Liquidator’s remuneration refers to the fees or compensation payable to a liquidator for services rendered during the liquidation of a company. Since the liquidator performs statutory, managerial, and fiduciary functions, he is entitled to reasonable remuneration. The amount and mode of remuneration are governed by the Companies Act, 2013, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and rules made thereunder. Liquidator’s remuneration is treated as a charge on the assets of the company and is payable in priority.
Meaning of Liquidator’s Remuneration
Liquidator’s remuneration means the consideration paid to the liquidator for conducting the winding-up proceedings, including realization of assets, settlement of claims, maintenance of accounts, and distribution of surplus. It may be fixed as a percentage of assets realised, amount distributed, or as a lump-sum fee, depending on the nature of liquidation and statutory provisions.
Illustrative Example
If assets realised = ₹10,00,000
Liquidator’s remuneration = 5% of assets realised
Remuneration = ₹50,000
This amount is paid first out of realised assets.
Authority to Fix Remuneration
liquidator’s remuneration refers to the fees payable to the liquidator for performing his statutory duties during the winding up of a company. Since the liquidator plays a pivotal role in taking control of assets, realising property, settling claims, and distributing surplus, it is essential that he is adequately compensated. The authority to fix his remuneration varies depending on the type of liquidation and is governed primarily by the Companies Act, 2013, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and relevant rules and regulations.
1. Compulsory Liquidation
In compulsory liquidation, the company is ordered to be wound up by a tribunal, typically the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), on grounds such as inability to pay debts or for public interest.
-
The tribunal appoints a liquidator and has the authority to fix his remuneration.
-
The remuneration may be a fixed sum, a percentage of assets realised, or a combination.
-
The tribunal ensures that remuneration is reasonable and proportionate to the duties performed.
-
This authority protects the interests of all creditors by avoiding overpayment.
2. Members’ Voluntary Liquidation
A members’ voluntary liquidation occurs when a company, though solvent, decides to wind up its affairs voluntarily.
-
The remuneration of the liquidator is decided by the shareholders or members in a general meeting.
-
Shareholders may determine the fee as a fixed amount or on a percentage basis of realised assets.
-
Members’ authority ensures that the liquidator is compensated fairly while the company’s resources are efficiently utilised.
-
If there is a committee of inspection, it may recommend remuneration, but the final approval lies with the members.
3. Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation
In a creditors’ voluntary liquidation, the company is insolvent, and the creditors initiate the liquidation.
-
The creditors or a committee of inspection appointed by them have the authority to fix the liquidator’s remuneration.
-
The remuneration may be a lump sum, percentage of assets realised, or a combination, as agreed by the creditors.
-
The aim is to ensure that the liquidator is motivated to realise assets efficiently for maximum creditor recovery.
-
Creditors’ approval is necessary to avoid conflicts of interest and ensure transparency.
4. Authority under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016
The IBC provides a modern framework for liquidation of companies.
-
Section 53 of IBC governs the distribution of assets and related liquidation expenses.
-
The Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) or Insolvency Resolution Professional is empowered to approve remuneration.
-
Remuneration under IBC is treated as part of liquidation costs, which have overriding priority over most claims.
-
The IBC framework ensures uniformity, transparency, and timely completion of liquidation.
5. Considerations in Fixing Remuneration
The authority fixing the remuneration considers the following factors:
- Size and complexity of the company
- Value of assets to be realised
- Time and effort required
- Legal and professional expertise needed
- Expenses incurred during liquidation
These factors ensure fair compensation while protecting the estate from excessive deductions.
6. Restrictions on Fixing Remuneration
Even when the authority has the power to fix fees:
-
It must be reasonable and proportionate to work performed.
-
Approval must comply with statutory provisions.
-
Any excess or unauthorised fee can be challenged before the tribunal.
These safeguards protect creditors and shareholders from misuse of authority.
Basis of Liquidator’s Remuneration
Liquidator’s remuneration may be calculated on the following bases:
- Percentage on Assets Realised: A fixed percentage is applied to the total assets realised by the liquidator.
- Percentage on Amount Distributed: Remuneration is calculated on the amount distributed among creditors and shareholders.
- Lump-Sum Basis: A fixed amount is agreed upon in advance.
- Mixed Basis: Combination of percentage on realisation and distribution.
Restrictions on Liquidator’s Remuneration
The following restrictions apply:
-
Remuneration must be reasonable and proportionate
-
It cannot be increased without approval of the competent authority
-
No remuneration is payable for work not authorised by law
-
Liquidator cannot draw remuneration unless sanctioned
These restrictions prevent misuse of authority.
Remuneration When Assets Are Insufficient
If assets are insufficient to cover all liabilities, liquidator’s remuneration is still payable in priority, subject to approval. However, in some cases, remuneration may be reduced or waived by the tribunal in the interest of justice.
Accounting Treatment of Liquidator’s Remuneration
In liquidation accounts:
-
Remuneration is shown on the debit side of the Liquidator’s Statement of Account
-
Treated as liquidation expense
-
Deducted before distribution to creditors and shareholders
It directly affects the amount available for distribution.
2 thoughts on “Liquidator’s Remuneration”