Narasimhan Committee Recommendations

The Narasimham Committee (1991) was formed to reform India’s banking sector post-liberalization. It recommended reducing SLR (Statutory Liquidity Ratio) and CRR (Cash Reserve Ratio), introducing prudential norms for NPAs, and promoting operational autonomy for banks.

The second Narasimham Committee (1998) focused on strengthening banking governance, suggesting mergers of weak banks, higher foreign bank participation, and stricter risk management. These reforms enhanced financial stability, improved credit efficiency, and paved the way for a modern, competitive banking system in India.

• Reduction in Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) and Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR)

The committee recommended reducing SLR and CRR to increase the availability of credit in the economy. Lowering these reserve requirements allowed banks to lend more to businesses and individuals, enhancing economic growth and financial sector efficiency by ensuring better fund utilization.

• Phased Reduction of Priority Sector Lending (PSL)

The committee suggested gradually reducing mandatory priority sector lending to enhance banking efficiency. It proposed limiting PSL to 10% of total credit while focusing on genuinely deserving sectors like agriculture and small businesses, ensuring that credit allocation was more market-driven rather than being dictated by government policies.

• Capital Adequacy Norms

To strengthen the financial health of banks, the committee recommended adopting international capital adequacy norms based on the Basel framework. It suggested that banks maintain a minimum capital-to-risk-weighted assets ratio (CRAR) to ensure financial stability and resilience against economic shocks, thus improving banking sector robustness.

• Autonomy to Public Sector Banks

The committee recommended granting more autonomy to public sector banks (PSBs) in decision-making, reducing political interference. This included allowing banks to set their own policies, manage recruitment, and make lending decisions based on commercial viability, helping PSBs become more competitive and efficient.

• Rationalization of Branch Licensing Policy

To promote operational efficiency, the committee suggested relaxing branch licensing policies. Instead of government-mandated branch expansion, banks should be allowed to open or close branches based on business potential and profitability. This would help banks focus on viable locations and optimize resource allocation.

• Strengthening of the Banking Supervision System

The committee recommended improving banking supervision by setting up the Board for Financial Supervision (BFS) under the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). This was aimed at ensuring better monitoring of banking operations, enforcing prudential norms, and reducing frauds, thereby enhancing the overall health of the banking sector.

• Encouraging the Entry of Private and Foreign Banks

To enhance competition and efficiency, the committee recommended allowing private sector and foreign banks to operate in India. This led to better financial services, improved customer experience, and increased efficiency in the banking system by introducing modern technology and global best practices.

• Asset Classification and Provisioning Norms

The committee emphasized the need for stricter asset classification and provisioning norms to address the problem of non-performing assets (NPAs). Banks were required to categorize loans based on their recovery status and make adequate provisions for bad loans, ensuring transparency and financial discipline.

• Debt Recovery Mechanisms

To resolve bad debts, the committee recommended establishing special tribunals for speedy recovery of non-performing loans. This led to the creation of Debt Recovery Tribunals (DRTs), which helped banks recover dues faster and improved financial discipline among borrowers, reducing the burden of NPAs.

• Establishment of Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs)

To deal with mounting NPAs, the committee suggested the formation of Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs). These companies would buy bad loans from banks and recover them efficiently. This allowed banks to clean up their balance sheets and focus on fresh lending.

• Reduction in Government Ownership in Banks

The committee recommended reducing government stake in public sector banks to below 50%, allowing for greater private participation. This aimed to improve efficiency, accountability, and competitiveness, as banks would operate based on market principles rather than government control.

• Development of Government Securities Market

The committee suggested strengthening the government securities (G-Secs) market to make it more transparent and efficient. It proposed a shift towards market-determined interest rates on government borrowing, reducing reliance on captive funding from banks and promoting competition in the financial system.

• Technology Upgradation in Banking

Recognizing the role of technology in improving banking efficiency, the committee recommended digitization and automation of banking processes. This included the introduction of computerized banking operations, electronic fund transfers, and online banking services to enhance customer experience and operational efficiency.

• Adoption of Universal Banking

The committee suggested that banks diversify their operations to include investment banking, insurance, and other financial services. This concept of universal banking aimed to make financial institutions more resilient and capable of catering to a wide range of customer needs under one roof.

• Strengthening Rural and Cooperative Banking System

To improve credit access in rural areas, the committee recommended restructuring rural and cooperative banks. It emphasized better governance, financial discipline, and reduced political interference to ensure that these institutions could effectively support agriculture and rural enterprises.

• Phased Deregulation of Interest Rates

The committee recommended a gradual move toward market-driven interest rates. Instead of government-imposed rates, banks should be allowed to determine lending and deposit rates based on market conditions, leading to more efficient credit allocation and financial stability.

• Introduction of Risk Management Practices

To enhance financial sector resilience, the committee stressed the need for better risk management systems in banks. It proposed the adoption of global best practices in credit risk assessment, operational risk management, and liquidity risk management to ensure long-term stability.

• Mergers and Consolidation of Banks

To create stronger financial institutions, the committee recommended the consolidation of weaker banks through mergers and acquisitions. This would help build a more robust banking sector capable of competing globally while reducing operational inefficiencies and risks.

• Improving Governance in Banks

The committee emphasized the need for improved governance in banks by reducing bureaucratic control and enhancing the role of professional management. It recommended independent boards, better internal control mechanisms, and performance-based evaluation of bank executives.

• Enhancing the Role of RBI as a Regulator

The committee proposed that the RBI should focus more on its role as a regulator rather than a direct participant in financial markets. Strengthening its supervisory and policy-making functions would help maintain financial stability and ensure that banks followed prudential norms effectively.