Methods of Settling Industrial Disputes (Arbitration, Joint Consultations, Works Committee, Conciliation, Adjudication etc)

If industrial peace is the backbone of a nation, strikes and lockouts are cancer for the same as they effect production and peace in the factories.

In the socioeconomic development of any country cordial and harmonious industrial relations have a very important and significant role to play. Industry belongs to the society and therefore good industrial relations are important from societys point of view.

Nowadays, industrial relations are not bipartite affair between the management and the work force or employees. Government is playing an active role in promoting industrial relations. The concept of industrial relations has therefore, become a tripartite affair between the employees, employers and the government concerned.

It is possible to settle the industrial disputes if timely steps are taken by the management. Such disputes can be prevented and settled amicably if there is equitable arrangement and adjustment between the management and the workers.

The following is the machinery for prevention and settlement of industrial disputes:

(i) Works Committees:

This committee represents of workers and employers. Under the Industrial Disputes Act 1947, works committees exist in industrial establishments in which one hundred or more workmen are employed during the previous year.

It is the duty of the Works Committee to promote measures for securing and preserving amity and good relations between the employers and workers. It also deals with certain matters viz. condition of work, amenities, safety and accident prevention, educational and recreational facilities.

(ii) Conciliation Officers:

Conciliation Officers are appointed by the government under the Industrial Disputes Act 1947.

The duties of conciliation officer are given below:

(i) He has to evolve a fair and amicable settlement of the dispute. In case of public utility service, he must hold conciliation proceedings in the prescribed manner.

(ii) He shall send a report to the government if a dispute is settled in the course of conciliation proceedings along with the charter of the settlement signed by the parties.

(iii) Where no settlement is reached, conciliation officer sends a report to the government indicating the steps taken by him for ascertaining the facts, circumstances relating to dispute and the reasons on account of which settlement within 14 days of the commencement of the conciliation proceedings.

Boards of Conciliation:

The government can also appoint a Board of Conciliation for promoting settlement of Industrial Disputes. The chairman of the board is an independent person and other members (may be two or four) are to be equally represented by the parties to the disputes.

The duties of the board include:

(a) To investigate the dispute and all matters affecting the merits and do everything fit for the purpose of inducing the parties to reach a fair and amicable settlement.

(b) A report has to be sent to the government by the board if a dispute has been settled or not within two months of the date on which the dispute was referred to it.

(iii) Court of Enquiry:

The government may appoint a court of enquiry for enquiring into any industrial dispute. A court may consist of one person or more than one person in and in that case one of the persons will be the chairman. The court shall be required to enquire into the matter and submit its report to the government within a period of six months.

(iv) Labour Courts:

As per the Second Schedule of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947.

The Government sets up Labour Courts to deal with matters such as:

(i) The propriety or legality of an order passed by an employer under the standing orders.

(ii) The application and interpretation of standing orders passed.

(iii) Discharge or dismissal of workmen including reinstatement, grant of relief to workers who are wrongfully dismissed.

(iv) Withdrawal of any customary concession of privilege.

(v) Illegality or otherwise of a strike or lockout, and all other matters not specified in the Third Schedule.

(v) Industrial Tribunals:

A Tribunal is appointed by the government for the adjudication of Industrial Disputes.

(vi) National Tribunal:

A National Tribunal is constituted by the Central Government for Industrial Disputes involving questions of national importance.

(vii) Arbitration:

The employer and employees may agree to settle the dispute by appointing an independent and impartial person called Arbitrator. Arbitration provides justice at minimum cost.

Debentures Legal Provisions

Companies generally raise funds by issuing as share capital or through borrowing from lenders. A debenture is one of ways of company borrowing where the company agrees to repay the debt where may also be a charge over the company’s assets to ensure the repayment of this debt. Debenture is an alternative form of investment in a company that is more secured than investment in shares because company must pay interest and it will be paid before the dividend payment. Debenture holders also get privilege, if the company which issued the debentures becomes bankrupt. A disadvantage is that debenture holders have no share in the company and therefore have no control over it.

Following provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 governs the floatation, issue and allotment with regards to the debentures:

  • Section 2(30): Definition;
  • Section 44: Nature of debentures;
  • Section 71: Provisions relating to issue and allotment of debentures;
  • Rule 18 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debenture) Rules, 2014: Rules pertaining to issue and allotment of debentures.

Governing Sections:

Section 2(30): Definition of Deposit: “debenture” includes debenture stock, bonds or any other instrument of a company evidencing a debt, whether constituting a charge on the assets of the company or not.

Section 44: Nature of Share and Debenture.

Section 71: Provision relating to Debentures.

Section 117(3) (a)A copy of every resolution or any agreement, in respect of the matters specified in sub-section [1](3) of section 17 together with the explanatory statement under section 102, if any, annexed to the notice calling the general meeting in which the resolution is proposed, shall be filed with the Registrar within thirty days of the passing of resolution.

Section 179 (3) (c,d): (c) to issue securities, including debentures, whether in or outside India;

*(d) to borrow monies;

Section 180(1) (c): The Board of Directors of a company shall exercise the powers “borrow money”, where the money to be borrowed, together with the money already borrowed by the company will exceed aggregate of its paid-up share capital and free reserves, only with the consent of the company by a special resolution, namely.

Section 56(4) (d): Within a period of six months from the date of allotment in the case of any allotment of debenture.

Section 42: Offer or invitation for subscription of securities on Private Placement.

Governing Rules:

  • Rule 18 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014:
  • Rule 24 The Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014: Resolutions and agreements to be filed.
  • Rule 1(c) of The Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014: “Deposit” does not include

“Any amount raised by the issue of debentures secured by a first charge or a charge ranking paripassu with the first charge on any assets referred 73 Proviso to in Schedule III of the Act excluding intangible assets of the company or debentures compulsorily convertible into shares of the company within five years.”

Rule 14 of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014: Process of Issue and allotment of Securities (Debentures).

Distinction between Shares and Debentures

Stocks/Shares

Stocks or shares are popular investment tools, issued by corporate entities through which they sell a portion of their proprietorship to general investors and raise funds through it. These are also known as scrips or owned capital.  As an owner of stocks, you are holding a part of the company’s financial capital. It entitles you to receive a portion of the company’s profit in return.

Types of stocks are

  • Equity shares
  • Preference shares

The price that you pay to buy shares is called share price. In return, you qualify to receive dividends as decided by the company. Profit is announced during the end of a financial year, which means, the longer you stay invested, higher will be your gain from the share.

Share prices depend on various factors, including market performance, macroeconomic parameters, sectoral performance, and individual company performance. As investment instruments, share are highly liquid and traded in the exchanges.

Debentures

Debentures are debt tools; issued by companies to raise funds as loans from the public. It is an acknowledgement from a corporate entity that it has taken a loan from you. However, a debenture isn’t a secured loan. It is backed solely by the creditworthiness of the issuing firm. But it carries some amount of assurance. It is why, in India, if a company declares bankruptcy, debenture holders have the first claim over the company’s assets.

Categories of debentures

Debentures also have different types, based on their intrinsic characters.

  • Perpetual Debentures: Perpetual debentures don’t have a maturity value and treated much like equities. These bonds create a lifelong stream of income for the investors, and they can trade those the market like equities.
  • Convertible Debentures: Some corporate give the offer to receive maturity value on debenture or get it converted to equity. This allows investors to alleviate some of the uncertainties associated with investing in unsecured bonds.
  • Non-convertible Debentures: It is a traditional type of bond that pays out the maturity and accrued interest at the end of the tenure without giving any opportunities to convert to equity.

Debentures can be either floating or fixed in nature. The payout on floating rate debenture varies with the market movement. But, for fixed-rate debentures, final payout remains assured.

Shares

Debentures

Meaning The shares are the owned funds of the company. The debentures are the borrowed funds of the company.
What is it? Shares represent the capital of the company. Debentures represent the debt of the company.
Holder The holder of shares is known as shareholder. The holder of debentures is known as debenture holder.
Status of Holders Owners Creditors
Form of Return Shareholders get the dividend. Debenture holders get the interest.
Payment of return Dividend can be paid to shareholders only out of profits. Interest can be paid to debenture holders even if there is no profit.
Allowable deduction Dividend is an appropriation of profit and so it is not allowed as deduction. Interest is a business expense and so it is allowed as deduction from profit.
Security for payment No Yes
Voting Rights The holders of shares have voting rights. The holders of debentures do not have any voting rights.
Conversion Shares can never be converted into debentures. Debentures can be converted into shares.
Repayment in the event of winding up Shares are repaid after the payment of all the liabilities. Debentures get priority over shares, and so they are repaid before shares.
Quantum Dividend on shares is an appropriation of profit. Interest on debentures is a charge against profit.
Trust Deed No trust deed is executed in case of shares. When the debentures are issued to the public, trust deed must be executed.

Issue of Debentures as a Collateral Security

The term ‘collateral security’ implies additional security given for a loan. Where a company obtains a loan from a bank or insurance company and the security offered to the company is not sufficient, the company may issue its own debentures to the lender as collateral security against the loan. In such a case, the lender has the absolute right over the debentures until and unless the loan is repaid.

Debentures can also be issued by a company as collateral security against a bank loan or any such borrowings. A collateral security is like a parallel security which is provided along with the actual security against the loan taken. Debentures issued as such a collateral liability are a contingent liability for the company, i.e. the liability may or may not arise. Only when the company defaults on such a loan will this liability arise.

On repayment of the loan, however, the lender is legally bound to release the debentures forthwith. But in case the loan is not repaid by the company on the due date or in the event of any other breach of agreement, the lender has the right to retain these debentures and to realize them. The lender is entitled to interest only on the amount of loan, but not on the debentures issued as collateral security.

Generally, because it is a contingent liability no entry is passed in the books of the company against such an issue of debentures. However, if some companies opt to pass an entry to record such a transaction, the following entries may be passed

Particulars Amount Amount
Debentures Suspense A/c Dr xxx
To Debentures  A/c xxx
(Being debentures issued as a collateral security)

Particulars Amount Amount
Debentures  A/c Dr xxx
To Debenture Suspense A/c xxx
(Being debentures cancelled on repayment of the loan)

 

Accounting Treatment:

When debentures are issued as a collateral security there are two treatments in the accounting books.

First Method:

(i) No journal entry is made in the account books at the time of issue of such debentures. A note is appended below the loan on the liabilities side of the balance sheet to the fact that they have been secured by the issue of debentures.

This will be shown in the balance sheet as follows:

 

Balance Sheet
Equity and Liabilities Note No. Current Year Previous Year
Non-Current Liabilities      
Long Term Borrowings      
Debentures      
Loan      

Second Method:

(ii) Sometimes issue of debentures as collateral security is recorded by making journal entry as follows:

Debentures Suspense a/c Dr.

To Debentures a/c

(With nominal value of debentures)

The Debentures Suspense Account will appear on the assets side of the balance sheet and Debentures on the liabilities side. When the loan is re-paid the entry is reversed in order to cancel it.

Issue of Debentures for, Consideration other than Cash

Debentures can be issued for non-cash considerations. The company may have purchased assets from some vendors or acquired some other business. Then instead of paying cash, the company may issue debentures to such vendors. Such an issue for debentures can be at par, or for a discount or at a premium.

Sometimes, a company purchases a running business (assets and liabilities) and issues to vendor, debentures as consideration. It is called issue of debentures in consideration, other than cash.

In such situation following entries are recorded.

(i) For Acquisition of Assets:

Sundry assets a/c Dr. (with amount of purchase consideration)

Vendor’s a/c

(Being sundry assets purchased)

(ii) For issue of Debentures at par:

Vendor’s a/c Dr. (with amount of purchase consideration)

Debentures a/c

(Being debentures issued as consideration for assets purchased)

(iii) For issue of Debentures at discount:

Vendor A/c Dr.

Discount on Issue of Debentures A/c

To Debentures A/c

(iv) For issue of Debentures at Premium:

Vendor A/c Dr.

To Debentures A/c

To Securities Premium Reserve A/c

Formula to find out No. of Debentures Issued

No. of Debentures Issued = Amount Payable/Issue Price

Particulars Amount Amount
Asset A/c Dr xxx
To Vendors A/c xxx
(Being asset purchased from vendor)
Vendors A/c Dr xxx
To Debentures A/c xxx
(Being debentures issued at par against the purchase of asset)
Vendors A/c Dr xxx
To Debentures A/c xxx
To Securities Premium A/c xxx
(Being debentures issued at a premium against the purchase of asset)
Vendors A/c Dr xxx
Discount on Debentures A/c Dr xxx
To Debentures A/c xxx
(Being debentures issued at a discount against the purchase of asset)  

Terms of Redemption: at Par, at Premium, or at Discount

Debentures are a type of long-term debt instrument used by companies to raise funds from the public or institutional investors. They are essentially a written acknowledgement of debt, under which the company promises to repay the principal along with a fixed rate of interest after a specified period. Debenture holders are creditors of the company and do not have ownership rights. Debentures can be secured or unsecured and may be convertible or non-convertible depending on the terms of issue.

These instruments offer a relatively safe investment option as they often come with fixed returns, especially when backed by company assets (secured debentures). From a company’s perspective, debentures are an effective tool for raising capital without diluting ownership. However, companies must ensure timely interest payments and redemption, as failure to do so can lead to legal action or reputational loss.

The application money is refunded in case the application is rejected and in case of partial allotment, the excess amount of application money will be used in further calls.

  • At Par: At Par refers to the issuance or trading of a financial instrument—such as shares or debentures—at its face value or nominal value. For example, if a share has a face value of ₹100 and it is issued at ₹100, it is said to be issued at par. In this case, there is no premium or discount involved. This term is commonly used in accounting and finance to indicate that the security’s issue price is equal to its stated value. Issuing at par is often done to attract investors, especially when a company is newly formed or rebuilding trust.
  • At Premium: At Premium refers to the issuance of shares or debentures at a price higher than their face (nominal) value. For instance, if a share with a face value of ₹100 is issued at ₹120, it is said to be issued at a premium of ₹20. The extra amount received over the face value is credited to the Securities Premium Account, which is a part of the company’s reserves. This amount cannot be used freely like other reserves and is governed by specific provisions under the Companies Act. Issuing at premium often reflects the company’s good reputation, performance, or strong investor demand.
  • At Discount: At Discount refers to the issuance of shares or debentures at a price lower than their face (nominal) value. For example, if a share with a face value of ₹100 is issued at ₹90, it is said to be issued at a discount of ₹10. This means the company receives less than the nominal value of the security. Issuing securities at a discount is generally discouraged, especially in the case of equity shares, and is subject to strict legal restrictions under the Companies Act. However, it may be allowed in certain cases like sweat equity or for debentures to attract investors.

Accounting Treatment for Terms of Issue

Let us now see the journal entries for the six different scenarios of the terms of issue. These are the entries passed for the issue of the shares in these different cases.

1) Issued at Par & Redeemable at Par

Particulars Amount Amount
Bank A/c Dr xxx
To Debenture Application & Allotment A/c xxx
(Being application money received)

2) Issued at Discount & Redeemable at Par

Particulars Amount Amount
Bank A/c Dr xxx
To Debenture Allotment A/c xxx
(Being allotment money received)
Particulars Amount Amount
Debenture Allotment A/c Dr xxx
Discount on Debenture A/c Dr xxx
To Debenture A/c xxx
(Being allotment of debentures at discount)

3) Issued at Premium & Redeemable at Par

Particulars Amount Amount
Bank A/c Dr xxx
To Debenture Allotment/Call A/c xxx
(Being allotment/call money received)
Particulars Amount Amount

Debenture Allotment/Call A/c

Dr xxx

To Debenture A/c

xxx

To Securities Premium A/c

xxx
(Being allotment of debentures at premium)

4) Issue at Par & Redeemable at Premium

Particulars Amount Amount
Bank A/c Dr xxx
To Debenture Application & Allotment A/c xxx
(Being application money received)
Particulars Amount Amount

Debenture Application & Allotment A/c

Dr xxx

Loss on Issue of Debentures

Dr xxx (premium amount)

To Debentures A/c

xxx (nominal value)

To Premium on Redemption of Debenture A/c

xxx (premium amount)

(Allotment of debentures at par, redeemable at premium)

5) Issued at Discount & Redeemable at Premium

Particulars Amount Amount

Bank A/c

Dr xxx

To Debenture Application & Allotment A/c

xxx

(Being application money received)

Particulars Amount Amount

Debenture Application & Allotment A/c

Dr

xxx

Loss on Issue of Debentures

Dr

xxx (Discount Amount + premium on redemption)

To Debentures A/c

xxx (nominal value)

To Premium on Redemption of Debenture A/c

xxx (premium amount)

(Allotment of debentures at discount, redeemable at premium)

6) Issued at Premium & Redeemable at Premium

Particulars Amount Amount
Bank A/c Dr xxx

To Debenture Application & Allotment A/c

xxx

(Being application money received)

Particulars Amount Amount

Debenture Application & Allotment A/c

Dr xxx

Loss on Issue of Debentures

Dr

xxx (premium amount)

To Debentures A/c

xxx (nominal value)

To Securities Premium A/c

xxx (premium on issue)

To Premium on Redemption of Debenture A/c

xxx (premium on redemption)

(Allotment of debentures at premium, redeemable at premium)

Writing off Discount/Loss on Issue of Debentures

The loss or discount on the issue of debentures is typically a capital loss or a fictitious asset and, hence, has to be written-off during the debentures’ lifetime. The amount of loss or discount on issue of debentures has to be not be written-off during the year of its issue since the benefit of the debentures would accumulate to the enterprise till their restitution or redemption.

Discount on issue of debentures is a loss of capital nature. It will appear on the asset side of balance sheet till it is written off. It is desirable that it is written off as quickly as possible. Discount on issue of debentures, being a loss of capital nature, it can be written off in two ways.

First Method:

In this case, the total amount of discount on debenture is spread over the life of debentures equally. Suppose the debentures are issued at discount, to be redeemed after five years. The amount of discount will be divided by five and the amount so arrived at will be charged to profit and loss account for five years. This method is followed where debentures are redeemed at the end of a specified period.

Second Method:

In this method discount is written off every year in proportion to the amount of debentures used every year. This method is followed where debentures are redeemed every year by serving a notice and by draw of lots.

Accounting entry for writing off discount is as under:

Profit and Loss a/c  
  To Discount on debentures a/c  

RBI and Corporate governance

A third and an area of particular relevance to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) relates to corporate governance in the financial sector. Today, therefore, the major focus of this presentation would relate to corporate governance in the financial sector itself.

It is possible to broadly identify different sets of players in the corporate governance system. For convenience they can be identified as law which is the legal system; regulators; the Board of Directors and Executive Directors on the Board; financial intermediaries; markets; and self regulatory organisations. There is a dynamic balance among them that determines the prevailing corporate governance system, and the balance varies from country to country. In some countries, self-regulatory organisations are well established and in others, as you are aware, the financial intermediaries play a greater part. These balances vary from country to country and, vary depending upon the stage of institutional development and the historical context. Since financial intermediaries are important players in corporate governance in India, special focus on the corporate governance in the financial sector itself becomes critical.

Secondly, the RBI, as regulator relevant to financial sector, has responsibility on the nature of corporate governance in the financial sector. Therefore, we, in the RBI, have to see how corporate governance is evolving, particularly in the context of the financial sector reforms that are being undertaken.

Third, banks are special and to the extent banks have systemic implications, corporate governance in the banks is of critical importance to the RBI.

Fourth, which is not peculiar, but certainly one of the important features of the Indian system, is the dominance of the Government or the public sector ownership in financial sector, whether it is the banking system or development financial institutions. In a way, Government, as a sole or significant owner of commercial, competitive, corporate entities in the financial sector would also set the standards for corporate governance in private sector.

Fifth, relates to the reform process initiated since 1991-92. In the pre-reform period, most decisions were externally, i.e., external to the financial intermediary determined including interest rates to be paid or charged and whom to lend. But recently, there has been a movement away from micro regulation by the RBI. There is thus, a shift from external regulation to the internal systems and therefore, the quality of the corporate governance within the bank or financial institution becomes critical in the performance of the financial sector and indeed the growth of financial sector.

In this perspective of the significance of corporate governance in the financial sector in India, the rest of the presentation is divided into three parts.

The first relates to corporate governance in Government owned financial intermediaries, i.e., the nature of the corporate governance in the context of the Government ownership.

The second set relates to corporate governance and regulatory issues in financial sector, especially relevant to the Reserve Bank of India.

The third part identifies the areas that require attention, taking into account not only the ownership and regulatory aspects but also the total systemic requirements. The areas requiring attention are simply listed for further attention.

Importance of Corporate Governance Under Government Ownership

The evolving corporate governance system in Government owned banks and financial institutions is very critical in India for a number of reasons.

First, public ownership is dominant in our financial sector and it is likely to be dominant for quite sometime in future in India. So, it sets a benchmark for the practices of corporate governance.

Second, the whole concept of competition in banking will have to be viewed in the light of the government ownership. If the regulator is trying to encourage competition, such encouragement of competition is possible if the market players i.e., banks concerned, are willing to respond to the competitive impulses that the regulator is trying to induce. It is possible that the nature of corporate arrangements and nature of incentive framework in the public sector banks are such the regulatory initiatives will not get the desired response or results. Consequently, the regulator’s inclination or pressure to create an incentive framework for introducing competition would also be determined by the extent to which the corporate governance in public sector financial intermediaries is conducive and responsive.

A third factor is diversified ownership in many public sector financial intermediaries, both the banks and financial institutions. The government is no longer 100 per cent owner in all public sector organisations. In organisations where there has been some divestment, it owns directly or indirectly about 55 to 70 per cent. The existence of private shareholders implies that issues like enhancing shareholders value, protecting shareholders value and protecting shareholders rights become extremely important. Such a situation did not exist in most of the public sector and financial sector until a few years back. The issue is whether this transformation in ownership pattern of the financial system has been captured in changing the framework of corporate governance.

A fourth factor is that if the financial sector, in particular banking system, has to develop in a healthy manner there is need for additional funding of these institutions. More so, when the central bank is justifiably prescribing better prudential requirements and capital adequacy norms. If some additional capital has to be raised by these institutions, they should be able to convince the capital market and shareholders that it is worth investing their money in. In the interest of ensuring that the institutions have adequate capital and that they continue to grow, they should be in a position to put in place and assure the market that their system of corporate governance is such that they can be trusted with shareholders money. The issue, therefore, is how our public sector financial institutions have been performing in terms of enhancing shareholder values. This is extremely important from system point of view because, additional funding has to be provided either by the Government or by the private shareholder. Given the fiscal position, the Government cannot be expected to invest significant funds in recapitalising public sector financial organisations. In brief, Government as an owner has to appreciate the importance of enhancing shareholder value, to reduce the possible fiscal burden of funding of banking or financial institutions in future and so attention to corporate governance in public sector is relevant from overall fiscal point of view also – whether for additional investment by Government or for successful divestment of its holdings.

Fifth, there is the issue of mixing up of regulatory, sovereign and, ownership functions and at the same time ensuring a viable system of corporate governance. A reference has been made to this in the Narasimham Committee Report on Banking Sector Reforms (Narasimham Committee II) Banking Sector Reforms and more recently in the Discussion Paper on Harmonising the Role and Operations of Development Financial Institutions and Banks (Discussion Paper on Universal Banking), circulated by the Reserve Bank of India. For instance, as the Narasimham Committee (II) has highlighted, in the case of the State Bank of India, the RBI is both regulator and owner. Also, ownership and regulatory functions are mixed up in the case of the Industrial Development Bank of India.

Role of Promoters, Nominee Directors and Mismanagement

A promoter is someone, who has been connected with the business from the start. He can also be referred to as the starter of a business or the founder. He is responsible for raising capital from various sources and entering into the first agreements for the start of a business and incorporation of a company.

SEBI’s Substantial Acquisition of Share Takeover Rules state that a Promoter is

  • He is someone at the cusp of a company
  • A person whose name is there in any of the filing papers of the company or according to the shareholding pattern filed by the company.

The concept of promoters is explained in the Indian Companies Act, 2013. Before 2013 there was no legal position defined in the Old Version of the Act of 1956. In the Old Act, the subscribers to the M.o.A was regarded as the promoters since they had subscribed to the company from its inception.

Role of Promoters

  1. Duty to disclose secret profits

He is allowed to make profits but not secretly which will be harmful to the company. He can profit only with the consent of the company which makes this a fiduciary relationship as that of a principal-agent.

  1. The duty of Disclosure of Interest

He must also declare his interest in every transaction that the company and he himself enters into. He must also request the company’s consent when he shows his interest.

  1. Duty under the Indian Contract Act

As said by the courts in due course of time, there is a business relationship between a company and a promoter, therefore a contract before incorporation with a promoter shouldn’t be depended upon. Thus his liabilities come within the purview of the ICA, 1872.

  1. Termination of the Promoter’s Duties

The duty of a promoter doesn’t end even after he has appointed the Board of Directors or he himself is on the board. It ends when the capital has been acquired (First Call) and the BoD have taken the control and have started managing. That is when his fiduciary relationship with the company ends.

Nominee Directors

A nominee director is an individual nominated by an institution, including banks and financial institutions, on the board of companies where such institutions have some ‘interest’. The ‘interest’ can either be in form of financial assistance such as loans or investment into shares. Such strategic investment may have a direct bearing on the profitability of a nominator and therefore, the appointment of nominee director becomes essential to facilitate monitoring of the operations and business of the investee company.

The main purpose of appointment of such person(s) is to safeguard the interest of the nominator, without conflicting with his/ her fiduciary duty as a director. Such a director has several roles and responsibilities, including adequate disclosure of interest, reporting to the nominator and protection of the interest of the company in its entirety. In case of holding such a position in widely held companies or publicly listed/traded companies,, the person should act in accordance with the operations of such entities, guided by industry specific statutory provisions in addition to the general roles and responsibilities expected of them.

Roles and Responsibilities of Nominee Director

  1. Act as a ‘watchdog’

A nominee director needs to oversee the operations of the investee company and ensure the policy decisions are based on sound commercial lines, rationale and adequate safeguards and also act as liaison between the investee company and the nominator.

  1. Participation and decision making

A nominee director is a non-executive director; however, he should be actively involved in decisions pertaining to financial performance of the investee company, fund-raising plans including debt-raising, investments, etc. He should make his presence felt by placing his expertise at the disposal of the Board of the investee company and actively participate in such meetings, which have a bearing on the interests of the nominator. He should also not abstain from voting on resolutions considered at the meetings of the Board of the investee company, involving the nominator, unless involving any personal interest of the nominee director.

  1. Maintain Confidentiality

A nominee director should exercise adequate care and caution while dealing with unpublished price sensitive information, in case of listed entity, having come to know of the same or being in a position where he is likely to be aware of such information. The nominee director is always required to abide by the code of conduct to regulate, monitor and report trading by insiders framed by the listed entity.

  1. One who safeguards the interests of the nominator

A nominee director oversees the operations of the company, to ensure that the policy decisions are based on sound commercial lines and rationality, with adequate safeguards such that the interests of the nominator are not jeopardized;

  1. An Information Bridge

The nominee director also acts as liaison between the investee company and the nominator for regular flow of information. Here, it must be noted that the question of confidential information being shared by the Nominee Director would crop up.

In this regard, reference may be made to guiding judicial principles which suggest that while the Nominee Director has the right to receive information about the Company, a nominee director is not bound to share information with the nominator merely by virtue of such nomination; rather, such duty of sharing information may arise out of separate agreement entered into between the nominator and the nominee. The said principle was also appreciated in Hawkes v Cuddy.

  1. Participation in decision making

The nominee director actively involves in discussions pertaining to the financial performance of the company, future plans, fund raising, etc. The objective is to apply his/her expertise on the matters placed before the board with the intent to protect the interests of the nominator.

  1. Maintenance of confidentiality

Though a nominee director has allegiance towards the nominator, the nominee director is always expected to abide the code of conduct for directors & key managerial personnel. The responsibility adds up where the investee company is a listed entity, as there are compliance requirements in respect of un-published price sensitive information.

Mismanagement

The process or practice of managing ineptly, incompetently, or dishonestly.

The value of the firm’s stock fell precipitously when word leaked out that officers of the company were under investigation for gross mismanagement.

Corporate governance has been defined as “a set of systems, processes and principles, which ensure that a company is governed in the best interest of all stakeholders.” Its objective is to ensure commitment to values and ethical conduct of business, transparency in business transactions; statutory and legal compliances, adequate disclosures and effective decision making to achieve corporate objectives. Good governance is simply good business, but, the moot question is as to whether the Indian companies are really, in spirit, committed to corporate governance or it is only a superficial compliance in letter and cost. The regulators are forcing the corporate governance regulations on the Indian Companies without measuring its benefits and advantages commensurate the cost in terms of resources of money, man hour and paper consumption. Importance, necessity and quality of corporate governance that Indian Companies needs cannot be undermined. Indian Companies are very intelligent and comply with all requirements of corporate governance in full, in letter, without meaning it in most cases. Ministry of Corporate Affairs, SEBI or stock exchanges have not yet put any mechanism in place to weigh and measure the effectiveness, usefulness or benefits of compliance of corporate governance commensurate with cost spent on its compliance.

Role of Shareholders & Other Stakeholders in Corporate Governance

A shareholder can be a person, company, or organization that holds stocks in a given company. A shareholder must own a minimum of one share in a company’s stock or mutual fund to make them a partial owner. Shareholders typically receive declared dividends if the company does well and succeeds.

Also called a stockholder, they have the right to vote on certain matters with regard to the company and to be elected to a seat on the board of directors.

If the company is getting liquidated and its assets are sold, the shareholder may receive a portion of that money, provided that the creditors have already been paid. When such a situation arises, the advantage of being a stockholder lies in the fact that they are not obliged to shoulder the debts and financial obligations incurred by the company, which means creditors cannot compel stockholders to pay them.

Roles of a Shareholder

Being a shareholder isn’t all just about receiving profits, as it also includes other responsibilities. Let’s look at some of these responsibilities.

  • Brainstorming and deciding the powers they will bestow upon the company’s directors, including appointing and removing them from office
  • Deciding on how much the directors receive for their salary. The practice is very tricky because stockholders must make sure that the amount they will give will compensate for the expenses and cost of living in the city where the director lives, without compromising the company’s coffers.
  • Making decisions on instances the directors have no power over, including making changes to the company’s constitution
  • Checking and making approvals of the financial statements of the company

The shareholders are the owners of the company and provide financial backing in return for potential dividends over the lifetime of the company. A person or corporation can become a shareholder of a company in three ways:

  • By subscribing to the memorandum of the company during incorporation
  • By investing in return for new shares in the company
  • By obtaining shares from an existing shareholder by purchase, by gift or by will

The Role of Stakeholders in Corporate Governance

The rights of shareholders, investors and all other stakeholders that are established by law or through mutual agreements are to be respected.

Performance-enhancing mechanisms for employee participation shall be permitted to develop.

Where stakeholders participate in the corporate governance process, the Company shall ensure them access to relevant, sufficient and reliable information on a timely and regular basis, as by law and Company’s governing documents.

Shareholders, employees and all other stakeholders shall be able to freely communicate their concerns about illegal or unethical practices to the Management Board, and their rights shall not be compromised for doing this.

The corporate governance framework the Company shall complement by an effective, efficient insolvency framework and by effective enforcement of creditor rights

error: Content is protected !!