Derecognition of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

Derecognition refers to the removal of an asset or liability (or a portion thereof) from an entity’s balance sheet. Derecognition questions can arise with respect to all types of assets and liabilities. This project focuses on financial instruments. Questions regarding derecognition of assets and liabilities often arise in the context of certain special purpose entities and whether those entities should be included in a set of consolidated financial statements.

Derecognition is the removal of a previously recognized financial asset or financial liability from an entity’s balance sheet. A financial asset should be derecognized if either the entity’s contractual rights to the asset’s cash flows have expired or the asset has been transferred to a third party (along with the risks and rewards of ownership). If the risks and rewards of ownership have not passed to the buyer, then the selling entity must still recognize the entire financial asset and treat any consideration received as a liability.

The IASB agreed to consider both a comprehensive project on derecognition or all types of assets and liabilities and also a separate, narrower scope project that would explore the need to revise guidance in IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement in the area of derecognition of financial instruments. This limited scope project would address questions that have arisen with regard to the application of conflicting aspects of IAS 39’s guidance on derecognition. The project would result in an amendment to IAS 39 possibly through issuance of a separate standard on derecognition that supersedes that section of IAS 39.

Standard IAS 39 provides extensive guidance on derecognition of a financial asset. Before deciding on derecognition, an entity must determine whether derecognition is related to:

  1. A financial asset (or a group of similar financial assets) in its entirety, or
  2. A part of a financial asset (or a part of a group of similar financial assets). The part must fulfil the following conditions (if not, then asset is derecognized in its entirety):
  • The part comprises only specifically defined cash flows from a financial asset (or group)
  • the part comprises only a fully proportionate (pro rata) share of the cash flows from a financial asset (or group)
  • the part comprises only a fully proportionate (pro rata) share of specifically identified cash flows from a financial asset (or group)

An entity shall derecognize the financial asset when:

  • The contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial asset expire, or
  • an entity transfers the financial asset and the transfer qualifies for the derecognition

Transfers of financial assets are discussed in more details. First of all, an entity must decide whether the asset was transferred or not. Then, if the financial asset was transferred, the entity must determine whether also risks and rewards from the financial asset were transferred.

Derecognition of a financial liability

A financial liability should be removed from the balance sheet when, and only when, it is extinguished, that is, when the obligation specified in the contract is either discharged or cancelled or expires. [IAS 39.39] Where there has been an exchange between an existing borrower and lender of debt instruments with substantially different terms, or there has been a substantial modification of the terms of an existing financial liability, this transaction is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original financial liability and the recognition of a new financial liability. A gain or loss from extinguishment of the original financial liability is recognised in profit or loss. [IAS 39.40-41]

Disclosures of Financial Instruments (Ind AS 107)

The objective of the Ind AS 107 is to require entities to provide disclosures in their financial statements that enable users to evaluate:

  • The significance of financial instruments for the entity’s financial position and performance; and
  • the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments to which the entity is exposed during the period and at the end of the  reporting period, and how the entity manages those

The qualitative disclosures describe management’s objectives, policies and processes for managing those risks. The quantitative disclosures provide information about the extent to which the entity is exposed to risk, based on information provided internally to the entity’s key management personnel. Together, these disclosures provide an overview of the entity’s use of financial instruments and the exposures to risks they create

The Ind AS applies to all entities, including entities that have few financial instruments (e.g., a manufacturer whose only financial instruments are accounts receivable and accounts payable) and those that have many financial instruments (e.g., a financial institution most of whose assets and liabilities are financial instruments).

When this Ind AS requires disclosures by class of financial instrument, an entity shall group financial instruments into classes that are appropriate to the nature of the information disclosed and that take into account the characteristics of those financial instruments. An entity shall provide sufficient information to permit reconciliation to the line items presented in the statement of financial position.

Objective

  1. The objective of this Indian Accounting Standard is to require entities to provide disclosures in their financial statements that enable users to evaluate:

(a) The significance of financial instruments for the entitys financial position and performance; and

(b) the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments to which the entity is exposed during the period and at the end of the reporting period, and how the entity manages those risks.

The principles in this Indian Accounting Standard complement the principles for recognising, measuring and presenting financial assets and financial liabilities in Ind AS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement and Ind AS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation.

Scope

This Indian Accounting Standard shall be applied by all entities to all types of financial instruments, except:

(a) Those interests in subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures that are accounted for in accordance with Ind AS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements, Ind AS 28 Investments in Associates or Ind AS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures. However, in some cases, Ind AS 27, Ind AS 28, and Ind AS 31 permits an entity to account for an interest in a subsidiary, associate or joint venture using Ind AS 39; in those cases, entities shall apply the requirements of this Indian Accounting Standard. Entities shall also apply this Indian Accounting Standard to all derivatives linked to interests in subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures unless the derivative meets the definition of an equity instrument in Ind AS 32.

(b) Employers rights and obligations arising from employee benefit plans, to which Ind AS 19 Employee Benefits applies.

(c) [Refer to Appendix 1]

(d) Insurance contracts as defined in Ind AS 104 Insurance Contracts. However, this Indian Accounting Standard applies to derivatives that are embedded in insurance contracts if Ind AS 39 requires the entity to account for them separately. Moreover, an issuer shall apply this Indian Accounting Standard to financial guarantee contracts if the issuer applies Ind AS 39 in recognising and measuring the contracts, but shall apply Ind AS 104 if the issuer elects, in accordance with paragraph 4(d) of Ind AS 104, to apply Ind AS 104 in recognising and measuring them.

(e) Financial instruments, contracts and obligations under share-based payment transactions to which Ind AS 102 Share-based Payment applies, except that this Indian Accounting Standard applies to contracts within the scope of paragraphs 57 of Ind AS 39.

(f) Instruments that are required to be classified as equity instruments in accordance with paragraphs 16A and 16B or paragraphs 16C and 16D of Ind AS 32.

This Indian Accounting Standard applies to recognised and unrecognised financial instruments. Recognised financial instruments include financial assets and financial liabilities that are within the scope of Ind AS 39. Unrecognised financial instruments include some financial instruments that, although outside the scope of Ind AS 39, are within the scope of this Indian Accounting Standard (such as some loan commitments).

This Indian Accounting Standard applies to contracts to buy or sell a non-financial item that are within the scope of Ind AS 39 (see paragraphs 57 of Ind AS 39).

Classes of Financial Instruments and Level of disclosure

When this Indian Accounting Standard requires disclosures by class of financial instrument, an entity shall group financial instruments into classes that are appropriate to the nature of the information disclosed and that take into account the characteristics of those financial instruments. An entity shall provide sufficient information to permit reconciliation to the line items presented in the balance sheet.

Financial Assets, Financial Liabilities Ind AS 32

Financial instrument: a contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity and a financial liability or equity instrument of another entity.

Financial Assets

Any asset that is:

  • Cash
  • An equity instrument of another entity
  • A contractual right

  1. to receive cash or another financial asset from another entity; or
  2. to exchange financial assets or financial liabilities with another entity under conditions that are potentially favourable to the entity; or

  • a contract that will or may be settled in the entity’s own equity instruments and is:
  • a non-derivative for which the entity is or may be obliged to receive a variable number of the entity’s own equity instruments
  • a derivative that will or may be settled other than by the exchange of a fixed amount of cash or another financial asset for a fixed number of the entity’s own equity instruments. For this purpose the entity’s own equity instruments do not include instruments that are themselves contracts for the future receipt or delivery of the entity’s own equity instruments
  • puttable instruments classified as equity or certain liabilities arising on liquidation classified by IAS 32 as equity instruments

Financial Liabilities

Any liability that is:

  1. a contractual obligation:
  • To deliver cash or another financial asset to another entity;
  • To exchange financial assets or financial liabilities with another entity under conditions that are potentially unfavourable to the entity; or
  1. a contract that will or may be settled in the entity’s own equity instruments and is
  • a non-derivative for which the entity is or may be obliged to deliver a variable number of the entity’s own equity instruments or
  • a derivative that will or may be settled other than by the exchange of a fixed amount of cash or another financial asset for a fixed number of the entity’s own equity instruments. For this purpose the entity’s own equity instruments do not include: instruments that are themselves contracts for the future receipt or delivery of the entity’s own equity instruments; puttable instruments classified as equity or certain liabilities arising on liquidation classified by IAS 32 as equity instruments

Equity instrument: Any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of an entity after deducting all of its liabilities.

Fair value: The amount for which an asset could be exchanged or a liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s length transaction.

The definition of financial instrument used in IAS 32 is the same as that in IAS 39.

Puttable instrument: a financial instrument that gives the holder the right to put the instrument back to the issuer for cash or another financial asset or is automatically put back to the issuer on occurrence of an uncertain future event or the death or retirement of the instrument holder.

Classification as liability or equity

The fundamental principle of IAS 32 is that a financial instrument should be classified as either a financial liability or an equity instrument according to the substance of the contract, not its legal form, and the definitions of financial liability and equity instrument. Two exceptions from this principle are certain puttable instruments meeting specific criteria and certain obligations arising on liquidation. The entity must make the decision at the time the instrument is initially recognised. The classification is not subsequently changed based on changed circumstances. [IAS 32.15]

A financial instrument is an equity instrument only if (a) the instrument includes no contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial asset to another entity and (b) if the instrument will or may be settled in the issuer’s own equity instruments, it is either:

  • A non-derivative that includes no contractual obligation for the issuer to deliver a variable number of its own equity instruments; or
  • A derivative that will be settled only by the issuer exchanging a fixed amount of cash or another financial asset for a fixed number of its own equity instruments. [ias 32.16]

Presentation of Financial Instruments (Ind AS 32) Meaning

Objective of IAS 32

The stated objective of IAS 32 is to establish principles for presenting financial instruments as liabilities or equity and for offsetting financial assets and liabilities. [IAS 32.1]

IAS 32 addresses this in a number of ways:

  • Clarifying the classification of a financial instrument issued by an entity as a liability or as equity
  • Prescribing the accounting for treasury shares (an entity’s own repurchased shares)
  • Prescribing strict conditions under which assets and liabilities may be offset in the balance sheet.

Parties to Financial Instruments: In case of Financial Instruments, the two parties are called:

  • Issuer of an Instrument who presents it on the Liability side of the Balance Sheet as per Schedule III- Division II.
  • Holder of an Instrument who presents it on the Asset side of the Balance Sheet as per Schedule III- Division II.

An analysis of Schedule III- Division II gives us an insight as under:

  1. Asset segregated into non-current and current; further segregated in terms on non-financial and financial in nature.
  2. Liability is segregated into Equity and Liability; liabilities are split in terms of non-current and current and further segregated in terms of non-financial and financial in nature.

IAS 32 applies in presenting and disclosing information about all types of financial instruments with the following exceptions: [IAS 32.4]

  • Interests in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures that are accounted for under IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements, IAS 28 Investments in Associates or IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures (or, for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements, IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements and IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures). However, IAS 32 applies to all derivatives on interests in subsidiaries, associates, or joint ventures.
  • Employers’ rights and obligations under employee benefit plans (see IAS 19 Employee Benefits)
  • Insurance contracts (see IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts). However, IAS 32 applies to derivatives that are embedded in insurance contracts if they are required to be accounted separately by IAS 39
  • Financial instruments that are within the scope of IFRS 4 because they contain a discretionary participation feature are only exempt from applying paragraphs 15-32 and AG25-35 (analysing debt and equity components) but are subject to all other IAS 32 requirements
  • Contracts and obligations under share-based payment transactions (see IFRS 2 Share-based Payment) with the following exceptions:
  • This standard applies to contracts within the scope of IAS 32.8-10 (see below)
  • Paragraphs 33-34 apply when accounting for treasury shares purchased, sold, issued or cancelled by employee share option plans or similar arrangements

Recognition and Measurement of Financial Instruments (Ind AS 39), Initial Recognition, Subsequent recognition of financial assets and Liabilities

Recognition and Measurement outlines the requirements for the recognition and measurement of financial assets, financial liabilities, and some contracts to buy or sell non-financial items. Financial instruments are initially recognised when an entity becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument, and are classified into various categories depending upon the type of instrument, which then determines the subsequent measurement of the instrument (typically amortised cost or fair value). Special rules apply to embedded derivatives and hedging instruments.

IAS 39 was reissued in December 2003, applies to annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005, and will be largely replaced by IFRS 9 Financial Instruments for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018.

Initial Recognition

IAS 39 requires recognition of a financial asset or a financial liability when, and only when, the entity becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument, subject to the following provisions in respect of regular way purchases. [IAS 39.14]

Regular way purchases or sales of a financial asset. A regular way purchase or sale of financial assets is recognised and derecognised using either trade date or settlement date accounting. [IAS 39.38] The method used is to be applied consistently for all purchases and sales of financial assets that belong to the same category of financial asset as defined in IAS 39 (note that for this purpose assets held for trading form a different category from assets designated at fair value through profit or loss). The choice of method is an accounting policy. [IAS 39.38]

IAS 39 requires that all financial assets and all financial liabilities be recognised on the balance sheet. That includes all derivatives. Historically, in many parts of the world, derivatives have not been recognised on company balance sheets. The argument has been that at the time the derivative contract was entered into, there was no amount of cash or other assets paid. Zero cost justified non-recognition, notwithstanding that as time passes and the value of the underlying variable (rate, price, or index) changes, the derivative has a positive (asset) or negative (liability) value.

Initial measurement

Initially, financial assets and liabilities should be measured at fair value (including transaction costs, for assets and liabilities not measured at fair value through profit or loss). [IAS 39.43]

Measurement subsequent to initial recognition

Subsequently, financial assets and liabilities (including derivatives) should be measured at fair value, with the following exceptions: [IAS 39.46-47]

  • Loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, and non-derivative financial liabilities should be measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
  • Investments in equity instruments with no reliable fair value measurement (and derivatives indexed to such equity instruments) should be measured at cost.
  • Financial assets and liabilities that are designated as a hedged item or hedging instrument are subject to measurement under the hedge accounting requirements of the IAS 39.
  • Financial liabilities that arise when a transfer of a financial asset does not qualify for derecognition, or that are accounted for using the continuing-involvement method, are subject to particular measurement requirements.

Fair value is the amount for which an asset could be exchanged, or a liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s length transaction. [IAS 39.9] IAS 39 provides a hierarchy to be used in determining the fair value for a financial instrument: [IAS 39 Appendix A, paragraphs AG69-82]

  • Quoted market prices in an active market are the best evidence of fair value and should be used, where they exist, to measure the financial instrument.
  • If a market for a financial instrument is not active, an entity establishes fair value by using a valuation technique that makes maximum use of market inputs and includes recent arm’s length market transactions, reference to the current fair value of another instrument that is substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis, and option pricing models. An acceptable valuation technique incorporates all factors that market participants would consider in setting a price and is consistent with accepted economic methodologies for pricing financial instruments.
  • If there is no active market for an equity instrument and the range of reasonable fair values is significant and these estimates cannot be made reliably, then an entity must measure the equity instrument at cost less impairment.

Amortised cost is calculated using the effective interest method. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or liability. Financial assets that are not carried at fair value though profit and loss is subject to impairment test. If expected life cannot be determined reliably, then the contractual life is used.

Recognition and Derecognition

A financial instrument is recognised in the financial statements when the entity becomes a party to the financial instrument contract. An entity removes a financial liability from its statement of financial position when its obligation is extinguished. An entity removes a financial asset from its statement of financial position when its contractual rights to the asset’s cash flows expire; when it has transferred the asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership; or when it has transferred the asset, and has retained some substantial risks and rewards of ownership, but the other party may sell the asset. The risks and rewards retained are recognised as an asset.

Measurement

A financial asset or financial liability is measured initially at fair value. Subsequent measurement depends on the category of financial instrument. Some categories are measured at amortised cost, and some at fair value. In limited circumstances other measurement bases apply, for example, certain financial guarantee contracts.

The following are measured at amortised cost:

  • held to maturity investments; non-derivative financial assets that the entity has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity;
  • loans and receivables; non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market; and
  • Financial liabilities that are not carried at fair value through profit or loss or otherwise required to be measured in accordance with another measurement basis.

The following are measured at fair value:

  • Financial assets and financial liabilities held for trading this category includes derivatives not designated as hedging instruments and financial assets and financial liabilities that the entity has designated for measurement at fair value. All changes in fair value are reported in profit or loss.
  • Available for sale financial assets: All financial assets that do not fall within one of the other categories. These are measured at fair value. Unrealised changes in fair value are reported in other comprehensive income. Realised changes in fair value (from sale or impairment) are reported in profit or loss at the time of realisation.

Classification of Lease Ind AS 17

A lease is classified as a finance lease if it transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incident to ownership. All other leases are classified as operating leases. Classification is made at the inception of the lease. [IAS 17.4]

Whether a lease is a finance lease or an operating lease depends on the substance of the transaction rather than the form. Situations that would normally lead to a lease being classified as a finance lease include the following: [IAS 17.10]

  • The lease transfers ownership of the asset to the lessee by the end of the lease term
  • The lessee has the option to purchase the asset at a price which is expected to be sufficiently
  • Lower than fair value at the date the option becomes exercisable that, at the inception of the lease, it is reasonably certain that the option will be exercised
  • The lease term is for the major part of the economic life of the asset, even if title is not transferred
  • At the inception of the lease, the present value of the minimum lease payments amounts to at least substantially all of the fair value of the leased asset
  • The lease assets are of a specialised nature such that only the lessee can use them without major modifications being made

Other situations that might also lead to classification as a finance lease are: [IAS 17.11]

  • If the lessee is entitled to cancel the lease, the lessor’s losses associated with the cancellation are borne by the lessee.
  • Gains or losses from fluctuations in the fair value of the residual fall to the lessee (for example, by means of a rebate of lease payments).
  • The lessee has the ability to continue to lease for a secondary period at a rent that is substantially lower than market rent

When a lease includes land and buildings elements, an entity assesses the classification of each element as finance or an operating lease separately. In determining whether the land element is an operating or a finance lease, an important consideration is that land normally has an indefinite economic life [IAS 17.15A]. Whenever necessary in order to classify and account for a lease of land and buildings, the minimum lease payments (including any lump-sum upfront payments) are allocated between the land and the buildings elements in proportion to the relative fair values of the leasehold interests in the land element and buildings element of the lease at the inception of the lease. [IAS 17.16] For a lease of land and buildings in which the amount that would initially be recognised for the land element is immaterial, the land and buildings may be treated as a single unit for the purpose of lease classification and classified as a finance or operating lease. [IAS 17.17] However, separate measurement of the land and buildings elements is not required if the lessee’s interest in both land and buildings is classified as an investment property in accordance with IAS 40 and the fair value model is adopted. [IAS 17.18]

Finance lease indicators

There are many risks and rewards outlined within the standard, but for the purpose of the Paper F7 exam there are several important areas. The main reward is where the lessee has the right to use the asset for most of, or all of, its useful economic life. The primary risks are where the lessee pays to insure, maintain and repair the asset.

When the risks and rewards remain with the lessee, the substance is such that even though the lessee is not the legal owner of the asset, the commercial reality is that they have acquired an asset with finance from the leasing company and, therefore, an asset and liability should be recognised.

Other indicators that a lease is a finance lease include:

  • At the inception of the lease the present value of the minimum lease payments amounts to substantially all of the fair value of the asset
  • The lease agreement transfers ownership of the asset to the lessee by the end of the lease
  • The leased asset is of a specialised nature
  • The lessee has the option to purchase the asset at a price expected to be substantially lower than the fair value at the date the option becomes exercisable

Finance lease accounting

Initial accounting

The initial accounting is that the lessee should capitalise the finance leased asset and set up a lease liability for the value of the asset recognised. The accounting for this will be:

Dr Non-current assets

Cr Finance lease liability

(This should be done by using the lower of the fair value of the asset or the present value of the minimum lease payments*.)

*Note: The present value of the minimum lease payments is essentially the lease payments over the life of the lease discounted to present value you will either be given this figure in the Paper F7 exam or, if not, use the fair value of the asset. You will not be expected to calculate the minimum lease payments.

All other leases are classified as operating leases.

  1. Substance over form: Whether a lease is a finance lease or an operating lease depends on the substance of the transaction rather than the form.
  2. Indicators to classify finance Lease: Indicators of situations that individually or in combination could also lead to a lease being classified as a finance lease are:
  • If the lessee is entitled to cancel the lease, the lessor’s losses associated with the cancellation are borne by the lessee
  • Gains or losses from fluctuations in the fair value of the residual accrue to the lessee (for example, by means of a rebate of lease payments)
  • The lessee has the ability to continue the lease for a secondary period at a rent that is substantially lower than market rent.

Commencement of Lease term, Minimum Lease Payments, Fair Value Ind AS 17

At the commencement of the lease term, lessees recognise finance leases as assets and liabilities in their statements of financial position at amounts equal to the fair value of the leased property or, if lower, the present value of the minimum lease payments, each determined at the inception of the lease.

Any initial direct costs of the lessee are added to the amount recognised as an asset. Minimum lease payments are apportioned between the finance charge and the reduction of the outstanding liability. The finance charge is allocated to each period during the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Contingent rents are charged as expenses in the periods in which they are incurred. A finance lease gives rise to depreciation expense for the recognised lease assets as well as finance expense for each accounting period.

“At the inception of the Lease, the present value of Minimum Lease Payment amounts to at least substantially (i.e. at least 90%) all of the fair value of the leasehold land”.

In case the above condition is fulfilled, the lessee should present the leasehold land under “Property Plant and Equipment”.

Further, if there is reasonable certainty that the lessee will obtain ownership at the end of the lease term then the land shall not be depreciated else shall be depreciated over the lease term or useful life whichever is lower.

For the purpose of classification of Land and Building separately, following methods are followed:

  • The Minimum Lease Payments (including lumpsum upfront payments) are allocated between the land and buildings in proportion to the relative fair values of the leasehold interest in the land and building at the inception of lease.
  • If the lease payments cannot be allocated reliably, the entire lease is classified as a finance lease unless it is clear that both elements are operating lease, in which the entire lease is classified as an operating lease.
  • If the land value is immaterial, the land and building may be treated as a single unit for the purpose of lease classification. In such case the economic life of the building is regarded as the economic life of the entire leased asset.

Finance lease accounting

Initial accounting

The initial accounting is that the lessee should capitalise the finance leased asset and set up a lease liability for the value of the asset recognised. The accounting for this will be:

Dr Non-current assets

Cr Finance lease liability

(This should be done by using the lower of the fair value of the asset or the present value of the minimum lease payments.)

Note: The present value of the minimum lease payments is essentially the lease payments over the life of the lease discounted to present value you will either be given this figure in the Paper F7 exam or, if not, use the fair value of the asset. You will not be expected to calculate the minimum lease payments.

Subsequent accounting

Depreciation

Following the initial capitalisation of the leased asset, depreciation should be charged on the asset over the shorter of the lease term or the useful economic life of the asset. The accounting for this will be:

Dr Depreciation expense

Cr Accumulated depreciation

When a company pays a rental, in effect it is making a capital repayment (ie against the lease obligation) and an interest payment. The impact of this will need to be shown within the financial statements in the form of a finance cost in the statement of profit or loss and a reduction of the outstanding liability in the statement of financial position. In reality there are several ways that this can be done, but the Paper F7 examiner has stated that he will examine the actuarial method only.

The actuarial method of accounting for a finance lease allocates the interest to the period it actually relates to, ie the finance cost is higher when the capital outstanding is greatest, but as the capital gets repaid, interest payments become lower (similar to a repayment mortgage that you may have on your property). To allocate the interest to a specific period you will require the interest rate implicit within the lease agreement again this will be provided in the exam and you are not required to calculate it.

One of the easiest ways to apply the actuarial method in the exam is to use a leasing table. Please take note of when the rental payment is actually due, is it in advance (ie rental made at beginning of the lease year) or is it in arrears (ie rental made at the end of the lease year)? This will affect the completion of the lease table as highlighted below:

Leases in the Financial Statements of Lessees Ind AS 17

Finance lease:

At commencement of the lease term, leases should be recorded as an asset and a liability at the lower of the fair value of the asset and the present value of the minimum lease payments (discounted at the interest rate implicit in the lease, if practicable, or else at the entity’s incremental borrowing rate).

Minimum lease payments shall be apportioned between the finance charge and the reduction of the outstanding liability. The finance charge to be allocated so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability.

The depreciation policy for depreciable leased assets should be consistent with that for owned assets.

If there is no reasonable certainty that the lessee will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term, the asset should be fully depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and its useful life.

Operating leases:

The lease payments should be recognised as an expense over the lease term on a straight-line basis, unless another systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern of the user’s benefit.

The following principles should be applied in the financial statements of lessees:

  • At commencement of the lease term, finance leases should be recorded as an asset and a liability at the lower of the fair value of the asset and the present value of the minimum lease payments (discounted at the interest rate implicit in the lease, if practicable, or else at the entity’s incremental borrowing rate) [IAS 17.20].
  • Finance lease payments should be apportioned between the finance charge and the reduction of the outstanding liability (the finance charge to be allocated so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability) [IAS 17.25].
  • The depreciation policy for assets held under finance leases should be consistent with that for owned assets. If there is no reasonable certainty that the lessee will obtain ownership at the end of the lease the asset should be depreciated over the shorter of the lease term or the life of the asset [IAS 17.27].
  • For operating leases, the lease payments should be recognised as an expense in the income statement over the lease term on a straight-line basis, unless another systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern of the user’s benefit [IAS 17.33]

Defined benefit plans, Other long-term employee benefits Ind AS 19

Any Plan which suggests or mandated by Law to pay employees “agreed benefits” (Determinable by various means). Further Any Actuarial Risk will be borne by Employer.

Employer’s obligation is to provide the agreed benefits to current and former employees and the actuarial and investment risk fall, in substance is on the employer. Examples are pension, gratuity, post-employment medical benefit, etc. Contribution and benefit plans can be varied like State plans, multi-Employer plans or Insured plans and they require separate disclosures in the financial statement.

Recognition of defined benefit cost

Component Recognition
Recognizing current and past periods service cost P&L
Recognize the net interest on the net defined benefit liability or asset arrived using discount rate (beginning of an accounting period) P&L
Remeasurement of defined benefit liability or asset consisting of: Actuarial gains/losses Return on plan assets Changes in the asset ceiling effect Other comprehensive income (should not be reclassified to P&L in subsequent period)

Other long-term employee benefits are all employee benefits other than short-term employee benefits, post-employment benefits and termination benefits.

The Standard does not require the measurement of other long -term employee benefits to the same degree of uncertainty as the measurement of post-employment benefits. The Standard requires a simplified method of accounting for other long-term employee benefits. Unlike the accounting required for post-employment benefits, this method does not recognise re- measurements in other comprehensive income.

Accounting treatment for defined benefit plan by an employer

  • Make reliable estimate of the employee benefit amount using actuarial techniques.
  • Discount such benefit using PUCM* to determine the present value of the benefit obligation and also the current service cost.
  • Determine the fair value of any plan assets.
  • Determine the total actuarial gain/losses to be recognized in other comprehensive income.
  • On introduction or change of a plan, determine the past service cost.
  • On curtailment or settlement of a plan, determine the resulting gain/loss.

Under PUCM, each period of employee service gives rise to an additional unit of benefit and such units are measured separately and added to the final obligation. It is applying the present value concept and recognizing a future value as on the balance sheet date. Actuarial gain/losses can result in an increase or decrease in either present value of a defined benefit obligation or the fair value of plan assets. Past service cost is the change in the present value of defined benefit obligations caused by employee service in prior periods.

Actuarial Valuation and Assumptions

Actuarial valuation for employee benefits aims to calculate the present value of benefit payment that will be paid to an employee in future as part of a benefit plan. Calculation of defined benefit obligation is the first step in this valuation. For the above valuation, actuaries will make assumptions to determine how likely an employee is to resign or die prior to the retirement age, how the employee salaries are expected to increase, etc.

In order to arrive at these, actuaries use probabilities for various events which are termed as actuaries’ assumptions. Actuarial assumptions should be unbiased and mutually compatible and cover both financial & demographic assumptions. Financial assumptions should be based on market expectations and also include:

Final Assumptions Demographic Assumptions
Discount rate Probable mortality rate
Employee salary escalation Employee Attrition rate
Medical cost escalation Probable disability

Recognition & Measurement

The net total of the following should be recognized in P&L, except to the extent that another IND AS permits or requires their inclusion in the asset cost:

  • Service cost
  • Net interest on the net defined benefit liability (asset)
  • Re-measurements of the net defined benefit liability (asset)

PUCM is used to actuarially value the other long-term benefits.

Employee Benefits Ind AS 19

The Indian Accounting Standard (Ind AS) 19 aims to prescribe accounting and disclosure for employee benefits. It requires recognition of the liability by an entity when an employee provides services for employee benefits to be paid in the future, and recognition of expenses when the entity utilises the economic benefit arising from service given by an employee in exchange for employee benefits.

For example, when an employee works for a company, the company derives benefit from the effort put in by the employee. Thus, it can be said that the company consumes the services rendered by the employee, and in this case the company will recognise this as an expenditure. And consequently, a liability arises to the employee that is payable by the company which is equivalent to the benefits that are payable by the company.

The liability can be in the form of salaries which are payable every month, or sometimes the liabilities can be carried forward and be payable on retirement, or after completion of a few years. These depend on the nature of the contract between the employer and employee, and all such benefits that are agreed upon to be paid to the employee need to be accounted for. Under Ind AS 19, even constructive obligations need to be accounted for. For example, this may include a festival bonus (like Eid Bonus or Diwali Bonus) which may not be a legal or contractual requirement, but one which the employer voluntarily provides and is followed based on precedence (ie. The company may have paid the same in the previous year, and the employee would expect it).

Accounting for Short Term Employee Benefits

Short term employee benefits are settled within a period of 12 months from the end of the period in which the services were rendered by the employee. Examples include salaries, paid annual leave, rental accommodation, car benefit etc. They are accounted on a undiscounted basis because the settlement is expected to happen within the short term. Short Term Employee Benefits are recognised as

A liability after deducting the amount paid within the year.

As an asset, if the amount paid exceeds the undiscounted amount of the benefits payable.

As an expense in the profit and loss

Example of accounting for Short Term Employee Benefits

Consider an employee with salary of 10,000 Rs per month and 1 month bonus payable every year. If at the end of the year, 2 months salary along with bonus are unpaid, then these are recognised as a liability. However if 2 months extra salary has been paid to the employee, then it is treated as an asset.

For Short term employee benefits, no specific disclosures are required under Ind AS 19.

Post-Employment Benefits: Defined Contribution Plans

Post-Employee benefit schemes where the obligation of an entity is to only contribute to a plan, and no further obligation arises on the entity is known as a Defined Contribution plan.

Defined Contribution Plans are recognised as

  • A liability after deducting the amount paid within the year.
  • As an asset, if excess amount has been contributed.
  • As an expense in the profit and loss

If the contribution is due within 12 months, then no discounting factor is applied. When the contributions do not fall due within 12 months of the end of the reporting period, then it should be discounted using the discount rate.

Example of Defined Contribution Plan Accounting

Lets say a company contributes 10% of every employee’s salary to a employee benefits plan. In this case, the company takes up no further obligation. The Company should account this contribution, amounting to 10% of its salary to the profit and loss account as an expense.

Post-Employment Benefits: Defined Benefits Plan

While Ind AS 19 prescribes accounting for many types of employee benefits such as long term paid absences, long service benefits, profit sharing / bonus schemes and termination benefits, post-employment benefits of a Defined Benefit Plan are accounted with additional complexity under Ind AS 19. The complexity of accounting for post-employment benefits is high, since it requires the use of actuarial assumptions relating to the demographics of the company/industry and also financial assumptions related to the overall economy.

Accrual of Benefits

Post employment benefit schemes with a Defined Benefit Plan are usually structured in a way that the employees gain the benefit for each year of service they have rendered to the company. This benefit is accrued over time, and when the employee leaves the service, the entire benefit is payable to the employee. This is the accrual system of accounting for employee benefits. Under Ind AS 19, the Projected Unit Credit method of accounting is prescribed for calculation of employee benefits, taking into account the accruing nature of these benefits. The basic premise of the PUC method is that each year of service rendered by an employee will give rise to one unit of benefit entitlement to the employee.

PUC Method

Under the PUC method of accounting, a projected accrued benefit is calculated at the begging of the year, and again at the end of the year for all the employees under the plan. The employee’s benefit will depend on years of service and also considers the future salary increase and the plan’s benefit allocation formula. The Benefit attributable to an employee on a future separation date (date of retirement) is the benefit defined under the plan based on credited service as on the valuation date. The “projected accrued benefit” is based on the Scheme’s accrual formula and upon service as of the beginning or end of the year, but using a member’s final compensation, projected to the age at which the employee is assumed to leave active service. The Scheme Liability is the actuarial present value of the “projected accrued benefits” as of the beginning of the year for active members. An individual’s estimated benefit obligation is the present value of the attributed benefit for valuation purposes at the beginning of the year, and the service cost is the present value of the benefit attributed to the year of service in the plan year.

Important Aspects of Defined Benefit Plan Accounting

The present value of a defined benefit obligation is the present day value of post-employment benefits based on the employee’s future salary, resulting from the employee’s service in the current and past periods. The Plan Assets are measured at fair value as on the balance sheet date. The Net obligation is recognised in the profit and loss account as an expenditure, along with a corresponding liability.

Example: In a funded plan having net obligations as 10 crores, and plan assets as 8 crores. In this case, 2 crores is the expense that the company has to make towards the DBO, and this is treated as an expense in the company’s profit and a corresponding liability is accounted.   

Current Service Cost is the cost incurred to the company due to the employee rendering service in the current year. If the employee renders no service, the current service cost is zero. For a Defined benefit obligation, current service cost can be defined as the increase in the present value of defined benefits obligation due to the employee’s service in the current year.

Interest Cost is the increase in defined benefits obligations that arise due to the passage of time. The present value of the DBO increases in a year, because the benefits are one time period closer to settlement. This is captured in interest cost.

Past Service Cost is the changes in present value of DBO due to plan amendments or curtailment. This may arise due to change in the nature of plan. For example, a company may amend the plan to increase the value of its defined benefit payable to its employees. This would result in recognition of the amounts that were not recognised earlier. In the alternative scenario for a plan curtailment, the company may curtail the bonus that is payable to employees who have completed 10 years of service from 6 month’s salary to 3 month’s salary. Thus, the employees will lose some benefits due to curtailment of the plan. These are captured in past service cost.

Plan Assets include the assets held by the Defined Benefit Plan in an employee benefits fund, or any insurance policy that is designed for employee benefit schemes.

Actuarial Gains/Losses are the changes in the DBO due to changes in actuarial assumptions. When accounting for defined benefit plans and post-employment benefits, certain assumptions have to be made on factors such as salary growth rate, attrition rate etc. Changes in these assumptions results in actuarial gain/loss. For example, salary growth rate of a company may fall from 10% to 3% due to economic slowdown. The gain or loss due to this change is known as actuarial gain/loss. These are treated as unrealised gains or losses, and is not debited to the profit and loss account but is captured in the Other Comprehensive Income (OCI).

Accounting for DBO

In the Profit and Loss account, the following components are recognised:

Under the head Service Cost: the current service cost, past service costs, settlements and curtailments (if any);

Under the head Net Interest Cost: Net Interest expense on DBO, Interest on Plan Assets, and interest on the effect of asset ceiling;

Additionally, any administrative expenses and taxes.

Accounting For Other Long Term Employee Benefits

Employee Benefits that are expected to be settled after 12 months from from the end of the period in which the services are rendered, but are not a post-employment benefits or termination/retrenchment benefit are called Other Long Term Employee Benefits . For example, the employee may be entitled to a loyalty bonus after working for 10 years. This is an Other Long Term Employee Benefit. Other examples include long service award or jubilee awards, long term compensated absences, and long term disability benefits.

Other Long Term Employee Benefits are accounted using the Projected Unit Credit Method in a similar method as that of Defined Benefit Plans, however the actuarial gains and losses arising out of Other Long Term Employee Benefit plans are not considered under the OCI but are considered in the profit and loss account. The components charged to the profit and loss account are service cost, net interest on the net defined benefit liability,

Accounting For Termination Benefits

Termination benefits arise when an employee is terminated by the employer or when an employee accepts the employer’s offer of benefits in exchange of termination of employment. This is different to post-employment benefits. Classic example of termination benefits is retrenchment compensation where the employee has no option to accept the termination. Voluntary Retirement Scheme is also an example of termination benefits where the employees are due a compensation and in return accept early retirement.

Termination Benefits are to be recognised on the earlier date of when the company can no longer withdraw the offer of the termination benefits, or when the company recognises costs for restructuring which involves the payment of termination benefits. For instance, a company may face debt restructuring and accordingly, several employees would have to be laid off, and the termination benefits would be recognised.

Measurement of Termination Benefits

Termination Benefits are measured based on the criteria considering if they are an enhancement to post-employment benefits. If they are an enhancement to post-employment benefits (for instance payable after retirement), then they are accounted as per Defined Contribution Plan or Defined Benefit Plan, as the case maybe. If they are not an enhancement to post-employment benefits, based on whether the termination benefits are expected to be settled within 12months they are accounted as either Short Term Employee Benefits (for cases when the settlement is within 12 months) or Other Long Term Employee Benefits (for other cases).

error: Content is protected !!