Remedies available to the Patent owner for Infringement of Patent Rights

Patent rights give the patent owner exclusive authority to make, use, sell, or distribute the patented invention for a specified period. In India, when any person uses a patented invention without the consent of the patent holder, it is considered a patent infringement under the Indian Patents Act, 1970. The patent owner has legal remedies to protect their rights, which may be enforced through civil litigation. The courts in India can grant various forms of relief such as injunctions, damages, account of profits, delivery-up, and seizure of infringing goods. These remedies aim to stop further infringement and compensate for the losses.

•  Injunction

An injunction is the most common and immediate remedy available to a patent owner. It is a court order directing the infringer to cease the unauthorized use of the patented invention. There are two types of injunctions—interim (temporary) and permanent. An interim injunction is granted during the pendency of the trial to prevent ongoing damage. A permanent injunction is issued after the court establishes infringement and grants final relief. Indian courts consider factors like prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable harm before granting an injunction. This remedy helps the patent owner stop further illegal exploitation of the invention.

• Damages

The patent owner is entitled to claim monetary damages for the loss suffered due to the infringement. Damages aim to put the patent holder in the financial position they would have been in had the infringement not occurred. Courts may assess damages based on lost profits, reasonable royalties, or loss of goodwill. In India, punitive damages are not commonly awarded in patent cases unless bad faith or wilful infringement is established. The burden of proving the quantum of loss lies on the plaintiff. If the patentee is unable to demonstrate actual loss, the court may still award nominal damages.

• Account of Profits

Instead of damages, a patent owner may choose to claim an account of profits. This remedy requires the infringer to disclose and pay all profits earned through unauthorized use of the patent. Unlike damages, which compensate for the loss to the patentee, account of profits focuses on the gain made by the infringer. This is an equitable remedy, meaning the court has discretion whether to grant it. A patent owner must choose between damages or account of profits—not both. The remedy ensures that the infringer does not unjustly benefit from someone else’s innovation and discourages willful violations of patent rights.

• Seizure or Delivery-up of Infringing Goods

Another remedy available to the patent owner is seizure, forfeiture, or destruction of infringing goods, materials, or equipment used in manufacturing the infringing products. The court may order the delivery-up of these items to the patent owner to prevent further infringement. This remedy is especially useful in commercial-scale violations where infringing goods are widely circulated in the market. It helps clean the market of illegal products and safeguards the patentee’s market share and reputation. This remedy also serves as a deterrent against future violations by removing all tools or outcomes of the infringement from the possession of the violator.

• Anton Piller Orders

The Anton Piller order is a form of search and seizure order granted by the court to prevent the destruction of infringing evidence. It allows the patent owner to enter the premises of the alleged infringer without prior notice and seize documents, samples, or devices related to the infringement. This remedy is granted in cases where there is a real danger that the defendant may destroy vital evidence. Though rarely granted, this remedy is powerful and ensures that justice is not obstructed due to lack of evidence. It reflects the seriousness of intellectual property protection under Indian civil law.

• Groundless Threats Action

Sometimes, a person may threaten others with legal action for patent infringement without any valid legal basis. The Indian Patents Act allows any person aggrieved by such groundless threats to approach the court for relief. The court may declare that the threats are unjustified and issue an injunction to restrain the threatening party. This provision protects businesses from undue harassment and ensures that patent rights are not misused to curb fair competition. However, the patentee may escape liability under this provision by proving the validity of the patent and actual infringement by the alleged party.

• Criminal Liability

Although patent infringement is largely a civil wrong in India, criminal remedies may be applicable in certain cases involving counterfeit patented goods. For example, under other laws such as the Indian Penal Code, criminal charges may be invoked if the infringer commits cheating, forgery, or fraud in the course of patent infringement. While the Patents Act itself does not prescribe criminal punishment for infringement, the affected party can approach the authorities if the infringement involves deception of consumers or forgery of documentation. However, this is rare, and most disputes are settled through civil suits and equitable remedies.