Delegation of authority, Principles, Benefits, Challenges

Delegation of authority is a fundamental management process that involves transferring decision-making power and responsibilities from a manager to subordinates. This process not only enhances the efficiency of an organization but also fosters employee development, motivation, and empowerment.

Principles of Delegation of Authority:

  • Parity of Authority and Responsibility:

Authority granted must be commensurate with the responsibility assigned. If an employee is given a task, they should also have the authority to make decisions necessary to complete it.

  • Unity of Command:

Each employee should receive orders from and be responsible to only one supervisor. This principle ensures clarity in command and accountability, reducing confusion and conflict.

  • Scalar Principle:

There should be a clear line of authority from the top management to the lowest ranks, ensuring that the delegation of authority follows a clear hierarchy.

  • Principle of Functional Definition:

The duties, authority, and accountability of each position should be clearly defined. This clarity helps in understanding roles and avoids overlaps and ambiguities.

  • Principle of Absoluteness of Responsibility:

Even after delegating authority, the manager retains ultimate responsibility for the tasks. Delegation does not mean abdication; the manager is still accountable for the outcomes.

Benefits of Delegation of Authority:

  • Enhanced Efficiency:

Delegation allows managers to offload routine tasks, enabling them to focus on strategic issues and critical decision-making. This improves overall efficiency and productivity within the organization.

  • Employee Development:

When employees are given authority and responsibility, they gain valuable experience and develop new skills. This process prepares them for higher roles and responsibilities in the future.

  • Motivation and Morale:

Delegation demonstrates trust in employees’ abilities, boosting their confidence and job satisfaction. Empowered employees are more motivated, engaged, and committed to their work.

  • Better Decision-Making:

Employees who are closer to the actual work processes often have better insights and can make more informed decisions. Delegation leverages this on-the-ground knowledge for more effective problem-solving.

  • Improved Time Management:

Managers can better manage their time by delegating tasks, reducing their workload, and avoiding burnout. This leads to more balanced and effective management.

  • Innovation and Flexibility:

Delegation encourages a more dynamic work environment where employees are encouraged to take initiative and innovate. This flexibility can lead to creative solutions and continuous improvement.

Challenges of Delegation of Authority:

  • Reluctance to Delegate:

Some managers may hesitate to delegate due to a lack of trust in their subordinates’ abilities or fear of losing control. Overcoming this mindset is crucial for effective delegation.

  • Inadequate Training:

Employees may lack the necessary skills and knowledge to handle delegated tasks effectively. Proper training and development programs are essential to prepare them for their new responsibilities.

  • Resistance from Employees:

Employees may resist taking on additional responsibilities due to fear of failure or increased workload. It’s important to address these concerns and provide support and encouragement.

  • Poor Communication:

Effective delegation requires clear and open communication. Misunderstandings or lack of clarity in instructions can lead to errors and inefficiencies.

  • Monitoring and Feedback:

While delegation involves transferring authority, managers still need to monitor progress and provide feedback. Striking the right balance between oversight and autonomy is challenging but necessary.

  • Risk of Over-Delegation:

Delegating too much too quickly can overwhelm employees and lead to mistakes. Managers need to gauge the capacity and readiness of their team members accurately.

Best Practices for Effective Delegation:

  • Select the Right Tasks:

Not all tasks are suitable for delegation. Managers should delegate routine, time-consuming tasks and retain those requiring strategic thinking or sensitive information.

  • Choose the Right People:

Assess employees’ skills, experience, and workload before delegating tasks. Match the task’s requirements with the employee’s capabilities to ensure successful outcomes.

  • Provide Clear Instructions:

Clearly articulate the task’s objectives, expected outcomes, deadlines, and any specific instructions. Ensure that the employee understands what is expected and has all the necessary information.

  • Empower and Trust Employees:

Give employees the authority they need to make decisions related to their tasks. Trust them to complete the work without micromanaging, but remain available for guidance.

  • Offer Support and Resources:

Ensure that employees have access to the resources, training, and support they need to accomplish their tasks. Providing adequate resources is essential for successful delegation.

  • Set Milestones and Checkpoints:

Establish clear milestones and regular check-ins to monitor progress. This helps in identifying any issues early and provides opportunities for feedback and course correction.

  • Provide Feedback and Recognition:

Offer constructive feedback to help employees improve and recognize their achievements to motivate and encourage them. Positive reinforcement strengthens their confidence and commitment.

  • Reflect and Learn:

After the task is completed, review the delegation process with the employee. Discuss what went well and what could be improved, fostering a culture of continuous learning and development.

Leadership function, Nature, Characteristics, Qualities, Importance

Leadership is an important element of the directing function of management. Wherever, there is an organized group of people working towards a common goal, some type of leadership becomes essential. “The power of leadership is the power of integrating. The leader stimulates what is best in us he unites and concentrates what we feel only gropingly and shatteringly. He is a person who gives form to the uncoarctate energy in every man. The person who influences me most is not he who does great Deeds, but he who makes me feel that I can do great deeds.” Marry Parker Follet.

Leadership is the ability to build up confidence and zeal among people and to create an urge in them to be led. To be a successful leader, a manager must possess the qualities of foresight, drive, initiative, self-confidence and personal integrity. Different situations may demand different types of leadership.

Definitions:

Leadership has been defined in various ways. Stogdill has rightly remarked that there are almost as many definitions of leadership as there are people who have tried to define it.

The definitions given by some famous authors and management experts are given below:

  1. Koontz and O’Donnell, Leadership is the ability of a manager to induce subordinates to work with confidence and zeal.
  2. Dubin, R.Leadership is the exercise of authority and making of decisions.
  3. Allford and Beaty, Leadership is the ability to secure desirable actions from a group of followers voluntarily, without the use of coercion.
  4. George R. Terry, Leadership is the activity of influencing people to strive willingly for group objectives.
  5. Hemphill, J.K., Leadership is the initiation of acts which result in a consistent pattern of group interaction directed towards the solution of a mutual problem.
  6. Jame J.Cribbin, Leadership is a process of influence on a group in a particular situation at a given point of time, and in a specific set of circumstances that stimulates people to strive willingly to attain organisational objectives and satisfaction with the type of leadership provided.
  7. Peter Drucker, Leadership is not making friends and influencing people, i.e., salesmanship it is the lifting of man’s visions to higher sights, the raising of man’s personality beyond its normal limitations.

In the various definitions of leadership the emphasis is on the capacity of an individual to influence and direct group effort towards the achievement of organizational goals. Thus, ‘ we can say that leadership is the practice of influence that stimulates subordinates or followers to do their best towards the achievement of desired goals.

Nature and Characteristics of Leadership:

An analysis of the definitions cited above reveals the following important characteristics of leadership:

  1. Leadership is a personal quality.
  2. It exists only with followers. If there are no followers, there is no leadership?
  3. It is the willingness of people to follow that makes person a leader.
  4. Leadership is a process of influence. A leader must be able to influence the behaviour, attitude and beliefs of his subordinates.
  5. It exists only for the realization of common goals.
  6. It involves readiness to accept complete responsibility in all situations.
  7. Leadership is the function of stimulating the followers to strive willingly to attain organizational objectives.
  8. Leadership styles do change under different circumstances.
  9. Leadership is neither bossism nor synonymous with; management.

Formal and informal Leaders:

From the view point of official recognition from top management, leaders may be classified as formal and informal leaders. A formal leader is one who is formally appointed or elected to direct and control the activities of the subordinates. He is a person created by the formal structure, enjoys organizational authority and is accountable to those who have elected him in a formal way. The formal leader has a two-fold responsibility. On the one hand, he has to fulfill the demands of the organization, while on the other he is also supposed to help, guide and direct his subordinates in satisfying their needs and aspirations.

Informal leaders are not formally recognized. They derive authority from the people who are under their influence. In any organization we can always find some persons who command respect and who are approached to help, guide and protect the informal leaders have only one task to perform, i.e., to help their followers in achieving their individual and group goals. Informal leaders are created to satisfy those needs which are not satisfied by the formal leaders. An organization can make effective use of informal leaders to strengthen the formal leadership.

Leadership Functions:

Following are the important functions of a leader:

1. Setting Goals:

A leader is expected to perform creative function of laying out goals and policies to persuade the subordinates to work with zeal and confidence.

2. Organizing:

The second function of a leader is to create and shape the organization on scientific lines by assigning roles appropriate to individual abilities with the view to make its various components to operate sensitively towards the achievement of enterprise goals.

3. Initiating Action:

The next function of a leader is to take the initiative in all matters of interest to the group. He should not depend upon others for decision and judgment. He should float new ideas and his decisions should reflect original thinking.

4. Co-Ordination:

A leader has to reconcile the interests of the individual members of the group with that of the organization. He has to ensure voluntary co-operation from the group in realizing the common objectives.

5. Direction and Motivation:

It is the primary function of a leader to guide and direct his group and motivate people to do their best in the achievement of desired goals, he should build up confidence and zeal in the work group.

6. Link between Management and Workers:

A leader works as a necessary link between the management and the workers. He interprets the policies and programmes of the management to his subordinates and represents the subordinates’ interests before the management. He can prove effective only when he can act as the true guardian of the interests of his subordinates.

Qualities of a Good Leader:

A successful leader secures desired behaviour from his followers. It depends upon the quality of leadership he is able to provide. A leader to be effective must possess certain basic qualities. A number of authors have mentioned different qualities which a person should possess to be a good leader.

Some of the qualities of a good leader are as follows:

  1. Good personality.
  2. Emotional stability.
  3. Sound education and professional competence.
  4. Initiatives and creative thinking.
  5. Sense of purpose and responsibility.
  6. Ability to guide and teach.
  7. Good understanding and sound judgment.
  8. Communicating skill.
  9. Sociable.
  10. Objective and flexible approach.
  11. Honesty and integrity of character.
  12. Self confidence, diligence and industry.
  13. Courage to accept responsibility

Importance of Leadership in Management:

The importance of leadership in any group activity is too obvious to be over-emphasized. Wherever, there is an organized group of people working towards a common goal, some type leadership becomes essential. Lawrence A. Appley remarked that the time had come to substitute the word leadership for management.

Although the concern for leadership is as old as recorded history, it has become more acute during the last few decades due to the complexities of production methods, high degree of specialization and social changes in the modern organizations. A good dynamic leader is compared to a ‘dynamo generating energy’ that charges and activates the entire group in such a way that near miracles may be achieved. The success of an enterprise depends to a great extent, upon effective leadership.’

1. It Improves Motivation and Morale:

Through dynamic leadership managers can improve motivation and morale of their subordinates. A good leader influences the behaviour of an individual in such a manner that he voluntarily works towards the achievement of enterprise goals.

2. It Acts as a Motive Power to Group Efforts:

Leadership serves as a motive power to group efforts. It leads the group to a higher level of performance through its persistent efforts and impact on human relations.

3. It Acts as an Aid to Authority:

The use of authority alone cannot always bring the desired results. Leadership acts as an aid to authority by influencing, inspiring and initiating action.

4. It is Needed at All Levels of Management:

Leadership plays a pivotal role at all levels of management because in the absence of effective leadership no management can achieve the desired results.

5. It Rectifies the Imperfectness of the Formal Organisational Relationships:

No organizational structure can provide all types of relationships and people with common interest may work beyond the confines of formal relationships. Such informal relationships are more effective in controlling and regulating the behaviour of the subordinates. Effective leadership uses there informal relationships to accomplish the enterprise goals.

6. It Provides the Basis for Co-operation:

Effective leadership increases the understanding between the subordinates and the management and promotes co-operation among them.

Process or Techniques of Effective Leadership:

The following are the techniques of effective leadership:

  1. The leader should consult the group in framing the policies and lines of action and in initiating any radical change therein.
  2. He should attempt to develop voluntary co-operation from his subordinates in realizing common objectives.
  3. He should exercise authority whenever necessary to implement the policies. He should give clear, complete and intelligible instructions to his subordinates.
  4. He should build-up confidence and zeal in his followers.
  5. He should listen to his subordinates properly and appreciate their feelings.
  6. He should communicate effectively.
  7. He should follow the principle of motivation.

Theories of Leadership

Leadership theories explore the factors that contribute to effective leadership and how leaders can motivate their followers to achieve organizational goals. These theories provide various perspectives and are classified into several types, each highlighting different aspects of leadership behavior and effectiveness.

Trait Theories:

These theories suggest that effective leaders share a common set of traits or characteristics that distinguish them from non-leaders. Examples of such traits include intelligence, assertiveness, adaptability, and charisma. Trait theories focus on identifying these inherent qualities that theoretically predict leader effectiveness.

Features of Trait Theories:

  • Focus on Personal Characteristics:

Trait theories emphasize inherent personal attributes, suggesting that leaders are born, not made. They identify specific traits such as intelligence, confidence, charisma, integrity, and sociability as critical to effective leadership.

  • Universality:

These theories often imply that the traits that make an effective leader are universal and that these traits are effective in different leadership scenarios, regardless of the organizational context or country. This universality concept has been both supported and criticized in various studies.

  • Quantifiable Traits:

Trait theories often attempt to measure leadership effectiveness through quantifiable psychological attributes. This quantitative approach allows for more empirical research and studies to identify and assess these traits, typically through psychological tests and assessments.

  • Predictive Value:

One of the primary goals of trait theories is to predict leadership success based on the presence of certain traits. The assumption is that identifying and measuring the right traits can predict potential leadership effectiveness and success.

  • Stable and Enduring Traits:

Trait theories assume that leadership traits are relatively stable over time and are enduring qualities of an individual. This stability implies that once a leader, always a leader, as these traits do not change significantly throughout one’s life.

Behavioral Theories:

Behavioral theories focus on the actions of leaders rather than their mental qualities or internal states. These theories categorize leaders based on specific behaviors and styles. Examples include democratic leadership, where leaders involve team members in decision-making, and autocratic leadership, where leaders make decisions without input from others.

Characteristics of Behavioral Theories:

  • Emphasis on Observable Actions:

Behavioral theories focus on what leaders do, rather than who they are. This approach looks at specific behaviors that can be observed, taught, and learned, making it more practical for training and development purposes. These actions include how leaders handle tasks, interact with followers, and make decisions.

  • Classification of Leadership Styles:

A significant aspect of behavioral theories is the classification of leadership into styles based on observed behaviors. Commonly, leadership styles are divided into categories like autocratic, democratic (participative), and laissez-faire, each defined by specific behavioral patterns that influence how leaders direct and support their followers.

  • Leadership as a Skill:

These theories suggest that leadership is a skill that can be developed through education and experience. It posits that with the right training and exposure to appropriate role models, most people can learn to lead effectively by adopting effective leadership behaviors.

  • Contextual Flexibility:

Behavioral theories recognize that effective leadership behaviors can vary depending on the situation and the needs of the followers. Leaders may need to adapt their style to different circumstances, suggesting a more flexible approach to leadership compared to the fixed trait perspective.

  • Impact on Leadership Development:

Behavioral theories have had a profound impact on leadership development programs. They have led to the creation of numerous training models that focus on enhancing specific leadership behaviors, such as communication, motivation, and conflict resolution. These theories underpin many of the modern practices in organizational leadership development.

Contingency Theories:

These theories propose that the effectiveness of a leadership style is contingent upon the context and situational factors. Leadership success depends on various elements, including the organizational environment, team characteristics, and task types. Famous models include Fiedler’s Contingency Model, which links the leader’s effectiveness to situational controllability.

Characteristics of Contingency Theories:

  • Situational Fit:

The central tenet of contingency theories is that leadership success depends on the alignment between a leader’s style, the followers’ needs, and the specific situational variables. This characteristic highlights the necessity for leaders to adapt their style to fit the particular circumstances and demands of the environment and task.

  • Leader-Member Relations:

A key aspect of contingency theories is the quality of the relationship between the leader and their followers. Good leader-member relations can enhance leadership effectiveness, while poor relations might hinder a leader’s ability to lead effectively, regardless of their inherent abilities or leadership style.

  • Task Structure:

Contingency theories often consider the structure of the tasks to be performed, categorizing them as either high or low in clarity and structure. The theory posits that different leadership styles are more effective depending on whether the task at hand is structured or unstructured.

  • Leader Position Power:

The amount of power and authority a leader holds can significantly impact their effectiveness. This includes the power to hire, fire, reward, and punish. Contingency theories examine how a leader’s control over these elements affects their ability to lead effectively.

  • Flexibility and Adaptability:

Leaders who embrace contingency theories must be flexible and adaptable in their leadership approach. They need to assess continuously and accurately the demands of their particular situation and adapt their leadership style accordingly. This adaptability is crucial for effectively leading under varying conditions.

Transactional Leadership Theories:

Transactional leadership is based on a system of rewards and penalties. Leaders and followers have a series of transactions: leaders offer rewards for productivity or penalties for lack of productivity. This theory is useful in understanding compliance and operational environments.

Characteristics of Transactional Leadership Theories:

  • Extrinsic Motivation:

Transactional leadership relies heavily on extrinsic motivators, such as rewards and punishments, to influence follower behavior. This approach assumes that people are motivated by reward and punishment and that social systems work best with a clear chain of command.

  • Conditionality of Reward:

In transactional leadership, rewards and punishments are contingent upon performance. Rewards are given for meeting or exceeding targets, and disciplinary measures are implemented for failing to meet agreed-upon standards. This conditionality ensures that followers are directly accountable for their actions.

  • Performance-Oriented:

Leaders focus on task completion and employee compliance and tend to be highly directive. Transactional leaders set clear goals and provide necessary resources but expect staff to perform their tasks with little oversight beyond structured monitoring and feedback on specific outcomes.

  • Management by Exception:

Transactional leaders often operate on a management by exception basis, intervening only when standards are not met or when the performance deviates from the set expectations. This approach can lead to efficient management, as leaders do not involve themselves in day-to-day activities that are going according to plan.

  • Structured Systems and Processes:

This leadership style thrives on rigid structures and prefers to operate within established processes and procedures. Transactional leaders enforce organizational rules rigidly, which can ensure a stable environment that may enhance productivity for tasks requiring high levels of consistency.

Transformational Leadership Theories:

Transformational leaders inspire followers to exceed their own self-interests for the good of the organization and can have a profound and extraordinary effect on their followers. They typically exhibit behaviors that motivate and inspire those around them by establishing trust and setting high expectations.

Characteristics of Transformational Leadership Theories:

  • Inspirational Motivation:

Transformational leaders have a unique ability to inspire and motivate followers by providing meaning and challenge to their work. They articulate a clear vision and are enthusiastic about the goals and missions of the organization. This charisma often translates into an infectious energy that drives the entire team towards achieving higher goals.

  • Intellectual Stimulation:

Leaders who adopt this style encourage innovation and creativity through challenging the usual ways of doing things and encouraging followers to explore new ways of solving problems. Intellectual stimulation is about pushing team members to question norms and to think critically and independently, which can lead to innovations that benefit the entire organization.

  • Individualized Consideration:

Transformational leaders pay attention to the needs of each follower, acting as a mentor or coach. This characteristic involves open communication to foster supportive relationships and to help followers develop and reach higher levels of achievement. Individualized consideration helps in recognizing the unique talents and contributions of each team member, which enhances personal growth and satisfaction.

  • Idealized Influence:

These leaders act as role models for their followers. Through their ethical behavior and personal actions, they earn the trust and respect of their team. Idealized influence is characterized by high standards of moral and ethical conduct, which sets a positive example for followers to emulate.

  • Visionary Leadership:

Transformational leaders are predominantly focused on the future, striving to lead changes that achieve long-term success and sustainability. They have a compelling vision for the future of the organization, and they communicate this vision effectively to align and motivate all members of the organization to work towards this common goal.

Servant Leadership Theory:

This theory suggests that the leader’s primary role is to serve others. Servant leaders prioritize the needs of their team members and help them perform as highly as possible. Unlike traditional leadership theories that focus on the end results, servant leadership emphasizes the growth and well-being of people and communities.

Characteristics of Servant Leadership Theory:

  • Empathy and Understanding:

Servant leaders prioritize understanding and empathizing with their followers. They strive to acknowledge their team members’ perspectives and feelings, which helps in building trust and a supportive team environment. This deep understanding aids in tailoring leadership actions to the specific needs and potentials of individual team members.

  • Commitment to the Growth of People:

Servant leaders are deeply committed to the growth of each individual within the organization. They nurture personal and professional development, providing opportunities for learning and advancement. This approach not only improves the skills and capabilities of team members but also contributes to their personal satisfaction and loyalty.

  • Listening Actively:

A hallmark of servant leadership is active and attentive listening. Servant leaders listen to the needs, concerns, and suggestions of their followers with an open mind. This practice is essential for understanding issues fully and fostering an inclusive atmosphere where every voice is valued.

  • Stewardship:

Servant leaders also take responsibility for their role as stewards of the organization and its resources, including human capital. They focus on making decisions that are ethical and benefit not only the organization but also the wider community and environment. This responsibility underscores a commitment to a higher purpose beyond profit or personal gain.

  • Building Community:

This leadership style emphasizes the importance of fostering a strong sense of community within the organization. Servant leaders work towards creating an environment where team members feel connected, supported, and part of a cohesive group. This sense of community enhances collaboration and can lead to higher levels of organizational commitment and effectiveness.

Situational Leadership Theory:

Developed by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard, this theory suggests that no single leadership style is best. Instead, it depends on the situation. Leaders must adapt their style to the performance readiness of their followers, which could be a mix of directive and supportive behaviors.

Characteristics of Situational Leadership Theory:

  • Adaptability:

One of the most critical attributes of situational leadership is adaptability. Leaders assess the situation and adapt their style to meet the needs of their followers. This flexibility is crucial in managing a dynamic work environment where team members’ competence and commitment levels can vary widely.

  • Four Leadership Styles:

Situational leadership categorizes leadership styles into four types: Directing (high directive, low supportive), Coaching (high directive, high supportive), Supporting (low directive, high supportive), and Delegating (low directive, low supportive). Each style is used based on the specific needs of the situation and the development level of the followers.

  • Development Level Assessment:

Leaders must evaluate the development level of their followers, which is a combination of their competence and motivation. This assessment dictates the leadership style chosen. For example, a new employee might need a more directive style (Directing), whereas a more experienced and motivated employee might benefit more from a delegating style.

  • Two-Way Communication:

Situational leadership heavily relies on open, two-way communication between leaders and followers. This ensures that leaders can gauge followers’ development levels accurately and that followers understand what is expected of them. It also helps in providing appropriate feedback and support tailored to individual needs.

  • Emphasis on Teaching and Coaching:

Unlike traditional leadership theories that focus primarily on achieving tasks, situational leadership places significant emphasis on the development of followers. Leaders take on more of a teaching or coaching role, aimed at developing employees’ skills and helping them progress to higher levels of autonomy and responsibility.

Path-Goal Theory:

This theory is about how leaders motivate subordinates to accomplish designated goals. The leader’s job is seen as coaching or guiding workers to choose the best paths for reaching their goals. Based on the expectancy theory of motivation, leaders should clarify the path to help their followers achieve career goals.

Characteristics of Path-Goal Theory:

  • Leader Behavior Adaptability:

Similar to situational leadership, Path-Goal Theory emphasizes the importance of adapting leader behavior based on the environment and the employees’ needs. Leaders can adopt different styles, such as directive, supportive, participative, and achievement-oriented, depending on what is most needed to help followers feel satisfied and perform effectively.

  • Clarification of the Path to Goals:

Leaders using this model actively clarify and define how followers can achieve their objectives. This involves outlining clear guidelines, providing direction, and setting performance standards. Leaders also help identify and remove barriers that might impede progress, thereby easing the path towards goal achievement.

  • Enhancement of Personal Rewards:

Path-Goal Theory asserts that leaders can motivate their followers by increasing the rewards that directly result from performance. This means linking performance to outcomes that are valuable to the follower, ensuring that they see a clear connection between their effort and the rewards they can obtain.

  • Employee Characteristics and Environmental Factors:

The theory takes into account the characteristics of the employees (such as their locus of control, experience, and perceived ability) and the environmental factors (such as the task structure, work group, and authority system). Leaders must understand these factors and adjust their style to fit the situation optimally to motivate their followers effectively.

  • Empowerment and Support:

Leaders are seen as facilitators who support their followers by providing them with the necessary resources, guidance, and encouragement. Supportive leadership is crucial in ensuring that employees feel valued and empowered to take necessary actions towards achieving their goals.

Leadership Styles

The Leadership Styles are the behavioral patterns that a leader adopt to influence the behavior of his followers, i.e. the way he gives directions to his subordinates and motivates them to accomplish the given objectives.

The leadership styles can either be classified on the basis of behavioral approach or situational approach. These approaches are comprised of several theories and models which are explained below:

Based on Behavioral Approach

  1. Power Orientation

The power orientation refers to the “degree of authority” that a leader adopts to influence the behavior of his subordinates. Based on this, the leadership styles can be further classified as:

  • Autocratic Leadership
  • Participative Leadership
  • Laissez-Faire
  1. Leadership as a continuum

This model is given by Tannenbaum and Schmidt, who believed that there are several leadership styles that range between two extremes of autocratic and free-rein, which are shown below:

  1. Employee-Production Orientation

Several types of research were conducted to study the leadership behavior that gets affected by the several characteristics that are related to each other. It was found that employee orientation and production orientation play an important role in determining the leadership style.The employee orientation is based on the premise that an employee is an important part of the group and is in parallel to the democratic leadership style. Whereas the production Orientation focuses on the production and technical aspects of the job and the employees are considered as the tools for accomplishing the jobs. Thus, the production orientation is parallel to the autocratic leadership style.

  1. Likert’s Management System

Rensis Likert along with his associates studied the patterns and behavior of managers to identify the leadership styles and defined four systems of management. These four systems are: Exploitative Authoritative, Benevolent Authoritative, consultative system and participative system.

  1. Managerial Grid

The managerial grid is the tool designed by Blake and Mouton to determine the leadership style. According to them, the leadership style gets influenced by both the task-oriented and relation-oriented behavior in varying degrees.

  1. Three Dimensional Grid

The three-dimensional grid is also called as a 3-D leadership model given by W.J. Reddin. Reddin included the effectiveness dimension along with the task-oriented and relationship-oriented dimensions to study how a leader behaves in a given situation and a specific environment.

Based on Situational Approach

  1. Fiedler’s Contingency Model

This theory is given by Fred Fiedler, who, along with his associates identified the situational variables and their relationship to determine the leadership styles. Thus, this model is comprised of three elements, leadership styles, situational variables and the interrelationship between these two.

  1. Hursey and Blanchard’s Situational Model

According to this model, the leader has to adopt the leadership style that matches up with the subordinate’s maturity i.e. his willingness to direct his behavior towards the goal.

  1. Path-Goal Model

The Path-Goal Model is given by Robert House, who, along with his associates tried to predict the effectiveness of leadership styles in varied situations. He believed that the foremost function of any leader is to define the goals to the subordinates clearly and assist them in finding the best path to accomplish that goal.

Coordination, Need, Nature, Importance, Types, Principles, Limitations

Coordination is the process of integrating and aligning various activities, resources, and efforts within an organization to achieve common goals. It ensures that different departments, teams, or individuals work together efficiently, minimizing conflicts and redundancies. Effective coordination fosters smooth communication, collaboration, and synergy, leading to better decision-making and goal accomplishment. It involves continuous interaction, feedback, and adjustments to keep operations on track. In essence, coordination is crucial for maintaining unity, improving performance, and enhancing organizational effectiveness.

Need of Coordination:

  • Achieving Organizational Goals

Coordination is essential for aligning the efforts of all departments toward achieving common organizational goals. Each unit may have its own objectives, but coordination ensures that these are harmonized to support the overall mission. Without proper coordination, departments may work in silos, leading to duplication of work, resource wastage, or conflicting outcomes. Effective coordination ensures that every action contributes meaningfully toward organizational success, creating a unified direction and improving the chances of attaining business objectives efficiently.

  • Ensuring Unity of Action

In any organization, different individuals and teams perform diverse tasks. Coordination integrates these activities to ensure unity of action. It binds various efforts into a cohesive whole so that everyone works as a team rather than as isolated individuals. This unity prevents confusion, contradictions, or overlap in tasks. By aligning work processes, coordination fosters harmony and collaboration among employees, reducing conflict and promoting smooth workflow across all levels of the organization.

  • Optimal Use of Resources

Resources such as manpower, materials, machines, and money are limited and must be used wisely. Coordination helps avoid both underutilization and overutilization of resources by ensuring that every department uses what it needs without hoarding or wasting. When teams communicate and coordinate their needs effectively, duplication is minimized and synergy is maximized. This results in greater efficiency and effectiveness, contributing to cost control and improved overall productivity of the organization.

  • Facilitating Specialization

As organizations grow, they employ specialists for different functions—like finance, marketing, and production. While specialization improves performance, it can also create isolation if departments do not communicate. Coordination ensures that specialized units work together toward shared goals. It encourages knowledge-sharing and prevents departments from working at cross-purposes. By connecting specialized roles, coordination creates a balance between autonomy and integration, allowing organizations to enjoy the benefits of specialization without fragmentation.

  • Adapting to Changing Environment

In a dynamic business environment, organizations must be agile and responsive to external changes such as market trends, customer preferences, and technological advancements. Coordination helps management respond quickly by ensuring that all departments adapt together, not in isolation. For instance, a new product launch requires synchronized efforts from R&D, marketing, production, and finance. Proper coordination ensures these units move in step, enabling the organization to navigate change effectively and maintain competitiveness.

  • Improving Employee Morale and Relations

Coordination fosters clear communication and understanding between different individuals and teams, reducing misunderstandings and internal conflicts. When people work in a coordinated manner, they experience fewer frustrations due to overlaps or contradictory instructions. This enhances job satisfaction, trust, and teamwork. Employees feel valued when their work is aligned with others and contributes to a larger purpose. As a result, morale is boosted, and the overall work culture becomes more cooperative and positive.

Features/Nature of Coordination:

  • Integrates Group Efforts

Coordination ensures that all the activities within an organization are aligned with each other. It integrates the efforts of different departments, teams, and individuals towards achieving the common organizational goals. By coordinating tasks, it minimizes confusion, conflict, and overlap, promoting unity and teamwork. It creates synergy, where the combined efforts are more effective than individual contributions.

  • Continuous Process

Coordination is not a one-time activity but a continuous process. It requires ongoing interaction, communication, and adjustment as activities progress. As work progresses and new challenges emerge, coordination must adapt and be maintained throughout the life cycle of a project or operation. Managers must continuously monitor tasks and activities to ensure that efforts remain synchronized.

  • Conscious Effort

Effective coordination is a conscious and intentional effort. It requires active planning, communication, and involvement from all members of the organization. Managers need to actively engage with teams to ensure that work is being done in the right direction and any potential conflicts or gaps are addressed promptly. Coordination is a deliberate action, requiring focus and attention from all individuals involved.

  • Facilitates Communication

Coordination depends heavily on effective communication. It ensures that information flows seamlessly between departments, teams, and individuals. Good communication helps in conveying instructions, addressing concerns, and providing feedback. It allows team members to stay updated on the progress of various tasks and avoid misunderstandings. Coordination encourages open channels of communication, which are vital for successful teamwork and collaboration.

  • Ensures Unity of Action

Coordination brings unity in action by aligning the efforts of individuals and departments towards common objectives. It minimizes internal conflicts, duplication of effort, and inconsistencies, ensuring that all actions contribute to the overall goals of the organization. This feature is particularly important in complex organizations where multiple departments work simultaneously on interrelated tasks.

  • Balances Autonomy and Integration

While coordination ensures that efforts are integrated, it also allows for a certain level of autonomy for individual teams or departments. Each unit is free to carry out its tasks in a way that suits its needs, but coordination ensures that their activities do not conflict with or disrupt the work of others. It strikes a balance between giving teams the freedom to operate independently and ensuring their work aligns with the broader organizational goals.

Importance/Need for Coordination:

  • Promotes Unity and Cooperation

Coordination fosters unity among employees, teams, and departments. It encourages individuals to work together towards a shared goal, reducing misunderstandings and ensuring that everyone is on the same page. Through effective coordination, employees understand their roles, responsibilities, and how their tasks contribute to the overall success of the organization. This sense of unity and cooperation helps to maintain a harmonious work environment.

  • Reduces Conflicts and Duplication of Efforts

When tasks are not coordinated, it can lead to conflicts between departments, teams, or individuals. Unclear roles, responsibilities, and overlapping functions can cause confusion, resulting in duplicated efforts or even contradictory actions. Coordination ensures that resources are used efficiently, and roles are clearly defined, thus minimizing conflicts and redundancies. It streamlines operations by preventing the duplication of work, saving time and resources.

  • Improves Efficiency and Productivity

Effective coordination ensures that tasks are completed on time, with minimal errors. By aligning various activities and operations, employees can focus on their individual tasks without the fear of misalignment or missed deadlines. Coordination allows the efficient allocation of resources, ensuring that each department has what it needs to function optimally. This leads to higher productivity, as work is carried out in a more organized and systematic manner.

  • Ensures Effective Communication

Coordination facilitates effective communication between departments, teams, and individuals. Clear and consistent communication helps in conveying goals, expectations, and feedback. It also aids in addressing issues and concerns in real-time. With proper coordination, information is shared seamlessly, ensuring that everyone is informed and on track. This effective communication helps in preventing misunderstandings and enhances collaboration.

  • Helps in Achieving Organizational Goals

Coordination is directly linked to achieving organizational goals. By aligning all efforts towards the common objectives, coordination ensures that every department, team, or individual contributes to the organization’s strategic direction. It reduces deviations from goals and aligns actions with organizational priorities, resulting in the effective realization of short-term and long-term objectives.

  • Improves Decision Making

When coordination is in place, managers have access to relevant and timely information from various departments. This enables better decision-making, as they can make informed choices based on the coordinated inputs. Without coordination, decisions may be made in isolation, leading to decisions that are not aligned with the overall goals. Coordination ensures that decisions are based on a comprehensive understanding of the organization’s operations.

Types of Coordination:

1. Internal Coordination

Internal coordination refers to the alignment of activities, resources, and tasks within the organization. It involves coordinating between different departments or teams within the same organization to ensure that everyone works together toward common goals. For example, coordination between the marketing and production departments ensures that marketing campaigns are aligned with production capabilities and timelines.

Key Features:

  • Intra-departmental cooperation
  • Effective communication among teams
  • Resource allocation within the organization

2. External Coordination

External coordination involves aligning the organization’s activities with external entities, such as suppliers, customers, regulatory bodies, and other stakeholders. This type of coordination ensures that the organization’s operations are aligned with external expectations and requirements. For example, coordinating with suppliers to ensure timely delivery of materials is essential for the production process.

Key Features:

  • Interaction with external stakeholders
  • Compliance with external standards and regulations
  • Building and maintaining relationships with suppliers, clients, and partners

3. Vertical Coordination

Vertical coordination involves the alignment of activities between different hierarchical levels of the organization. It ensures that communication flows smoothly between top management, middle management, and operational levels. Vertical coordination helps in setting objectives, directing activities, and monitoring progress at different levels of the organization.

Key Features:

  • Top-down and bottom-up communication
  • Alignment of goals at different levels of management
  • Decision-making flow from higher to lower levels

4. Horizontal Coordination

Horizontal coordination refers to the alignment of activities between departments or teams at the same hierarchical level. It ensures that different departments or units within the organization work collaboratively to achieve common goals. For example, coordination between the sales and finance departments to ensure that customer orders are processed and invoiced correctly.

Key Features:

  • Coordination between same-level departments
  • Focus on cross-functional collaboration
  • Minimization of silos in the organization

5. Temporal Coordination

Temporal coordination involves synchronizing activities to ensure that tasks are completed on time and in a manner that aligns with the organization’s schedules and timelines. This type of coordination is crucial for meeting deadlines, managing projects, and ensuring that tasks are completed in sequence. For example, in project management, coordination ensures that each phase of the project is completed before the next phase begins.

Key Features:

  • Alignment of schedules and timelines
  • Efficient use of time
  • Monitoring progress and adjusting timelines as necessary

6. Functional Coordination

Functional coordination focuses on aligning activities across different functions or specialized departments within the organization. It involves ensuring that each department or function contributes to the overall objectives of the organization. For example, coordination between the human resources department and the production department to ensure that staffing levels meet production needs.

Key Features:

  • Interdepartmental cooperation
  • Allocation of tasks based on departmental expertise
  • Ensuring all functions contribute to organizational goals

Principles of Coordination:

  • Principle of Clear Objectives

Effective coordination begins with clearly defined objectives for the organization. All efforts should be directed toward common, well-articulated goals. When everyone in the organization knows the ultimate objective, coordination becomes easier because employees understand their roles and how they contribute to the larger mission. Clear objectives serve as a benchmark for evaluating progress and aligning actions.

  • Principle of Unity of Direction

Unity of direction implies that all activities within the organization must be geared towards a common goal. Different departments or units may have different functions, but their actions should all contribute to achieving the same organizational objectives. This principle ensures that every team or individual works in the same direction, eliminating confusion and promoting consistency in efforts across the organization.

  • Principle of Timeliness

Coordination must happen at the right time to be effective. Delayed or premature coordination can lead to inefficiencies, missed opportunities, and resource wastage. The principle of timeliness emphasizes that actions should be coordinated in real time or at the most suitable stage in the process to ensure that all departments or individuals are synchronized. Proper scheduling and monitoring are essential for adhering to this principle.

  • Principle of Reciprocal Relationship

This principle suggests that coordination is a two-way process. There needs to be constant communication and feedback between various departments or units for successful coordination. Each department should understand not only its responsibilities but also how its work impacts other departments. For example, coordination between the production and sales departments is essential, as each department’s actions affect the other. Mutual respect and understanding are critical to maintaining a reciprocal relationship.

  • Principle of Flexibility

Organizations operate in dynamic environments where changes are constant. The principle of flexibility asserts that coordination efforts should be adaptable to changing conditions. Managers must be prepared to adjust plans, timelines, and strategies to accommodate shifts in the market, technology, or internal operations. Rigid coordination systems can create bottlenecks and inefficiencies. Flexibility allows the organization to remain agile and responsive to new challenges.

  • Principle of Communication

Effective communication is at the heart of successful coordination. This principle emphasizes the need for clear, consistent, and timely communication across all levels of the organization. Information should flow smoothly from top to bottom and across departments to ensure that all team members are aligned and well-informed. Communication bridges gaps between different functions and facilitates the exchange of ideas, feedback, and updates, helping to resolve issues and promote collaboration.

  • Principle of Continuity

Coordination should be an ongoing process, not a one-time effort. The principle of continuity highlights that coordination should be maintained throughout the life cycle of a project, operation, or task. Continuous interaction, monitoring, and adjustments are necessary to keep all activities aligned with organizational goals. Ongoing coordination ensures that any new challenges or changes are promptly addressed and that all members remain focused on the common objectives.

  • Principle of Economy

Coordination must be efficient in terms of time, resources, and effort. The principle of economy emphasizes that coordination should not lead to unnecessary delays or resource wastage. It should streamline processes, reduce redundancies, and make the best use of available resources. An efficient coordination process allows the organization to achieve its goals in the least amount of time and with the optimal use of resources.

Limitations in Achieving Coordination:

  • Poor Communication

Effective coordination relies on clear and continuous communication. When communication channels are unclear or ineffective, it leads to misunderstandings, confusion, and conflicts among departments or teams. Without proper communication, individuals may not understand their roles or the goals they are working toward, leading to fragmented efforts. Miscommunication or lack of communication can significantly hinder coordination.

  • Resistance to Change

Employees and managers may resist coordination efforts, especially when changes are introduced in the way work is organized. People often become attached to their ways of working and may be reluctant to embrace new methods, processes, or tools for coordination. This resistance can stem from fear of the unknown, lack of trust in new approaches, or a sense of security in existing systems. Overcoming resistance to change is crucial for successful coordination.

  • Lack of Authority and Accountability

Coordination requires clear authority and responsibility for overseeing the process. When there is ambiguity about who is responsible for coordination efforts, or when authority is not well-defined, it becomes difficult to align activities and resolve conflicts. Lack of accountability can lead to confusion over decision-making and delays in addressing issues, preventing smooth coordination. Effective coordination demands that someone take charge of monitoring progress and ensuring alignment.

  • Overlapping Responsibilities

Overlapping or unclear responsibilities between departments or individuals can create confusion and hinder coordination. When roles and responsibilities are not clearly defined, employees may work in isolation or duplicate efforts, leading to inefficiency. It can also lead to conflicts when different teams compete for resources or authority. Clearly defining and delineating roles is essential to prevent such overlaps and ensure effective coordination.

  • Limited Resources

Achieving coordination often requires adequate resources, including time, money, and personnel. If resources are limited, it becomes difficult to coordinate the activities of various departments effectively. For example, if a company lacks sufficient personnel or technology to facilitate communication, it will struggle with coordination. In such cases, coordination efforts may suffer from delays, budget constraints, or lack of tools needed to track and align tasks.

  • Cultural and Psychological Barriers

Cultural differences, both within and outside the organization, can present barriers to coordination. In diverse teams, differences in values, communication styles, and work ethics can create misunderstandings and hinder smooth collaboration. Additionally, psychological factors such as a lack of trust or fear of conflict can create reluctance to share information or collaborate effectively. Overcoming these cultural and psychological barriers is essential for fostering effective coordination.

Techniques of coordination in Management

Co-ordination is a continuous process and it is done at all levels of management. Mangers use a variety of techniques in the business organisation to achieve co-ordination.

These techniques may be divided as:

  1. General techniques and
  2. Specific techniques.

Technique 1. General:

Co-ordination can easily be achieved if managerial functions are properly designed and executed. Thoughtful and proper design of managerial functions is the key to successful co-ordination. Almost all managerial functions directly affect co-ordination, for example planning, organisation, departmentation, supervision, leadership and control. Policies and procedures should be co-ordinated while planning the objectives and goals of the business concern.

If the policies and procedures are in consistent with objectives, it will create problems to the business concern. Therefore there should be clear-cut and effective delegation of authority and specified relationships to avoid many conflicts and misunderstanding. This promotes co-ordination. It is the duty of top executives to create various departments based on various functions and establish relationship between various departmental heads, managers, executives and subordinates.

People, leadership and supervision, too, promote co-ordination which ultimately results in team spirit and honest effort for achieving ultimate objectives. Control techniques also help the organisation towards achieving common objectives of the organisation as well. The co-ordination can be achieved if manager starts co-ordination efforts of unifying, blending and harmonizing from the very early stage of planning and continues to the last stage of controlling.

Technique 2. Specific:

It is managers’ duty to see that the co-ordination exists in the entire organisation although he cannot order for it. It is the product of efforts undertaken in the enterprise.

Following are some specific techniques that can be used by managers for ensuring co-ordination:

i. Co-Ordination by Meetings and Conferences:

Periodic meetings of staff of various levels of management is an effective technique of co-ordination. Weekly group meeting or conference of the departmental heads under the chairmanship of the general manager is a very effective device for co­ordination, suggested by Henri Fayol. It provides them an opportunity for direct contact, asking them how the things are going on.

Their problems difficulties, management’s expectation from them, solving their problems, exchanging various ideas, opinions, points of view, problems, and solutions are effectively discussed and resolved in such meetings. All this leads to harmony and unity in working.

ii. Co-Ordination by Committees:

Establishment of departmental committees is another technique to ensure effective co-ordination. These committees meet periodically and discuss various managerial problems and find solutions to these problems. Sometimes there are some permanent committees for the purpose of coordinating the activities of two or more departments. The committees usually comprise of representatives from all departments. Thus committees solve many managerial problems and serve as a sound technique of co-ordination.

iii. Co-Ordination by Liaison Officer:

Instead of establishing permanent co-ordination committees, appointing a liaison officer and entrusting him the co-ordination work is less expensive and more effective as this liaison officer is always available. This liaison officer would do the work of establishing and maintaining co-ordination among important departments. In modern days this practice is not prevalent.

iv. Co-Ordination by Order and Command:

This is one of the effective techniques of co­ordination. A manager, by issuing orders and commands to their subordinates, achieves effective co­ordination. The manager can also clearly define the work of his subordinates, their role, function, and timing of performing the work, in order to achieve co-ordination. In modern days this technique is not considered good, since, it neglects significance of human relations.

v. Co-Ordination by Goals or Targets:

The top boss fixes targets for all the departments and entrusts the job of fulfilling them to his subordinates’ i.e. departmental heads. He, by his own means, ensures achievement of such goals and completion of the targets. This, indirectly, establishes co­ordination.

vi. Co-Ordination by Departmentation:

Departmentation facilitates co-ordination in a better way than other techniques. It is one of the important means of dividing the large scale business concern into smaller administrative units. Departmentation is done on the basis of functions products, customers, territories and so on. As these departments are interdependent, co-ordination is automatically established.

vii. Co-Ordination by Communication:

Proper communication is a successful system of co­ordination. As such adequate facilities for good communication should be provided. Defective communication system may result in ineffective co-ordination.

viii. Co-Ordination by Special Coordinators:

In big industrial concerns, along with various managers, a project coordinator is appointed. His main duty is to co-ordinate various activities relating to a particular project. The function of this co-ordination cell is to collect information and send it to the various departments. Smooth co-ordination and ultimate success of the enterprise is assumed by such a special co-ordination cell.

A company may adopt any type of technique from the above. Its choice depends upon the type, size and objective of the business concern. Sometimes a company may adopt a combination of some of the above techniques to achieve the desired results.

When a group of people works to achieve a common objective or purpose, co-ordination becomes a must to synchronise their efforts. And when sub-division of work is not possible then co-ordination becomes compulsory. Co-ordination is essential when diversified tasks are undertaken by some persons, co-ordination starts as soon as the operations begin. Without proper co-ordination the organisational objectives cannot be achieved. It is essential for the survival of an organisation.

Co-ordination is the essence of management. In all small and big organisations there are individuals and groups competing for influence and resources. There are differences of opinion and values, conflicts of priorities and of goals. Individuals as well as groups have different roles, different goals and different skills. The overall task of management is to co-ordinate and integrate or blend these differences into one united wholeness. Co-ordination is a central problem of the organisation.

Ideally co-ordination spreads throughout all managerial activities. Management has to secure effective co­ordination of human efforts and non-human resources. Management of a big business is essentially a task of co-ordination. All departments, sections etc. are duly welded into one united and integrated whole aimed at working to achieve common goals. Thus we have unity of direction and unity of objectives. Co-ordination tones up general level of employee morale and job satisfaction.

Various types of plans such as objectives, policies, strategies schedules and programmes serve as means of co­ordinating the activities of the enterprise spread over several departments and divisions. The organisation cannot be said to be efficient unless it attempts to achieve co-ordination by creating a sound organisation structure. It defines the activities of the enterprise in terms of individual tasks and the activities that are grouped into homogenous work units and authority positions.

Without the process of integration of diverse activities, roles and authority relationships will not be clear, Staffing function involves manpower planning, employment, training, wage fixation, merit rating, job evaluation etc. All these sub-functions are performed in such a manner that there are right persons on different jobs. All this helps in achieving co-ordination in assigning tasks to various individuals. With the help of direction, manager can influence the behaviour of individuals so as to evolve goal directed effort.

This is very much essential for achieving co-ordination. Controlling also contributes towards achieving co-ordination. Under this function, standards of performance are established, and actual performance is compared with standard performance and deviation if any is measured, and then necessary corrective measures are undertaken.

By implementing these measures all activities are converted into achieving co-ordination in the business enterprise. Finally it can be concluded in such a way that, co-ordination is achieved by performing various functions of management.

Effective coordination in Management

Co-ordination cannot be achieved by force or imposed by authority. Achieving co-ordination through orders is a futile exercise. There are situations or problems that make achieving coordination a very difficult task.

1. Poorly defined and understood objectives:

It will be impossible to achieve co-ordination if the goals of the enterprise are not clearly defined. Every individual and each department must understand what is expected of them by the organisation. Top management must clearly state the objectives for the enterprise, as a whole. The various plans formulated in the enterprise must be inter-related and designed to fit together. Only then the organization can be coordinated.

2. Improper division of work:

Division of work is one of the most important requisites of effective organising. If the tasks are not differentiated and assigned to individuals according to their skills and qualification, it will be quite difficult to coordinate the activities of the enterprise.

3. Structured organization:

When the degree of formalisation, span of control degree of centralisation etc. are not clearly understood and activities are not properly departmentalised a very poorly structured organization will emerge making coordination very difficult.

4. Defined Lines of authority:

Coordination can never be achieved if the lines of authority are not clearly defined. Authority must be delegated in a clear way. The individual must know, what is expected of him by his superior(s). Once authority is accepted, the subordinate must be made accountable for results, in his work area. There should be no room for overlapping of authority and wastage of effort(s).

5. Poor communication:

A smooth flow of two-way communication is pre­requisite of co-ordination, if sound communication networks are not developed, an enterprise can never be co-ordinated. Personal contact is generally considered to be the most effective means of communication for achieving co-ordination. Other means of communication such as records, reports, may also be used in order to supply timely and accurate information to various groups in an organization.

6. Ineffective Leadership:

According to McFarland, real coordination can be achieved only through effective leadership. Top management, to this end, must be able to provide:

(i) a conducive work environment,

(ii) proper allocation of work,

(iii) incentives for good work, etc. It must persuade subordinates, to have identity of interests and to adopt a common outlook.

Principles of organisation

1. Principle of Objective:

The enterprise should set up certain aims for the achievement of which various departments should work. A common goal so devised for the business as a whole and the organization is set up to achieve that goal. In the absence of a common aim, various departments will set up their own goals and there is a possibility of conflicting objectives for different departments. So there must be an objective for the organization.

2. Principle of Specialisation:

The organization should be set up in such a way that every individual should be assigned a duty according to his skill and qualification. The person should continue the same work so that he specialises in his work. This helps in increasing production in the concern.

3. Principles of Co-ordination:

The co-ordination of different activities is an important principle of the organization. There should be some agency to co-ordinate the activities of various departments. In the absence of co-ordination there is a possibility of setting up different goals by different departments. The ultimate aim of the concern can be achieved only if proper co-ordination is done for different activities.

4. Principle of Authority and Responsibility:

The authority flows downward in the line. Every individual is given authority to get the work done. Though authority can be delegated but responsibility lies with the man who has been given the work. If a superior delegates his authority to his subordinate, the superior is not absolved of his responsibility, though the subordinate becomes liable to his superior. The responsibility cannot be delegated under any circumstances.

5. Principle of Definition:

The scope of authority and responsibility should be clearly defined. Every person should know his work with definiteness. If the duties are not clearly assigned, then it will not be possible to fix responsibility also. Everybody’s responsibility will become nobody’s responsibility. The relationship between different departments should also be clearly defined to make the work efficient and smooth.

6. Span of Control:

Span of control means how many subordinates can be supervised by a supervisor. The number of subordinates should be such that the supervisor should be able to control their work effectively. Moreover, the work to be supervised should be of the same nature. If the span of control is disproportionate, it is bound to affect the efficiency of the workers because of slow communication with the supervisors.

7. Principle of Balance:

The principle means that assignment of work should be such that every person should be given only that much work which he can perform well. Some person is over worked and the other is under-worked, then the work will suffer in both the situations. The work should be divided in such a way that everybody should be able to give his maximum.

8. Principle of Continuity:

The organization should be amendable according to the changing situations. Everyday there are changes in methods of production and marketing systems. The organization should be dynamic and not static. There should always be a possibility of making necessary adjustments.

9. Principle of Uniformity:

The organization should provide for the distribution of work in such a manner that the uniformity is maintained. Each officer should be in-charge of his respective area so as to avoid dual subordination and conflicts.

10. Principle of Unity of Command:

There should be a unity of command in the organization. A person should be answerable to one boss only. If a person is under the control of more than one person then there is a like-hood of confusion and conflict. He gets contradictory orders from different superiors. This principle creates a sense of responsibility to one person. The command should be from top to bottom for making the organization sound and clear. It also leads to consistency in directing, coordinating and controlling.

11. Principle of Exception:

This principle states that top management should interfere only when something goes wrong. If the things are done as per plans then there is no need for the interference of top management. The management should leave routine things to be supervised by lower cadres. It is only the exceptional situations when attention of top management is drawn. This principle relieves top management of many botherations and routine things. Principle of exception allows top management to concentrate on planning and policy formulation. Important time of management is not wasted on avoidable supervision.

12. Principle of Simplicity:

The organizational structure should be simple so that it is easily understood by each and every person. The authority, responsibility and position of every person should be made clear so that there is no confusion about these things. A complex organizational structure will create doubts and conflicts among persons. There may also be over-lapping’s and duplication of efforts which may otherwise be avoided. It helps in smooth running of the organization.

13. Principle of Efficiency:

The organization should be able to achieve enterprise objectives at a minimum cost. The standards of costs and revenue are pre-determined and performance should be according to these goals. The organization should also enable the attainment of job satisfaction to various employees.

14. Scalar Principle:

This principle refers to the vertical placement of supervisors starting from top and going to the lower level. The scalar chain is a pre-requisite for effective and efficient organization.

Organisation

An entrepreneur organizes various factors of production like land, labour, capital, machinery, etc. for channelizing them into productive activities. The product finally reaches consumers through various agencies. Business activities are divided into various functions, these functions are assigned to different individuals.

Various individual efforts must lead to the achievement of common business goals. Organization is the structural framework of duties and responsibilities required of personnel in performing various functions with a view to achieve business goals through organization. Management tries to combine various business activities to accomplish predetermined goals.

Present business system is very complex. The unit must be run efficiently to stay in the competitive world of business. Various jobs are to be performed by persons most suitable for them. First of all various activities should be grouped into different functions. The authority and responsibility is fixed at various levels. All efforts should be made to co-ordinate different activities for running the units efficiently so that cost of production may be reduced and profitability of the unit may be increased.

Definition by Experts

Louis Allen, “Organization is the process of identifying and grouping work to be performed, defining and delegating responsibility and authority and establishing relationships for the purpose of enabling people to work most effectively together in accomplishing objectives.” In the words of Allen, organization is an instrument for achieving organizational goals. The work of each and every person is defined and authority and responsibility is fixed for accomplishing the same.

Wheeler, “Internal organization is the structural framework of duties and responsibilities required of personnel in performing various functions within the company. It is essentially a blue print for action resulting in a mechanism for carrying out function to achieve the goals set up by company management”. In Wheeler’s view, organization is a process of fixing duties and responsibilities of persons in an enterprise so that business goals are achieved.

Koontz and O’Donnell, ‘The establishment of authority relationships with provision for co-ordination between them, both vertically and horizontally in the enterprise structure.” These authors view organization as a coordinating point among various persons in the business.

Oliver Sheldon, “Organization is the process so combining the work which individuals or groups have to perform with the facilities necessary for its execution, that the duties so performed provide the best channels for the efficient, systematic, positive and coordinated application of the available effort”. Organization helps in efficient utilization of resources by dividing the duties of various persons.

Spriegel, “In its broadest sense organisation refers to the relationship between the various factors present in a given endeavor. Factory organisation concerns itself primarily with the internal relationships within the factory such as responsibilities of personnel, arrangement and grouping of machines and material control. From the standpoint of the enterprise as a whole, organisation is the structural relationship between the various factors in the enterprise”.

Spriegel has given a wide definition of the organization. He has described it as the relationship among persons, factors in the enterprise. All factors of production are coordinated in order to achieve organisational objectives.

George Terry, “Organising is the establishing of effective authority relationships among selected work, persons, and work places in order for the group to work together efficiently”. According to Terry organisation is the creation of relationship among persons and work so that it may be carried on in a better and efficient way.

C.H. Northcott, ‘The arrangement by which tasks are assigned to men and women so that their individual efforts contribute effectively to some more or less clearly defined purpose for which they have been brought together”. According to Northcott the purpose of organisation is to co-ordinate the activities of various individuals working in the organisation for the attainment of enterprise goals.

L.H. Haney, “Organisation is a harmonious adjustment of specialised parts for accomplishment of some common purpose or purposes”. Organisation is the adjustment of various activities for the attainment of common goals.

Concepts of Organisation:

  1. Static concept
  2. Dynamic concept,

1. Static Concept:

Under static concept the term ‘organisation’ is used as a structure, an entity or a network of specified relationship. In this sense, organisation is a group of people bound together in a formal relationship to achieve common objectives. It lays emphasis on position and not on individuals.

2. Dynamic Concept:

Under dynamic concept, the term ‘organisation’ is used as a process of an on-going activity. In this sense, organisation is a process of organising work, people and the systems. It is concerned with the process of determining activities which may be necessary for achieving an objective and arranging them in suitable groups so as to be assigned to individuals. It considers organisation as an open adoptive system and not as a closed system. Dynamic concept lays emphasis on individuals and considers organisation as a continuous process.

Characteristics of Organisation:

Different authors look at the word ‘organisation’ from their own angle. One thing which is common in all the viewpoints is that organisation is the establishment of authority relationship among persons so that it helps in the achievement of organisational objectives.

Some of the characteristics of organisation are studied as follows:

1. Division of Work:

Organisation deals with the whole task of business. The total work of the enterprise is divided into activities and functions. Various activities are assigned to different persons for their efficient accomplishment. This brings in division of labour. It is not that one person cannot carry out many functions but specialisation in different activities is necessary to improve one’s efficiency. Organisation helps in dividing the work into related activities so that they are assigned to different individuals.

2. Co-ordination:

Co-ordination of various activities is as essential as their division. It helps in integrating and harmonising various activities. Co-ordination also avoids duplications and delays. In fact, various functions in an organisation depend upon one another and the performance of one influences the other. Unless all of them are properly co­ordinated, the performance of all segments is adversely affected.

3. Common Objectives:

All organisational structure is a means towards the achievement of enterprise goals. The goals of various segments lead to the achievement of major business goals. The organisational structure should build around common and clear cut objectives. This will help in their proper accomplishment.

4. Co-operative Relationship:

An organisation creates co-operative relationship among various members of the group. An organisation cannot be constituted by one person. It requires at least two or more persons. Organisation is a system which helps in creating meaningful relationship among persons. The relationship should be both vertical and horizontal among members of various departments. The structure should be designed that it motivates people to perform their part of work together.

5. Well-Defined Authority-Responsibility Relationships:

An organisation consists of various positions arranged in a hierarchy with well defined authority and responsibility. There is always a central authority from which a chain of authority relationship stretches throughout the organisation. The hierarchy of positions defines the lines of communication and pattern of relationships.

Business Features and Scope

Business refers to the organized efforts of individuals or entities to produce, buy, or sell goods and services to earn a profit. It involves various activities such as production, marketing, finance, and operations, aiming to meet customer needs and generate value. Businesses range from small, local shops to large multinational corporations, spanning diverse sectors like retail, technology, and manufacturing. Beyond profit, businesses contribute to economic growth, create employment, and foster innovation. Successful businesses adapt to market demands, embrace ethical practices, and contribute positively to society and the economy.

Features of Business:

  1. Economic Activity

Business is fundamentally an economic activity focused on producing goods or services to satisfy consumer needs. It involves creating value through transactions that generate profit, contributing to the economic stability and growth of a society.

  1. Profit Motive

The primary objective of most businesses is to earn a profit, which enables sustainability, growth, and reinvestment. Profit serves as a reward for the risks taken by the business owner and as a measure of the business’s success.

  1. Exchange of Goods and Services

Business involves the exchange of goods and services between buyers and sellers. This exchange occurs in various markets, from local shops to international e-commerce platforms, ensuring that consumers have access to the products they need.

  1. Risk and Uncertainty

All businesses face a certain level of risk, including economic downturns, market changes, or competition. Entrepreneurs and companies navigate these uncertainties with strategies like innovation, market research, and financial planning to mitigate potential losses.

  1. Regularity of Transactions

A defining feature of business is the continuity of transactions. Regular buying and selling activities distinguish a business from occasional trades, ensuring consistent operations and market presence over time.

  1. Customer Satisfaction

Meeting customer needs and preferences is essential for business success. Satisfied customers are more likely to return, recommend the business to others, and contribute to long-term profitability. Many companies prioritize customer service, quality, and convenience to build loyalty.

  1. Creation of Utility

Businesses create utility by transforming raw materials into valuable products, delivering them to consumers, or providing essential services. Through form, place, and time utilities, businesses increase the product’s value to customers, fulfilling specific demands effectively.

  1. Investment of Capital

Businesses require capital for establishment, operations, and growth. This capital, whether in the form of financial assets, property, or machinery, funds the production process and day-to-day activities. Proper capital management is crucial for financial stability and expansion.

  1. Dynamic and Evolving Nature

The business environment is constantly changing due to factors like technology, consumer trends, and global market shifts. Successful businesses adapt to these changes by innovating, investing in new technologies, and adjusting strategies to stay relevant and competitive.

  1. Social Responsibility

Businesses today are increasingly aware of their impact on society and the environment. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives focus on ethical practices, sustainability, and community welfare, recognizing that socially responsible businesses build trust, improve brand reputation, and contribute to a positive societal impact.

Scope of Business:

  1. Production and Manufacturing

The production and manufacturing aspect of business involves transforming raw materials into finished goods or services. This process includes research and development (R&D), quality control, and optimization of production techniques. Efficient production is critical for creating valuable products that meet consumer demands.

  1. Marketing and Sales

Marketing and sales activities are essential to promote and distribute products to consumers. This scope includes market research, advertising, branding, and customer relationship management. Effective marketing strategies help businesses identify target markets, understand consumer behavior, and establish brand loyalty.

  1. Finance and Accounting

Finance and accounting encompass activities related to managing business finances. This area includes budgeting, financial planning, cost analysis, and managing cash flow. Proper financial management ensures profitability, sustainability, and compliance with regulations, enabling businesses to make informed investment decisions.

  1. Human Resource Management

Human resource management (HRM) involves recruiting, training, and developing employees to align with organizational goals. HRM also handles employee benefits, performance appraisal, and compliance with labor laws. Effective HR practices contribute to a motivated and skilled workforce, enhancing productivity and organizational culture.

  1. Operations Management

Operations management focuses on the day-to-day activities needed to produce goods and services efficiently. It includes managing supply chains, inventory, logistics, and quality assurance. Effective operations streamline production, minimize waste, and enhance customer satisfaction by ensuring timely delivery of products.

  1. Research and Development (R&D)

R&D is vital for innovation, product improvement, and adapting to market changes. Through R&D, businesses explore new technologies, improve existing products, and develop solutions that cater to evolving consumer needs. Investing in R&D helps businesses remain competitive and relevant in their industry.

  1. Customer Service

Customer service is essential for maintaining positive relationships with customers. This area includes post-purchase support, handling complaints, and providing product-related assistance. Quality customer service enhances customer satisfaction, promotes brand loyalty, and positively impacts business reputation.

  1. Legal and Regulatory Compliance

Businesses must comply with laws and regulations, including employment laws, environmental policies, and financial reporting standards. Legal compliance ensures that businesses operate within the law, protecting them from legal disputes and penalties, and promoting ethical practices within the organization.

  1. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

Corporate social responsibility focuses on ethical practices and community involvement. Through CSR, businesses contribute to social and environmental causes, such as sustainability initiatives, charitable donations, and employee volunteering. CSR builds goodwill, enhances brand image, and shows the company’s commitment to positive societal impact.

error: Content is protected !!