Verification and Valuation of different Items

Fixed assets of are a permanent nature with which the business is carried on and which are held for earning income and not for re-sale in the ordinary course of the business. It is a long-term tangible property that a firm owns and uses in its operations to generate income. Fixed assets are not converted into cash or consumed within a year. They are also called as Capital Assets. Example: land and buildings, plant and machinery, furniture etc. These assets are to be valued at cost price less total depreciation in their value by constant use. Additions by way of purchase and deletions by way of sales should be taken into account. The mode of valuation of different types of assets differs depending upon the nature of the business and the purpose for which the assets are held.

  1. Land and Buildings

Land means a long -term asset that refers to the cost of real property exclusive of the cost of any constructed assets on the property. The value of land has an appreciated value and is not subject to depreciation. A building is a noncurrent or long-term asset which shows the cost of a building (excluding the cost of the land) Buildings will be depreciated over their useful life of the asset.

Classified into two types

Land and Buildings can further be classified as:

  • Freehold property
  • Leasehold property

(i)  Freehold Property

A property which is free from hold (Possession/Rights) is called as freehold property. This means that the property is free from the hold of anybody besides the owner who enjoys complete ownership.

Auditor’s Duty

  • Where Freehold property has been purchased, the auditor should examine the title deeds e.g., purchase deed, certificate of registration, the broker’s note and auctioneer’s account etc., to verify the correct position.
  • When the property has been mortgaged, the auditor should obtain a certificate from the mortgagee regarding the possession of title deed and outstanding amount of loan.
  • When the property has been acquired in the current year, then the cost may be verified with the help of the bank passbook. He should vouch all the payments made in this connection.
  • He should see that the property account should be shown in the Balance Sheet at cost price including the legal and registration charges less depreciation up-to-date.
  • He should also see that a separate account for building and land on which it is constructed is maintained. It is necessary because depreciation is provided for building and not for the land.

(ii)  Leasehold Property

Leasehold is an accounting term for an asset being leased. The asset is typically property such as a building or space in a building.

  • The property which is on lease (rent).
  • The property (plot/flat/villa/mall/ factories) which is leased by the landlord for a certain period of time to the lessee (tenant /leaseholder/renter/ occupant/dweller).
  • The (tenants) have been given the right to use during that specified time by the landlord.
  • The ownership of the property returns to the landlord when the lease comes to an end.

Auditor’s Duty

  • The auditor should verify this by inspecting the lease agreement or contract to find out value and duration. He should see that the terms and conditions of lease are properly complied with.
  • In case property has been mortgaged, the auditor should obtain a certificate from the mortgagee regarding the possession of title deed.
  • Where the leasehold property has been sub-let, the counter part of the tenant’s agreement should also be examined.
  • The auditor should physically inspect the properties.
  • The auditor should also note that proper provision has been made for depreciation of lease problem and for any possible claims arising there under.
  1. Plant and Machinery

A plant is an asset with a useful life of more than one year that is used in producing revenues in a business’s operations. Plant is recorded at cost and depreciation is reported during their useful life.

Auditor’s Duty

  • When the machines are purchased in the current accounting period, the invoices and the agreement with the vendors should be verified.
  • The auditor should ` examine the plant register in which particulars about the cost, records about sales, provision for depreciation, etc., are available.
  • He should prepare a list of each machine from the plant register and should get the list certified by the works manager as he is not a technical person and therefore he has to depend upon the advice of the works manager regarding their valuation, etc.
  • He should see that plant and machinery account is shown in the Balance Sheet at cost less depreciation after making proper adjustment for purchases and sales during the year under audit.
  • In case any plant and machinery has been scrapped, destroyed or sold, he should ascertain that the profit or loss arising thereon has been correctly determined.

Valuation of Fixed Assets

  1. Valuation of Land: Land which does not have depreciated value, is valued at cost price.
  2. Valuation of Other Fixed Assets: Other fixed assets like Buildings, Plant, machinery, office equipment, furniture and fixtures should be valued at going concern value.
  3. Depreciation: Auditor should ensure that adequate amount of depreciation has been provided, taking into account the working life and usage of the asset.
  4. Disclosure in Balance Sheet: He should verify that furniture, fittings and fixtures are disclosed in Balance Sheet at cost less depreciation.

Meaning and Objectives of Verification and Valuation

Concept and Meaning of Verification

Verification means proving the correctness. One of the main work’s of auditor is verification of assets and liabilities. Verification is the act of assuring the correctness of value of assets and liabilities, title and their existence in the organization. An auditor should be satisfied himself about the actual existence of assets and liabilities appearing in the balance sheet is correct. If balance sheet incorporates the incorrect assets, both profit and loss account and balance sheet do not present true and fair views.

Thus, verification means to confirm the truth or accuracy and to substantiate. It is a process by which the auditor satisfies himself not only about the actual existence, possession, ownership and the basis of valuation but also ensures that the assets are free from any charge. While verifying the assets, an auditor should consider the following points:

  • Ensuring the existence of assets.
  • Acquiring the assets for business.
  • Ensuring the proper valuation of assets.
  • Ensuring that the assets are free from any charge.

Objective of Verification

The objectives of verification are as follows:

  • To show the correct value of assets and liabilities.
  • To know whether the Balance Sheet exhibits a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the business.
  • To find out the ownership, possession and title of the assets appearing in the Balance Sheet.
  • To find out whether assets are in existence.
  • To detect frauds and errors, if any while recording assets in the books of the concern.
  • To find out whether there is an adequate internal control regarding acquisition, utilization and disposal of assets.
  • To verify the arithmetic accuracy of the accounts.
  • To ensure that the assets have been properly recorded.

Auditor’s Duty Regarding Verification

The auditor of a business is required to report in concrete terms that the Balance Sheet exhibits a true and fair view of the state of its affairs. In other words, he has to examine and ascertain the correctness of the money value of assets and liabilities appearing in the Balance Sheet and this examination is known as verification of assets and liabilities. Therefore, an auditor has to keep in mind the following points while verifying the assets:

  • Ensuring the existence of assets.
  • Acquiring the assets for business.
  • Legal ownership and possession of the assets.
  • Ensuring the proper valuation of assets.
  • Ensuring that the assets are free from any charge.

Concept and Meaning of Valuation

Valuation is the act of determining the value of assets and critical examination of these values on the basis of normally accepted accounting standard. Valuation of assets is to be made by the authorized officer and the duty of auditor is to see whether they have been properly valued or not. For ensuring the proper valuation, auditor should obtain the certificates of professionals, approved values and other competent persons. Auditor can rely upon the valuation of concerned officer but it must be clearly stated in the report because an auditor is not a technical person.

An auditor should consider the following points regarding the assets while making valuation off assets:

  • Original cost
  • Expected working life
  • Wear and tear
  • Scrap value

Objectives of Valuation

  • To assess the correct financial position of the concern.
  • To enquire about the mode of investment of the capital of the concern.
  • To assess the goodwill of the concern.
  • To evaluate the differences in the value of the asset as on the date of purchase and on the date of Balance Sheet.

Methods of Valuation

Valuation of various assets can be made by using different methods of valuation of fixed assets. Some of the major methods are as follows:

  1. Cost Price Method

In this method, valuation of assets is made on the basis of purchase price of the assets. This price refers to the price at which an asset is acquired plus expenses incurred in connection with the acquisition of an asset. It is a very simple method of valuing assets.

  1. Market Value Method

Valuation of assets can be made on the basis of market price of such assets. But if same nature of assets is not available in the market, it is very difficult to determine the value of such assets. So, there are two methods related to it. They are:

  • Replacement Value Method: It represents the value at which a given asset can be replaced. This method of valuation of assets can be done only in the case of replacement of the same asset.
  • Net Realizable Value: It refers to the price in which such asset can be sold in the market. But expenditure incurred at the sale of such asset should be deducted.
  1. Standard Cost Method

Some of the business organizations fix the standard cost on the basis of their past experience. On the basis of standard cost, they make valuation of assets and present in the Balance Sheet.

  1. Book Value

This is the value at which an asset appears in the books of accounts. It is usually the cost less depreciation written off so far.

  1. Going concern or Historical Value or Conventional Value or Token Value

It is equivalent to the cost less a reasonable amount of depreciation written off. No notice is taken of any fluctuation in the price of the assets. Reason for this is that these assets are acquired for use in the business and not for resale.

  1. Scrap Value

This method shows the value realized from sale of an asset as scrap. In other words, it refers to the value, which may be obtained from the assets if it is sold as scrap.

Auditor’s Duty as Regards Valuation

In a legal case against Kingston Cotton Mills Co: It was held that “although it is no part of an Auditor’s’ duty to value the assets and liabilities, yet he must exercise reasonable skill and care in scrutinizing the basis of valuation. He should test the accuracy of the values put by the officers of the business. In any case, the auditor cannot guarantee the accuracy of the valuation”.

It is not an auditor’s duty to determine the values of various assets. It has been judicially held that he is not a valuer or a technical man to estimate the value of an asset. But he is definitely concerned with values set against the assets. He has to certify that the profit and loss account shows true profit or loss for the year and Balance Sheet shows a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company at the close of the year. Therefore he should exercise reasonable care and skill, analyse all the figures critically, inquire into the basis of valuation from the technical experts and satisfy himself that the different classes of assets have been valued in accordance with the generally accepted assumptions and accounting principles. If the market value of the assets are available i.e., in the case of share investment then he should verify the market value with the stock exchange quotations. If there is any change in the mode of the valuation of an asset, he should seek proper explanation for it. If he is satisfied with the method of valuation of the assets he is free from his liability.

Vouching of Payments: Cash Purchases

In vouching, payments shown on cash book, an auditor should see that payment has been made wholly and exclusively for the business of the client and that it is properly authorized by the person who is competent to do so.

Vouching of Cash Transaction

In a business concern, cash book is maintained to account for receipts and payments of cash. It is an important financial book for a business concern. Errors and frauds arise mostly in connection with receipts and payments of cash by making misappropriations wherever possible. Hence the auditor should see whether all receipts have been recorded in cash book and no fictitious payment appears on the payment side of cash book.

General Points to be Considered while Vouching Cash Transactions

The auditor should consider the following general points while vouching the cash transactions:

  1. Internal Check System

Before starting the vouching of cash book, the auditor should enquire about the internal check system in operation. If there is no well organized internal check system, there are lot of chances of misappropriation of cash. He should study carefully the internal check systems regarding cash sales and other receipts. The internal control needs to be revised periodically and suitable modification is done to make it more effective.

  1. The auditor should verify and test the system of accounting

The system of accounting should be tested for its accuracy of recording cash transactions. By suppressing the receipt of cash and overstatement of payments, fraud can be committed.

  1. Examination of Test Checking

As far as possible, all cash transactions are to be checked elaborately. However, if the auditor is satisfied that there is an efficient internal check system, he can resort to test checking. In such a case, he may check a few items at random and if he finds that they are all in order and free from irregularities, he has reason to assume that the remaining transactions will be correct.

  1. Comparison of rough Cash Book with the Cash Book

Usually, cash receipts are entered first in the rough cash book before they are entered in the cash book. The auditor should examine the entries in the rough cash book and main cash book and then compare them to detect whether there is any error or irregularity.

  1. Examine the Method of Depositing Cash Receipts Daily

The auditor should examine the method adopted for depositing daily cash receipts in bank. The pay in slip should invariably be used for this purpose. Accounting of receipts should not be delayed. Adjusting customer’s account with allowances and rebates are not actually allowed. Misappropriation of cash is possible to the extent of adjustment.

  1. Preparing of Bank Reconciliation Statement

The auditor should prepare a Bank Reconciliation Statement verifying the bank balance with cash book and pass book and find out the reasons for the difference between the bank balance as per Pass Book and that of in the Cash Book.

  1. Verification of Cash in Hand

The auditor should verify the cash in hand by actually counting it and see whether it agrees with cash book balance.

  1. Ensuring Proper Control of Receipts Book

The auditor should see whether receipt books are kept under proper control. While doing so, he should enquire as to whether all receipts are in printed forms, whether counterfoil receipts are used or a system of carbon copy is used, and all receipt books and all receipts are separately and consecutively numbered.

He should compare the particulars as regards to date, amount, name, etc. with cash book entries. If there are certain entries in cash book for which receipts have been issued, they should be carefully checked. The receipts have to be signed by a responsible officer, and not by the cashier.

The unused receipt book should be kept in safe custody with some responsible officials. Along with cash receipt, the rule for granting cash discount should be examined. If there is a system under which a receipt accompanies the receipt of cash, such a receipt, usually known as delivery note should be properly signed and returned to the customer.

Proceeds of the sale of Investments

When a company sells an investment, it results in a gain or loss which is recognized in income statement. A gain on sale of investment arises when the (disposal) value of an investment exceeds its cost. Similarly, a capital loss is when the value of investment drops below its cost.

Accounting treatment of a disposal of investment depends on:

  • The nature of the investment i.e. whether it is a share of common stock, preferred stock, a bond, etc.,
  • The extent of the investment i.e. the percentage holding, and
  • The initial recognition and continuing accounting of the investment.

Investments in shares of common stock are accounted for using either the fair value through profit and loss, fair value through other comprehensive income, equity method or consolidation depending on the extent of ownership.

Vouching of Receipts: Cash Sales, Receipts from Debtors

Vouching of Receipts from Debtors

There should be an effective system of Internal Check. Important parts of such systems should be (a)Persons maintaining the debtor’s ledger should not be allowed to collect the money from the customers, and (b) The customers should be asked to remit cash/cheques through the post.

The auditor should ensure that the unused receipt books are kept in the custody and control of some responsible officer. The original copies of all the spoilt receipt forms are attached with the duplicate copies in the receipt book. Proper scrutiny should be made about the discounts allowed to the customers. Special attention should be paid to amounts written off as bad debts. Tally the dates and amounts on the counterfoils with those in the cash book. Teeming and Lading should be avoided.

Vouching of Sale of Investment

Sale of Investment should give rise to capital receipts, except in the case of sale by brokers or investment firms for whom the proceeds will constitute revenue receipts. Vouching of sale of investment should be done with the broker’s advice and comparison with the stock market quotations in the fin racial journal. It should also be checked with related to investments accounts. The securities on hand and the payments received thereon from time-to-tithe should be checked.

Routine Checking and Vouching

Routine Checking

The term ‘routine checking’ means

(a) The checking of casts, sub-casts, carry forwards, extensions and other calculations in the books of original entry;

(b) The checking of postings into ledgers, and

(c) The checking of ledger accounts, as regards their casts, balancing the carrying forward of balances and the transfer of balances and the transfer of balances to the Trial Balance.

For this purpose, Auditors usually employ ticks of different kinds. Very often coloured pencils are used to distinguish one type of ticks from other.

Objectives of Routine Checking

  1. Verification of the arithmetical accuracy of the original books;
  2. Ascertainment of postings from books of original entry to the correct accounts in the ledgers;
  3. Ensuring, by special ticks, that no figures are altered after they have been checked.

Contrary to this the objects of vouching are much wider in their scope. In addition to the objects of routine checking discussed above, auditor undertakes the work of vouching with the object of going behind the books and to completely satisfy himself that the transactions recorded in the books are (i) properly authorised and (ii) correctly entered into. His attempt would be in the direction of finding out facts behind the figures. Careful and intelligent vouching would help an auditor to a very great extent in detecting frauds. The extent of vouching to be performed by an auditor would depend upon the systems of book-keeping and internal check in operation in the business.

Advantages of Routine Checking

Following benefits can be obtained from the routine checking:

  1. All the original entries will be checked; so all the errors and frauds can be detected easily.
  2. All the entries and posting will be tested.
  3. Routine checking helps to conduct final audit because all the balancing and totals have already been checked.
  4. Separate and specific staffs are not needed because it is a regular process.

Disadvantages of Routine Checking

Followings are the limitations of routine checking:

  1. Routine checking is a mechanical test, so the staff who performs this work does not have inspiration. So, there are chances of leaving errors and frauds.
  2. Routine checking can only detect small errors and frauds but not the planned frauds.
  3. Routine checking is not needed where self balancing system is applied.
  4. Routine checking cannot detect principle and compensating errors.

The following points, show the relationship/difference between routine checking and vouching:

  1. The auditor verifies the arithmetical accuracy of the entries through routine checking. In vouching entries are checked with the help of related documentary evidence.
  2. Vouching also includes examination of documentary evidence in support of recorded transactions besides routine checking. Thus, routine checking is a part of vouching.
  3. The work of routine checking is generally done by junior audit clerks, whereas vouching is done by senior audit clerks.
  4. Vouching traces the sources of information beyond the books of accounts whereas routine checking is limited to recorded entries.

The auditor verifies the arithmetical accuracy of the entries through routine checking. In vouching entries are checked with the help of related documentary evidence.

Vouching also includes examination of documentary evidence in support of recorded transactions besides routine checking. Thus, routine checking is a part of vouching.

The work of routine checking is generally done by junior audit clerks, whereas vouching is done by senior audit clerks.

Vouching traces the sources of information beyond the books of accounts whereas routine checking is limited to recorded entries.

Vouching, Meaning, Definition, Importance, Objective, Process, Source

Vouching is a fundamental audit technique that involves examining documentary evidence, such as invoices, receipts, contracts, and other supporting vouchers, to verify the authenticity, accuracy, and validity of transactions recorded in the books of account. It goes beyond merely checking arithmetical accuracy, extending to confirming that transactions are genuine, properly authorized, correctly classified, and recorded in the appropriate accounting period. Essentially, vouching establishes a link between entries in the books of account and the original source documents supporting those entries, ensuring that recorded transactions actually occurred and are supported by adequate evidence. It is considered the backbone of auditing, as it forms the basis for verifying the substance and validity of financial transactions rather than just their arithmetic correctness.

Importance of Vouching:

1. Verification of Recorded Transactions

Vouching helps the auditor verify whether transactions recorded in the books of account are supported by appropriate documentary evidence. The auditor examines invoices, receipts, vouchers, contracts, bank records and other supporting documents. This process helps establish whether recorded transactions actually occurred and were properly authorised. Vouching is particularly important for checking purchases, sales, expenses, payments and receipts. By examining supporting evidence, the auditor can identify incorrect, fictitious or unauthorised transactions. Therefore, vouching provides reasonable assurance that transactions recorded in the accounting records are genuine, properly supported and relevant to the entity’s business activities.

2. Detection of Errors and Frauds

Vouching is an important procedure for detecting errors and possible frauds in accounting records. The auditor compares recorded transactions with supporting documents and examines whether the transactions are genuine, correctly recorded and properly authorised. Fictitious purchases, inflated expenses, duplicate payments, unauthorised transactions and manipulation of records may be identified through careful vouching. The auditor should maintain professional scepticism when examining unusual or suspicious transactions. Vouching does not guarantee detection of every fraud, but it provides useful evidence for identifying irregularities. Therefore, systematic vouching helps strengthen the auditor’s examination and reduces the possibility of undetected errors and fraudulent transactions.

3. Establishment of Authenticity

Vouching helps establish the authenticity of transactions recorded in the books of account. The auditor examines original or reliable supporting documents to determine whether the transaction is genuine. For example, a purchase entry may be supported by a purchase invoice, goods received note and payment record. The auditor may also verify the authority and relevance of the documents. If supporting evidence is missing or appears unusual, further investigation may be necessary. This process helps distinguish genuine transactions from fictitious or unsupported entries. Therefore, vouching is important for establishing the authenticity and credibility of transactions included in the accounting records.

4. Verification of Accuracy

Vouching assists the auditor in checking the accuracy of amounts and details recorded in the books. The auditor compares the accounting entry with supporting documents to verify the date, amount, description, quantity and other relevant particulars. Mathematical calculations and related information may also be checked. Errors such as incorrect amounts, duplicate entries or wrong account classification may be identified during this process. The auditor should investigate significant differences and determine their effect on the financial statements. Therefore, vouching contributes to the accuracy of accounting records and helps the auditor assess whether transactions have been recorded correctly.

5. Verification of Proper Authorisation

Vouching helps determine whether transactions have been properly authorised by responsible personnel. Supporting documents may contain evidence of approval, signatures, purchase orders or other authorisation details. The auditor examines whether transactions comply with the entity’s established policies and internal controls. Unauthorised payments, purchases or expenses may indicate weaknesses in internal control or possible misuse of funds. Where necessary, the auditor should investigate unusual or improperly authorised transactions. Therefore, vouching helps assess whether transactions have been entered into with proper authority and whether the entity’s control procedures relating to financial transactions are being followed.

6. Checking Compliance with Rules

Vouching helps the auditor examine whether financial transactions comply with applicable laws, accounting policies, internal rules and contractual requirements. Supporting documents may provide evidence regarding taxes, approvals, statutory payments, purchase conditions and other requirements. The auditor can identify transactions that do not follow prescribed procedures or applicable requirements. Non compliance may result in financial loss, penalties or incorrect presentation in the financial statements. Therefore, vouching provides useful evidence for assessing compliance related matters while examining recorded transactions. It helps the auditor determine whether the entity has followed relevant rules and properly supported its financial activities.

7. Verification of Proper Classification

Vouching helps the auditor determine whether transactions have been recorded under appropriate accounts. The supporting documents provide information about the nature and purpose of each transaction, allowing the auditor to assess its proper classification. For example, expenditure on acquiring a long term asset should generally be distinguished from routine revenue expenditure. Similarly, personal or non business expenses should not be incorrectly charged to business accounts. Incorrect classification can affect profit, assets, liabilities and financial disclosures. Therefore, vouching helps identify classification errors and ensures that transactions are appropriately recorded in the relevant accounts and presented correctly in the financial statements.

8. Completeness of Audit Evidence

Vouching provides supporting evidence for transactions selected for examination and helps the auditor understand whether accounting entries are supported by underlying documents. By tracing entries to source documents, the auditor can assess whether recorded transactions have adequate documentation. In some audit procedures, the auditor may also examine source documents and trace them into the accounting records to test completeness. Proper vouching therefore helps identify missing entries or incomplete recording when appropriately designed. It strengthens the evidence available to the auditor and supports conclusions regarding relevant financial statement assertions. Thus, vouching contributes to the completeness and reliability of audit evidence.

9. Verification of Business Purpose

Vouching helps the auditor determine whether recorded transactions relate to the business activities of the entity. Supporting documents such as invoices, agreements, purchase orders and receipts provide information about the nature and purpose of transactions. This helps identify personal, unusual or unrelated expenses that may have been incorrectly recorded as business transactions. The auditor should investigate transactions that appear inconsistent with the entity’s activities or policies. Proper examination also helps assess whether expenses and payments have a legitimate business purpose. Therefore, vouching supports the auditor in evaluating whether recorded transactions are genuine business transactions and appropriately reflected in the financial statements.

10. Supports the Audit Opinion

Vouching provides important audit evidence that supports the auditor’s conclusions regarding recorded transactions and related financial statement assertions. The auditor uses the evidence obtained through vouching along with other audit procedures to assess whether financial statements are materially misstated. Proper vouching helps verify occurrence, accuracy, authorisation and classification of transactions. Significant errors or irregularities identified during vouching may require further investigation and consideration in the audit report. However, vouching alone is not sufficient for forming the audit opinion. Therefore, effective vouching contributes to obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence and supports the auditor in forming a reasonable and well supported audit opinion.

Objective of Vouching:

1. To Verify the Existence of Transactions

The primary objective of vouching is to verify whether transactions recorded in the books of account actually occurred. The auditor examines supporting documents such as invoices, receipts, agreements, payment records and vouchers to establish the genuineness of recorded transactions. This helps prevent fictitious or unsupported entries from remaining in the accounting records. For example, a recorded purchase can be checked against the supplier invoice and goods received documentation. The auditor should investigate transactions where supporting evidence is missing, incomplete or inconsistent. Therefore, vouching helps provide reasonable assurance that recorded transactions represent genuine events relating to the entity.

2. To Verify Accuracy of Transactions

Vouching aims to determine whether transactions have been recorded accurately in the books of account. The auditor compares accounting entries with supporting documents and checks amounts, dates, quantities, descriptions and other relevant details. Errors such as incorrect amounts, duplicate entries or wrong calculations may be identified through this process. The auditor may also check whether transactions have been posted to the correct accounts. Significant differences should be investigated and appropriately resolved. Therefore, vouching helps ensure that financial transactions are accurately recorded and that the accounting records provide reliable information for preparing the financial statements.

3. To Detect Errors

An important objective of vouching is to identify errors in accounting records. Errors may occur because of incorrect recording, omission, duplication, wrong classification or mathematical mistakes. By comparing book entries with supporting documents, the auditor can identify discrepancies and investigate their causes. For example, an expense recorded at an incorrect amount may be detected by comparing the ledger entry with the original invoice. The auditor should evaluate whether identified errors are material and whether corrective action is required. Therefore, systematic vouching helps detect accounting errors and contributes to the accuracy and reliability of the financial statements.

4. To Detect Fraud

Vouching aims to assist in identifying fraudulent transactions and irregularities in accounting records. The auditor examines supporting documents to determine whether transactions are genuine, properly authorised and related to the entity’s business. Vouching may reveal fictitious purchases, false expenses, duplicate payments, unauthorised transactions or manipulation of records. Unusual documents, missing evidence and suspicious transactions should receive additional attention. The auditor should maintain professional scepticism throughout the process. Vouching cannot guarantee detection of all frauds, but it provides valuable evidence for identifying possible fraudulent activities. Therefore, it is an important procedure for assessing the risk of fraud and irregularities.

5. To Verify Proper Authorisation

Another objective of vouching is to determine whether transactions have been properly authorised by responsible personnel. The auditor examines signatures, approval records, purchase orders and other evidence of authorisation available with supporting documents. Proper authorisation helps ensure that transactions comply with the entity’s internal policies and established procedures. Unauthorised transactions may indicate control weaknesses, misuse of assets or possible fraud. The auditor should investigate significant transactions where appropriate approval is missing. Therefore, vouching helps assess whether financial transactions were entered into with proper authority and whether the entity’s internal control procedures relating to financial transactions are operating appropriately.

6. To Verify Proper Classification

Vouching helps ensure that transactions are recorded under appropriate accounting heads. The auditor examines supporting documents to understand the nature and purpose of each transaction and determines whether it has been correctly classified. For example, expenditure relating to acquisition of a long term asset should be distinguished from routine revenue expenditure where applicable. Incorrect classification can affect profit, assets, liabilities and disclosures in the financial statements. The auditor should investigate unusual or incorrectly classified entries and consider their financial effect. Therefore, vouching helps ensure that transactions are properly classified and presented in accordance with applicable accounting principles and policies.

7. To Verify Completeness of Recording

Vouching may help the auditor assess whether relevant transactions have been completely recorded in the accounting system. For this purpose, the auditor may select source documents such as invoices, receipts or goods received records and trace them into the books of account. This direction of checking can help identify transactions that occurred but were not recorded. Completeness is particularly important for liabilities, purchases, expenses and other transactions where omissions may affect the financial statements. Therefore, appropriately designed vouching procedures help the auditor identify omitted transactions and provide evidence regarding the completeness of accounting records and financial statement information.

8. To Verify Business Purpose

Vouching aims to determine whether recorded transactions have a genuine connection with the business activities of the entity. The auditor examines invoices, contracts, receipts and other documents to understand the purpose and nature of transactions. This may help identify personal expenses, unrelated payments or unusual transactions incorrectly charged to the business. Transactions without a clear business purpose may require further investigation. The auditor should consider whether such transactions have been properly authorised and accounted for. Therefore, vouching helps establish that recorded expenses and payments are related to legitimate business activities and are appropriately reflected in the financial statements.

9. To Verify Compliance with Rules

Vouching helps determine whether recorded transactions comply with applicable laws, regulations, accounting policies and internal procedures. The auditor examines supporting documents for evidence of required approvals, statutory deductions, tax treatment, contractual conditions and other relevant requirements. Non compliance may result in financial penalties, liabilities or incorrect accounting treatment. The auditor should identify significant instances of non compliance and consider their effect on the financial statements. Therefore, vouching supports the auditor in evaluating whether transactions have been properly conducted and recorded in accordance with applicable requirements and the entity’s established policies and procedures.

10. To Obtain Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence

A major objective of vouching is to obtain audit evidence supporting conclusions about recorded transactions. By examining relevant source documents and comparing them with accounting entries, the auditor obtains evidence regarding occurrence, accuracy, authorisation and classification. The quality of evidence depends on its relevance, reliability and source. Vouching procedures should be appropriately designed according to the audit objectives and assessed risks. The auditor may need additional procedures when the evidence obtained is insufficient or contradictory. Therefore, vouching contributes to obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence and helps the auditor form reasonable conclusions regarding the financial statements and ultimately the audit opinion.

Process of Vouching:

1. Understanding the Transaction

The first step in vouching is to understand the nature and purpose of the transaction selected for examination. The auditor studies the relevant accounting entry and identifies the account involved, date, amount and description of the transaction. The auditor also considers the applicable accounting policies and internal control procedures. Understanding the transaction helps determine what supporting documents should be examined and which financial statement assertions are relevant. The auditor should pay attention to unusual, significant or high risk transactions. Therefore, proper understanding of the transaction provides a suitable foundation for carrying out vouching procedures effectively and systematically.

2. Selection of Transactions

The auditor selects transactions from the books of account for detailed examination. The selection may be based on audit sampling, materiality, assessed risk, professional judgement or the nature of the transactions. Significant and unusual transactions may require particular attention. The auditor should ensure that the selected items provide an appropriate basis for achieving the audit objective. In certain circumstances, specific items may be examined completely because of their importance or high risk. Proper selection helps the auditor obtain sufficient appropriate evidence without necessarily examining every transaction. Therefore, careful selection is an important step in an effective vouching process.

3. Examination of Supporting Documents

After selecting transactions, the auditor examines the relevant supporting documents. These may include invoices, receipts, vouchers, purchase orders, contracts, delivery notes, bank statements and payment records. The auditor checks whether the documents support the transaction recorded in the books and whether they appear genuine and complete. Particular attention should be given to dates, amounts, names, descriptions and other important details. Missing or unusual documents should be investigated. Therefore, examination of supporting documents helps the auditor establish the authenticity, accuracy and validity of transactions recorded in the accounting records.

4. Checking Authorisation

The auditor examines whether the transaction was properly authorised by the responsible person according to the entity’s internal policies and procedures. Supporting documents may contain signatures, approval records, purchase orders or other evidence of authorisation. The auditor considers whether the person approving the transaction had appropriate authority and whether the transaction complied with established procedures. Unauthorised or improperly approved transactions may indicate control weaknesses or possible irregularities. Therefore, checking authorisation helps the auditor determine whether transactions were validly approved and whether the internal control system relating to financial transactions is operating appropriately.

5. Checking Accounting Accuracy

The auditor compares the details in supporting documents with the corresponding accounting entries. Amounts, dates, quantities, descriptions and account classifications are checked for accuracy. The auditor may also verify calculations, totals and applicable taxes or other charges. Differences between documents and books should be investigated and appropriately documented. This procedure helps identify errors such as incorrect amounts, duplicate recording or wrong account classification. Therefore, checking accounting accuracy ensures that the transaction has been correctly recorded in the books and contributes to the reliability of financial information presented in the financial statements.

6. Checking Business Relevance

The auditor determines whether the transaction relates to the business activities of the entity. Supporting documents are examined to understand the nature and purpose of the transaction. Expenses or payments that appear personal, unusual or unrelated to business operations should receive additional attention. The auditor may examine relevant policies, agreements and approvals to determine whether the transaction has a legitimate business purpose. This step helps prevent personal or unauthorised expenses from being incorrectly charged to the entity. Therefore, checking business relevance helps ensure that recorded transactions are genuine business transactions and appropriately included in the accounting records.

7. Checking Proper Classification

The auditor examines whether the transaction has been recorded under the correct accounting head. The nature of the transaction and supporting documents are considered to determine its appropriate classification. For example, expenditure relating to acquisition of an asset should be distinguished from routine revenue expenditure where applicable. Incorrect classification may affect profit, assets, liabilities and financial statement disclosures. The auditor should identify and investigate unusual or incorrectly classified transactions. Proper classification is important for fair presentation of financial statements. Therefore, checking classification during vouching helps ensure that transactions are recorded and presented under appropriate accounting categories.

8. Cross Checking with Other Records

The auditor compares information obtained from vouchers with other relevant accounting and supporting records. These may include ledgers, subsidiary books, bank statements, stock records, contracts, purchase registers and sales registers. Cross checking helps identify inconsistencies, omissions and duplicate entries. It also provides corroborative evidence regarding the transaction under examination. Where differences arise, the auditor should investigate their causes and assess their significance. This procedure increases confidence in the reliability of the information recorded in the books. Therefore, cross checking is an important part of vouching because it helps confirm transactions through multiple sources of evidence.

9. Recording Audit Findings

The auditor should properly document the results of vouching in the audit working papers. The documentation may include details of transactions examined, supporting documents verified, exceptions identified and conclusions reached. Significant discrepancies, missing documents or unusual transactions should be clearly recorded for further investigation. Proper documentation enables senior auditors to review the work performed and understand the basis of the conclusions. It also provides evidence that appropriate audit procedures were carried out. Therefore, recording audit findings is essential for maintaining an adequate audit trail and supporting the auditor’s conclusions regarding the transactions examined.

10. Follow Up and Conclusion

The final step is to evaluate exceptions identified during vouching and determine their effect on the audit. Missing documents, discrepancies, unauthorised transactions or unusual entries should be investigated further. The auditor may perform additional procedures or seek explanations and supporting evidence from management or external parties. Identified misstatements should be evaluated individually and collectively, considering their effect on the financial statements. After completing the necessary procedures, the auditor records an appropriate conclusion in the working papers. Therefore, follow up and conclusion ensure that vouching findings are properly considered before finalising the audit and forming the audit opinion.

Source of Vouching:

1. Internal Documentary Records

Internal documentary records are an important source for vouching transactions recorded in the books of account. These records are prepared or maintained by the entity during its normal business activities. Examples include payment vouchers, receipt vouchers, purchase orders, goods received notes, sales invoices, debit notes, credit notes and internal approval documents. The auditor examines these records to verify the authenticity, accuracy and proper authorisation of transactions. Their reliability depends on the effectiveness of internal controls and the manner in which the documents are prepared and maintained. Therefore, internal documents provide essential supporting evidence during the vouching process.

2. External Documentary Records

External documents are records received from parties outside the entity and provide useful evidence for vouching. Examples include supplier invoices, customer confirmations, bank statements, insurance documents, legal agreements and statements received from financial institutions. Such documents may provide stronger evidence because they originate outside the entity. The auditor examines these documents to verify the occurrence, accuracy and validity of recorded transactions. However, the auditor should consider their authenticity, relevance and reliability. External documents are particularly useful for corroborating information recorded in the entity’s books. Therefore, they form an important source of independent supporting evidence during the vouching process.

3. Invoices and Bills

Invoices and bills are important sources of evidence for vouching purchases, sales and expenses. A purchase invoice may provide information about the supplier, date, quantity, price, taxes and total amount of goods or services purchased. The auditor compares these details with purchase records and ledger entries. Sales invoices can similarly be examined to verify recorded sales transactions. The auditor should check whether invoices are genuine, properly authorised and related to the business. Where appropriate, invoices may be cross checked with purchase orders, delivery documents and payment records. Therefore, invoices and bills provide essential documentary support for verifying financial transactions.

4. Receipts and Payment Vouchers

Receipts and payment vouchers provide evidence regarding cash and bank transactions recorded by the entity. Receipts may support amounts received from customers or other parties, while payment vouchers support amounts paid for purchases, expenses, salaries or other obligations. The auditor examines the amount, date, purpose, payee or payer and authorisation details. Bank records may also be compared with payment vouchers to verify actual movement of funds. Missing or unusual vouchers require further investigation. Therefore, receipts and payment vouchers are important sources of vouching evidence for verifying the occurrence, accuracy and authorisation of cash and payment transactions.

5. Bank Statements

Bank statements are an important external source of evidence for vouching cash and bank transactions. They provide details of deposits, withdrawals, transfers, charges, interest and other banking transactions recorded by the bank. The auditor compares bank statement entries with the entity’s cash book and bank ledger to identify differences or unusual transactions. Bank statements may also be used with bank reconciliation statements to verify outstanding items. Since they originate from an external financial institution, they can provide useful independent evidence. Therefore, bank statements are valuable for vouching receipts, payments and other transactions involving the entity’s bank accounts.

6. Contracts and Agreements

Contracts and agreements provide evidence regarding the terms, conditions, rights and obligations associated with transactions. They may relate to purchases, sales, loans, leases, services, insurance or other business arrangements. The auditor examines these documents to determine whether transactions recorded in the books are consistent with the agreed terms. Important details such as amounts, payment conditions, dates, interest rates and responsibilities may be verified. Contracts can also help identify liabilities or commitments that may require accounting or disclosure. Therefore, contracts and agreements are important sources of vouching evidence for verifying the validity and proper treatment of significant transactions.

7. Purchase Orders and Delivery Documents

Purchase orders and delivery documents provide supporting evidence for purchase transactions. A purchase order generally contains details of goods or services ordered, quantities, prices and authorised terms. Delivery documents or goods received notes provide evidence that the goods or services were actually received by the entity. The auditor can compare these documents with supplier invoices and accounting records to verify the transaction. Differences in quantities, prices or dates should be investigated. These documents also help establish the relationship between ordering, receiving and recording a transaction. Therefore, purchase orders and delivery documents are useful sources for vouching purchases and related expenses.

8. Payroll and Salary Records

Payroll records provide evidence for vouching salary, wages and employee related expenses. They may include salary registers, attendance records, appointment documents, payroll statements, bank transfer records and statutory deduction records. The auditor examines these records to verify the number of employees, salary amounts, deductions, approvals and payments. The auditor may also compare payroll information with employment records and bank statements. Unusual changes, fictitious employees or unauthorised payments may require further investigation. Therefore, payroll and salary records provide important evidence for verifying employee related expenses and determining whether salary transactions have been properly authorised and recorded.

9. Accounting Books and Registers

Accounting books and registers provide the basic records from which transactions are selected for vouching. These may include the cash book, purchase book, sales book, journal, general ledger, purchase register and sales register. The auditor selects transactions from these records and traces them to relevant supporting documents. This helps establish whether recorded transactions are genuine and properly supported. The auditor may also compare information across different accounting records to identify inconsistencies or omissions. Therefore, accounting books and registers are an important starting point for the vouching process and help the auditor systematically examine recorded transactions.

10. Legal and Statutory Documents

Legal and statutory documents provide evidence regarding transactions and obligations arising from laws, regulations or contractual requirements. Examples include tax records, registration documents, statutory payment records, title documents, licences and legal correspondence. The auditor may examine these documents to verify ownership, statutory payments, tax liabilities, regulatory compliance and other relevant matters. Such documents can also help identify obligations that may need to be recognised or disclosed in the financial statements. Their reliability depends on the issuing authority and authenticity of the documents. Therefore, legal and statutory documents provide important supporting evidence for vouching transactions and related obligations.

Differences between Internal Check and Internal Audit

  1. Meaning

  • Internal Check is an arrangement of duties allocated in such a way that the work of one person is automatically checked by another.
  • Internal Audit is an independent appraisal of the operations and records of the company.
  1. Object

  • The purpose of Internal Audit is to detect the errors and frauds which have already been committed.
  • The purpose of Internal Check is to prevent or minimize he possibilities of errors, frauds or irregularities.
  1. Need for separate staff

  • For carrying out Internal Audit, a separate staff of employees is engaged for the purpose.
  • For internal check, no new appointment is made. It, in fact represents only the arrangement of duties of the staff in a particular way.
  1. Nature of work

  • The work involved in the Internal Audit is just like that of a watch man. Internal auditor has to report, from time to time, to the management about the various in efficiencies and suggest improvements. It is also his duty to see that the internal check system does not become static.
  • Internal Check, on the other hand, represents a process under which the work goes on uninterruptedly and the checking too is more or less automatic.
  1. Timing of work

  • Internal Audit starts when the accounting process of different transactions is finished.
  • Internal Check is an operation during the course of transaction.
  1. Internal audit

  • It is a device for checking the work, whereas
  • Internal check is a device for doing the work.
  1. In Internal Audit Errors and Frauds are detected after the completion of work, whereas in Internal Check the Errors and Frauds are discovered during the course of work.
  2. Scope of work

  • The scope of Internal Check is very limited.
  • The scope of Internal Audit is comparatively board.
  1. Involvement

  • A large number of employees are needed for the implementation of Internal Check System.
  • Whereas, a much smaller number of persons are needed for implementing Internal Audit implementation.

Differences between Internal Check and Internal Audit

If you want to successfully manage risk, it helps to use the correct risk terms and expressions. Many people use risk terms without realizing that they may not be using the right terminology. It’s easy to become confused because sometimes the field of risk management uses similar terms for different purposes. For example, “Operational Risk Management” has a different meaning in the banking and insurance industry, compared to other industries (oil & gas, mining, manufacturing, chemicals, etc.).

Similarly, the term “audit” can refer either to an internal audit conducted by an organization itself, or an external audit performed by an auditing firm hired by the organization. Some people confuse the two when using the term “audit”. This is important because an internal audit and external audit may assess different things, and have different frameworks and workflows.

Internal Audit is a Function Performed at Specific Times

Many people in risk management use this simple formula to explain the difference between Internal Audit and Internal Control: Internal Audit is a function, while Internal Control is a system. Internal audits are performed at specific times to assess:

  • If the company has a good understanding of the risks that it faces
  • If the controls put in place to mitigate risks are effective.

There is one very important distinction to be made: it is not the job of internal auditors to identify risks, nor to specify the controls that are needed. Internal Audit evaluates whether the process leading to the identification of risks is working well, checks whether controls already in place are working according to the way they are intended to, and evaluates an organization’s governance system and process.

Internal Control is an Ongoing System

Internal Control is made up of procedures, policies and measures designed to make sure that an organization meets its objectives, and that risks that can prevent an organization from meeting its objectives are mitigated. While the Internal Audit function is performed by internal auditors, Internal Control is the responsibility of operational management functions. Another point of contrast is frequency. An internal audit is a check that is conducted at specific times, whereas Internal Control is responsible for checks that are on-going to make sure operational efficiency and effectiveness are achieved through the control of risks. Some risk experts even say that Internal Control is a part of a company’s day-to-day management and administration.

Internal Audit: Meaning, Advantages and Disadvantages of Internal Audit

The words “internal audit” often conjure a sense of fear, frustration, and time consumption. Even in the best circumstances, most would find having someone review their activities unsettling or intimidating. Having an understanding of the role of an internal audit, knowing what to expect during an internal audit, and knowing potential pitfalls to avoid will help put you at ease and make a much more pleasant and valuable experience.

Meaning

Internal Audit is a department or an organization of people within a company that is tasked with providing unbiased, independent reviews of systems, business organizations, and processes. The role of Internal Audit is to provide senior leaders and governing bodies of an organization an objective source of information regarding the organization’s risks, control environment, operational effectiveness, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

As Internal Audit reports to senior leadership, it is only appropriate that its activities are directed by CEO or Board of Directors through its Audit Committee. Members of Internal Audit must be independent of internal politics and unbiased to provide leadership with objective source of information. Under the direction of Audit Committee, Internal Audit works with management to systematically review control activities over critical systems and processes.

The reviews performed by Internal Audit are often called internal audits. An internal audit may be used to assess an organization’s performance or the execution of a process against a number of standards, policies, metrics, or regulations. These audits may include examining a business’s internal controls around corporate governance, accounting, financial reporting, and IT general controls. Internal audits may also entail evaluating the effectiveness/efficiency of critical business operations such as supply chain management. Those individuals working in Internal Audit are called internal auditors. Internal auditors may cover all areas of an organization or specialize based on their skill-sets.

The aim of internal audits is to identify weaknesses within the organization’s processes and control environment internally so that they can be fixed as quickly as possible to prevent harm to the organization or its stakeholders. Accordingly, the internal audit plan for an organization should be driven by risk basis or, in other words, be designed to examine those areas that present the greatest risk to the company. The internal audit plan should also include a component of the strategic needs of an organization.

Advantages of Internal Audit

  1. To Discover Errors and Frauds

Internal audit helps to discover accounting errors and frauds so that they can be rectified before the final audit.

  1. To Maintain Proper Accounting

It helps to maintain proper accounting system in the organization. It ensures accuracy and authenticity of accounting records.

  1. Provides Base for Final Audit

Internal audit examines and verifies entire books of accounts and locate mistakes and frauds. So, conduction of final audit becomes easier.

  1. Increase Employees Efficiency

Internal audit alerts the staffs by checking their performance regularly. It helps to increase their efficiency and also helps to minimize errors.

  1. Proper Utilization of Resources

Internal audit ensures proper utilization of resources by detecting their misuse. It helps to increase operational efficiency and productivity.

  1. Valuable Suggestions

It gives suggestions and instructions regarding the financial and operational activities of the organization. So it helps to maintain better management, proper supervision and effective control.

Disadvantages/Demerits of Internal Audit

  1. Not Suitable for Small Firms

Internal audit is not suitable for small business organizations with less financial and operational activities.

  1. Not Acceptable

It is conducted for internal purpose only. It is not accepted by shareholders and other external users.

  1. Chance of Errors

There may be a chance of errors because of the poor knowledge of the audit staff.

  1. Time Consuming

It takes a long time to perform internal auditing. It may disturb regular office work.

Types of Internal Audits

While a significant portion of internal audit covers internal controls over financial reporting within the organization as they pertain to generally accepted accounting procedures (GAAP) impacting their financial statements. Many organizations also recognize the need for other types of assessments or audits outside of accounting or finance. Some of these key areas include compliance (i.e., regulatory), environmental, information technology, operational and performance audits.

  1. Compliance Audits

Compliance Audits evaluate compliance with applicable laws, regulations, policies and procedures. Some of these regulations may have a significant impact on the company’s financial well-being. Failure to comply with some laws, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) or General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), may result in millions of dollars in fines or preclude a company from doing business in certain jurisdictions.  Here is a link to a beginners guide to GDPR.

  1. Environmental Audits

Environmental Audits assess the impact of a company’s operations on the environment. They may also assess the company’s compliance with environmental laws and regulations.

  1. Information Technology

Audits may evaluate information systems and the underlying infrastructure to ensure the accuracy of their processing, the security and confidential customer information or intellectual property. They will typically include the assessment of general IT controls related logical access, change management, system operations, and backup and recovery.

  1. Audits assess

Audits assess the organization’s control mechanisms for their overall efficiency and reliability.

  1. Performance Audits

Performance Audits evaluate whether the organization is meeting the metrics set by management in order to achieve the goals and objectives set forth by the Board of Directors.

Internal Audit Procedure / Process

An internal audit should have four general phases of activities—Planning, Fieldwork, Reporting, and Follow-up. The following provides a brief synopsis of each phase.

  1. Planning

During the planning process, the internal audit team will define the scope and objectives, review guidance relevant to audit (e.g., laws, regulations, industry standards, company policies and procedures, etc.), review the results from previous audits, set a timeline and budget for the audit, create an audit plan to be executed, identify the process owners to involve, and schedule a kick-off meeting to commence the audit.

  1. Fieldwork

Fieldwork is the actual act of auditing. Throughout this phase, the audit team will execute the audit plan. This usually includes interviewing key personnel to confirm an understanding of the process and controls, reviewing relevant documents and artifacts for an example execution of the controls, testing the controls for a sample over a period of time, documenting the work performed, and identifying exceptions and recommendations.

  1. Reporting

As you might guess, internal audit will draft the audit report during the reporting phase. The report should be written clearly and succinctly to avoid misinterpretation and to encourage the intended audience to actually read and understand the report. Findings should be accompanied by recommendations that are actionable and lead directly to process improvements. The process of issuing an internal audit report should include drafting the report, review the draft with management to ensure the accuracy of findings, and issuance and distribution of the final report.

  1. Follow-up

The final stage is an important one that is often overlooked and neglected. Following up is critical to ensure that the recommendations have been implemented to address the findings identified. This process should include appropriate follow-up with process owners needing to implement the recommendations as well as Board oversight of the company’s overall status in addressing findings identified by internal audit. If an organization fails to follow-up on the implementation of recommendations, it is unlikely that the changes will be made.

error: Content is protected !!