Breach of Contract and Remedies to Breach of Contract

Breach of Contract is a critical aspect of business law, particularly within the Indian legal framework, which is governed by the Indian Contract Act, 1872. This piece of legislation outlines the rules and protocols surrounding agreements made between two or more parties and the remedies available in the event of a breach. Understanding the nuances of breach of contract in the Indian context is essential for businesses operating within the country to navigate legal challenges effectively and safeguard their interests.

Breach of contract in India is a complex area of law, encompassing various types of breaches and a range of remedies to address these breaches. The Indian Contract Act, 1872, serves as the backbone for understanding and navigating contractual relationships and their dissolution. For businesses operating in India, a thorough understanding of these principles is crucial to protecting their interests and ensuring that they can effectively respond to contractual breaches. As the Indian economy continues to grow and evolve, so too will the legal landscape surrounding contracts, necessitating a dynamic and informed approach to business law.

Definition of Breach of Contract

A breach of contract occurs when a party involved in a contractual agreement fails to fulfill their part of the bargain as stipulated in the contract. This failure can be either actual or anticipatory. An actual breach happens when a party refuses to perform their obligation on the due date or performs incompletely or unsatisfactorily. Anticipatory breach occurs when a party declares their intention not to fulfill their contractual obligations in the future.

Types of Breaches

In Indian law, breaches are typically categorized based on their nature and severity:

  1. Actual Breach

An actual breach occurs when a party fails to perform their part of the contract on the due date or during the performance period. This breach can be of two types:

  • Non-performance:

When a party outright fails to perform their obligations under the contract.

  • Defective Performance:

When a party’s performance is incomplete or fails to meet the contract’s stipulated standards.

  1. Anticipatory Breach

Anticipatory breach, or anticipatory repudiation, happens when one party informs the other, before the due date for performance, that they will not fulfill their contractual obligations. This breach allows the non-breaching party to take immediate action, such as claiming damages or seeking other remedies, without waiting for the actual time of performance.

  1. Material Breach

Material breach is a significant failure to perform, to such an extent that it undermines the contract’s very essence, denying the non-breaching party the contract’s full benefit. The severity of a material breach allows the aggrieved party to terminate the contract and sue for damages. Determining whether a breach is material involves assessing the breach’s impact on the contractual relationship and the benefits that the non-breaching party would have received if the contract had been fully performed.

  1. Minor (or Partial) Breach

A minor breach, also known as a partial breach, occurs when the breach does not significantly affect the contract’s core. The breach might involve minor deviations from the agreed terms, where the main obligations are still fulfilled. While the contract remains in effect, and termination is not justified, the non-breaching party can still seek compensation for the losses incurred due to the partial non-compliance.

  1. Fundamental Breach

A fundamental breach is a grave violation of the contract, going to the heart of the agreement and resulting in such significant harm that the contract cannot be fulfilled as intended. This type of breach allows the aggrieved party not only to terminate the contract but also to claim damages. The concept of a fundamental breach highlights scenarios where the breach’s nature is so severe that it renders the contractual relationship irreparably damaged.

Remedies for Breach of Contract

When a breach of contract occurs, the law provides several remedies to the aggrieved party. These remedies are designed to address the harm caused by the breach and, as much as possible, restore the injured party to the position they would have been in had the breach not occurred. Here’s an overview of the primary remedies for breach of contract:

  1. Damages

Damages are the most common remedy for a breach of contract. They involve the payment of money from the breaching party to the non-breaching party as compensation for the breach. There are several types of damages:

  • Compensatory Damages:

These are intended to compensate the non-breaching party for the loss directly resulting from the breach, putting them in the position they would have been in if the contract had been performed.

  • Consequential (Special) Damages:

These compensate for additional losses that are a result of the breach but were foreseeable at the time the contract was made.

  • Nominal Damages:

A small sum awarded when a breach occurred, but the non-breaching party did not suffer any actual loss.

  • Liquidated Damages:

These are pre-determined damages agreed upon by the parties at the time of the contract, to be paid in case of a breach.

  • Punitive Damages:

Intended to punish the breaching party for egregious behavior and deter future breaches. However, they are rarely awarded in contract law.

  1. Specific Performance

This remedy involves a court order compelling the breaching party to perform their obligations under the contract. Specific performance is generally reserved for cases where monetary damages are inadequate to compensate for the breach, such as in the sale of unique goods or real estate.

  1. Rescission

Rescission cancels the contract, releasing both parties from their obligations. After rescission, the parties should make restitution, returning any property or funds exchanged under the contract. This remedy is often sought when a contract was formed under misrepresentation, fraud, undue influence, or mistake.

  1. Reformation

Reformation involves modifying the contract to reflect the true intentions of the parties. This remedy is typically used when there has been a mutual mistake in the terms of the contract or when one party was under a misunderstanding.

  1. Injunction

An injunction is a court order preventing a party from doing something, such as breaching the contract. Injunctions are particularly useful in preventing irreparable harm that cannot be adequately compensated by damages.

Quantum Meruit

Although not a remedy for breach of contract in the strict sense, quantum meruit allows a party to recover the reasonable value of services rendered if a contract does not exist or cannot be enforced. This principle ensures that a party does not unjustly benefit from the work of another.

Choosing the Right Remedy

The appropriate remedy for a breach of contract depends on various factors, including the nature of the breach, the type of contract, the harm suffered by the non-breaching party, and the intentions of the parties. Courts have broad discretion to grant the remedy that they deem most just and equitable in the circumstances.

Important Principles

Several principles are key to understanding breach of contract in India:

  • Freedom of Contract: Parties are free to contract on any terms they agree upon.
  • Pacta Sunt Servanda: Agreements must be kept.
  • Mitigation of Damages: The aggrieved party has a duty to mitigate or reduce the damages caused by the breach.
  • Quantum Meruit: If a contract is terminated due to breach, the party who has performed work honestly can claim payment to the extent of work done.

Judicial Approach

Indian courts have developed a pragmatic approach toward breach of contract, focusing on the intent and circumstances surrounding each case. Courts often emphasize fair play and justice, ensuring that remedies are equitable and just, reflecting the contract’s spirit.

Indian Contract Act, 1872 Introduction

The Indian Contract Act, 1872, is a fundamental piece of legislation that governs contract law in India. It lays down the legal framework for the creation, execution, and enforcement of contracts in the country. The Act came into effect on September 1, 1872, and it has since been the cornerstone of commercial and civil agreements in India.

Objectives of the Indian Contract Act, 1872

The primary objectives of the Indian Contract Act are to ensure that contracts are made in a systematic and standardized manner, to define and enforce the rights and duties of parties involved in a contract, and to provide legal remedies in case of breach of contract. It aims to promote economic activities by ensuring trust and reliability in transactions.

Scope and Applicability

The Indian Contract Act applies to the whole of India except the state of Jammu and Kashmir (note: this may need updating based on current legal developments). It is applicable to all contracts, whether oral or written, related to goods, services, or immovable property, as long as they fulfill the criteria specified within the Act.

Key Provisions of the Act

The Act is divided into two parts: the first part (Sections 1 to 75) deals with the general principles of the law of contract, and the second part (Sections 124 to 238) deals with specific kinds of contracts, such as indemnity and guarantee, bailment, pledge, and agency.

  • Offer and Acceptance:

The Act defines how contracts are formed, starting with a lawful offer by one party and its acceptance by another.

  • Competency of Parties:

It specifies who is competent to contract, excluding certain categories of individuals like minors, persons of unsound mind, and those disqualified by law.

  • Free Consent:

The Act emphasizes that for a contract to be valid, consent must be freely given without coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.

  • Consideration:

It outlines that a contract must be supported by consideration (something of value) exchanged between the parties, except in certain cases provided by the Act or any other law.

  • Legality of Object and Consideration:

The object and consideration of a contract must be lawful and not prohibited by law.

  • Performance of Contracts:

The Act specifies how contracts should be performed and the obligations of parties involved in the contract.

  • Breach of Contract and Remedies:

It details the consequences of breaching a contract and the remedies available to the aggrieved party, such as damages, specific performance, and injunction.

Importance of the Act

The Indian Contract Act, 1872, plays a crucial role in the Indian legal system by providing a standardized and legal framework for contracts, which is essential for economic transactions and relationships. It facilitates commerce and trade, not only within the country but also in international dealings involving Indian parties. The Act ensures predictability and fairness in contractual relationships, thereby contributing to the overall trust and efficiency in the economic system.

Business Law Bangalore University BBA 6th Semester NEP Notes

Unit 1 Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Book]
Indian Contract Act, 1872 Introduction VIEW
Definition of Contract, Essentials of Valid Contract, Offer and Acceptance, Consideration, Contractual capacity, Free consent VIEW
Classification of Contract, Discharge of a Contract VIEW
Breach of Contract and Remedies to Breach of Contract VIEW
Unit 2 The Sale of Goods Act. 1930 [Book]
The Sale of Goods Act, 1930 Introduction, Definition of Contract of Sale, Essentials of Contract of Sale, Conditions and Warranties VIEW
Transfer of Ownership in Goods including Sale by a Non-owner and Exceptions VIEW
Performance of Contract of Sale VIEW
Unpaid Seller, Rights of an Unpaid seller against the Goods and against the Buyer VIEW
Unit 3 Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 [Book]
Introduction Meaning and Definition, Characteristics, Kinds of Negotiable Instruments VIEW
Promissory Note VIEW
Bills of Exchange Meaning, Characteristics, Types VIEW
Cheques Meaning, Characteristics, Types VIEW
Parties to Negotiable Instruments VIEW
Dishonour of Negotiable Instruments, Notice of Dishonour, Noting and Protesting VIEW
Unit 4 Consumer Protection Act 1986 [Book]
Consumer Protection Act 1986 VIEW
Definitions of the terms Consumer, Consumer Dispute, Defect, Deficiency, Unfair Trade Practices, and Services VIEW
Rights of Consumer under the Act VIEW
Consumer Redressal Agencies: District Forum, State Commission and National Commission VIEW
Unit 5 Environment Protection Act 1986 [Book]
Environment Protection Act 1986 Introduction, Objectives of the Act, Definitions of Important Terms Environment, Environment Pollutant, Environment Pollution, Hazardous Substance and Occupier VIEW
Types of Pollution under Environment Protection Act 1986 VIEW
Powers of Central Government to protect Environment in India VIEW

Indemnified and Surety

The term Indemnified refers to a person or party who is protected or compensated against a loss or damage by another party, known as the indemnifier. The concept of indemnification is rooted in Section 124 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which defines a Contract of Indemnity as a contract in which one party promises to save the other from loss caused by the conduct of the promisor or any third party.

The indemnified party is essentially the one who is at risk of suffering a loss and is seeking protection through a legal agreement. Once a valid indemnity contract is executed, the indemnified is legally entitled to claim compensation from the indemnifier if any specified loss arises.

Role of the Indemnified:

In any indemnity agreement, the indemnified plays a passive role in the sense that they are not responsible for causing the loss but are rather exposed to it due to certain actions, liabilities, or transactions. For instance, in a contract where a company indemnifies an employee against legal actions arising out of official duties, the employee becomes the indemnified.

Rights of the Indemnified:

The indemnified has the right to:

  • Recover damages or losses covered under the contract of indemnity.

  • Claim legal expenses incurred while defending a claim, provided the expenses were incurred in good faith.

  • Be protected against future anticipated losses, especially if the liability is certain and imminent, though Indian courts generally recognize this only after actual loss.

These rights help ensure that the indemnified party does not suffer financial harm due to risks that are contractually transferred to the indemnifier.

Examples of Indemnified Party:

  1. A tenant indemnified by the landlord against third-party claims.

  2. An insurance policyholder being indemnified by the insurance company for damage to property.

  3. A business partner indemnified against legal liabilities arising from company decisions.

Surety:

Surety is a person who gives a guarantee for the performance, debt, or conduct of another person, known as the principal debtor, to a third party, called the creditor. The concept of surety is covered under Section 126 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which defines a Contract of Guarantee as a contract to perform the promise or discharge the liability of a third person in case of their default.

The surety promises to be answerable if the principal debtor fails to meet their obligations. This creates a tripartite agreement among the creditor, principal debtor, and surety. The surety’s liability is secondary, meaning it arises only when the principal debtor defaults.

Nature of the Surety’s Liability:

The surety’s liability is generally co-extensive with that of the principal debtor (Section 128), unless otherwise stated in the contract. This means that the creditor can directly approach the surety for payment, even without first proceeding against the principal debtor. However, if the debtor fulfills the obligation, the surety’s role ends.

Rights of the Surety:

Once the surety discharges the debt or obligation of the principal debtor, he acquires certain rights:

  1. Right of Subrogation: The surety steps into the shoes of the creditor and can recover the amount from the principal debtor.

  2. Right to Indemnity: The surety has a right to be indemnified by the principal debtor for any payment lawfully made under the guarantee.

  3. Right to Contribution: In case of multiple sureties, one surety who pays more than their share can recover the excess from co-sureties.

Examples of Surety:

  • A parent acting as a guarantor for their child’s education loan.

  • A person guaranteeing repayment of a business loan for a friend.

  • An individual assuring a landlord that the tenant will pay rent on time.

Rights and Duties of Bailor and Bailee, Pawnor and Pawnee

Bailment involves the delivery of goods by one person (the bailor) to another (the bailee) for a specific purpose under a contract, where the goods are to be returned or otherwise disposed of upon completion of the purpose. Both parties have legal rights and duties toward each other.

Rights of the Bailor:

  • Right to Enforcement of Bailee’s Duties

The bailor has the right to expect that the bailee will perform all contractual obligations, including taking care of the goods and returning them as agreed. If the bailee fails in their duty (such as through negligence or unauthorized use), the bailor can take legal action for damages or compensation. This ensures the bailor’s interest in the goods is protected throughout the period of bailment.

  • Right to Claim Damages

If the bailee fails to take reasonable care of the goods and they are lost or damaged due to negligence, the bailor has the right to claim compensation. This right is essential for protecting the value of goods entrusted to the bailee and holds them accountable for their conduct during the bailment.

  • Right to Terminate Bailment

The bailor has the right to terminate the bailment if the bailee acts inconsistently with the contract. For example, if the bailee misuses the goods or refuses to return them, the bailor may revoke the agreement and demand immediate return of the goods. This safeguards the bailor’s legal ownership and control.

  • Right to Receive Accretion (Section 163)

If any natural increase or profit arises from the bailed goods (like offspring of animals), the bailor has the right to claim such accretion. The bailee is not entitled to keep or sell these additions and must return them with the original goods upon completion of bailment.

  • Right to Recover Goods

The bailor can demand the return of goods once the bailment period ends or the purpose is accomplished. If the bailee fails or refuses to return the goods, the bailor has the legal right to recover them through a court of law. This ensures the bailor’s rightful ownership is not jeopardized.

Duties of the Bailor:

  • Duty to Disclose Faults (Section 150)

The bailor must inform the bailee of any known defects in the goods that may cause harm or affect usage. If the bailor fails to disclose such faults, and the bailee suffers loss or injury, the bailor is liable. This duty ensures transparency and safety during bailment, particularly when goods are dangerous or defective.

  • Duty to Bear Expenses (Gratuitous Bailment)

In a gratuitous (free) bailment, the bailor must bear all necessary expenses incurred by the bailee in caring for and preserving the goods. This includes storage, maintenance, or handling costs unless otherwise agreed. It prevents the bailee from facing financial burden when they are not being compensated for the bailment.

  • Duty to Accept Goods Back

The bailor has a duty to accept the goods once the purpose is completed or the time expires. If the bailor refuses to take the goods back, they may be liable for compensation to the bailee for any loss or additional costs incurred in storing or handling the goods beyond the bailment period.

  • Duty to Indemnify Loss due to Defects

If the bailee suffers any loss due to hidden faults in the goods that the bailor was aware of but did not disclose, the bailor must indemnify the bailee. This duty arises under Section 150 and protects the bailee from damages not caused by their own conduct or negligence.

  • Duty to Compensate Bailee for Loss Due to Premature Termination

In gratuitous bailment, if the bailor ends the contract before the agreed time or before the purpose is fulfilled, and the bailee suffers loss due to this, the bailor must compensate the bailee. This prevents unfair financial harm when the bailee has acted in good faith.

Rights of the Bailee

  • Right to Compensation (Section 158)

The bailee is entitled to be reimbursed for any necessary expenses incurred in maintaining the goods, especially in gratuitous bailments. This right prevents financial loss to the bailee who takes care of the goods without reward and ensures fair treatment for fulfilling the bailor’s request.

  • Right of Lien (Section 170–171)

The bailee has a particular lien, meaning they can retain the goods until dues or lawful charges are paid. If the bailee is in the business of receiving goods and no payment is made, they can legally keep the goods until the charges are cleared. It is a protective right in commercial bailments.

  • Right to Sue for Compensation

If the bailor causes loss to the bailee (e.g., by giving faulty goods without warning), the bailee can sue the bailor for damages. This right ensures that the bailee is not unfairly burdened due to the bailor’s negligence or non-disclosure of risks related to the goods.

  • Right to Deliver Goods to Joint Bailors

If goods are jointly bailed by multiple people, the bailee has the right to deliver them to any one of the joint bailors unless specifically instructed otherwise. This prevents confusion or legal issues when returning the goods and provides legal security to the bailee.

  • Right to Recover Loss Due to Bailor’s Refusal

If the bailor refuses to accept the goods back after the bailment ends, and the bailee suffers loss due to continued possession or care of the goods, the bailee has the right to recover such losses from the bailor. This protects the bailee’s interest when their obligation has been fulfilled.

Pledge

Pledge is a special type of bailment where goods are delivered as security for payment of a debt or performance of a promise. The person who delivers the goods is called the pawnor, and the person who receives them is called the pawnee.

Rights of the Pawnee:

  • Right of Retention (Section 173)

The pawnee has the right to retain the pledged goods until the full repayment of the debt, interest, and any necessary expenses incurred in the preservation of goods. This right serves as a legal security to the pawnee for the recovery of dues and is valid even in the absence of a written agreement.

  • Right to Recover Extraordinary Expenses (Section 175)

If the pawnee incurs extraordinary or necessary expenses to preserve the pledged goods (e.g., special storage or maintenance costs), they are entitled to recover such costs from the pawnor. However, the pawnee cannot retain the goods for these expenses alone—they must file a suit if unpaid.

  • Right to Sell the Goods (Section 176)

If the pawnor defaults in payment or performance, the pawnee has the right to sell the goods after giving reasonable notice to the pawnor. The sale must be done fairly. The proceeds are adjusted toward the debt, and any surplus is returned to the pawnor. If the proceeds fall short, the pawnee can sue for the balance.

  • Right to Sue for Debt and Retain Goods

The pawnee may choose to sue for recovery of the debt and still retain possession of the pledged goods. They are not bound to sell the goods. This dual remedy strengthens the pawnee’s legal position and gives them flexibility in enforcing the pledge.

  • Right Against Third Party Interference

The pawnee has the right to be protected from third-party claims or interference in the possession of pledged goods. As a bailee, the pawnee enjoys legal protection under the Indian Contract Act and can sue anyone who unlawfully takes or harms the goods in their custody.

Duties of the Pawnee:

  • Duty to Take Reasonable Care (Section 151)

The pawnee must take reasonable care of the pledged goods, just like a prudent person would take of their own goods. If the goods are damaged or lost due to negligence, the pawnee is liable to compensate the pawnor. This duty ensures the goods remain protected while in custody.

  • Duty Not to Use Goods

The pawnee is not allowed to use the pledged goods unless the pawnor has given express or implied permission. Unauthorized use is a violation of the pledge agreement and may result in legal consequences, including termination of the contract or compensation for misuse.

  • Duty to Return Goods

Once the debt is repaid or the promise is performed, the pawnee is legally obligated to return the pledged goods to the pawnor. If the pawnee fails or refuses to return them, they may be liable for damages or even face legal proceedings for wrongful detention.

  • Duty to Return Accretion (Section 163)

If the pledged goods generate profit or accretion during the pledge (e.g., dividends on pledged shares or offspring of pledged animals), the pawnee must return such increase to the pawnor along with the original goods. This ensures that ownership-related benefits remain with the pawnor.

  • Duty to Sell Goods Fairly (If Exercising Right to Sell)

If the pawnee exercises the right to sell the pledged goods due to the pawnor’s default, the sale must be conducted fairly, and the surplus proceeds (if any) must be returned to the pawnor. Any unfair sale or failure to inform can lead to compensation claims.

Rights of the Pawnor:

  • Right to Redeem Goods (Section 177)

The pawnor has the right to redeem the goods pledged at any time before the pawnee sells them. This right continues even after default, provided the pawnee has not yet sold the goods. The pawnor must repay the full debt and any additional lawful expenses to reclaim the goods.

  • Right to Receive Surplus from Sale

If the pawnee sells the goods upon default and receives more than the owed amount, the pawnor has the right to claim the surplus amount. The pawnee cannot unjustly enrich themselves through the sale; they are legally bound to return the balance to the pawnor after adjusting dues.

  • Right to Notice Before Sale

The pawnor is entitled to reasonable notice before the pawnee sells the goods due to default. If the pawnee fails to give such notice, the sale can be declared void, and the pawnor may claim compensation or reclaim the goods, depending on the circumstances.

  • Right to Compensation for Unauthorized Use

If the pawnee uses the goods without permission or causes damage through negligence, the pawnor has the right to claim compensation. This right holds the pawnee accountable and ensures the safety of the goods in the absence of the owner.

  • Right to Recover Goods Upon Repayment

Upon full repayment of the debt and expenses, the pawnor has the absolute right to recover the pledged goods. This includes any increase or profit derived from them. If the pawnee refuses, the pawnor can initiate legal proceedings for recovery and damages.

Rights and Duties of indemnifier

Under Section 124 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a contract of indemnity involves a promise by one party (indemnifier) to compensate the other (indemnified) for loss. The indemnifier assumes responsibility in case of certain events that cause damage or loss to the indemnified.

Rights of the Indemnifier:

  • Right to Control the Defence

When the indemnified faces a legal suit or proceedings, the indemnifier has the right to control the defence. This includes appointing lawyers, making strategic decisions, or choosing whether to settle the dispute. This right ensures that the indemnifier, who is ultimately liable to pay, can avoid unnecessary or inflated claims and control litigation expenses to protect their financial interest.

  • Right to Access Legal Proceedings

The indemnifier is entitled to receive full information about legal proceedings, facts, and circumstances involving the indemnified. This includes the right to inspect legal documents, monitor case status, and be informed of actions taken. This access allows the indemnifier to assess liability, ensure transparency, and possibly intervene in a timely manner to limit loss or offer reasonable settlements to mitigate financial damage.

  • Right to Subrogation

Once the indemnifier pays for the loss or damages on behalf of the indemnified, he attains the right of subrogation. This means the indemnifier steps into the shoes of the indemnified and can recover the amount from third parties responsible for the loss. Subrogation helps the indemnifier claim legal redress, damages, or refunds and prevents unjust enrichment of the indemnified.

  • Right to Proof of Loss

The indemnifier has the right to demand credible proof or evidence of the loss before compensating the indemnified. This ensures that the indemnifier is not held liable for false, exaggerated, or fraudulent claims. The indemnified must demonstrate that the loss falls within the agreed terms of indemnity. This right is a protective measure to prevent misuse of indemnity arrangements.

  • Right to Be Informed of Settlements

If the indemnified chooses to settle a claim or dispute without court intervention, the indemnifier has the right to be informed beforehand. Since the indemnifier may be responsible for the settlement amount, prior knowledge and consent help them evaluate the fairness of the settlement. This prevents the indemnified from entering unfavorable or excessive settlements without the indemnifier’s approval.

  • Right to Reimbursement on Misuse

If the indemnifier pays for a loss based on false information or fraud by the indemnified, he retains the right to recover that amount. This right protects the indemnifier from being financially liable for dishonest conduct by the other party. Courts uphold this right to ensure indemnity is used only in good faith and within the legal scope of the original contract.

  • Right to Define Scope of Indemnity

The indemnifier has the right to specify the extent, conditions, and limitations of indemnity at the time of entering the contract. This means the indemnifier can include clauses to exclude certain types of losses (like indirect damages, penalties, or third-party actions) or set a financial cap. Clearly defining scope protects the indemnifier from open-ended or unlimited liability in the future.

Duties of the Indemnifier

  • Duty to Compensate for Actual Loss

The primary duty of the indemnifier is to compensate the indemnified for any actual loss or damage suffered due to the acts covered under the contract. This includes financial loss, legal costs, or damages awarded by the court. The indemnifier is legally bound to fulfill this duty once the indemnified proves that the loss falls under the indemnity clause.

  • Duty to Act in Good Faith

The indemnifier must act honestly and in good faith while discharging obligations under the contract. This includes cooperating with the indemnified, not withholding critical information, and not taking unfair advantage of the indemnity arrangement. Good faith is fundamental to all contracts, and its breach may result in loss of trust or legal consequences.

  • Duty to Honour Terms of Contract

The indemnifier has a legal obligation to perform according to the specific terms agreed in the contract of indemnity. This includes honoring the agreed limit of liability, covering specified events, and respecting timelines. Failure to perform as per the contract may amount to breach, making the indemnifier liable for damages or penalties.

  • Duty to Pay Reasonable Legal Costs

When indemnity covers legal actions, the indemnifier must bear reasonable costs of litigation, including lawyer’s fees and court charges, if these are incurred in good faith. The indemnified should not suffer additional legal burden when acting within the terms of the contract. Courts may enforce this duty even if the indemnity amount does not explicitly mention legal costs.

  • Duty Not to Interfere Unreasonably

Although the indemnifier may have the right to control proceedings, they must not interfere unreasonably or act in a way that harms the indemnified’s legal interests. For example, pressuring the indemnified to accept an unfair settlement may be considered a breach of duty. The indemnifier must balance control with the indemnified’s rights and interests.

  • Duty to Indemnify Promptly

It is the indemnifier’s duty to compensate the indemnified within a reasonable time after the loss has occurred and been substantiated. Unnecessary delay in payment can lead to financial hardship for the indemnified and may invite legal action or interest on delayed compensation. Prompt action is seen as a sign of good faith and professionalism.

  • Duty to Uphold Confidentiality

In situations where indemnity is linked to sensitive information, such as in professional services or commercial contracts, the indemnifier must maintain confidentiality. Sharing or misusing such information may not only breach the contract but also legal provisions under privacy or trade secret laws. Upholding confidentiality protects the integrity of the business or relationship.

Parties to Negotiable Instruments

Negotiable instruments are financial documents that guarantee the payment of a specific amount of money, either on demand or at a set time. These instruments play a crucial role in the modern financial system by facilitating the transfer of funds and extending credit. The most common types of negotiable instruments include cheques, promissory notes, and bills of exchange. Each of these instruments involves various parties, whose roles and responsibilities are defined by the nature of the instrument itself.

  1. Drawer

The drawer is the person who creates or issues the negotiable instrument. In the context of a cheque, the drawer is the account holder who writes the cheque, instructing the bank to pay a specified amount to a third party.

  1. Drawee

The drawee is the party who is directed to pay the amount specified in the negotiable instrument. In the case of cheques, the drawee is the bank or financial institution where the drawer holds an account. For bills of exchange, the drawee is the person or entity who is requested to pay the bill.

  1. Payee

The payee is the person or entity to whom the payment is to be made. The payee is named on the instrument and has the right to receive the amount specified from the drawee, upon presentation of the instrument.

  1. Endorser

An endorser is someone who holds a negotiable instrument (originally payable to them or to bearer) and signs it over to another party, making that party the new payee. This action, known as endorsement, transfers the rights of the instrument to the endorsee.

  1. Endorsee

The endorsee is the person to whom a negotiable instrument is endorsed. The endorsee gains the right to receive the payment specified in the instrument from the drawee, subject to the terms of the endorsement.

  1. Bearer

In the case of a bearer instrument, the bearer is the person in possession of the negotiable instrument. Bearer instruments are payable to whoever holds them at the time of presentation for payment, not requiring endorsement for transfer.

  1. Holder

The holder of a negotiable instrument is the person in possession of it in due course. This means they possess the instrument either directly from its issuance or through an endorsement, intending to receive payment from the drawee.

  1. Holder in Due Course

A holder in due course is a special category of holder who has acquired the negotiable instrument under certain conditions, including taking it before it was overdue, in good faith, and without knowledge of any defect in title. Holders in due course have certain protections and can claim the amount of the instrument free from many defenses that could be raised against the original payee.

Business Laws LU BBA 5th Semester NEP Notes

Unit 1 Indian Contract Act 1872 [Book]
The Indian Contract Act 1872: Scope of the Act VIEW
Essential of A Valid Contract, Agreement VIEW
Performance of Contracts VIEW
Breach of Contract VIEW
Remedies of Breach of Contract VIEW
Quasi-Contracts VIEW
Contract of indemnity and Guarantee: Meaning and its Distinction VIEW
Rights and Duties of indemnifier VIEW
Indemnified and Surety, Discharge of surety’s liability VIEW
Bailment and Pledge: meaning and distinction VIEW
Rights and Duties of Bailor and Bailee, Pawnor and Pawnee VIEW
Read More
Offer VIEW
Acceptance VIEW
Communication of offer VIEW
Acceptance & Revocation VIEW
Capacity of contract, Free concert: Coercion, Duress & undue influence, Fraud, Misrepresentation, Mistake VIEW
Legality of object VIEW
Contingent Contract VIEW
Unit 2 Sale of Good Act, 1930 [Book]
The Sale of Good Act, 1930 VIEW
Formation of Contract VIEW
Conditions & Warranties VIEW
Rights of an Unpaid Seller VIEW
Performance of the Contract of Sale, Caveat empetor VIEW
Ownership of goods and transfer VIEW
Buyers right VIEW
Unpaid seller and his rights VIEW
Unit 3 Partnership Act 1932 [Book]
Law of Partnership VIEW
Partnership distinguished from similar organization VIEW
Types of partner, Liability of partner VIEW
Duties of partner VIEW
Dissolution of partnership VIEW
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 Definition, Features, Assumptions VIEW
Promissory Notes, Bill of Exchange, Cheque VIEW
Payments in new courts VIEW
Conditions when bankers must refuse payments VIEW
Negotiations, indorsement VIEW
Holder-in-Due Course VIEW
Dishonour and Discharge of Negotiable Instrument VIEW
VIEW
Endorsements VIEW
Kinds of bills: Their expectancies, Presentment, Dishonour, Compensation VIEW
Hundies & their Kinds VIEW
Unit 4 The Companies Act, 1956 [Book]
The Companies Act, 1956 Nature VIEW
Type of Companies VIEW
Formation of Companies VIEW
Memorandum of Association VIEW
Articles of Association VIEW
Prospectus VIEW VIEW
Share capital VIEW VIEW
Membership VIEW
Meetings VIEW VIEW VIEW
Winding-Up VIEW VIEW
VIEW

Methods including alteration of Share capital, variation of share-holder rights, sub division, consolidation, surrender and reissue/cancellation, reduction of share capital, with relevant legal provisions and accounting treatments for same

Alteration of share capital

Alteration of Share Capital refers to the changes in the existing capital structure of the firm. A company can alter its share capital only if it is authorized by its Articles of Association. An article of association is the document framed at the time of incorporation of the company to govern its internal affairs.

In case of public company, the shares are being subscribed from the public. So, the limited company has to make alteration of the memorandum of association clause also. There is a capital clause in the memorandum of association that contains the details regarding the amount of share capital that can be raised by the company during its lifetime. The capital clause has to be get altered by the registrar appointed under Companies Act 2013.

SECTION: 61 Way to Alter Share Capital

Section 61 of the Companies Act, 2013 states the five different ways to alter the share capital which are as follows:

Increase in Authorized Capital: Authorized Capital is also known as Registered or Nominal Capital. This is the capital with which company gets incorporated. The company can increase its share capital by altering its capital clause mentioned in the Memorandum of Association.  

Consolidation of Shares: The Company can also alter its share capital by consolidating the smaller denominations shares into larger denominations. In case there is any change regarding voting rights of shareholders results out of the consolidation, the permission of the tribunal or court is compulsory. In case of consolidation of shares, the following journal entry is passed:

Share Capital (Old) A/c    Dr.

     To Share Capital (New) A/c

Variation of share-holder right

This provision must be mentioned in the memorandum or articles of the company; and if not altered them accordingly:
If variation by one class of shareholders affects the rights of any other class of shareholders, the consent of three-fourths of such other class of shareholders shall also be obtained and the provisions of this section shall apply to such variation.
Where the holders of not less than 10% of issued class of shares did not consent in favour of Special Resolution, they may apply to the Tribunal to have the variation cancelled.
If such application is received by the Tribunal, the variation shall not effect unless and until it is confirmed by Tribunal.
Provided that an application under this section shall be made within 21 days after the date on which the consent was given or the resolution was passed, and may be made on behalf of the shareholders entitled to make the application by such one or more of their number as they may appoint in writing for the purpose.
The decision of the Tribunal on any application shall be binding on the shareholders.
The company shall, within thirty days of the date of the order of the Tribunal, file a copy thereof with the Registrar.

Sub Division

A company can also alter its share capital by sub dividing the value of the shares held by the shareholders. Section 61 allows the company to sub-divide its shares of higher denominations into smaller denominations. The company can do so only if it is authorized by the memorandum of association. In case there is sub-division of partly paid-up shares, the condition to be fulfilled is that the difference between the paid-up amount and unpaid amount continues to be the same. This way of alteration of share capital results in the holding of a greater number of shares in the hands of the shareholders with low denomination. The journal entry to be passed in this method is as follows:

Share Capital (Old) A/c    Dr.

     To Share Capital (New) A/c

Consolidation

  • Company can consolidate and divide its shares into shares of larger amount only if it is authorized by its Articles of Association and after obtaining approval of members by ordinary resolution. (Section 61(1)
  • Company shall ensure that proposed consolidation and division of shares shall not result in change in the voting percentage of shareholders. Otherwise, Company shall be required to approach Tribunal (at present, Company Law Board) seeking permission for proposed consolidation and division of shares resulting in change in the voting percentage of shareholders (Proviso to Section 61(1)(b))
  • A company may replace all the existing certificates by new certificates upon consolidation and division of shares subject to compliance with prescribed rules.

Surrender and Reissue/Cancellation

Cancel the unissued shares: the company can also cancel its unissued capital. But this does not leads to alteration of share capital. In this method, no journal entry is passed and no treatment is done in the books of the accounts.

Conversion of shares into stock: The Company can also alter its shares capital by converting the fully paid-up shares into the stock. Stock is the aggregate of fully paid-up shares.  The company can do so only if it is authorized by its articles of association. Also, the company can re convert its stock into shares.

The journal entries to be passed are as follows:

A) Conversion of shares into stock

Equity share capital A/c    Dr.

    To Equity Capital Stock A/c

B) Conversion of stock into shares

Equity Capital Stock A/c     Dr.

     To Equity Share Capital A/c

Reduction of share capital

Bailment and Pledge

Bailment is a legal relationship in which the owner of goods (called the bailor) delivers them to another person (called the bailee) for a specific purpose under a contract, with the understanding that the goods will be returned after the purpose is fulfilled or otherwise disposed of according to the bailor’s directions.

Bailment is governed by Sections 148 to 171 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

Definition (Section 148)

According to Section 148,

“A bailment is the delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose, upon a contract that they shall, when the purpose is accomplished, be returned or otherwise disposed of according to the directions of the person delivering them.”

Thus, bailment involves:

  • Delivery of goods

  • Specific purpose

  • Return or disposal of goods as instructed

Features of Bailment:

  1. Delivery of Goods
    Only movable goods (not immovable property or money) can be bailed. The delivery can be:

    • Actual delivery: Physical handing over of goods.

    • Constructive delivery: Transfer of possession without actual handover, like handing over keys to a godown.

  2. Contract
    Bailment must be based on a contract, express or implied. In some cases (e.g. finder of goods), bailment exists even without a formal agreement.

  3. Purpose
    Goods are delivered for a specific objective, such as safekeeping, transportation, or repair.

  4. Return of Goods
    The bailee must return the goods or dispose of them as per the bailor’s instructions once the purpose is fulfilled.

Duties of the Bailee:

  • Take reasonable care of goods (Section 151)

  • Not use goods for unauthorized purposes

  • Return goods on time (Section 160)

  • Return increase or profit (e.g., baby animals, interest on bonds)

Duties of the Bailor:

  • Disclose known faults in goods (Section 150)

  • Compensate bailee for losses due to defective goods

  • Pay agreed charges or expenses

Types of Bailment

  1. Gratuitous Bailment: Bailment without reward (e.g., lending a book to a friend).

  2. Bailment for Hire or Reward: Bailment with consideration (e.g., leaving a car with a valet or in a garage for service).

Termination of Bailment:

Bailment ends when:

  • The purpose is fulfilled

  • The agreed time expires

  • The bailee returns the goods

  • The bailor demands return (in some cases)

Examples of Bailment:

  • Giving clothes to a dry cleaner

  • Depositing valuables in a hotel locker

  • Lending a bicycle for a day

Pledge

Pledge is a special type of bailment, where goods are delivered by one party to another as security for repayment of a debt or performance of a promise. It is a commonly used concept in banking, lending, and commercial transactions involving collateral.

Pledge is governed by Sections 172 to 179 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

Definition (Section 172):

According to Section 172 of the Indian Contract Act:

“The bailment of goods as security for payment of a debt or performance of a promise is called a pledge.”

In this relationship:

  • The pawnor (pledgor) is the person who delivers the goods as security.

  • The pawnee (pledgee) is the person who receives the goods and holds them until the debt or obligation is fulfilled.

Essentials of a Valid Pledge

  1. Delivery of Possession
    There must be delivery of movable goods (not immovable property) by the pawnor to the pawnee. Delivery can be:

    • Actual: Physical handover of goods.

    • Constructive: Symbolic delivery (e.g., handing over documents of title like a warehouse receipt).

  2. Purpose – Security for Debt or Promise
    The pledge must be made as security for a debt repayment or the performance of a promise.

  3. Return of Goods
    Once the debt is repaid or the promise fulfilled, the pawnee must return the goods to the pawnor.

  4. Ownership Retained by Pawnor
    Ownership of the goods remains with the pawnor; only possession is transferred temporarily.

Rights of the Pawnee

  1. Right of Retention (Section 173)
    The pawnee can retain the goods pledged until the full payment of the debt or performance of the promise.

  2. Right to Recover Expenses (Section 175)
    If the pawnee incurs expenses in preserving or protecting the goods, he can recover those from the pawnor.

  3. Right to Sell (Section 176)
    If the pawnor defaults, the pawnee can:

    • Sue for the debt, retaining the goods, or

    • Sell the goods after giving reasonable notice to the pawnor.

Duties of the Pawnee:

  • Take reasonable care of the pledged goods.

  • Not use goods for unauthorized purposes.

  • Return goods upon repayment or performance of the promise.

Rights and Duties of the Pawnor:

  • Right to redeem goods before actual sale by the pawnee.

  • Duty to repay the debt or perform the promise.

  • Duty to compensate for any expenses incurred by the pawnee.

Pledge by Non-Owners (Section 178 & 179):

In certain cases, non-owners (like mercantile agents or persons with possession under a voidable contract) can make a valid pledge if:

  • They act in the ordinary course of business.

  • The pawnee acts in good faith and without knowledge of any defect in title.

Examples of Pledge:

  • Pledging gold ornaments with a bank for a loan.

  • A business pledging goods in a warehouse for working capital financing.

Key differences between Bailment and Pledge:

Aspect Bailment Pledge
Purpose Custody Security
Involves Goods only Movable goods
Parties Bailor, Bailee Pawnor, Pawnee
Ownership Retained Retained
Possession Temporary transfer Security transfer
Consideration May or may not Always
Right to Sell No Yes (on default)
Use of Goods With permission Not allowed
Right of Retention Limited Extended
Delivery Type Actual/Constructive Actual/Constructive
Governing Sections 148–171 172–179
Example Dry cleaning Gold loan
Compensation For damage For default
Return Obligation After use/purpose After repayment
Legal Remedy Sue only Sue or sell
error: Content is protected !!