Comprehensive /Master budget

The Master Budget is consolidated summary of the various functional budgets. It has been defined as “a summary of the budget schedules in capsule form made for the purpose of presenting, in one report, the highlights of the budget forecast”.

The definition of this budget given by the Chartered Institute of Management Accountant, England, is as follows:

“The summary budget incorporating its component functional budgets and which is finally approved adopted and employed”.

The master budget is prepared by the budget committee on the basis of co-ordinated functional budgets and becomes the target for the company during the budget period when it is finally approved by the committee.

This budget summarises functional budgets to produce a Budgeted Profit and Loss Account and a Budgeted Balance Sheet as at the end of the budget period as is clear from the form given as follows:

Advantages of the Master Budget:

Following are the main advantages of the master budget:

(1) A summary of all functional budgets in capsule form is available in one report.

(2) The accuracy of all the functional budgets is checked because the summarised information of all functional budgets should agree with the information given in the master budget.

(3) It gives an overall estimated profit position of the organisation for the budget period.

(4) Information relating to forecast balance sheet is available in the master budget.

This budget is very useful the top management because it is usually interested in the summarised meaningful information provided by this budget.

Some of the components of the master budget are briefly explained as follows:

1. Materials and utilities budget:

This budget provides for acquiring raw materials required for production, spare parts for maintenance, labour time, machine time, and energy consumption and so on.

The labour time and machine time is usually related to what a unit of time is budgeted to yield. In other words it relates to the output per unit of time.

2. Control of liquidity:

This budget involves cash flow and is very important in controlling cash and meeting current financial obligations. The budget forecasts cash receipts and outlays for a given period of time and are necessary to control the income and expenses so that there is no shortage of cash to pay for bills and also there in no excessive unused cash which may be unproductive.

3. Revenue and expense budgets:

The revenue budgets should show anticipated sales by product or by geographical territory or by department and so on. In anticipating sales, managers must take into account their competitors, planned advertising expenditures, sales force effectiveness and other relevant factors.

The expense budgets list the primary activities undertaken by a unit to achieve its goals and the costs associated with these activities. These budgets cover all necessary and relevant areas including rent, utilities, supplies, security and so on.

4. Capital expenditure budgets:

These budgets plan for long term investments and include expenditures for new plants and equipment, major installations, replacement of existing equipment, renovation of buildings and so on. These are typically substantial expenditures both in terms of magnitude and duration.

Capital budgeting is a part of long range planning and must be broken into well defined phases of the program known as milestones each phase being budgeted for cost, time and effort in self contained way.

5. Sales budgets:

A sales budget is the direct outcome of sales forecast and is based on the consideration of demand and supply situation, competition, past sales trends, future prediction of sales, seasonal changes that affect sales and so on.

The sales forecasting is based upon such factors as population trends, general economic environment, consumer’s purchasing power, disposable income, price trends of the products, inflation rate and so an.

6. Production budget:

The production budget contains the plan for future manufacturing operations and is based upon the sales forecasts and sales budgets. It aims at obtaining utilization of manufacturing methods and facilities. The budget may be prepared in two parts, one being the production volume budget and the other being the budget for cost of manufacturing.

The production volume budget relates to the production of physical units and involves production planning. The cost of production budget deals with all costs attributable to the manufacture of the product.

7. Balance Sheet:

A balance sheet is composite budget and reflects anticipated assets, liabilities and owner’s equity or net worth at the end of a given period in the future. It provides a forecast of the anticipated financial status of the company at a future date.

All these budgets should be carefully set and should be flexible enough so that any reasonable changes in the values of various variables can be accommodated.

Cost Variance Analysis

When the actual cost differs from the standard cost, it is called variance. If the actual cost is less than the standard cost or the actual profit is higher than the standard profit, it is called favorable variance. On the contrary, if the actual cost is higher than the standard cost or profit is low, then it is called adverse variance.

Each element of cost and sales requires variance analysis. Variance is classified as follows:

  • Direct Material Variance
  • Direct Labor Variance
  • Overhead Variance
  • Sales Variance

Direct Material Variance

Material variances can be of the following categories:

  • Material Cost Variance
  • Material Price Variance
  • Material Usage Variance
  • Material Mix Variance
  • Material Yield Variance
Material Cost Variance
Standard cost of materials for actual output – Actual cost of material used

Or

Material price variance + Material usage or quantity variance

Or

Material price variance + Material mix variance + Material yield variance

Material Price Variance
Actual usage ( Standard Quantity Price – Actual Unit Price)

Actual Usage = Actual Quantity of material (in units) used

Standard Unit Price = Standard Price of material per unit

Actual Unit Price = Actual price of material per unit

Material Usage or Quantity Variance
Material usage or Quantity variance: Standard price per unit (Standard Quantity – Actual Quantity )
Material Mix Variance
Material mix variance arises due to the difference between the standard mixture of material and the actual mixture of Material mix.

Material Mix variance is calculated as a difference between the standard prices of standard mix and the standard price of actual mix.

If there is no difference between the standard and the actual weight of mix, then:

Standard unit cost (Standard Quantity – Actual Quantity )

Or

Standard Cost of Standard Mix – Standard cost of Actual Mix

Sometimes due to shortage of a particular type of material, standard is revised; then:

Standard unit cost (Revised Standard Quantity – Actual Quantity)

Or

Standard cost of revised Standard Mix – Standard Cost of Actual mix

If the actual weight of mix differs from the standard weight of mix, then:

Standard cost of revised standard mix ×

(Total weight of actual mix /mixTotal weight of revised standard mix)

Material Yield Variance
When the standard and the actual mix do not differ, then

Yield Variance = Standard Rate × (Actual Yield – Standard Yield)

Standard Rate =

Standard cost of standard mix /Net standard output (i.e.Gross output−Standard loss)

Direct Labor Variance

Direct labor variances are categorized as follows:

  • Labor Cost Variance
  • Labor Rate of Pay Variance
  • Total Labor Efficiency Variance
  • Labor Efficiency Variance
  • Labor Idle Time Variance
  • Labor Mix Variance or Gang Composition Variance
  • Labor Yield Variance or Labor Efficiency Sub Variance
  • Substitution Variance
Labor Cost Variance
Standard Cost of Labor – Actual Cost of Labor
Labor Rate of pay Variance
Actual Time taken × (Standard Rate – Actual Rate)
Total Labor Efficiency Variance
Standard rate × (Standard time – Actual time)
Labor Efficiency Variance
Standard Rate (Standard time for actual output – Actual time worked)
Labor Idle Time Variance
Idle Time Variance = Abnormal Idle Time × Standard Rate

Total Labor Cost Variance = Labor rate of Pay variance + Total labor Efficiency Variance

Total Labor Efficiency Variance = Labor Efficiency Variance + Labor Idle Time Variance

Labor Mix Variance or Gang Composition Variance
If actual composition of labor is equal to standard:

LMV = Standard Cost of Standard Composition (for Actual time taken) – Standard Cost of Actual Composition (for Actual time worked)

If standard composition of labor revised due to shortage of any specific type of labor but the total actual time is equal to the total standard time:

LMV = Standard Cost of Revised Standard Composition (for Actual Time Taken) – Standard Cost of Actual Composition (for Actual Time Worked)

If actual and standard time of labor differs:

=

(Total time of actual labor composition/ Total time of standard labor composition)

× Std.cost of std.composition − Std.cost of actual composition

In case the Standard is revised and there is a difference in the total Actual and the Standard time:

=

(Total time of actual labor composition/Total time of revised std./labor composition)

× Std.cost of (revised std.composition − actual composition)

Labor Yield Variance
Std. Labor Cost per unit × (Actual Yield In units – Std. Yield in units expected from Actual time worked on production)
Substitution Variance
(Actual hrs × Std. Rate of Std. Worker) – (Actual hrs × Std.Rate actual worker)

 

Fixed and Flexible Budget

Fixed Budget:

This budget is drawn for one level of activity and one set of conditions. It has been defined as a budget which is designed to remain unchanged irrespective of the volume of output or turnover attained. It is rigid budget and is drawn on the assumption that there will be no change in the budgeted level of activity. It does not take into consideration any change in expenditure arising out of changes in the level of activity.

Thus, it does not provide for changes in expenditure arising out of change in the anticipated conditions and activity. A fixed budget will, therefore, be useful only when the actual level of activity corresponds to the budgeted level of activity.

A master budget tailored to a single output level of (say) 20,000 units of sales is a typical example of a fixed budget. But, in practice, the level of activity and set conditions will change as a result of internal limitations and external factors like changes in demand and prices, shortages of materials and power, acute competition etc.

It is hardly of any use as a mechanism of budgetary control because it does not make any distinction between fixed, variable and semi-variable costs and provides for no adjustment in the budgeted figures as a result of change in cost due to change in level of activity. It does not provide a meaningful basis for comparison and control. It is also not helpful at all in the fixation of price and submission offenders.

Flexible Budget:

The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, England, defines a flexible budget (also called sliding scale budget) as a budget which, by recognising the difference in behaviour between fixed and variable costs in relation to fluctuations in output, turnover, or other variable factors such as number of employees, is designed to change appropriately with such fluctuations. Thus, a flexible budget gives different budgeted costs for different levels of activity.

A flexible budget is prepared after making an intelligent classification of all expenses between fixed, semi-variable and variable because the usefulness of such a budget depends upon the accuracy with which the expenses can be classified.

Such a budget is prescribed in the following cases:

(i) Where the level of activity during the year varies from period to period, either due to the seasonal nature of the industry or to variation in demand.

(ii) Where the business is a new one and it is difficult to foresee the demand.

(iii) Where the undertaking is suffering from shortage of a factor of production such as materials, labour, plant capacity etc. The level of activity depends upon the availability of such a factor of production.

(iv) Where an industry is influenced by changes in fashion.

(v) Where there are general changes in sales.

(vi) Where the business units keep on introducing new products or make changes in the design of its products frequently.

(vii) Where the industries are engaged in make to order business like ship-building.

Utility (or Importance) of Flexible Budget

  1. Flexible budget provides a logical comparison of budgeted allowances with the actual cost i.e., a comparison with like basis.
  2. Flexible budget reckons operational realities and streamlines control function and profit planning. It gives balanced perspective on comparison. When flexible budget is prepared, actual cost at actual activity is compared with budgeted cost at actual activity i.e., two things to a like basis.
  3. Flexible budget recognises concept of variability and provides logical comparison of expenditure with actual expenditure as a means of control.
  4. With flexible budget, it is possible to establish budgeted cost for any range of activity.
  5. A flexible budget is very useful for purposes of budgetary control because it corresponds with changes in the level of activity.
  6. It is helpful in assessing the performance of departmental heads because their performance can be judged in relation to the level of activity attained by the organisation.
  7. Cost ascertainment at different levels of activity is possible because a flexible budget is prepared for various levels of activity.
  8. It is helpful in price fixation and sending quotations.

Difference

Fixed Budget

Flexible Budget

Meaning The budget designed to remain constant, regardless of the activity level reached is Fixed Budget. The budget designed to change with the change in the activity levels is Flexible Budget.
Nature Static Dynamic
Activity Level Only one Multiple
Performance Evaluation Comparison between actual and budgeted levels cannot be done accurately, if there is a distinction in their activity levels. It provides a good base for making a comparison between the actual and budgeted levels.
Rigidity Fixed Budget cannot be modified as per the actual volume. Flexible budget can be easily modified in accordance with the activity level attained.
Estimates Based on assumption Realistic and Practical

Functional Budgets

A functional budget is a budget which relates to any of the functions of an undertaking, e.g., sales, production, research and development, cash etc.

Following functional budgets are generally prepared:  

(i) Sales Budget:

Sales budget is the most important budget and of primary importance. It forms the basis on which all the other budgets are built up. This budget is a forecast of quantities and values of sales to be achieved in a budget period. Every effort should be made to ensure that its figures are as accurate as possible because this is usually the starting budget (sales being limiting factor on which all the other budgets are built up).

The Sales Manager should be made directly responsible for the preparation and execution of the budget. The sales budget may be prepared according to products, sales territories, types of customers, salesmen etc.

In the preparation of the sales budget, the sales manager should take into consideration the following factors:

  1. Past Sales Figures and Trends:

The complier of the sales budget should be assisted by graphs recording sales of the previous year and the general sales trend (upward and downward) should be noticed from the graphs. The record of previous year’s sales is the most reliable basis as to future sales as the past performance is based on actual business conditions. But in addition to past sales, other factors affecting future sales, e.g., seasonal fluctuations, growth of market, trade cycle etc., should be considered in the preparation of the sales budget.

  1. Salesmen’s Estimates:

In preparing the sales budget, the sales manager should consider the estimates of sales received from salesmen because they can make more accurate estimates, being in direct contact with the customers. However, it should be seen that salesmen’s estimates should neither be over-optimistic nor too conservative.

  1. Plant Capacity:

The budget should be within the plant capacity available and should ensure proper utilisation of plant facilities. Proposed plant extensions should be allowed for in the preparation of the sales budget.

  1. Availability of Raw Material and Other Supplies:

Adequate supply of raw materials and other supplies should be ensured before preparing the sales estimates. Sales estimates should be adjusted according to the availability of raw material if the raw materials are in short supply.

  1. General Trade Prospects:

The probability of the sales going up or down depends on the general trade prospects. In this connection valuable information may be gathered from financial papers and magazines such as the Economic Times, the Financial Express, the Commerce, etc.

  1. Orders in Hand:

In boom periods or where production is a very lengthy process the value of orders in hand may have considerable influence on the amount of sales to be budgeted.

  1. Seasonal Fluctuations:

In preparation of the sales budget, seasonal fluctuations should be considered because sales are affected by these fluctuations. In order to have an even flow of production, efforts should be made to minimise the effects of seasonal fluctuations on sales by giving special concessions or added inducements during the off- season.

  1. Financial Aspect:

The sales budget should be within the financial capacity of the concern. Sales expansion usually requires an increase in capital outlay. Thus, if any big sales expansion is planned, it must be ensured that facilities are available to finance the operations.

  1. Adequate Return on Capital Employed:

The sales volume budgeted should produce an adequate return on the capital employed.

  1. Competition:

The nature and degree of competition within the industry should be considered in the preparation of the sales budget to have a realistic sales budget capable of being achieved in the face of competition.

  1. Miscellaneous Considerations:

Other considerations such as advertising and sales promotion efforts, government intervention, import possibility, product profitability, market research studies, pricing policies etc. should also be kept in view.

The sales manager, after taking into consideration the above factors, should prepare the sales budget in terms of quantities and amounts and the sales estimates must be analysed for products periods and territories. The sales budget should include an estimate of selling and distribution costs in addition to an estimate of the total proceeds.

(ii) Production Budget:

Production budget is a forecast of the total output of the whole organisation broken down into estimates of output of each type of product with a scheduling of operations (by weeks and months) to be performed and a forecast of the closing finished stock. This budget may be expressed in quantitative (weight, units etc.) or financial (rupees) units or both.

This budget is prepared after taking into consideration the estimated opening stock, the estimated sales and the desired closing finished stock of each product.

The Works Manager is responsible for the total production budget and the departmental managers are responsible for the departmental production budget.

In preparing the production budget, the following factors are considered:

(1) The time lag between the production in the factory and sales to the customer should be considered so as to allow for the time required for the despatch of goods from the factory to the place of the customers.

(2) The stock of goods to be maintained both at the factory’s godown and at the sales centres.

(3) The level of production needed to meet the sales programme. Monthly production targets should be fixed and it should be seen that production is kept more or less at a uniform level throughout the year.

Planning the level of production involves the answer of four questions:

(a) What is to be produced?

(b) When is it to be produced?

(c) How is it to be produced?

(d) Where is to be produced?

The material, labour and plant requirements should be ascertained to have the desired production to meet the sales programme.

The sales and the production budget are inter-dependent because production budget is governed by the sales budget and the sales budget is largely determined by the production capacity and by production costs. The specimen proforma of production budget is given on the next page.

(iii) Cost of Production Budget:

After determining the volume of output the cost of procuring the output must be obtained by preparing a cost of production budget. This budget is an estimate of cost of output planned for a budget period and may be classified into material cost budget, labour cost budget and overhead budget because cost of production includes material, labour and overheads.

Materials Budget:

In drawing up the production budget, one of the first requirements to be considered is material. As we know, materials may be direct or indirect. Thus materials budget deals with the requirement and procurement of direct materials. Indirect materials are dealt with under the works overhead budget.

The budget should be related to the production budget and the period of the budget should be of short duration because this budget has an important bearing on the cash budget.

The preparation of the materials budget includes:

(1) The preparation of estimates of different types of raw materials needed for various products.

(2) Procuring or purchasing raw materials in required quantities at the required time.

In preparing the materials budget the following factors are considered:

(i) Raw materials required for the budgeted output.

(ii) The percentage of raw materials to total cost of products should be calculated on the basis of previous records. On the basis of this percentage a rough total value of raw materials required for the budgeted output will be ascertained.

(iii) Consideration must be given to the company’s stocking policy. Figures related to the anticipated raw materials stock to be held at different times should be known.

(iv) Consideration must be given to the lag between the placing of the order of the purchase of materials and the receipt of materials.

(v) The seasonal nature in the availability of raw materials should be considered.

(vi) The price trend in the market.

Materials budget can be classified into material requirement budget and material procurement purchase budget. The material requirement budget gives information about the quantity of materials required during the budget period to attain the production target. Material requirement budget takes into consideration the inventory of materials and the materials on order at the beginning of a budget period, and the anticipated inventory of materials are the materials to be on order on the closing date of the budget period.

Purchase Budget:

Purchase Budget is mainly dependent on production budget and material requirement budget. This budget provides information about the materials to be acquired from the market during the budget period.

Following factors should be taken into consideration while preparing a purchase budget:

  1. Quantity and quality of each material needed according to the production target;
  2. Capital items, tools and general supplies required during the budget period ;
  3. The present stock position and materials expected to arrive, already covered by purchase orders ;
  4. The dates on which purchase items are required ;
  5. Prices of items to be bought and possibility of quantity discount;
  6. Sources of supply ;
  7. Availability of cash to settle accounts of suppliers ;
  8. Transport requirements ;
  9. Inspection and receiving arrangements ; and
  10. Storage capacity and other factors such as handling of stocks, insurance, obsolescence and shrinkage.

Purchase budget should be prepared by the purchase manager by getting relevant information about capital items, tools, general supplies and direct materials required during the budget period from other related departments. Like other budgets, the purchase budget has to be approved by the budget committee.

After approval it becomes the responsibility of the purchase officer to see that purchases are made as per the purchase budget.

(iv) Labour and Personnel Budget:

Direct Labour Budget:

This budget gives an estimate of the requirements of direct labour essential to meet the production target. This budget may be classified into labour requirement budget and labour recruitment budget. The labour requirement budget is developed on the basis of requirement of the production budget given and detailed information regarding the different classes of labour, e.g. fitters, welders, turners, millers, grinders, drillers etc., required for each department, their scales of pay and hours to be spent.

This budget is prepared with a view to enable the personnel department to carry out programmes of training and transfer and to find out sources of labour needed so that every effort may be made to remove difficulties arising in production through lack of suitable personnel.

Labour recruitment budget is prepared on the basis of labour requirement budget after taking into consideration the available workers in each department, the expected changes in the labour force during the budget period due to the labour turnover.

This budget gives information about the personnel specifications for the jobs for which workers are to be recruited, the degree of skill and experience required and the rates of pay. In preparing the labour cost budget, the question of overtime should not be overlooked because workers are to get higher rates of wages if they work on overtime.

Regular overtime should be avoided by engagement of additional workers and extension of plant. Where standard costing system is applied, the labour cost budget is developed on the basis of standard labour cost per unit multiplied by the quantity of anticipated production determined in the production budget. If standard costing system is not being followed in the organisation, the information of labour cost may be obtained from past records or estimated cost.

Manpower Budget:

This budget gives the requirements of direct and indirect labour necessary to meet the programme set out in the sales, manufacturing, maintenance, research and development and capital expenditure budgets. The labour requirements are expressed in terms of rupee value, number of labour hours, number and grade of workers etc. This budget makes provision for shift and overtime work and for the effective training for new workers on labour cost.

The main purposes of this budget are:

(1) It provides efficient personnel management.

(2) It helps to make provision for a suitable yardstick with which the actual labour force may be compared and controlled.

(3) It helps in reducing labour turnover by providing favourable conditions.

(4) It also helps to measure and stabilise the ratio between direct labour and indirect labour.

(5) It gives the requirements of cash for paying wages and thus facilitates the preparation of Cash Budget.

(v) Manufacturing (or Production) Overheads Budget:

This budget gives an estimate of the works overhead expenses to be incurred in a budget period to achieve the production target. The budget includes the cost of indirect materials, indirect labour and indirect works expenses. The budget may be classified into fixed cost, variable cost and semi-variable cost. It can be broken into departmental overhead budget to facilitate control.

In preparing the budget, fixed works overhead can be estimated on the basis of past information after taking into consideration the expected changes which may occur during the budget period. Variable expenses are estimated on the basis of the budgeted output because these expenses are bound to change with the change in output.

The Cost Accountant prepares this budget on the basis of figures available in the manufacturing overhead ledger or the head of the workshop may be asked to give estimates for the manufacturing expenses. A good method is to combine the estimates of the Cost Accountant and the shop executive.

(vi) Administration Expenses Budget:

This budget covers the expenses incurred in framing policies, directing the organisation and controlling the business operations. In other words, the budget provides an estimate of the
expenses of the central office and of management salaries. The budget can be prepared with the help of past experience and anticipated changes.

Budget may be prepared for each administration department so that responsibility for increasing such expenses may be fixed and related to the different executives. Much difficulty is not experienced in developing such budget as most of the administration expenses are of a fixed nature.

Although fixed expenses remain constant and are not related to sales volume in the short run, they are dependent upon sales in the long run. With a small change in output, they do not change.

However, if there is a persistent fall in output, administration expenses will have to be reduced by discharging the services of some members of the staff and taking other economy measures. On the other hand, with persistent increase in output or business activity, administration expenses will increase but they may lag behind business activity.

(vii) Plant Utilisation Budget:

This budget lays down the requirements of plant capacity to carry out the production as per the production programme. This budget is expressed in terms of convenient physical units as weight or number of products or working hours.

The main functions of this budget are:

(i) It will show the machine load in each department during the budget period.

(ii) It will indicate the overloading on some departments, machine or group of machines and alternative courses of actions as working overtime, off-loading, procurement or expansion of plants, sub-contracting etc., can be taken.

(iii) Idle capacity in some departments may be utilised by making efforts to increase the demand for the products by providing after sale service, conducting advertisement campaign, reducing prices, introducing lucky prize coupons, recruiting efficient sales staff etc.

(viii) Capital Expenditure Budget:

The capital expenditure budget gives an estimate of the amount of capital that may be needed for acquiring the fixed assets required for fulfilling production requirements as specified in the production budget. The budget is prepared after taking into consideration the available productive capacities, probable reallocation of the existing assets and possible improvement in production techniques. Separate budgets may La prepared for different items of fixed assets such as plant and equipment budget, building budget etc.

The capital expenditure budget is an important budget providing for acquisition of assets, necessitated by the following factors:

(i) Replacement of existing assets.

(ii) Purchase of additional assets to meet a proposed increase in production due to increase in demand.

(iii) Purchase of additional assets because of starting up of new lines of production.

(iv) Installation of an improved type of machinery so as to reduce cost of production.

Thus, the capital expenditure budget enables one to know what new fixed assets are needed and what will be their costs and rates of return.

(ix) Research and Development Cost Budget:

While developing research and development cost budget, it should be clear in mind that work relating to research and development is different from that relating to the manufacturing function. Manufacturing function gives quicker results than research and development which may go on for several years. Therefore, these budgets are established on a long term basis say for 5 to 10 years which can be further subdivided into short-term budgets on annual basis.

As a rule research workers are less cost conscious; so they are not susceptible to strict control. A research and development budget is prepared taking into consideration the research projects in hand and the new research and development projects to be taken up. Thus this budget provides an estimate of the expenditure to be incurred on research and development during the budget period.

After fixation of the research and development cost budget, the research executive fixes priorities for the various research and development projects and submits research and development project authorization forms to the budget committee.

The projects are finally approved by the senior executive. Before giving the approval, the expenditure on research and development is matched against the benefits likely to be availed of from the new object. After the approval of the budget, a close watch is kept on the expenditure so that it may not exceed budget provisions. It is also seen that extent of progress made is commensurate with the expenditure incurred.

(x) Cash (or Financial) Budget:

This budget gives an estimate of the anticipated receipts and payments of cash during the budget period. Therefore, this budget is divided into two parts, one showing the estimated cash receipts on account of cash sales, credit collections and miscellaneous receipts and the other showing the estimated disbursement on account of cash purchases, amount payable to creditors, wages payable to workers, indirect expenses payable, income tax payable, dividend payable, budgeted capital expenditure etc. In short, every factor which affects the receipts and payments of cash is taken into account in the preparation of this budget.

Cash budget makes a provision for a minimum cash balance which will be available at all times. In general, this balance should be equal to one month’s operating expenses plus some provision for contingencies. The minimum balance of cash will help in tiding over adverse conditions of a minor nature. Meanwhile management can make alternative arrangement for additional cash.

This budget is prepared by the Chief Accountant for the guidance of management so that arrangements may be made for the requirements of the organisation.

Advantages of Cash Budget:

Following are the main advantages of preparing cash budget:

(i) It provides an opportunity to review the cash flow for future periods as realistically as possible and make sure that cash is available for revenue and capital expenditure.

(ii) Where adequate amount of cash is not likely to be available during certain periods e.g. when payment of bonus, dividend, tax etc. fall due the company can know in advance so that advance action can be taken to make available the required amount on the most advantageous terms.

(iii) If large surplus of cash is likely to result during certain periods then it will be possible to plan most profitable investment of these funds.

(iv) Preparation of a cash budget by a company will help to plan its cash position in such a way that maximum seasonal discounts can be availed of.

(v) Even for obtaining funds from financial institutions, the system of preparing cash budget helps to convince the bank or other financial institutions about the benefices of the company’s requirements.

(vi) The importance of cash budget may be more in some trades than in others e.g. in trades where there are wide seasonal fluctuations or where long contracts are undertaken.

There are three methods of preparing cash forecasts:

(i) Receipt and Payment Method

(ii) Balance Sheet Forecast Method

(iii) Profit Forecast Method.

(i) Receipt and Payment Method:

This method is useful for forecasting all cash receipts and payments for a short period. Forecasts of cash receipts and payments are made on the basis of the provisions made in the individual functional budgets including the capital expenditure budget and research and development budget. In short, this method of cash forecasts is the same as we have described in the beginning of the discussion on cash budget. Following illustration will make it more clear.

(ii) Balance Sheet Forecast Method:

This method is used for long term forecasting of cash. Forecast of cash is made on the basis of changes in the balance sheet. The opening balance of cash all anticipated changes in the assets and liabilities are added or deducted according to the nature of the time.

Decreases in assets and increases in liabilities are added to the opening balance of cash and increases in assets and decreases in liabilities are deducted from the opening balance of cash. The resulting figure is the estimated cash in hand or cash required at the end of the period.

This method suffers from the following defects:

(a) This method does not take into consideration items of expenses and incomes on the assumption that there is a regular pattern of inflow and outflow of cash.

(b) This method does not give an idea of surplus or deficiency of cash occurring within the budget period because it shows cash in hand or cash required at the end of the budget period.

(iii) Profit Forecast Method:

This method is also helpful for long term forecast of cash and is based on the assumption that it is the profit which makes cash available to the opening balance of cash, estimated net profit adjusted by adding back depreciation (not being outflow of cash), decrease in amount due to stock, bills receivable, debtors, work-in-progress and fixed assets, capital receipts, increase in liabilities and amount received on issue of shares and debentures are added.

Increase in amount due to current assets and fixed assets, decrease in liabilities, dividend payments and prepayments are deducted and the resultant figure will be cash in hand or cash required at the end of the budget period.

This method also has the same drawbacks which balance sheet forecast method has. Of all the three methods, receipt and payment method is the most popular because it shows surplus or deficiency of cash occurring within the budget period.

Standard Costing introduction

Standard Costing is a cost accounting method that involves setting predetermined, standard costs for direct materials, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead. It is used to establish a benchmark for comparing actual costs to expected costs and to identify any variances that may occur during production.

Standard costing, costs are recorded in the accounting system at standard rates, and variances are identified and analyzed to understand the reasons for deviations from the standard. This information is then used to adjust future cost estimates and improve cost control.

Standard costing is commonly used in manufacturing industries where products are produced in large quantities and costs can be accurately predicted based on historical data and experience. It is also used in service industries where costs can be assigned to individual products or services.

Process of Standard Costing:

  • Establishing standard costs for direct materials, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead
  • Recording actual costs incurred during production
  • Calculating and analyzing variances between actual and standard costs
  • Investigating and explaining the reasons for variances
  • Adjusting future cost estimates based on the information gathered from the analysis.

Advantages of standard costing:

  • It helps to identify inefficiencies in production processes.
  • It provides a framework for cost control.
  • It enables management to identify areas for improvement.
  • It facilitates the calculation of variances that can be used for performance evaluation.
  • It provides a consistent basis for decision-making.

Disadvantages of Standard Costing:

  • It can be time-consuming and expensive to set up.
  • It may not accurately reflect the actual costs of production.
  • It may not be suitable for businesses that operate in rapidly changing markets.
  • It can lead to a focus on cost reduction at the expense of quality and customer service.
  • It may not take into account non-financial factors that can impact production costs, such as employee morale and motivation.

The main formulas used in standard costing are:

  • Standard Cost per unit = Direct materials standard cost per unit + Direct labor standard cost per unit + Manufacturing overhead standard cost per unit
  • Total Standard cost = Standard cost per unit × Number of units produced
  • Variance = Actual cost – Standard cost
  • Material price variance = (Actual price – Standard price) × Actual quantity
  • Material quantity variance = (Actual quantity – Standard quantity) × Standard price
  • Labor rate variance = (Actual rate – Standard rate) × Actual hours
  • Labor efficiency variance = (Actual hours – Standard hours) × Standard rate
  • Overhead spending variance = (Actual overhead – Budgeted overhead) × Actual activity
  • Overhead efficiency variance = (Actual activity – Standard activity) × Standard overhead rate.

Standard Costing example question with solution

ABC Ltd. produces and sells widgets. The company’s budgeted production for the year is 10,000 units, with a budgeted overhead of $50,000. The budgeted direct materials and direct labor cost per unit are $20 and $10 respectively. The budgeted fixed overhead per unit is $5. The standard overhead rate per direct labor hour is $5.

During the year, ABC Ltd. produced 9,800 units, and incurred actual overhead of $49,500. The actual direct materials cost was $195,000, while actual direct labor cost was $98,000.

Required:

  • Calculate the standard cost per unit for direct materials, direct labor, and overhead.
  • Calculate the total standard cost per unit.
  • Prepare a standard cost card.
  • Calculate the overhead variance and the overhead cost applied.

Solution:

  • Calculation of standard cost per unit:

Direct materials cost per unit = Budgeted direct materials cost per unit = $20

Direct labor cost per unit = Budgeted direct labor cost per unit = $10

Variable overhead cost per unit = Standard overhead rate per direct labor hour * Budgeted direct labor hours per unit = $5 * 1 = $5

Fixed overhead cost per unit = Budgeted fixed overhead cost per unit = $5

Total standard cost per unit = Direct materials cost per unit + Direct labor cost per unit + Variable overhead cost per unit + Fixed overhead cost per unit

= $20 + $10 + $5 + $5 = $40

  • Calculation of total standard cost per unit:

Total standard cost per unit = Standard cost per unit * Budgeted production per year = $40 * 10,000 = $400,000

  • Preparation of standard cost card:

Direct materials: $20 per unit

Direct labor: $10 per unit

Variable overhead: $5 per unit

Fixed overhead: $5 per unit

Total: $40 per unit

  • Calculation of overhead variance and overhead cost applied:

Actual overhead = $49,500

Actual direct labor cost = $98,000

Standard overhead rate per direct labor hour = $5

Budgeted direct labor hours = Budgeted production * Budgeted direct labor hours per unit = 10,000 * 1 = 10,000 hours

Overhead cost applied = Standard overhead rate per direct labor hour * Actual direct labor hours

= $5 * 9,800 = $49,000

Overhead variance = Actual overhead – Overhead cost applied

= $49,500 – $49,000 = $500 (favorable)

The favorable variance suggests that the company’s actual overhead cost was less than the overhead cost applied based on the standard rate.

Setting of Standard

Standard costing is a method of accounting that uses standard costs and variances to evaluate performance and control costs. In standard costing, a standard is set for each cost element, such as direct materials, direct labor, and overhead. The standard represents the expected cost for a unit of product or service, based on historical data or estimates.

Setting standards in standard costing is an important process that allows businesses to control costs and evaluate performance. By setting standards for each cost element, businesses can compare actual costs to expected costs and identify variances. Variances may be favorable (actual costs are lower than expected) or unfavorable (actual costs are higher than expected), and can provide insights into areas where cost control measures may be necessary. By analyzing variances and taking corrective action, businesses can improve their performance and profitability.

Steps in setting standards in Standard Costing:

  • Identify cost elements:

The first step in setting standards is to identify the cost elements that will be included in the standard cost. This typically includes direct materials, direct labor, and overhead.

  • Determine standard quantity and price:

For each cost element, the standard quantity and price are determined. The standard quantity is the amount of a cost element that is required to produce one unit of product or service, while the standard price is the expected cost per unit of the cost element.

  • Establish standard costs:

The standard cost for each cost element is calculated by multiplying the standard quantity by the standard price. For example, if the standard quantity for direct materials is 2 pounds per unit and the standard price is $5 per pound, the standard cost for direct materials is $10 per unit.

  • Review and update standards:

Standards should be reviewed and updated regularly to ensure they remain accurate and relevant. This includes considering changes in market conditions, technology, and production processes that may affect costs.

Applications of Standard Costing:

  • Budgeting and Forecasting:

Standard costing is integral to the budgeting process, providing a basis for estimating future costs. It helps management forecast the costs of materials, labor, and overheads, which allows for better financial planning and resource allocation. By using standard costs, companies can predict profitability and set realistic financial goals for the upcoming periods.

  • Cost Control:

One of the primary applications of standard costing is in cost control. By comparing actual costs with standard costs, management can identify variances and investigate their causes. Favorable variances indicate cost savings, while unfavorable variances signal inefficiencies or wastage. This helps managers take corrective actions to maintain cost efficiency.

  • Performance Evaluation:

Standard costing helps in evaluating the performance of departments, cost centers, and employees. Managers can assess whether workers and departments are operating efficiently by comparing actual performance with standards. Variances provide insight into areas where performance may need improvement, and they can also be used to reward or penalize employees based on their contributions to cost management.

  • Inventory Valuation:

Standard costs are often used to value inventories in the balance sheet. This simplifies the process of determining the cost of goods sold (COGS) and ending inventory, as actual costs do not need to be tracked continuously. Inventory is recorded at standard cost, and any variances are recognized separately, improving financial reporting efficiency.

  • Pricing Decisions:

Standard costing helps in setting competitive yet profitable prices. By having a clear understanding of the standard cost of producing goods or delivering services, businesses can make informed pricing decisions that cover costs while maintaining profitability. Standard costs provide a baseline for determining the minimum price at which a product should be sold.

  • Variance Analysis:

One of the most significant applications of standard costing is variance analysis. Variances between actual and standard costs are analyzed to understand deviations in material usage, labor efficiency, and overheads. This analysis helps management pinpoint problem areas and make informed decisions to improve efficiency and reduce costs.

  • Motivation and Benchmarking:

Standard costs serve as benchmarks that motivate employees and departments to achieve cost efficiency. When realistic and attainable, standard costs create targets that guide operational activities. Employees strive to meet or beat these standards, driving productivity and cost-saving initiatives across the organization.

Labour Variance

Direct labour variances arise when actual labour costs are different from standard labour costs. In analysis of labour costs, the emphasis is on labour rates and labour hours.

Labour variances constitute the following:

Labour Cost Variance:

Labour cost variance denotes the difference between the actual direct wages paid and the standard direct wages specified for the output achieved.

This variance is calculated by using the following formula:

Labour cost variance = (AH x AR) – (SH x SR)

Where:

AH = Actual hours

AR = Actual rate 

SH = Standard hours

SR = Standard rate

Labour Efficiency Variance:

The calculation of labour efficiency or usage variance follows the same pattern as the computa­tion of materials usage variance. Labour efficiency variance occurs when labour operations are more efficient or less efficient than standard performance. If actual direct labour hours required to complete a job differ from the number of standard hours specified, a labour efficiency variance results; it is the difference between actual hours expended and standard labour hours specified multiplied by the stand­ard labour rate per hour.

Labour efficiency variance is computed by applying the following formula:

Labour efficiency variance = (Actual hours – Standard hours for the actual output) x Std. rate per hour.

Assume the following data:

Standard labour hour per unit = 5 hr

Standard labour rate per hour = Rs 30

Units completed = 1,000

Labour cost recorded = 5,050 hrs @ Rs 35

Labour efficiency variance = (5,050-5,000) x Rs 30 = Rs 1,500 (unfavourable) It may be noted that the standard labour hour rate and not the actual rate is used in computing labour efficiency variance. If quantity variances are calculated, changes in prices/rates are excluded, and when price variances are calculated, standard quantities are ignored.

(i) Labour Mix Variance:

Labour mix variance is computed in the same manner as materials mix variance. Manufacturing or completing a job requires different types or grades of workers and production will be complete if labour is mixed according to standard proportion. Standard labour mix may not be adhered to under some circumstances and substitution will have to be made. There may be changes in the wage rates of some workers; there may be a need to use more skilled or expensive types of labour, e.g., employ­ment of men instead of women; sometimes workers and operators may be absent.

These lead to the emergence of a labour mix variance which is calculated by using the following formula:

Labour mix variance = (Actual labour mix – Revised standard labour mix in terms of actual total hours) x Standard rate per hour

(ii) Labour Yield Variance:

The final product cost contains not only material cost but also labour cost. Therefore, gain or loss (higher or lower output than the standard output) should take into account labour yield variance also. A lower output simply means that final output does not correspond with the production units that should have been produced from the hours expended on the inputs.

It can be computed by ap­plying the following formula:

Labour yield variance = (Actual output – Standard output based on actual hours) x Av. Std. Labour Rate per unit of output.

Or

Labour yield variance = (Actual loss – Standard loss on actual hours) x Average standard labour rate per unit of output

Labour yield variance is also known as labour efficiency sub-variance which is computed in terms of inputs, i.e., standard labour hours and revised labour hours mix (in terms of actual hours).

Labour efficiency sub-variance is computed by using the following formula:

Labour efficiency sub-variance = (Revised standard mix – standard mix) x Standard rate

Labour Rate Variance:

Labour rate variance is computed in the same manner as materials price variance. When actual direct labour hour rates differ from standard rates, the result is a labour rate variance. It is that portion of the direct wages variance which is due to the difference between actual rate paid and standard rate of pay specified.

The formula for its calculation is:

Labour rate variance = (Actual rate – Standard rate) x Actual hours

Using data from the example given above, the labour rate variance is Rs 25,250, i.e.,

Labour rate variance = (35 – 30) x 5050 hours = 5 x 5050 = Rs 25,250 (unfavourable)

The number of actual hours worked is used in place of the number of the standard hours speci­fied because the objective is to know the cost difference due to change in labour hour rates, and not hours worked. Favourable rate variances arise whenever actual rates are less than standard rates; unfavourable variances occur when actual rates exceed standard rates.

Idle Time Variance:

Idle time variance occurs when workers are not able to do the work due to some reason during the hours for which they are paid. Idle time can be divided according to causes responsible for creat­ing idle time, e.g., idle time due to breakdown, lack of materials or power failures. Idle time variance will be equivalent to the standard labour cost of the hours during which no work has been done but for which workers have been paid for unproductive time.

Material Variance

Material cost variance is the difference between the actual cost of direct material used and stand­ard cost of direct materials specified for the output achieved. This variance results from differences between quantities consumed and quantities of materials allowed for production and from differences between prices paid and prices predetermined.

This can be computed by using the following formula:

Material cost variance = (AQ X AP) – (SQ X SP)

Where AQ = Actual quantity

AP = Actual price

SQ = Standard quantity for the actual output 

SP = Standard price

Material Usage Variance:

The material quantity or usage variance results when actual quantities of raw materials used in production differ from standard quantities that should have been used to produce the output achieved. It is that portion of the direct materials cost variance which is due to the difference between the actual quantity used and standard quantity specified.

As a formula, this variance is shown as:

Materials quantity variance = (Actual Quantity – Standard Quantity) x Standard Price

A material usage variance is favourable when the total actual quantity of direct materials used is less than the total standard quantity allowed for the actual output.

(a) Material Mix Variance:

The materials usage or quantity variance can be separated into mix variance and yield variance.

For certain products and processing operations, material mix is an important operating variable, specific grades of materials and quantity are determined before production begins. A mix variance will result when materials are not actually placed into production in the same ratio as the standard formula. For instance, if a product is produced by adding 100 kg of raw material A and 200 kg of raw material B, the standard material mix ratio is 1: 2.

Actual raw materials used must be in this 1: 2 ratio, otherwise a materials mix variance will be found. Material mix variance is usually found in industries, such as textiles, rubber and chemicals, etc. A mix variance may arise because of attempts to achieve cost savings, effective resources utilisation and when the needed raw materials quantities may not be available at the required time.

Materials mix variance is that portion of the materials quantity variance which is due to the difference between the actual composition of a mixture and the standard mixture.

It can be computed by using the following formula:

Material mix variance = (Standard cost of actual quantity of the actual mixture – Standard cost of actual quantity of the standard mixture)

Or

Materials mix variance = (Actual mix – Revised standard mix of actual input) x Standard price

(b) Materials Yield Variance:

Materials yield variance explains the remaining portion of the total materials quantity variance. It is that portion of materials usage variance which is due to the difference between the actual yield obtained and standard yield specified (in terms of actual inputs). In other words, yield variance occurs when the output of the final product does not correspond with the output that could have been obtained by using the actual inputs. In some industries like sugar, chemicals, steel, etc. actual yield may differ from expected yield based on actual input resulting into yield variance.

The total of materials mix variance and materials yield variance equals materials quantity or usage variance. When there is no materials mix variance, the materials yield variance equals the total materials quantity variance. Accordingly, mix and yield variances explain distinct parts of the total materials usage variance and are additive.

The formula for computing yield variance is as follows:

Yield Variance = (Actual yield – Standard Yield specified) x Standard cost per unit

Materials Price Variance:

A materials price variance occurs when raw materials are purchased at a price different from standard price. It is that portion of the direct materials which is due to the difference between actual price paid and standard price specified and cost variance multiplied by the actual quantity. Expressed as a formula,

Materials price variance = (Actual price – Standard price) x Actual quantity

Materials price variance is un-favourable when the actual price paid exceeds the predetermined standard price. It is advisable that materials price variance should be calculated for materials purchased rather than materials used. Purchase of materials is an earlier event than the use of materials.

Therefore, a variance based on quantity purchased is basically an earlier report than a variance based on quantity actually used. This is quite beneficial from the viewpoint of performance measurement and corrective action. An early report will help the management in measuring the performance so that poor performance can be corrected or good performance can be expanded at an early date.

Recognizing material price variances at the time of purchase lets the firm carry all units of the same materials at one price—the standard cost of the material, even if the firm did not purchase all units of the materials at the same price. Using one price for the same materials facilities management control and simplifies accounting work.

If a direct materials price variance is not recorded until the materials are issued to production, the direct materials are carried on the books at their actual purchase prices. Deviations of actual purchase prices from the standard price may not be known until the direct materials are issued to production.

Responsibility Accounting, Functions, Process, Challenges, Responsibility Centers

Responsibility Accounting is a management control system that assigns accountability for financial results to specific individuals or departments within an organization. Each unit or manager is responsible for the budgetary performance of their area, enabling precise tracking of revenues, costs, and overall financial outcomes. This system helps in evaluating performance by comparing actual results with budgeted figures, identifying variances, and taking corrective actions. Responsibility accounting fosters decentralized decision-making, enhances accountability, and motivates managers to optimize their areas’ financial performance. By clearly defining financial responsibilities, it ensures better control over resources and aligns departmental activities with the organization’s overall objectives, promoting efficiency and effectiveness in achieving financial goals.

Functions of Responsibility Accounting:

  • Cost Control:

Responsibility accounting aids in controlling costs by assigning specific financial responsibilities to managers, ensuring that expenditures are kept within budgeted limits. Managers are accountable for the costs incurred in their respective departments, promoting efficient resource use.

  • Performance Evaluation:

It allows for the evaluation of managerial performance based on financial outcomes. By comparing actual results with budgeted figures, organizations can assess how well managers are controlling costs and generating revenues.

  • Budget Preparation:

Responsibility accounting facilitates detailed and accurate budget preparation. Each manager is involved in creating budgets for their department, ensuring that the overall organizational budget is comprehensive and realistic.

  • Decentralized Decision-Making:

It promotes decentralized decision-making by empowering managers to make financial decisions within their areas of responsibility. This leads to quicker and more effective responses to operational challenges and opportunities.

  • Variance Analysis:

The system provides tools for variance analysis, identifying deviations between actual and budgeted performance. Understanding these variances helps in diagnosing problems, understanding their causes, and taking corrective actions.

  • Goal Alignment:

Responsibility accounting ensures that departmental goals align with the overall organizational objectives. By setting specific financial targets for each responsibility center, it promotes coherence and unity in pursuing the company’s strategic goals.

  • Motivation and Accountability:

It enhances motivation and accountability among managers and employees. Knowing they are responsible for their department’s financial performance encourages managers to work more efficiently and make prudent financial decisions, driving overall organizational success.

Process of Responsibility Accounting:

  1. Defining Responsibility Centers

  • Types of Responsibility Centers:

Identify and establish different types of responsibility centers such as cost centers, revenue centers, profit centers, and investment centers. Each center will have specific financial responsibilities.

  • Assigning Managers:

Designate managers to each responsibility center, ensuring they are accountable for the financial performance of their respective areas.

  1. Setting Financial Targets and Budgets

  • Budget Preparation:

Involve managers in the preparation of budgets for their respective centers. This ensures realistic and achievable targets.

  • SMART Objectives:

Ensure that financial targets are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound (SMART).

  1. Tracking and Recording Financial Data

  • Data Collection:

Implement systems for collecting accurate and timely financial data. This includes recording revenues, costs, and other relevant financial transactions.

  • Accounting Systems:

Use robust accounting software to facilitate precise tracking and recording of financial data.

  1. Performance Measurement

  • Variance Analysis:

Regularly compare actual financial performance against the budgeted targets. Identify variances, both favorable and unfavorable, and analyze the reasons behind these differences.

  • Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):

Establish KPIs for each responsibility center to measure financial and operational performance effectively.

  1. Reporting and Communication

  • Regular Reports:

Generate periodic financial reports for each responsibility center. These reports should detail actual performance, variances, and insights into financial activities.

  • Communication Channels:

Ensure clear and open communication channels for discussing performance reports, variances, and necessary corrective actions.

  1. Analyzing and Taking Corrective Actions

  • Variance Analysis:

Perform detailed analysis to understand the causes of significant variances between actual and budgeted performance.

  • Corrective Measures:

Implement corrective actions to address unfavorable variances. This might include cost-cutting measures, process improvements, or revenue enhancement strategies.

  1. Reviewing and Revising Budgets

  • Continuous Review:

Regularly review and update budgets based on actual performance and changing conditions. Adjust financial plans to reflect new information, opportunities, or threats.

  • Feedback Loop:

Establish a feedback loop where insights from performance analysis inform future budget preparations and strategic planning.

  1. Enhancing Accountability and Motivation

  • Performance Appraisal:

Use the information gathered from responsibility accounting to conduct performance appraisals for managers. Reward and recognize managers who meet or exceed financial targets.

  • Training and Development:

Provide training and support to managers to help them understand their financial responsibilities and improve their budgeting and financial management skills.

Challenges of Responsibility Accounting:

  • Accurate Performance Measurement:

Measuring performance accurately can be difficult, especially when indirect costs and revenues need to be allocated to specific departments. Misallocation can lead to unfair evaluations and misguided decisions.

  • Goal Congruence:

Ensuring that departmental goals align with the overall organizational objectives can be challenging. Managers may focus on optimizing their own areas at the expense of the company’s broader goals.

  • Complexity in Implementation:

Setting up a responsibility accounting system can be complex and time-consuming. It requires detailed planning, consistent data collection, and robust financial systems to track and report performance effectively.

  • Resistance to Change:

Managers and employees may resist the implementation of responsibility accounting due to fear of increased scrutiny or accountability. Overcoming this resistance requires effective change management and communication.

  • Maintaining Flexibility:

While responsibility accounting promotes control, it can sometimes lead to rigidity. Managers may become overly focused on meeting budget targets, potentially stifling innovation and flexibility in responding to unexpected opportunities or challenges.

  • Quality of Data:

The effectiveness of responsibility accounting relies heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of financial data. Poor data quality can lead to incorrect performance assessments and misguided decisions.

  • Interdepartmental Conflicts:

Responsibility accounting can sometimes lead to conflicts between departments, especially when resources are limited, or when the success of one department depends on the performance of another. These conflicts can disrupt overall organizational harmony and performance.

Responsibility Centers:

Responsibility centers are segments or units within an organization where managers are held accountable for their performance. These centers are designed to monitor performance, control costs, and ensure that goals are met in alignment with the overall business strategy. There are four main types of responsibility centers, each with specific objectives and measures of performance.

  • Cost Center

A cost center is responsible for controlling and minimizing costs, but it does not generate revenues directly. The performance of a cost center is measured based on the ability to manage expenses within budgeted limits. For example, a production department or an administrative unit may be classified as a cost center. Managers in cost centers are accountable for controlling costs and improving efficiency without concern for revenue generation.

  • Revenue Center

A revenue center is responsible for generating revenues but does not directly manage costs. The primary performance measure for a revenue center is the ability to achieve sales targets. For instance, a sales department or a retail outlet is a revenue center. Managers in revenue centers focus on increasing sales, expanding the customer base, and driving revenue growth, but they are not directly responsible for managing costs associated with the production of goods or services.

  • Profit Center

A profit center is responsible for both revenue generation and cost control, aiming to maximize profitability. It is accountable for managing both income and expenses. The performance of a profit center is typically measured based on the profit it generates, i.e., revenue minus expenses. Examples of profit centers include a branch of a retail business or a product line within a company. Profit center managers are expected to make decisions that impact both the cost and revenue sides of the business to enhance profitability.

  • Investment Center

An investment center goes a step further by being responsible for revenue, costs, and investment decisions. Managers in an investment center are accountable for generating profits as well as making decisions that affect the capital invested in the business. The performance of an investment center is often evaluated based on Return on Investment (ROI) or Economic Value Added (EVA). A division or a subsidiary of a corporation is often an investment center, where managers are responsible not only for managing revenues and costs but also for making strategic decisions regarding capital allocation.

Activity based Accounting

Activity-based costing (ABC) is a methodology for more precisely allocating overhead costs by assigning them to activities. Once costs are assigned to activities, the costs can be assigned to the cost objects that use those activities. The system can be employed for the targeted reduction of overhead costs. ABC works best in complex environments, where there are many machines and products, and tangled processes that are not easy to sort out. Conversely, it is of less use in a streamlined environment where production processes are abbreviated.

The Activity Based Costing Process Flow

Activity-based costing is best explained by walking through its various steps. They are:

  1. Identify costs. The first step in ABC is to identify those costs that we want to allocate. This is the most critical step in the entire process, since we do not want to waste time with an excessively broad project scope. For example, if we want to determine the full cost of a distribution channel, we will identify advertising and warehousing costs related to that channel, but will ignore research costs, since they are related to products, not channels.
  2. Load secondary cost pools. Create cost pools for those costs incurred to provide services to other parts of the company, rather than directly supporting a company’s products or services. The contents of secondary cost pools typically include computer services and administrative salaries, and similar costs. These costs are later allocated to other cost pools that more directly relate to products and services. There may be several of these secondary cost pools, depending upon the nature of the costs and how they will be allocated.
  3. Load primary cost pools. Create a set of cost pools for those costs more closely aligned with the production of goods or services. It is very common to have separate cost pools for each product line, since costs tend to occur at this level. Such costs can include research and development, advertising, procurement, and distribution. Similarly, you might consider creating cost pools for each distribution channel, or for each facility. If production batches are of greatly varying lengths, then consider creating cost pools at the batch level, so that you can adequately assign costs based on batch size.
  4. Measure activity drivers. Use a data collection system to collect information about the activity drivers that are used to allocate the costs in secondary cost pools to primary cost pools, as well as to allocate the costs in primary cost pools to cost objects. It can be expensive to accumulate activity driver information, so use activity drivers for which information is already being collected, where possible.
  5. Allocate costs in secondary pools to primary pools. Use activity drivers to apportion the costs in the secondary cost pools to the primary cost pools.
  6. Charge costs to cost objects. Use an activity driver to allocate the contents of each primary cost pool to cost objects. There will be a separate activity driver for each cost pool. To allocate the costs, divide the total cost in each cost pool by the total amount of activity in the activity driver, to establish the cost per unit of activity. Then allocate the cost per unit to the cost objects, based on their use of the activity driver.
  7. Formulate reports. Convert the results of the ABC system into reports for management consumption. For example, if the system was originally designed to accumulate overhead information by geographical sales region, then report on revenues earned in each region, all direct costs, and the overhead derived from the ABC system. This gives management a full cost view of the results generated by each region.
  8. Act on the information. The most common management reaction to an ABC report is to reduce the quantity of activity drivers used by each cost object. Doing so should reduce the amount of overhead cost being used.

We have now arrived at a complete ABC allocation of overhead costs to those cost objects that deserve to be charged with overhead costs. By doing so, managers can see which activity drivers need to be reduced in order to shrink a corresponding amount of overhead cost. For example, if the cost of a single purchase order is $100, managers can focus on letting the production system automatically place purchase orders, or on using procurement cards as a way to avoid purchase orders. Either solution results in fewer purchase orders and therefore lower purchasing department costs.

Uses of Activity Based Costing

The fundamental advantage of using an ABC system is to more precisely determine how overhead is used. Once you have an ABC system, you can obtain better information about the following issues:

  • Activity costs. ABC is designed to track the cost of activities, so you can use it to see if activity costs are in line with industry standards. If not, ABC is an excellent feedback tool for measuring the ongoing cost of specific services as management focuses on cost reduction.
  • Customer profitability. Though most of the costs incurred for individual customers are simply product costs, there is also an overhead component, such as unusually high customer service levels, product return handling, and cooperative marketing agreements. An ABC system can sort through these additional overhead costs and help you determine which customers are actually earning you a reasonable profit. This analysis may result in some unprofitable customers being turned away, or more emphasis being placed on those customers who are earning the company its largest profits.
  • Distribution cost. The typical company uses a variety of distribution channels to sell its products, such as retail, Internet, distributors, and mail order catalogs. Most of the structural cost of maintaining a distribution channel is overhead, so if you can make a reasonable determination of which distribution channels are using overhead, you can make decisions to alter how distribution channels are used, or even to drop unprofitable channels.
  • Make or buy. ABC provides a comprehensive view of every cost associated with the in-house manufacture of a product, so that you can see precisely which costs will be eliminated if an item is outsourced, versus which costs will remain.
  • Margins. With proper overhead allocation from an ABC system, you can determine the margins of various products, product lines, and entire subsidiaries. This can be quite useful for determining where to position company resources to earn the largest margins.
  • Minimum price. Product pricing is really based on the price that the market will bear, but the marketing manager should know what the cost of the product is, in order to avoid selling a product that will lose a company money on every sale. ABC is very good for determining which overhead costs should be included in this minimum cost, depending upon the circumstances under which products are being sold.
  • Production facility cost. It is usually quite easy to segregate overhead costs at the plant-wide level, so you can compare the costs of production between different facilities.

Clearly, there are many valuable uses for the information provided by an ABC system. However, this information will only be available if you design the system to provide the specific set of data needed for each decision. If you install a generic ABC system and then use it for the above decisions, you may find that it does not provide the information that you need. Ultimately, the design of the system is determined by a cost-benefit analysis of which decisions you want it to assist with, and whether the cost of the system is worth the benefit of the resulting information.

Problems with Activity Based Costing

Many companies initiate ABC projects with the best of intentions, only to see a very high proportion of the projects either fail or eventually lapse into disuse. There are several reasons for these issues, which are:

  • Cost pool volume. The advantage of an ABC system is the high quality of information that it produces, but this comes at the cost of using a large number of cost pools – and the more cost pools there are, the greater the cost of managing the system. To reduce this cost, run an ongoing analysis of the cost to maintain each cost pool, in comparison to the utility of the resulting information. Doing so should keep the number of cost pools down to manageable proportions.
  • Installation time. ABC systems are notoriously difficult to install, with multi-year installations being the norm when a company attempts to install it across all product lines and facilities. For such comprehensive installations, it is difficult to maintain a high level of management and budgetary support as the months roll by without installation being completed. Success rates are much higher for smaller, more targeted ABC installations.
  • Multi-department data sources. An ABC system may require data input from multiple departments, and each of those departments may have greater priorities than the ABC system. Thus, the larger the number of departments involved in the system, the greater the risk that data inputs will fail over time. This problem can be avoided by designing the system to only need information from the most supportive managers.
  • Project basis. Many ABC projects are authorized on a project basis, so that information is only collected once; the information is useful for a company’s current operational situation, and it gradually declines in usefulness as the operational structure changes over time. Management may not authorize funding for additional ABC projects later on, so ABC tends to be “done” once and then discarded. To mitigate this issue, build as much of the ABC data collection structure into the existing accounting system, so that the cost of these projects is reduced; at a lower cost, it is more likely that additional ABC projects will be authorized in the future.
  • Reporting of unused time. When a company asks its employees to report on the time spent on various activities, they have a strong tendency to make sure that the reported amounts equal 100% of their time. However, there is a large amount of slack time in anyone’s work day that may involve breaks, administrative meetings, playing games on the Internet, and so forth. Employees usually mask these activities by apportioning more time to other activities. These inflated numbers represent misallocations of costs in the ABC system, sometimes by quite substantial amounts.
  • Separate data set. An ABC system rarely can be constructed to pull all of the information it needs directly from the general ledger. Instead, it requires a separate database that pulls in information from several sources, only one of which is existing general ledger accounts. It can be quite difficult to maintain this extra database, since it calls for significant extra staff time for which there may not be an adequate budget. The best work-around is to design the system to require the minimum amount of additional information other than that which is already available in the general ledger.
  • Targeted usage. The benefits of ABC are most apparent when cost accounting information is difficult to discern, due to the presence of multiple product lines, machines being used for the production of many products, numerous machine setups, and so forth – in other words, in complex production environments. If a company does not operate in such an environment, then it may spend a great deal of money on an ABC installation, only to find that the resulting information is not overly valuable.

The broad range of issues noted here should make it clear that ABC tends to follow a bumpy path in many organizations, with a tendency for its usefulness to decline over time. Of the problem mitigation suggestions noted here, the key point is to construct a highly targeted ABC system that produces the most critical information at a reasonable cost. If that system takes root in your company, then consider a gradual expansion, during which you only expand further if there is a clear and demonstrable benefit in doing so. The worst thing you can do is to install a large and comprehensive ABC system, since it is expensive, meets with the most resistance, and is the most likely to fail over the long term.

Make or Buy Decision

Make or Buy decision is a critical strategic choice that businesses face when considering whether to manufacture a product in-house (make) or purchase it from an external supplier (buy). This decision has significant implications for cost management, quality control, production efficiency, and overall business strategy.

Factors Influencing the Make or Buy Decision:

  1. Cost Analysis:

One of the primary considerations in the make or buy decision is cost. A comprehensive cost analysis involves evaluating both direct and indirect costs associated with manufacturing in-house versus purchasing from a supplier. Key elements are:

  • Direct Costs: These include raw materials, labor, and overhead costs associated with production. Calculating the total cost of producing the item in-house helps determine if it’s more cost-effective than buying.
  • Indirect Costs: These are not directly tied to production but can affect overall costs. Examples include administrative expenses, equipment depreciation, and maintenance costs.

To compare costs effectively, businesses often use the following formula:

Total Cost of Making = Direct Costs + Indirect Costs

If the total cost of making is lower than the purchase price from suppliers, it may be beneficial to produce in-house.

  1. Quality Control:

Quality is another crucial factor in the make or buy decision. Companies must assess whether they can maintain the desired quality standards if they choose to make the product in-house.

  • Quality Assurance: In-house production allows companies to have greater control over quality assurance processes, ensuring that products meet specifications and standards.
  • Supplier Quality: If opting to buy, it’s essential to evaluate the supplier’s reputation and reliability. A supplier with a history of delivering high-quality products can mitigate quality concerns.
  1. Production Capacity:

The current production capacity of the organization plays a significant role in the make or buy decision. Factors to consider:

  • Existing Capacity: If the company has excess capacity, it may make sense to manufacture the product in-house. Conversely, if facilities are at full capacity, outsourcing may be necessary to meet demand.
  • Flexibility: In-house production offers greater flexibility to adapt to changes in demand or production specifications. This adaptability can be crucial in industries with fluctuating market conditions.
  1. Strategic Focus:

Companies should also consider their long-term strategic goals. The make or buy decision should align with the organization’s core competencies and strategic objectives. Considerations are:

  • Core Competency: If the product is central to the company’s core business and aligns with its strengths, making it in-house may be preferable. For example, a tech company may choose to manufacture its components to maintain control over innovation and quality.
  • Non-Core Activities: Conversely, if the product is not central to the company’s operations, outsourcing may allow management to focus on core activities. For example, a restaurant chain might outsource packaging supplies to concentrate on food quality and service.
  1. Supply Chain Considerations:

The reliability and efficiency of the supply chain also influence the decision. Factors to evaluate:

  • Lead Times: Consider the time required to manufacture versus the lead time for purchasing from a supplier. Long lead times may warrant in-house production to meet customer demands promptly.
  • Supplier Dependability: Assessing the supplier’s ability to deliver consistently and on time is crucial. If suppliers are unreliable, in-house production may be the safer option.

Decision-Making Process:

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis:

Conduct a thorough cost-benefit analysis, considering all relevant costs associated with both making and buying.

  • Risk Assessment:

Evaluate the risks associated with each option, including quality risks, supply chain risks, and potential impacts on operational efficiency.

  • Long-Term Implications:

Consider the long-term implications of the decision on the organization’s strategy, market position, and operational capabilities.

  • Stakeholder Involvement:

Engage relevant stakeholders, including production teams, finance, and procurement, to gather insights and perspectives on the decision.

  • Trial Period:

If feasible, consider conducting a trial period to test the viability of either option before making a long-term commitment.

Decision-Making Points

The results of the quantitative analysis may be sufficient to make a determination based on the approach that is more cost-effective. At times, qualitative analysis addresses any concerns a company cannot measure specifically.

Factors that may influence a firm’s decision to buy a part rather than produce it internally include a lack of in-house expertise, small volume requirements, a desire for multiple sourcing and the fact that the item may not be critical to the firm’s strategy. A company may give additional consideration if the firm has the opportunity to work with a company that has previously provided outsourced services successfully and can sustain a long-term relationship.

Similarly, factors that may tilt a firm toward making an item in-house include existing idle production capacity, better quality control or proprietary technology that needs to be protected. A company may also consider concerns regarding the reliability of the supplier, especially if the product in question is critical to normal business operations. The firm should also consider whether the supplier can offer the desired long-term arrangement.

topic 1

Objective of Make and Buy Decision:

  • Cost Efficiency:

One of the primary objectives is to achieve cost savings. By comparing the total cost of manufacturing a product in-house versus purchasing it from an external supplier, businesses aim to minimize expenses. The goal is to identify the option that provides the best financial outcome.

  • Quality Control:

Ensuring product quality is essential for maintaining customer satisfaction and brand reputation. Companies often choose to make products in-house to exert greater control over quality assurance processes. This objective focuses on delivering products that meet or exceed quality standards.

  • Resource Optimization:

The make or buy decision seeks to optimize the allocation of resources, including labor, materials, and production facilities. Businesses aim to use their resources efficiently, ensuring that they are directed toward the most profitable and strategic activities.

  • Flexibility and Responsiveness:

In today’s dynamic market, flexibility is crucial. The decision allows companies to assess whether in-house production can provide the agility needed to respond to changes in consumer demand or market conditions more rapidly than relying on external suppliers.

  • Strategic Focus:

Companies often evaluate whether the product is core to their business strategy. If it aligns with their strengths and competitive advantage, the objective is to make the product in-house, allowing the company to focus on its strategic priorities.

  • Supply Chain Reliability:

A key objective is to ensure a reliable supply chain. Businesses evaluate the dependability of suppliers and their ability to deliver products on time. If external suppliers are unreliable, the objective may shift toward in-house production to mitigate risks associated with delays and disruptions.

error: Content is protected !!