLPs more suitable for long-term professional or commercial operations compared to unregistered partnerships.

  • Hybrid Nature of LLP

LLPs combine the benefits of partnerships and companies. They offer operational flexibility like partnerships and limited liability protection like companies. This hybrid structure allows partners to enjoy both ease of management and legal protection. It encourages professional firms, SMEs, and startups to adopt a business framework that balances autonomy, legal security, and growth potential.

  • Continuous Operation

LLPs can operate continuously without being affected by changes in partners, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Unlike traditional partnerships, death, retirement, or insolvency of a partner does not dissolve the LLP. This merit supports long-term planning, stability, and investor confidence, allowing the LLP to execute contracts, maintain relationships, and grow sustainably over time.

Demerits / Disadvantages of Limited Liability Partnership (LLP)

  • Limited Fund-Raising Capacity

One of the main disadvantages of LLPs is that they have limited ability to raise capital. Unlike companies, LLPs cannot issue shares to the public or raise funds through equity markets. Partners can only contribute capital or admit new partners. This limits growth opportunities for large-scale projects. SMEs and startups may find external investment challenging, restricting expansion and diversification compared to private or public limited companies.

  • Dependence on Partners’ Capital

The financial strength of an LLP largely depends on the capital contribution of its partners. If partners have limited funds, the firm may struggle to finance operations or growth. Unlike companies that can raise funds via equity or loans, LLPs rely primarily on internal resources, making it difficult to undertake large projects or compete with well-capitalized companies in the same sector.

  • Lack of Public Confidence

Although LLPs are legally recognized, they may lack the public credibility enjoyed by private or public limited companies. Some stakeholders, like investors, suppliers, and banks, may hesitate to engage due to perceived informal structure or limited transparency. This can affect business opportunities, contracts, or partnerships, especially in industries where formal corporate structures are expected.

  • Mandatory Compliance Requirements

While LLP compliance is simpler than a company, it still involves annual filings, maintenance of accounts, and return submissions. Non-compliance attracts penalties. Smaller firms or professionals may find these requirements burdensome if they lack administrative capacity. This disadvantage makes LLPs less convenient for very small businesses or individuals who want minimal statutory obligations.

  • Limited Transferability of Interest

A partner’s interest in an LLP is not easily transferable without the consent of all partners. Unlike shares in a company, which can be sold to outsiders, LLP interests require agreement among existing partners. This restricts liquidity for partners and may complicate exit strategies, limiting the attractiveness of LLPs for investors seeking flexibility.

  • No Perpetual Capital Market Access

LLPs cannot raise capital from stock exchanges or issue debentures to the public. This limits access to large-scale funding, which is easily available to private and public companies. Expanding operations, entering new markets, or undertaking large projects may require alternative financing, making growth slower compared to corporate structures.

  • Professional Liability Risks

While partners enjoy limited liability, certain professional services provided by LLPs (like accounting, law, or consultancy) may expose partners to professional negligence claims. In such cases, partners can be held personally liable for malpractice. This makes LLPs less advantageous for professional services unless insurance and risk management measures are in place.

  • Complexity in Multi-Partner LLPs

With a large number of partners, management and decision-making can become complex. Disputes may arise over profit sharing, responsibilities, or admission of new partners. While LLPs allow flexibility, the absence of a formal governance structure like a company board may lead to inefficiency, conflicts, or slower decisions in larger LLPs compared to corporate entities.

Key Difference Between Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) and Private Limited Company

Basis Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) Private Limited Company (Pvt Ltd)
Legal Status Separate legal entity distinct from partners. Separate legal entity distinct from shareholders.
Liability Partners’ liability limited to their agreed contribution. Shareholders’ liability limited to the value of shares held.
Minimum Partners/Shareholders Minimum 2 partners required; no maximum limit specified. Minimum 2 shareholders and 2 directors; maximum 200 shareholders.
Management Managed directly by partners as per LLP agreement. Managed by a Board of Directors; shareholders are not involved in day-to-day operations.
Governance Structure Flexible; decisions are made according to LLP agreement. Rigid; decisions follow Companies Act and board resolutions.
Compliance Less compliance; annual accounts, annual return, and LLP agreement filing. Higher compliance; annual accounts, annual return, board meetings, and statutory records.
Audit Requirement Required only if turnover exceeds ₹40 lakh or contribution exceeds ₹25 lakh. Mandatory statutory audit regardless of turnover.
Capital Raising Cannot issue shares to the public; relies on partners’ capital or new partners. Can issue shares, private placements, or debentures; can raise substantial capital.
Transferability Partner’s interest cannot be transferred without consent of all partners. Shares can be transferred freely subject to Articles of Association.
Perpetual Succession Exists irrespective of changes in partners. Exists irrespective of changes in shareholders or directors.
Registration Registered under LLP Act, 2008. Registered under Companies Act, 2013.
Taxation LLP taxed as a partnership; profit taxed at the firm level; no dividend tax. Company taxed at corporate tax rates; dividends may attract dividend distribution tax.
Number of Members Unlimited partners allowed. Maximum 200 shareholders.
Credibility Medium credibility; preferred for professional services and SMEs. High credibility; preferred for large-scale businesses and investors.
Suitability Suitable for startups, SMEs, and professional services requiring flexibility. Suitable for large businesses, investors, and companies planning rapid expansion.

One-man company

Section 2(62) of Companies Act defines a one-person company as a company that has only one person as to its member. Furthermore, members of a company are nothing but subscribers to its memorandum of association, or its shareholders. So, an OPC is effectively a company that has only one shareholder as its member.

Such companies are generally created when there is only one founder/promoter for the business. Entrepreneurs whose businesses lie in early stages prefer to create OPCs instead of sole proprietorship business because of the several advantages that OPCs offer.

The Companies Act, 2013 completely revolutionized corporate laws in India by introducing several new concepts that did not exist previously. On such game-changer was the introduction of One Person Company concept. This led to the recognition of a completely new way of starting businesses that accorded flexibility which a company form of entity can offer, while also providing the protection of limited liability that sole proprietorship or partnerships lacked.

Several other countries had already recognized the ability of individuals forming a company before the enactment of the new Companies Act in 2013. These included the likes of China, Singapore, UK, Australia, and the USA.

Features of a One Person Company

  • Private company: Section 3(1)(c) of the Companies Act says that a single person can form a company for any lawful purpose. It further describes OPCs as private companies.
  • Single-member: OPCs can have only one member or shareholder, unlike other private companies.
  • Nominee: A unique feature of OPCs that separates it from other kinds of companies is that the sole member of the company has to mention a nominee while registering the company.
  • Company may be a One Person Company (OPC) which requires only one person as a subscriber to form a company and such a company will be treated under the Act as a private company.
  • A person, who registers one-person company, is not eligible to incorporate more than one one-person company
  • The memorandum of OPC must indicate the name of a person (other than the subscriber), with his prior written consent in the prescribed form, who will become a member of the OPC when the subscriber dies or is incapacitated to contract.
  • The nominee to the memorandum of one person company shall not be eligible to become a nominee for more than one such company.
  • No perpetual succession: Since there is only one member in an OPC, his death will result in the nominee choosing or rejecting to become its sole member. This does not happen in other companies as they follow the concept of perpetual succession.
  • Minimum one director: OPCs need to have minimum one person (the member) as director. They can have a maximum of 15 directors.
  • No minimum paid-up share capital: Companies Act, 2013 has not prescribed any amount as minimum paid-up capital for OPCs.
  • Special privileges: OPCs enjoy several privileges and exemptions under the Companies Act that other kinds of companies do not possess.

Privileges of One Person Companies

  • They do not have to hold annual general meetings.
  • A company secretary is not required to sign annual returns; directors can also do so.
  • Provisions relating to independent directors do not apply to them.
  • Their financial statements need not include cash flow statements.
  • Their articles can provide for additional grounds for vacation of a director’s office.
  • Several provisions relating to meetings and quorum do not apply to them.
  • They can pay more remuneration to directors than compared to other companies.

Membership in One Person Companies

Only natural persons who are Indian citizens and residents are eligible to form a one-person company in India. The same condition applies to nominees of OPCs. Further, such a natural person cannot be a member or nominee of more than one OPC at any point in time.

It is important to note that only natural persons can become members of OPCs. This does not happen in the case of companies wherein companies themselves can own shares and be members. Further, the law prohibits minors from being members or nominees of OPCs.

Formation of One Person Companies

A single person can form an OPC by subscribing his name to the memorandum of association and fulfilling other requirements prescribed by the Companies Act, 2013. Such memorandum must state details of a nominee who shall become the company’s sole member in case the original member dies or becomes incapable of entering into contractual relations.

This memorandum and the nominee’s consent to his nomination should be filed to the Registrar of Companies along with an application of registration. Such nominee can withdraw his name at any point in time by submission of requisite applications to the Registrar. His nomination can also later be canceled by the member.

Advantages

  • Compliance Burden:

The One-person Company includes in the definition of “Private Limited Company” given under section 2(68) of the Companies Act, 2013. Thus, an OPC will be required to comply with provisions applicable to private companies. However, OPCs have been provided with a number of exemptions and therefore have lesser compliance related burden.

  • Organized Sector of Proprietorship Company:

OPC will bring the unorganized sector of proprietorship into the organized version of a private limited company. Various small and medium enterprises, doing business as sole proprietors, might enter into the corporate domain. The organized version of OPC will open the avenues for more favorable banking facilities. Proprietors always have unlimited liability. If such a proprietor does business through an OPC, then liability of the member is limited.

Minimum Requirements:

  • Minimum 1 Shareholder
  • Minimum 1 Director
  • The director and shareholder can be same person
  • Minimum 1 Nominee
  • No Need of any Minimum Share Capital
  • Letters ‘OPC’ to be suffixed with the name of OPCs to distinguish it from other companies

Limited Liability Protection to Directors and Shareholder:

  • The most significant reason for shareholders to incorporate the ‘single-person company’ is certainly the desire for the limited liability.
  • All unfortunate events in business are not always under an entrepreneur’s control; hence it is important to secure the personal assets of the owner, if the business lands up in crises
  • While doing business as a proprietorship firm, the personal assets of the proprietor can be at risk in the event of failure, but this is not the case for a One Person Private Limited Company, as the shareholder liability is limited to his shareholding. This means any loss or debts which is purely of business nature will not impact, personal savings or wealth of an entrepreneur.
  • If the business is unable to pay its liabilities, the individual has to pay such liabilities off in the case of sole proprietorship; and the individual is not responsible for such liabilities in the case of a one-person company.
  • An OPC gives the advantage of limited liability to entrepreneurs whereby the liability of the member will be limited to the unpaid subscription money. This benefit is not available in case of a sole proprietorship.

Legal Status and Social Recognition For Your Business

One Person Company is a Private Limited Structure; this is the most popular business structure in the world. Gives suppliers and customers a sense of confidence in business. Large organizations prefer to deal with private limited companies instead of proprietorship firms. Pvt. Ltd. business structure enjoys corporate status in society which helps the entrepreneur to attract quality workforce and helps to retain them by giving corporate designations, like directorship. These designations cannot be used by proprietorship firms.

Adequate Safeguards:

In case of death/disability of the sole person should be provided through appointment of another individual as nominee director. On the demise of the original director, the nominee director will manage the affairs of the company till the date of transmission of shares to legal heirs of the demised member.

Easy to Get Loan from Banks

Banking and financial institutions prefer to lend money to the company rather than proprietary firms. In most of the situations Banks insist the entrepreneurs to convert their firm into a Private Limited company before sanctioning funds. So, it is better to register your startup as a One Person private limited rather than proprietary firm.

Perpetual Succession:

An OPC being an incorporated entity will also have the feature of perpetual succession and will make it easier for entrepreneurs to raise capital for business. The OPC is an artificial entity distinct from its owner. Creditors should therefore be warned that their claims against the business cannot be pressed against the owner.

Tax Flexibility and Savings

In an OPC, it is possible for a company to make a valid contract with its shareholder or directors. This means as a director you can receive remuneration, as a lessor you can receive rent, as a creditor you can lend money to your own company and earn interest. Directors’ remuneration, rent and interest are deductible expenses which reduces the profitability of the Company and ultimately brings down taxable income of your business.

Ownership limitations:

As per Rule 2.1 (1) of the Draft Rules under Companies Act, 2013 only a natural person who is an Indian citizen and resident in India shall be eligible to incorporate a One Person Company.

Thus, the person incorporating the OPC must be a natural person implying that it cannot be formed by a juristic person or an artificial person e.g. any type of company incorporated under Companies Act 2013.  This restricts the ownership of only individuals and not corporations.

This provision also discourages foreign direct investment by disallowing foreign companies and multinational companies to incorporate their subsidiaries in India as a One Person Company. Hence, an OPC will have to change their legal status to a private limited company to bring in investors. Foreigners and NRIs are allowed to invest in a Private Limited Company under the Automatic Approval route where 100% FDI is available in most sectors.

Restrictions on conversion

An OPC cannot be incorporated under Section 8 (Formation of companies with charitable objects etc) of Companies Act 2013. An OPC is also not allowed to carry out Non-Banking Financial Investment activities. This includes investing in securities of any body corporate.

An OPC can only convert into either a private or public company once the following conditions are met:

  1. The OPC must have been in existence for a minimum of two years; or
  2. It must have a paid up share capital which has increased beyond Rs. 50,00,000/- (rupees fifty lakh); or
  3. Its average turnover must have exceeded Rs. 2,00,00,000/- (rupees two crore).

Such restrictions stifle an entrepreneur’s desire for diversity and expansion.

ESOPs

Since an OPC can have only one shareholder, there can be no sweat equity shares or ESOPs to incentivize employees. ESOPs can only be implemented if OPC converts into a private or public limited company. A private or public limited company can easily expand by an increase of authorized capital and further allotment of shares to even third parties.

Hence, a private company is a preferable option for start-ups who want to encourage their employees by way of stock options.

Private Companies Meaning, Definition, Features, Privileges, Merits and Limitations

A private company is owned by either a small number of shareholders, company members, or a non-governmental organization, and it does not offer its stocks for sale to the general public. Instead, its stock is offered, owned, or exchanged privately among a small number of shareholders or even held by a single individual. Private companies are also referred to as privately-held companies, limited companies, limited liability companies, or private corporations, depending on the country where they’re incorporated and how they are structured.

Section 2(68) of Companies Act, 2013 defines private companies. According to that, private companies are those companies whose articles of association restrict the transferability of shares and prevent the public at large from subscribing to them. This is the basic criterion that differentiates private companies from public companies.

The Section further says private companies can have a maximum of 200 members (except for One Person Companies). This number does not include present and former employees who are also members. Moreover, more than two persons who own shares jointly are treated as a single member.

This definition had previously prescribed a minimum paid-up share capital of Rs. 1 lakh for private companies, but an amendment in 2005 removed this requirement. Private companies can now have a minimum paid-up capital of any amount.

Features of Private Companies

  • No minimum capital required: There was a minimum paid-up share capital requirement of Rs. 1 lakh previously, but that is omitted now.
  • Minimum 2 and maximum 200 members: A private company can have a minimum of just two members (but just one is enough if it a One Person Company), and a maximum of up to 200 members.
  • Transferability of shares restricted: Private companies cannot freely transfer their shares to the public like public companies. This is why stock exchanges never list private companies.
  • “Private Limited”: All private companies must include the words “Private Limited” or “Pvt. Ltd.” in their names.
  • Privileges and exemptions: Since private companies do not freely transfer their shares and involve limited interest by members, the law has granted them several exemptions that public companies do not enjoy.

Privileges of Private Companies

The Companies Act has provided certain privileges and exemptions to private companies that public companies do not possess. These privileges accord them greater freedom in conducting their affairs. Here are some examples of them:

  • No need to prepare a report for annual general meetings.
  • Only 2 minimum directors required.
  • No need to appoint independent directors.
  • They can adopt additional grounds for the disqualification of directors and vacation of their office.
  • They can pay greater remuneration to their directors than compared to some other types of companies.

Merits

Owning Property

A company being a juristic person, can acquire, own, enjoy and alienate, property in its own name. No shareholder can make any claim upon the property of the company so long as the company is a going concern. The shareholders are not the owners of the company’s property. The company itself is the true owner.

Free & Easy transferability of shares

Shares of a company limited by shares are transferable by a shareholder t any other person. The transfer is easy as compared to the transfer of interest in business run as a proprietary concern or a partnership. Filing and signing a share transfer form and handing over the buyer of the shares along with share certificate can easily transfer shares.

Limited Liability

Limited Liability means the status of being legally responsible only to a limited amount for debts of a company. Unlike proprietorships and partnerships, in a limited liability company the liability of the members in respect of the company’s debts is limited. In other words, the liability of the members of a company is limited only to the extent of the face value of shares taken up by them. Therefore, where a company is limited by shares, the liability of the members on a winding-up is limited to the amount unpaid on their shares.

Borrowing Capacity

A company enjoys better avenues for borrowing of funds. It can issue debentures, secured as well as unsecured and can also accept deposits from the public, etc. Even banking and financial institutions prefer to render large financial assistance to a company rather than partnership firms or proprietary concerns.

Dual Relationship

In the company form of organization it is possible for a company to make a valid and effective contract with any of its members. It is also possible for a person to be in control of a company and at the same time be in its employment. Thus, a person can at the same time be a shareholder, creditor, director and also an employee of the company.

Capacity to sue and be sued

To sue means to institute legal proceedings against or to bring a suit in a court of law. Just as one person can bring a legal action in his/her own name against another in that person’s name, a company being an independent legal entity can sue and also be sued in its own name.

Limitations

No valuation of investment:

Shares of a private company are not listed on stock ex­change. There are no regular dealings in these shares. A shareholder cannot, therefore, know the real value of his investment in a private company.

Lack of public confidence:

Public has little confidence in a private company because its affairs are unknown and it is not subject to strict control under the law.

Smaller resources:

A private company cannot have more than fifty members. Its credit standing is lower than that of a public company. Therefore, the financial and managerial resources of a private company are comparatively limited.

Poor protection to members:

A private company enjoys several exemptions from various provisions of the Companies Act. Minority members may suffer at the hands of the majority members. Dissatisfied members cannot cut off their connection with the company except at a loss.

Lack of transferability of shares:

There are restrictions on the transfer of shares in a private company. As a result a shareholder cannot leave a private company easily and quickly.

Sole Trading concern, Meaning, Definition and Features

Sole trade is the oldest and most commonly used form of business organisation. It is as old as civilization is. Historically, it appears that business first started with this form of organisation. With the development of science and technology the needs of the business also increased and new forms of organisation developed. This organisation is also known as Sole-Proprietorship, Individual-Proprietorship, and Single Entrepreneurship. In sole trade organisation, an individual is at the helm of affairs. He makes all the investments, shares all risks, takes all profits, manages and controls the business himself.

The sole-trader mainly depends up to his own resources, so the business is generally on a small-scale basis. The business is normally run with the help of family members but he may employ persons to look after the day-to-day activities of the business. So far as his liability is concerned, it is unlimited.

Features of Sole Proprietorship:

Individual Initiative:

This business is started by the initiative of a single person. He prepares the blue prints of the venture and arranges various factors of production. He may employ other person for assistance but ultimate authority and responsibility lies with him. All the profits and losses are taken by the single individual.

Management and Control:

The proprietor manages the whole business himself. He prepares various plans and executes them under his own supervision. There may be some persons to help him but ultimate control lies with the owner.

Unlimited Liability:

In sole trade business liability is unlimited. The proprietor is responsible for all losses arising from the business. The liability is not limited only to his investments in the business but his private property is also liable for business obligations.

Business Secrecy:

All important decisions are taken by the owner himself. He keeps all the business secrets only to himself. Business secrets are very important for small business. By retaining business secrets he avoids competitors entering the same business.

No sharing of profits:

A sole trading concern is established and managed by the single person. Profit is not required to share with another. Sole trader individually enjoys the profit and bears the risk by himself.

Limited area of operation:

Since the sole trading concern is invested by the single person, there is less scope for expansion and growth of it. Sole trader individually can’t manage the big size of a business and he can’t manage the big size of a business and he cannot invest for this as well.

Independent Decision:

The sole trader can freely make the decision. He or she does not need to take consent of others while making the decision. Therefore, in this form of business decision making is fast.

Undivided risk and responsibility:

In this business, risk and responsibility can be shared with another person. The sole trader individually takes all kinds of risk. A sole trader is personally responsible for accomplishing all activities of a business.

Objectives of Sole-Trade Business:

Channelise Individual Funds:

Individuals have small surplus funds with them. These funds are not enough to set up big business. People may not like to risk their funds in those businesses where they have no say and control. It is better to set up a small business instead of keeping the funds idle. So sole-trade business provides a channel to make productive use of individual funds.

Serve Consumers:

A small trader comes in direct contact with the consumers. A consumer wants to buy his day-to-day requirements from the nearest place. Sole-traders set up their shops wherever the consumers are available. A consumer saves time by purchasing daily necessities from the nearest retail outlet.

Strengthen Distribution Channel:

Sole-Trade business is generally on a small scale basis. People set up small retail outlets under sole-proprietary organisation. A retailer is an important link in the chain of distribution. He is in direct contact with the consumers. No distribution channel from the producer to the consumer can be successful without the active involvement of sole-traders.

Avoid Concentration of Wealth:

In order to avoid concentration of wealth in a few funds, sole trade business helps in its distribution among large number of people. When large number of people enter into different businesses, may be at a small scale, it helps in distribution of economic wealth.

Help Large Business:

The success of large-scale business is also linked to the help provided by small business units. Small units provide ancillary service to big units. Large units require a number of small components from small units. So sole-trade business provides service to large units by providing them all those things which they do not want to manufacture themselves. In Japan, all large scale units depend upon the supplies from small units.

Disadvantages of Sole Trading Concern

  • Limited capital
  • Limited managerial ability
  • Unlimited liability
  • Loss in absence
  • Uncertain life
  • Limited scope for expansion
  • Limited scope for opportunity

Limited managerial ability:

It is managed by a single owner who may not have adequate managerial skills and technical abilities. So, it may face various managerial deficiencies.

Limited capital:

Its capital is limited due to the investment of a single owner. Such limited capital is insufficient for large-scale production and marketing of goods and services.

Unlimited liability:

The sole trader does not have limited liability to his business capital. The owner must pay the liability of his business even by selling his private properties if the assets of the business are not sufficient to meet such liabilities.

Loss in absence:

It may come to close if the proprietor remains absent from his business due to his illness or other reasons. So, if the owner or proprietor is absent, the business may face the loss.

Uncertain life:

Its life is closely connected with the life of the owner. So, it can be terminated any time due to death, lunacy, insolvency or disability of the owner.

Limited scope of expansion:

It has a limited scope for expansion and development. Due to the limited amount of capital and managerial skills, its activities cannot be diversified.

Limited scope for opportunity:

It offers limited opportunities to his employees. Due to the limited scope of expansion and development of business, its employees get limited opportunities for training, higher studies, career development, attractive salaries, and other benefits.

HR Scorecard, Functions, Techniques, Benefits

HR Scorecard is a strategic HR measurement tool designed to link HR’s effectiveness to the strategic objectives of the organization. It goes beyond traditional HR metrics by incorporating performance drivers and outcomes that connect human resource initiatives with the company’s financial performance and competitive strategy. The HR Scorecard integrates financial and non-financial measures, focusing on areas such as talent development, organizational culture, and employee engagement, thereby demonstrating how HR contributes to achieving strategic goals. This approach enables organizations to assess the impact of their human capital on overall business success and adjust their strategies accordingly for continuous improvement.

HR Scorecard Functions:

  • Aligning HR Strategy with Business Strategy

HR Scorecard aligns HR strategies and practices with the overall business strategy, ensuring that human resource initiatives are directly contributing to the achievement of the organization’s goals. This alignment ensures that HR activities are focused on areas that matter most to the business.

  • Measuring HR Effectiveness

It provides a mechanism to measure the effectiveness of HR initiatives through specific, relevant metrics. By tracking these metrics over time, the HR Scorecard helps in evaluating how well HR is performing in areas such as talent management, training and development, and employee engagement.

  • Identifying Improvement Areas

HR Scorecard helps in identifying areas within the HR function that require improvement. By analyzing the data collected, HR can pinpoint specific practices or processes that are not performing as expected and develop targeted interventions to address these gaps.

  • Demonstrating HR Value

By linking HR activities to business outcomes, the HR Scorecard demonstrates the value that HR brings to the organization. This is particularly important in justifying HR investments and showcasing how human capital influences overall business performance.

  • Facilitating Decision Making

The insights gained from the HR Scorecard enable informed decision-making regarding HR policies, programs, and investments. By understanding the impact of different HR initiatives, leaders can make strategic decisions that optimize human capital management.

  • Enhancing Communication

HR Scorecard can be used as a communication tool to share HR’s contributions with stakeholders, including senior management, investors, and employees. By clearly articulating how HR supports the business strategy, it fosters greater understanding and support for HR initiatives.

  • Driving Cultural Change

The metrics and objectives outlined in the HR Scorecard can help drive cultural change within the organization. By focusing on behaviors and outcomes that align with the company’s strategic goals, the HR Scorecard can influence organizational culture in a direction that supports business success.

  • Promoting Accountability

HR Scorecard assigns accountability for specific outcomes to HR and other leaders within the organization. By establishing clear metrics and goals, it ensures that individuals and teams are responsible for their contributions to the organization’s objectives.

  • Supporting Continuous Improvement

HR Scorecard is not a static tool but a dynamic part of the organization’s ongoing strategy execution process. It supports continuous improvement by providing a structured approach to assessing HR’s performance and making adjustments as needed based on changing business needs and external factors.

HR Scorecard Techniques:

  • Strategy Mapping

This technique involves creating a visual representation of the organization’s strategy, showing the cause-and-effect relationships between strategic objectives across different perspectives, including financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth. It helps in identifying key HR initiatives that support these objectives.

  • Identifying HR Deliverables

Identifying the key deliverables or outcomes that the HR function must achieve to support the organization’s strategic goals. This involves defining what HR needs to deliver in terms of employee skills, behaviors, and organizational culture.

  • Developing HR Measures

For each HR deliverable, developing specific measures that can be used to assess performance. These measures should be balanced between leading indicators (predictive measures that signal future performance) and lagging indicators (outcome measures that indicate past performance).

  • Linking HR Measures to Business Performance

Establishing a clear linkage between HR measures and overall business performance metrics. This involves demonstrating how HR outcomes influence key business outcomes, such as profitability, customer satisfaction, and operational efficiency.

  • Benchmarking

Comparing HR performance metrics against industry standards, best practices, or competitors. Benchmarking helps in identifying performance gaps and areas where the organization can improve its HR practices.

  • Setting Targets and Objectives

Setting specific, measurable targets for each HR measure, aligned with the organization’s strategic goals. These targets serve as benchmarks for evaluating HR performance and guiding improvement efforts.

  • Data Collection and Analysis

Implementing systems and processes for collecting data on HR measures and analyzing this data to gain insights into HR performance. This may involve using HR information systems, surveys, and other data collection tools.

  • Reporting and Visualization

Creating reports and dashboards that visually present HR performance data, making it accessible and understandable to stakeholders. Effective reporting involves highlighting key metrics, trends, and areas of concern.

  • Continuous Improvement

Using insights gained from HR Scorecard data to drive continuous improvement in HR practices. This involves identifying areas where HR is not meeting targets, analyzing root causes, and implementing initiatives to address these issues.

Integration with Business Planning

Integrating HR planning and activities with overall business planning processes. This ensures that HR initiatives are consistently aligned with changing business strategies and objectives.

HR Scorecard Benefits:

  • Strategic Alignment

The HR Scorecard ensures that HR activities and initiatives are directly aligned with the strategic goals of the organization. This alignment guarantees that human resources efforts are focused on areas with the highest impact on business success.

  • Enhanced Decision Making

By providing quantitative data on the effectiveness of HR practices, the HR Scorecard supports data-driven decision making. Leaders can use insights from the scorecard to make informed choices about HR investments and strategies.

  • Improved HR Performance

The HR Scorecard identifies performance gaps and areas of improvement within the HR function. This information can be used to enhance HR practices, policies, and programs, leading to overall improvements in HR performance.

  • Demonstrated HR Value

The HR Scorecard helps to quantify and demonstrate the value that HR adds to the organization. By linking HR initiatives to business outcomes, it showcases how effective human resource management contributes to organizational success.

  • Better Resource Allocation

With clear insights into which HR initiatives are most effective, organizations can allocate resources more efficiently, investing in programs and practices that offer the highest return on investment.

  • Increased Accountability

The HR Scorecard assigns clear accountability for achieving specific outcomes, encouraging HR and other leaders to take responsibility for their contributions to the organization’s goals. This increases accountability and drives performance.

  • Enhanced Communication

The HR Scorecard can be used as a communication tool to articulate the role and contributions of HR to stakeholders, including senior management, employees, and investors. This enhances transparency and fosters a deeper understanding of HR’s strategic value.

  • Support for Cultural Change

By emphasizing behaviors and outcomes that align with strategic objectives, the HR Scorecard can help drive cultural change within the organization, promoting values and practices that support business success.

  • Continuous Improvement

HR Scorecard facilitates continuous improvement by providing a mechanism for regular review and adjustment of HR strategies and practices based on performance data and changing business needs.

  • Competitive Advantage

Finally, by optimizing human resource management and aligning HR practices with strategic objectives, the HR Scorecard can contribute to building a sustainable competitive advantage. Effective management of human capital can differentiate an organization in the marketplace and drive superior performance.

Approaches to Strategic International HRM

  1. Ethnocentric Approach:

Here the MNC simply transfers HR practices and policies used in the home country to subsidiaries in foreign locations. Expatriates from the MNCs home country manage the foreign subsidiaries and the MNCs headquarters maintain tight control over the subsidiaries policies.

  1. Polycentric Approach:

In this case, the subsidiaries are basically independent from headquarters. HR policies are developed to meet the circumstances in each foreign location. Local managers in the foreign sites are hired to manage HRM activities.

  1. Region-Centric Approach:

This approach represents a regional grouping of subsidiaries. HR policies are coordinated within the region to as much an extent as possible. Subsidiaries may be staffed by manager from any of the countries within the region. Coordination and communication within the region are high, but quite limited between the region and the MNCs headquarters.

  1. Geocentric Approach:

In this case, HR policies are developed to meet the goals of the global network of home country locations and foreign subsidiaries. This may include policies which are applied across all subsidiaries, as well as policies adapted to the needs of individual locations depending on what is best to maximize global results.

The firm is viewed as a single international business entity rather than a collection of individual home country and foreign business units. HRM and other activities throughout the MNC are managed by individuals who are most appropriate for the job regardless of their nationally. Thus, one may find a British manager handling HRM activities in the New York office of a Dutch MNC.

Practices of International Human Resource Management

An organization needs to consider the purpose for which it needs to send the employees for international assignments. For example, an organization may send its employees aboard to set up or explore a new market, or prepare them for top management positions. After the purpose of the international assignment is specified, the organization can initiate the process of selecting the best employees for the international project.

The following are the aspects of concern in IHRM:

  1. International staffing
  2. Pre-departure training for international assignments
  3. Repatriation
  4. Performance management in international assignments
  5. Compensation issues in international assignments.

International Staffing:

International staffing refers to the selection of the most appropriate employees for international operations of an MNC.

The selection of the most appropriate employees can be done by using the following three sources:

  • Home Country or Parent Country Nationals (PCNs):

Refer to the citizen of the country in which the headquarters of the MNCs is located. PCNs are not the citizens of the country in which they are working. For instance, an Indian citizen who is posted to an overseas subsidiary of an organization that has its headquarters in India is a PCN. In addition, PCNs are termed as expatriates.

Generally, PCNs are hired to occupy key and top-level management positions because they possess sound knowledge about the operations of parent organization. The knowledge about parent organization helps the PCNs in ensuring proper linkage between foreign subsidiaries and the headquarters. However, hiring PCNs is a costly affair for an organization as it has to bear the relocation cost for them.

  • Host Country Nationals (HCNs):

Refer to the employees of an organization, who are citizens of the country in which the foreign subsidiary is located. An Indian manager working in an Indian subsidiary of a US organization is an HCN. For example, IBM normally hires HCNs. In addition, HCNs generally occupy middle and lower management level positions. The recruitment of HCNs is not a costly affair for an organization because it does not need to incur extra cost in cross-cultural training of employees.

  • Third Country Nationals (TCNs):

Refer to the citizens of a country, other than the country where the organization is headquartered and the country that is hosting the subsidiary. Staffing is done on the basis of ability and not on the basis of nationalism. For example, a British citizen working in the Indian subsidiary of an organization whose headquarters is located in the US, is termed as a TCN. You should note that a TCN has substantial international experience and exposure that is quite advantageous for an organization.

The approach of internal staffing differs from organization to organization.

Benefits of Competencies for Effective Execution of HRM Functions

Competency management as a business lever for hiring, development, mobility, and promotion started more than 40 years ago. It continues as essential today in the effective management of human capital. To implement competency management to drive employee development and performance excellence, let us align on four key definitions.

  1. Competencies are abilities, behaviors, knowledge, and skills that impact the success of employees and organizations. Some common competencies are analytical thinking, communication, flexibility, integrity, and teamwork.
  2. A competency model is a set of key competencies, ideally seven to 10, carefully selected in alignment with an organization’s business goals. High-performance models include four types of competencies: core competencies, leadership competencies, functional competencies, and career competencies
  3. A competency proficiency scale is a defined rating or measurement that assigns an expected level of competence on a given competency. Leading practice scales have behavioral indicators as their building blocks with related behaviors organized under each competency. Scale ratings range from three to seven mastery levels, with five levels being the most common.
  4. Competency management is the set of management practices that identify and optimize the skills and competencies required to deliver on an organization’s business strategy. Competency management provides the foundation to manage strategic talent management practices such as workforce planning, acquiring top talent, and developing employees to optimize their strengths.

Benefits of Competencies

Effective and automated competency management creates a real-time and predictive inventory of the capability of any workforce. By defining and automating job roles and associated competency proficiency, leadership can readily identify strengths and skill gaps. Competency management then informs targeted skills development learning solutions improving individual and organizational performance, leading to better business results.

High-performance organizations describe the following benefits of effective and automated competency management:

  • Enriched understanding of expected behaviors and performance. Of course, the quickest path to improving performance starts by knowing the target performance. Organizations that take the time to define the short list of competencies and expected proficiency level for each competency, by job role, essential for the achievement of business goals, have taken the first step toward giving employees and leaders the best shot at performance excellence.
  • Improved talent planning. Competency assessment results inform leadership about current and future talent capability. To be assessed as competent, the employee must demonstrate the ability and experience to perform a job’s specific tasks. Data and analytics about employees’ skills and knowledge are essential for performance risk mitigation that leadership would otherwise be blind to.
  • Optimized development and mobility strategy. High-performance organizations realize that organizational success depends on how capable their people are. They also recognize that formal training does not necessarily equip employees with the appropriate skills to thrive in the workplace. This is where competency management and competency-based development comes in. Competency-based development is created around the competency standards that have been identified for a specific role in an organization.
  • Enhanced talent pipeline. Automated competency management enables on-demand information about employees’ and leaders’ competency mastery and readiness to move into next-level or other critical roles. In this fashion, organizations are better prepared with development planning and, as a result, yield healthier talent pipelines regardless of business cycle or economic conditions.
  • Improved operational efficiencies. Competency management automation facilitates business-driven learning and development, eliminates non-value-add training, highlights strengths to be further developed, flags critical skill gaps for mitigation, and generates higher levels of employee and leader satisfaction with their overall experience with the organization.
  • Integrated talent processes. Serving as the standard for expected performance by job role, competency management becomes the standard by which the highest-performing organizations talk about and manage all phases of the employee lifecycle: from talent acquisition to development, to retention and reward.

Competency based HRM Meaning

The Competency Based Human Resources Management is an approach that standardizes and integrates all HR activities based on competencies that support organizational goals.

Competency-based HRM is about using the concept of competency and the results of competency analysis to inform and improve the processes of performance management, recruitment and selection, employee development and employee reward. The language has dominated much of HR thinking and practice in recent years.

Competencies are any observable abilities, skills, knowledge, motivations or traits defined in terms of the behaviors needed for successful job performance.

From the competency framework, the main types of competencies are created, and they consist of core, functional and leadership competencies.

Core Competencies, are fundamental to the organizational success and are applied across the whole organization from the board of directors, and middle management, down to fresh graduates and juniors. These competencies decide how organizations want to shape their employees, the company’s image and its professional characteristics. They are one of the company’s strengths, competitive advantage and could affect its profitability and growth.

Competency-based HR is primarily based on the concepts of behavioural and technical competencies as defined in the first section of this chapter. But it is also associated with the use of National and Scottish Vocational qualifications (NVQs/SNVQs) as also examined in the first section. The next five sections of the chapter concentrate on the application and use of behavioural and technical competencies under the following headings:

  • Competency frameworks;
  • Reasons for using competencies;
  • Use of competencies;
  • Guidelines on the development of competency frameworks;
  • Keys to success in using competencies.

Behavioural competencies

Behavioural competencies define behavioural expectations, ie the type of behaviour required to deliver results under such headings as teamworking, communication, leadership and decision-making. They are sometimes known as ‘soft skills’. Behavioural competencies are usually set out in a competency framework.

The behavioural competency approach was first advocated by McClelland (1973). He recommended the use of criterion-referenced assessment. Criterion referencing or validation is the process of analysing the key aspects of behaviour that differentiate between effective and less effective performance.

Technical competencies

Technical competencies define what people have to know and be able to do (knowledge and skills) to carry out their roles effectively. They are related to either generic roles (groups of similar jobs), or individual roles (as ‘role-specific competencies’). The term ‘technical competency’ has been adopted fairly recently to avoid the confusion that existed between the terms ‘competency’ and ‘competence’. Competency, as mentioned above, is about behaviours, while competence as defined by Woodruffe (1990) is: ‘A work-related concept which refers to areas of work at which the person is competent. Competent people at work are those who meet their performance expectations.’ Competences are sometimes known as ‘hard skills’. The terms technical competencies and competences are closely related although the latter has a particular and more limited meaning when applied to NVQs/SNVQs, as discussed below.

NVQ/SNVQ competences

The concept of competence was conceived in the UK as a fundamental part of the process of developing standards for NVQs/SNVQs. These specify minimum standards for the achievement of set tasks and activities expressed in ways that can be observed and assessed with a view to certification. An element of competence in NVQ language is a description of something that people in given work areas should be able to do. They are assessed on being competent or not yet competent. No attempt is made to assess the degree of competence.

Functional Competencies are the Business’ Front Wheel Competencies, no vehicle can function or move forward without its front wheels; the same goes for business, no organization can perform without its Functional or its Job Specific Competencies. These competencies drive high performance and quality results for each function in the organization. It can be technical or non-technical knowledge, skills, and abilities required to fulfill job tasks, duties or responsibilities.

Leadership competencies are basically leadership skills and behaviors that contribute to superior performance, used to assess an individual’s ability and skills to be a leader. By using a competency-based approach to leadership, organizations can better identify and develop their next generation of leaders.

Finally, applying the Competency Based HRM in any organization is the most effective approach nowadays; as competencies act as an effective benchmark for measuring employees’ qualifications and suitability of filling a specific position.

Applying the approach across the organization, should lead to more fairness in evaluation, proper career development, improve hiring decision, increase operating effectiveness and most important to supporting the achievement of strategic and business goals.

Contemporary Approaches to HR Evaluation

Some of the benefits are:

  • Providing feedback more regularly improves communication and employee engagement.
  • Potential problems are addressed sooner.
  • The time to address performance issues and get them corrected is lessened.

Proactive Approach

HR managers must anticipate the challenges or problems before they arise. Prevention is better than cure.

The proactive approach will save companies considerable time and money in the short and long run. P. F. Drucker (1997) highlighted the importance of a proactive approach very rightly.

He argues,” In a perfect world every startup would take the proactive approach and build their company from the beginning by identifying not only the mission, vision, values, goals, objectives, etc., but will determine where they want to go in the short and long-term and build a holistic, aligned organization beginning at the founder level where they can attract, hire, and retain the top talent to get them where they want to go.”

Human Resource Approach

People are human beings with a lot of potentials and intellectual abilities. It is important to treat people with respect and dignity.

Commodity Approach

People are a commodity. They are viewed as a cog of a machine. People can be hired and fired through money. It is money that matters most. There is a saying, “money is sweeter than honey.” This approach views people as an economic man.

Strategic Approach

People are the strategic asset of an organization. People have core competencies, the basis of competitive advantage.

Human resources are the combination of talent and skills; some of them are inborn and other skills they have acquired through learning and education. The strategic HRM approach focuses on people management programs and long-term solutions.

It stresses organizational development interventions, achieving employee organizational fit, and other aspects that ensure employees add value to the organization.

Management Approach

HRM is a part of general management. Management is nothing but managing people in the workplace. Managers at all levels are responsible for managing their employees or subordinates.

Reactive Approach

It occurs when decision-makers respond to problems. If efforts are reactive only, problems may be compounded, and opportunities may be missed, and organizations may suffer loss.

Companies may lose time and money if they take a reactive approach.

System Approach

A system is a set of interrelated but separate elements or parts working together for a common goal.

For example, HRM is a system that may have parts such as procurement, training, performance appraisal and reward, etc. One part affects and is affected by the other.

error: Content is protected !!