Tag: Capital Structure

A dividend is a reward for the shareholders of a company for investing in the company and continuing to be a part of it. Dividend distribution is a part of the financing decision for a company. The management has to decide what percentage of profits they shall give away as dividends over a period of time. They retain the balance for the internal use of the company in the future. It acts as an internal source of finance for the company. Dividend theories suggest how the value of the company is affected by the decision to distribute the profits as dividends by the management. It further affects on account of the frequency of dividend distribution and the quantum of dividend distribution over the years.

Both types of dividend theories rely upon several assumptions to suggest whether the dividend policy affects the value of a company or not. However, many of these assumptions do not stand in the real world. They have been used only to simplify the situation and the theory.

For example, suppose the management of a particular company decides to cut down on the dividend payout and retain more of its earnings. According to the Walter model, this happens when the internal ROI is greater than the cost of capital of the company. However, in reality, this may not mean that it has better use of the funds in hand and can provide a higher ROI than its cost of capital. The company may be going through a tough phase and needs more finance. Moreover, many assumptions in the above models, such as that of constant ROI, cost of capital and absence of taxes, transaction costs, and floatation costs, do not hold ground in the real world. A perfect capital market rarely exists, and investment opportunities, as well as future profits, can never be certain.

Several theories have been proposed to explain the determinants and implications of dividend policy adopted by companies. These theories provide insights into why companies choose to pay dividends, how they make dividend decisions, and how these decisions impact shareholder wealth.

Each dividend theory provides a different perspective on the factors influencing dividend policy. While some theories emphasize investor preferences and signaling, others highlight the irrelevance of dividend decisions in a perfect market. In practice, companies often consider a combination of these theories, taking into account their financial situation, growth opportunities, and the preferences of their shareholder base when determining their dividend policies.

1. Modigliani-Miller (MM) Propositions:

Developed by Franco Modigliani and Merton Miller, MM propositions argue that, in a perfect capital market, dividend policy is irrelevant. Investors are assumed to be indifferent between dividends and capital gains.

• Propositions:
  • Dividend Irrelevance Proposition: The value of a firm is not affected by its dividend policy.
  • Homemade Dividends: Investors can create their desired cash flow by buying or selling shares, making dividend policy irrelevant.

2. Bird-in-Hand Theory (Myron Gordon):

The Bird-in-Hand theory suggests that investors prefer receiving dividends today rather than waiting for uncertain capital gains in the future. The theory is associated with Myron Gordon.

• Propositions:
  • Investors perceive certain dividends as more valuable than potential future capital gains.
  • Dividend payments provide investors with tangible returns and reduce uncertainty.

3. Clientele Effect (John Lintner):

John Lintner proposed the clientele effect, suggesting that firms attract a specific group (clientele) of investors based on their dividend policy.

• Propositions:
  • Companies tend to have a consistent dividend policy to cater to the preferences of their existing shareholder base.
  • Investors with different preferences self-select into firms that match their desired dividend profile.

4. Signaling Theory (Myron Gordon and John Lintner):

Signaling theory suggests that firms use dividend policy to convey information to the market about their financial health and future prospects.

• Propositions:
  • Companies with stable dividends signal financial stability and confidence in future earnings.
  • Dividend changes can convey positive or negative information about a company’s prospects.

5. Residual Theory (Walter’s Model):

Proposed by James E. Walter, the residual theory suggests that a company should pay dividends from residual earnings after meeting its investment needs.

• Propositions:
  • Dividends are paid from what remains after funding all acceptable investment opportunities.
  • It emphasizes the importance of maintaining a balance between retained earnings and dividends.

6. Linter’s Model of Dividend Determination:

John Lintner expanded on his clientele effect work with a model that aims to explain how companies set their dividend policies over time.

• Propositions:
  • Companies target a specific dividend payout ratio based on their earnings and stability.
  • Dividend changes are gradual and influenced by past dividends.

7. Dividend Stability Theory (Gordon and Shapiro):

Building on the Bird-in-Hand theory, Gordon and Shapiro propose that investors prefer a stable dividend policy as it provides a reliable income stream.

• Propositions:
  • Companies should establish and maintain a stable dividend payout to satisfy investor preferences.
  • Stable dividends contribute to investor confidence and loyalty.

8. Tax Preference Theory:

The tax preference theory suggests that investors may prefer capital gains over dividends due to favorable tax treatment.

• Propositions:
  • Capital gains may be more tax-efficient for investors than receiving dividends, especially in jurisdictions with preferential capital gains tax rates.
  • Investors might prefer companies that prioritize share price appreciation over dividends.

Financial Criteria for Capital Allocation

Capital allocation is about where and how a corporation’s chief executive officer (CEO) decides to spend the money that the company has earned. Capital allocation means distributing and investing a company’s financial resources in ways that will increase its efficiency, and maximize its profits.

A firm’s management seeks to allocate its capital in ways that will generate as much wealth as possible for its shareholders. Allocating capital is complicated, and a company’s success or failure often hinges upon a CEO’s capital-allocation decisions. Management must consider the viability of the available investment options, evaluate each one’s potential effects on the firm, and allocate the additional funds appropriately and in a manner that will produce the best overall results for the firm.

Greater-than-expected profits and positive cash flows, however desirable, often present a quandary for a CEO, as there may be a great many investment options to weigh. Some options for allocating capital could include returning cash to shareholders via dividends, repurchasing shares of stock, issuing a special dividend, or increasing a research and development (R&D) budget. Alternatively, the company may opt to invest in growth initiatives, which could include acquisitions and organic growth expenditures.

In whatever ways a CEO chooses to allocate the capital, the overarching goal is to maximize shareholders’ equity (SE), and the challenge always lies in determining which allocations will yield the most significant benefits.

Strategic Capital Budgeting. Smart companies rigorously translate their strategic priorities into resource budgeting guidelines, which they use to balance their investment portfolios.

Investment Project Selection. Top performers are equally tough-minded in their funding decisions with respect to individual project investments. Their CFOs perform investment evaluations that provide a comprehensive understanding of the projects under consideration.

Investment Governance. Superior capital allocators establish consistent governance mechanisms that they use to choose, support, and track investments at the corporate level.

Strategic Investment Decisions

Companies that exercise superior capital budgeting discipline do three things well: They invest in businesses rather than projects, they translate portfolio roles into capital allocation guidelines, and they strive for balanced investment portfolios.

Invest in businesses rather than projects. Capital allocation is about looking at the forest and the trees, and top performers look at the forest first. The outperformers in BCG’s capital allocation database invest systematically in businesses that create value from a strategic as well as a financial point of view, whereas underperformers invest too much in value-destroying growth.

Translate portfolio roles into capital allocation guidelines. Assigning clear roles to the individual businesses in the portfolio and setting corresponding capital allocation guidelines is a good way to link strategic potential to resource allocation.

Balance the investment portfolio. Another way to link corporate strategy to capital allocation is to analyze a company’s investment program from a portfolio perspective. Is the investment portfolio consistent with the company’s strategic priorities, and is it balanced according to key strategic criteria?

The energy company cited above regularly analyzes the risk-return balance of its investment portfolio. In this way, it found out that it was focusing too much on low-risk, low-return projects and making only a few big and risky bets with a high potential return. As a result, management changed its investment strategy and encouraged managers to take on smaller, but high-risk, endeavors in order to improve the company’s overall risk-return profile.

Investment Project Selection

Determining funding for individual capital projects is a financial exercise, but outperformers also make sure that they fully understand the financial profile of the projects in question the quality of the estimates, the variability of cash flows, and the payback profile over time.

Go beyond internal rate of return. In theory, there is a simple rule for choosing among competing investment projects: sort the list of projects based on their expected internal rate of return and select those with the highest IRRs until the budget is fully committed. In practice, however, the effectiveness of this approach is constrained by the quality of the assumptions that go into the valuations and by the influence of additional criteria that are not transparent or not explicit in selection decisions.

A good way to improve the quality of assumptions is to require all business cases for major investment projects to include a model that shows the important business drivers. This makes critical assumptions explicit and allows decision makers to understand the impact of the key drivers. Moreover, it facilitates simple sensitivity and scenario analyses. Managers can calculate the breakeven values of critical variables that must be achieved for the project to generate value. This approach will help avoid focusing only on the expected rate of return in a hypothetical base case.

At many companies, criteria beyond financial returns also come into play in making investment decisions. But if such factors are not made explicit, they can distort the decision-making process and encourage political behavior. One European industrial conglomerate addresses this challenge by evaluating investment projects based on four explicit criteria that are summarized in a simple scoring model: strategic profile (growth potential and fit with the strategy of the underlying business), financial profile (expected project return and short-term impact on EBIT), risk profile (payback time and assessment of market risks), and resource profile (fit with existing capabilities and required management attention).

Management still makes the final investment decision, but the decision-making model ensures that all perspectives are taken into account. Sustainability considerations and metrics can also be factored into the decision in this way.

Apply relevant criteria. Depending on the structure of a company’s investment portfolio, decision makers may need to apply different criteria in order to highlight differences in the value drivers of various investment types. For example, a strict focus on internal rate of return and payback time may systematically favor incremental improvement investments at the expense of larger breakthrough investments that tend to have longer-term and uncertain payoffs.

The process followed at a large mining client illustrates best practice. The company applies relevant, but different, evaluation criteria for each investment type. Efficiency improvement investments such as equipment upgrades are assessed based on their direct financial impact. Capacity extensions, on the other hand, are evaluated in the context of market assumptions, such as competitor capacity and the outlook for commodity prices. And long-term investments, such as R&D in digital technology, are weighed on the basis of strategic attractiveness and prospective longer-term options; financial returns are not part of the analysis. Such an approach ensures that the company chooses the best projects within each investment type without discriminating against individual categories.

Embrace risk—based on true understanding. Understanding the underlying risks should be a particular focus in project selection. Research has shown time and again that human beings are weak at risk assessment, but some techniques can help. A good starting point can be to frame the discussion in terms of a base question: What do we need to believe in to make this an attractive investment? This framing can help uncover the implicit business assumptions behind a proposal and the key risks hidden in the business plan.

The financial decision relates to the disbursement of profits back to investors who supplied capital to the firm. The term dividend refers to that part of profits of a company which is distributed by it among its shareholders. It is the reward of shareholders for investments made by them in the share capital of the company. The dividend decision is concerned with the quantum of profits to be distributed among shareholders. A decision has to be taken whether all the profits are to be distributed, to retain all the profits in business or to keep a part of profits in the business and distribute others among shareholders. The higher rate of dividend may raise the market price of shares and thus, maximize the wealth of shareholders. The firm should also consider the question of dividend stability, stock dividend (bonus shares) and cash dividend.

It is crucial for the top management to determine the portion of earnings distributable as the dividend at the end of every reporting period. A company’s ultimate objective is the maximization of shareholders wealth. It must, therefore, be very vigilant about its profit-sharing policies to retain the faith of the shareholders. Dividend payout policies derive enormous importance by virtue of being a bridge between the company and shareholders for profit-sharing. Without an organized dividend policy, it would be difficult for the investors to judge the intentions of the management.

The Dividend Policy is a financial decision that refers to the proportion of the firm’s earnings to be paid out to the shareholders. Here, a firm decides on the portion of revenue that is to be distributed to the shareholders as dividends or to be ploughed back into the firm.

Purpose of  Dividend Policies:

• Constant Percentage of Earnings:

A firm may pay dividend at a constant rate on earnings. Since payment of dividend depends on the current earnings, the payment of dividend will rise in the year the firm is earning higher profit and the dividend payment will be lower in the year in which the profit falls. Since fluctuations in profits lead to fluctuations in dividends, the principle adversely affects the price of the shares. As a result, the firm will find it difficult to raise capital from the external source.

• Constant Rate of Dividend:

As per this policy, the firm pays a dividend at a fixed rate on the paid up share capital. If this policy is pursued, the shareholders are more or less sure on the earnings on their investment. This policy of paying dividend at a constant rate will not create any problem in those years in which the company is making steady profit. But paying dividend at a constant rate may face the trouble in the year when the company fails to earn the steady profit. Therefore, some of the experts opine that the rate of dividend should be maintained at a lower level if thus policy is followed.

• Stable Rupee Dividend plus Extra Dividend:

Under this policy, a firm pays fixed dividend to the shareholders. In the year the firm is earning higher profits it pays extra dividend over and above the regular dividend. When the normal condition returns, the firm begins to pay normal dividend by cutting down the extra dividend.

Objects of Dividend Decisions

• Evaluation of Price Sensitivity

Companies chosen by investors for its regularity of dividend must have a more stringent dividend policy than others. It becomes essential for such companies to take effective dividend decisions for maintaining stock prices.

• Cash Requirement

The financial manager must take into account the capital fund requirements while framing a dividend policy. Generous distribution of dividends in capital-intensive periods may put the company in financial distress.

• Stage of Growth

Dividend decision must be in line with the stage of the company- infancy, growth, maturity & decline. Each stage undergoes different conditions and therefore calls for different dividend decisions.

Types of Dividends

Dividends are a portion of a company’s earnings distributed to its shareholders as a return on their investment. There are various types of dividends that companies can choose to issue based on their financial condition, profitability, and strategic goals.

The type of dividend a company chooses to issue depends on various factors, including its financial condition, growth strategy, and the preferences of its shareholders. Dividends play a crucial role in attracting and retaining investors, providing them with a tangible return on their investment and influencing the overall perception of the company’s financial health and stability.

1. Cash Dividends:

Cash dividends are the most traditional form of dividends, where shareholders receive cash payments directly from the company’s profits.

• Significance: Provides shareholders with liquidity, allowing them to receive a direct monetary return on their investment.

2. Stock Dividends:

Stock dividends involve the distribution of additional shares of the company’s stock to existing shareholders, proportional to their current holdings.

• Significance: Offers a non-cash alternative for returning value to shareholders, while potentially avoiding immediate tax implications.

3. Property Dividends:

Property dividends involve the distribution of physical assets or investments to shareholders instead of cash.

• Significance: Typically occurs when a company has valuable assets that can be distributed to shareholders, providing them with ownership in those assets.

4. Scrip Dividends:

Scrip dividends allow shareholders to choose between receiving cash or additional shares of stock. Shareholders can opt for new shares rather than cash.

• Significance: Provides flexibility to shareholders in choosing their preferred form of dividend.

5. Liquidating Dividends:

Liquidating dividends occur when a company distributes a portion of its capital to shareholders, often as a result of closing down or selling a segment of the business.

• Significance: Typically signifies the end of the company’s operations or a significant change in its structure.

6. Special Dividends:

Special dividends are one-time, non-recurring payments made by a company in addition to regular dividends.

• Significance: Issued in response to exceptional profits, windfalls, or unique circumstances, providing shareholders with an extra return.

7. Interim Dividends:

Interim dividends are payments made to shareholders before the company’s final annual financial statements are prepared.

• Significance: Provides shareholders with periodic returns throughout the year, rather than waiting for the end of the fiscal year.

8. Regular Dividends:

Regular dividends are routine, recurring payments made to shareholders at predetermined intervals, often quarterly, semi-annually, or annually.

• Significance: Establishes a consistent pattern of returning value to shareholders, contributing to investor confidence.

9. Dividend Reinvestment Plans (DRIPs):

DRIPs allow shareholders to automatically reinvest their cash dividends to purchase additional shares of the company’s stock.

• Significance: Encourages the compounding of returns by reinvesting dividends directly into additional shares, often at a discount.

10. Spin-Off Dividends:

Spin-off dividends occur when a company distributes shares of a subsidiary or business segment as dividends to existing shareholders.

• Significance: Enables the separation of different business units, allowing shareholders to hold interests in both entities separately.

Relevance of Dividend decision:

The dividend decision is a critical aspect of financial management, as it determines the distribution of profits between shareholders and reinvestment in the business. This decision affects the financial structure, market valuation, and growth potential of a company. Properly planned dividend policies ensure a balance between the expectations of shareholders and the company’s financial health, making them highly relevant for organizational success.

• Shareholder Satisfaction

Dividend decisions directly impact shareholder satisfaction, as dividends provide a return on their investment. Regular and adequate dividends create confidence among shareholders and attract potential investors. This is especially significant for income-focused shareholders, such as retirees, who depend on dividends as a source of income.

• Market Perception and Valuation

A company’s dividend policy influences market perception and its share price. Firms with a consistent dividend record are often perceived as stable and financially strong. On the other hand, irregular or no dividends might signal financial distress, leading to a decline in investor confidence and share prices.

• Financial Flexibility and Stability

Retaining profits rather than distributing them as dividends can strengthen a company’s financial stability. Retained earnings provide a source of internally generated funds for reinvestment in growth opportunities, debt repayment, or tackling unforeseen challenges. However, excessive retention may frustrate shareholders who expect returns on their investments.

• Cost of Capital

Dividend policies impact the cost of capital for a business. Companies that prioritize reinvestment and retain profits may reduce dependency on external financing, lowering the cost of capital. Conversely, higher dividend payouts may require companies to borrow for future investments, increasing financial risk.

• Signaling Effect

Dividend decisions send signals to the market about a company’s performance and prospects. An increase in dividends often reflects management’s confidence in the firm’s profitability and growth, while a reduction or omission may indicate financial trouble.

• Impact on Growth

Dividend policies play a vital role in balancing short-term returns with long-term growth. Companies that reinvest a significant portion of their profits may achieve sustainable growth, while those focusing on high dividends may compromise future expansion.

A company’s dividend policy dictates the amount of dividends paid out by the company to its shareholders and the frequency with which the dividends are paid out. When a company makes a profit, they need to make a decision on what to do with it. They can either retain the profits in the company (retained earnings on the balance sheet), or they can distribute the money to shareholders in the form of dividends.

The regular dividend policy is used by companies with a steady cash flow and stable earnings. Companies that pay out dividends this way are considered low-risk investments because while the dividend payments are regular, they may not be very high.

Dividend policy is a very important and integral part of the corporate strategy of any company as it influences investor’s confidence and indicates the company’s financial health. The management of the company must factor in the business environment, the company’s growth strategy, liquidity position, etc. before determining the amount and frequency of dividend payments.

Stable Dividend policy

Under the stable dividend policy, the percentage of profits paid out as dividends is fixed. For example, if a company sets the payout rate at 6%, it is the percentage of profits that will be paid out regardless of the amount of profits earned for the financial year.

Whether a company makes $1 million or $100,000, a fixed dividend will be paid out. Investing in a company that follows such a policy is risky for investors as the amount of dividends fluctuates with the level of profits. Shareholders face a lot of uncertainty as they are not sure of the exact dividend they will receive.

Residual Dividend Policy: In this type of dividend distribution, the company pays dividend based on the amount of left over earnings. In residual dividend policy, a company pays dividends only after ensuring that all the planned investments have been done. In most cases, the dividend payment happens when the part of profit earmarked for funding the capital expenditure proposals is put aside. This policy reduces the need for raising external funds to a large extent.

• Constant Dividend Per Share: In this policy, a company pays a fixed amount of dividend per share every year irrespective of the profit generated by it. Such companies create a reserve fund which ensures that it is able to pay the same dividend in those years too when it fails to achieve an adequate level of earnings. Please note that the amount of dividend is largely constant year after year, but the rate of the dividend may vary depending on the level of earning during each year.
• Constant Payout Ratio: In this policy, the dividend paid every period is a fixed proportion of the earnings during that period. In other words, the percentage of profit distributed to the shareholders in the form of dividends remains constant. So, the dividends paid in such a company will vary as the earnings fluctuate from one period to another.
• Constant Dollar Dividend: In this policy, a company pays a relatively lower rate of dividend per share to avoid instances of no dividend payment in case of weak financial performance. In other words, dividends paid in dollar terms largely remain constant irrespective of the profit level during the period.

Regular Dividend policy

Under the regular dividend policy, the company pays out dividends to its shareholders every year. If the company makes abnormal profits (very high profits), the excess profits will not be distributed to the shareholders but are withheld by the company as retained earnings. If the company makes a loss, the shareholders will still be paid a dividend under the policy.

Irregular Dividend policy

Under the irregular dividend policy, the company is under no obligation to pay its shareholders and the board of directors can decide what to do with the profits. If they a make an abnormal profit in a certain year, they can decide to distribute it to the shareholders or not pay out any dividends at all and instead keep the profits for business expansion and future projects.

The irregular dividend policy is used by companies that do not enjoy a steady cash flow or lack liquidity. Investors who invest in a company that follows the policy face very high risks as there is a possibility of not receiving any dividends during the financial year.

No Dividend policy

Under the no dividend policy, the company doesn’t distribute dividends to shareholders. It is because any profits earned is retained and reinvested into the business for future growth. Companies that don’t give out dividends are constantly growing and expanding, and shareholders invest in them because the value of the company stock appreciates. For the investor, the share price appreciation is more valuable than a dividend payout.

Over Capitalization occurs when a company has more capital (both debt and equity) than it can effectively utilize to generate earnings or value. This leads to a lower rate of return on capital, making the business inefficient. The excess capital can manifest in a higher-than-necessary stock issuance, borrowing at uncompetitive rates, or inflating the company’s capital base, resulting in an inflated value of the business that does not reflect its true earning potential.

In such cases, the company may face several financial issues, including a reduced ability to meet debt obligations, stagnant stock prices, and the inability to use resources effectively to generate profits. Over capitalization may result from poor planning, overoptimistic growth expectations, or mismanagement.

Causes of Over Capitalization:

• Issuance of Excessive Equity Shares:

One of the primary causes of over capitalization is the issuance of too many shares relative to the company’s earning potential. When a firm issues more shares to raise capital, it increases the total capital in circulation, which may not align with its profitability. If the company cannot generate enough profits to sustain the high number of shares, over capitalization results.

• Excessive Debt Financing:

Relying heavily on debt can lead to over capitalization if a company borrows more than it can reasonably repay from its earnings. This increases the financial obligations, and if earnings do not match the debt levels, it can lead to difficulties in servicing the debt, thus overloading the company’s capital base.

• Inflated Asset Valuation:

Sometimes, companies overestimate the value of their assets when raising capital. When the valuation of assets is inflated, the company may raise more funds than needed, resulting in an excessive capital base. This is often seen in the case of mergers or acquisitions where the value of acquired assets is overstated.

• Overestimation of Earnings Potential:

Over capitalization can also result from overly optimistic forecasts regarding the company’s earnings. If a business expects rapid growth or higher profitability than what is achievable, it may raise excessive funds to support this expected growth. When the expected returns do not materialize, over capitalization occurs.

• Lack of Proper Financial Planning:

Poor financial planning, or a lack of financial discipline, often leads to over capitalization. Companies may fail to assess their actual capital needs thoroughly, raising more capital than they can utilize effectively. This may stem from management’s inability to forecast capital requirements accurately.

• Unrealistic Expansion Plans:

Companies planning to expand aggressively may raise more capital than required in anticipation of higher returns from expansion. If the expansion does not meet projections or fails to generate the expected growth, the business becomes overcapitalized with surplus capital that cannot be deployed effectively.

• Mismanagement of Funds:

In some cases, mismanagement or poor allocation of funds may lead to over capitalization. Companies may take on excessive capital without a clear strategy for how to deploy it, resulting in an unproductive capital base.

Consequences of Over Capitalization

• Low Rate of Return on Capital:

The most significant consequence of over capitalization is a low or insufficient rate of return on capital. When a company has more capital than it can utilize effectively, the returns generated from this capital will be less than what the investors expect, leading to a decrease in profitability.

• Decline in Earnings Per Share (EPS):

Over capitalization can lead to a fall in earnings per share (EPS) due to the larger number of shares in circulation. As the company struggles to generate enough profits, the earnings are diluted across a greater number of shares, decreasing the value for existing shareholders.

• Reduced Dividends:

Companies that are overcapitalized may have to reduce or even eliminate dividend payouts to shareholders. This is because excessive capital results in a lower return on investment, which diminishes the company’s ability to distribute profits in the form of dividends.

• Decreased Market Value of Shares:

The market often recognizes when a company is overcapitalized. Excess capital relative to earnings potential leads to the perception that the business is inefficient. This results in a decline in the market value of shares, as investors realize that the company cannot generate enough profits to justify its capital structure.

• Difficulty in Servicing Debt:

In the case of debt over capitalization, the company may find it challenging to service its debt obligations. Excessive debt burdens may lead to an inability to meet interest payments or repay principal amounts, which can result in liquidity issues and even bankruptcy.

• Inefficiency in Capital Deployment:

With an excessive amount of capital, companies may struggle to deploy funds effectively in growth or operational improvements. This inefficient allocation of resources leads to missed opportunities for profitability and expansion, exacerbating the over capitalization issue.

• Loss of Confidence Among Stakeholders:

Over capitalization often results in a lack of confidence from investors, lenders, and other stakeholders. The company’s inability to generate adequate returns on the capital invested can cause a decline in investor trust, leading to a reduction in share prices, difficulty in raising additional funds, and overall poor business performance.

Remedies for Over Capitalization

• Reduction in Share Capital:

One of the most common remedies for over capitalization is the reduction of share capital. Companies may reduce the number of shares in circulation through a share buyback or consolidation of shares (also known as a stock split). By doing so, the company reduces the excess capital and improves the EPS, thereby increasing shareholder value.

• Debt Restructuring:

Over capitalized companies with excessive debt may need to restructure their debt. This could involve renegotiating the terms of the debt to extend repayment periods, reduce interest rates, or convert some of the debt into equity. This can help reduce the financial burden and improve the company’s liquidity.

• Issuance of Bonus Shares:

Issuing bonus shares can help address over capitalization by redistributing the excess capital into shareholder equity, which can lead to a more balanced capital structure. Bonus shares allow the company to give back capital to its shareholders in the form of additional shares, rather than keeping excessive capital on the books.

• Improved Earnings and Operational Efficiency:

Companies should focus on improving their operational efficiency and earnings to match the capital invested. Streamlining operations, reducing waste, and focusing on profitable growth can help increase the returns on the capital base, addressing the issue of over capitalization.

• Return of Excess Capital to Shareholders:

If a company finds that it has excess capital that it cannot efficiently utilize, it may consider returning it to shareholders through dividends or capital reduction programs. This will help align the capital base with the company’s true earnings potential and improve financial performance.

• Review of Capital Structure:

Companies should periodically review their capital structure to ensure it aligns with their operational needs. A more balanced mix of equity and debt, without overreliance on either, can help optimize the cost of capital and financial stability, preventing over capitalization.

• Strategic Expansion and Investment:

A company facing over capitalization should evaluate its expansion plans and investments carefully. Investments should be made in areas that offer a clear path to generating substantial returns. By focusing on high-return projects, companies can utilize their capital efficiently and avoid excess capital accumulation.

Under Capitalization occurs when a company’s capital base (both equity and debt) is inadequate relative to its operations, expansion needs, or potential earnings. When a firm is undercapitalized, it lacks the necessary funds to support its business activities, maintain operations, and pursue growth opportunities. As a result, it may rely heavily on external debt or short-term financing, often leading to financial instability.

A business that is undercapitalized may not be able to meet its financial obligations such as paying suppliers, paying employee wages, servicing debts, or investing in needed assets. It can also be unable to seize profitable investment opportunities or compete effectively with better-capitalized competitors. In the long run, under capitalization can result in a decline in market share, profitability, and overall business performance.

Causes of Under Capitalization:

• Inadequate Equity Investment:

The primary cause of under capitalization is insufficient equity investment by the owners or shareholders. If a company relies too heavily on debt and does not have enough equity capital, it can result in under capitalization. Equity provides a financial cushion to absorb losses and support operations in case of unforeseen events, while debt brings in fixed obligations.

• Over-reliance on Short-Term Debt:

Companies that rely on short-term debt to meet their operational requirements are at risk of under capitalization. Short-term debt does not provide long-term stability and can lead to liquidity crises when it is due for repayment. Over-reliance on such debt may cause companies to run out of cash, especially if they are unable to generate sufficient profits.

• Low Retained Earnings:

When companies do not reinvest their profits into the business or have low retained earnings, it limits their ability to build up their equity base. As a result, they may become undercapitalized and find it difficult to raise capital to meet their future needs. Insufficient reinvestment in the business limits growth and deprives the company of the funds required to cover operational expenses.

• Inefficient Capital Structure:

An inefficient capital structure, with too much short-term debt and too little long-term equity, can cause under capitalization. Companies that rely on borrowed funds to finance their operations may be unable to generate enough returns to cover their interest expenses and repay debt, leading to under capitalization. A well-balanced mix of equity and long-term debt is essential for avoiding this issue.

• External Economic Factors:

Under capitalization can also result from external economic factors such as inflation, market downturns, or changes in government policies. For example, during an economic recession, a company may experience a decline in revenues, which makes it difficult to raise adequate capital. Similarly, regulatory changes may limit a company’s access to financing or increase the cost of capital.

• Lack of Planning and Forecasting:

Companies that fail to plan and forecast their capital requirements accurately are prone to under capitalization. Inaccurate assessments of capital needs may lead businesses to raise insufficient funds, which hampers their ability to expand, operate smoothly, or meet future financial obligations.

• Unrealistic Valuation and Market Perception:

A company’s inability to properly value itself or its growth prospects can contribute to under capitalization. For instance, if a business overestimates its future cash flows or undervalues its current market position, it may struggle to attract the necessary investment. The market perception of a company’s worth can also influence its ability to raise capital.

Consequences of Under Capitalization

• Liquidity Problems:

The most immediate consequence of under capitalization is liquidity problems. When a company does not have enough capital to support its operations, it may struggle to pay its creditors, employees, or suppliers. This creates a vicious cycle of financial instability, as the company may resort to borrowing at high-interest rates, leading to further financial strain.

• Inability to Seize Growth Opportunities:

Under capitalized firms are often unable to take advantage of profitable growth opportunities. Without the necessary funds to invest in new projects, research and development, or acquisitions, they miss out on potential market share and long-term profitability. This inability to grow at the same rate as competitors can lead to stagnation and, eventually, business failure.

• Higher Operational Costs:

Due to an insufficient capital base, under capitalized companies may be forced to borrow money at higher interest rates. These higher costs of borrowing increase the firm’s operational expenses, reducing profitability. The need for short-term debt may also lead to additional administrative and financing costs, further eroding the company’s financial position.

• Reduced Market Confidence:

When investors and creditors recognize that a company is undercapitalized, it diminishes their confidence in the company’s ability to manage financial risks. As a result, stock prices may fall, and the firm’s creditworthiness may be downgraded, making it harder to raise capital in the future. Low investor confidence also results in lower valuations of the company’s assets and equity.

• Inability to Meet Financial Obligations:

A business that is undercapitalized may find it challenging to meet its financial obligations such as paying interest on debt, dividends to shareholders, or salaries to employees. The inability to meet these obligations could lead to a loss of goodwill, a decline in customer trust, and eventually the company’s inability to remain in business.

• Competitive Disadvantage:

Companies with inadequate capital struggle to compete with well-capitalized firms that have the resources to fund research and development, marketing, and expansion activities. Under capitalization limits the company’s ability to innovate and stay competitive in the marketplace, putting it at a significant disadvantage.

• Bankruptcy or Liquidation:

If under capitalization persists over time and financial problems worsen, the business may face bankruptcy or forced liquidation. Undercapitalized firms are more vulnerable to financial distress during periods of economic downturns, competitive pressures, or operational challenges. They may be unable to pay off their debts and, as a result, may be forced to close down their operations.

Remedies for Under Capitalization

• Raising Additional Capital:

The most direct remedy for under capitalization is raising additional capital. Companies can do this by issuing more shares (equity financing) or raising long-term debt. Equity financing helps increase the capital base without the pressure of fixed interest payments, while long-term debt can provide the funds needed to stabilize operations. A balanced mix of both equity and debt is ideal for financing the company’s growth.

• Restructuring Debt:

Companies facing under capitalization may benefit from debt restructuring, which involves renegotiating the terms of existing debt to lower interest rates, extend repayment periods, or even convert some debt into equity. This reduces the pressure of fixed financial obligations and allows the company to focus on long-term growth.

• Increase Retained Earnings:

To address under capitalization in the long term, companies should increase their retained earnings by reinvesting profits back into the business rather than distributing them as dividends. By retaining more of their profits, companies can gradually build a stronger equity base and reduce reliance on external financing.

• Cutting Operational Costs:

If a company is undercapitalized, it can improve its financial position by cutting unnecessary operational costs. Cost control measures, such as improving operational efficiency, reducing waste, and automating processes, can free up funds that can be reinvested into the business to improve profitability.

• Strategic Partnerships and Joint Ventures:

Entering into strategic partnerships or joint ventures with other firms can help undercapitalized companies raise capital and access new markets. By pooling resources with a partner, a company can reduce the financial burden of expansion and increase its capital base.

• Equity Financing through Private Placements:

Companies that are not publicly traded can raise capital through private placements by offering equity to a select group of investors. This can provide the necessary funds without the need for a public offering, allowing the business to grow and improve its financial position.

• Improve Financial Planning and Forecasting:

To avoid under capitalization, companies should focus on improving their financial planning and forecasting. This includes accurately estimating capital needs, anticipating future cash flows, and maintaining a balanced capital structure. By ensuring they have the right amount of capital at the right time, businesses can avoid under capitalization and its negative consequences.

Capital Structure refers to the mix of debt and equity a company uses to finance its operations and growth. It represents the proportion of various sources of capital, such as long-term debt, preferred equity, and common equity, in the total financing of the firm. The structure affects a company’s risk profile, cost of capital, and financial stability. An optimal capital structure balances the benefits and risks associated with debt and equity to maximize shareholder value while maintaining financial flexibility. Factors influencing capital structure include business risk, market conditions, tax considerations, and the cost of raising funds.

Asset’s structure implies the composition of total assets used by a firm i.e., make-up of the assets side of Balance Sheet of a company. It indicates the application of fund in the different types of assets fixed and current.

Asset’s Structure = Fixed Assets + Current Assets

Types of Capital Structure:

• Equity Capital Structure:

This structure relies solely on equity financing, including common and preferred shares. It avoids debt obligations, providing greater financial stability but potentially higher costs due to dividend expectations. It suits businesses seeking low risk and stable growth.

• Debt Capital Structure:

Focused primarily on borrowing, this structure includes loans, bonds, and other forms of debt. It benefits from tax deductions on interest but increases financial risk due to fixed repayment obligations, suitable for firms with steady cash flows.

• Hybrid Capital Structure:

Combines equity and debt, leveraging the advantages of both. This balanced approach reduces risk while maintaining flexibility, ideal for diversified growth.

• Optimal Capital Structure:

A carefully calculated mix of debt and equity designed to minimize the cost of capital and maximize shareholder value. It requires periodic adjustments based on financial goals and market conditions.

Importance of Capital Structure:

• Cost of Capital:

Capital structure directly influences the cost of capital for a company. A well-balanced mix of debt and equity minimizes the overall cost of capital, ensuring that funds are acquired at the lowest possible rate. This helps companies to maximize profits and shareholder value. The lower the cost of capital, the higher the return on investment (ROI).

• Financial Flexibility:

A good capital structure provides financial flexibility. It allows a company to raise funds easily in case of future financial needs. Companies with an optimal balance of debt and equity have better access to capital markets for future funding, enabling them to take advantage of new opportunities or manage unforeseen financial challenges.

• Risk Management:

Capital structure affects the level of risk a company is exposed to. A higher proportion of debt increases the financial risk because of the fixed interest payments that must be made regardless of the company’s performance. On the other hand, equity financing reduces financial risk but may dilute ownership. Therefore, finding the right balance is crucial to managing risk effectively.

• Control and Ownership:

The way a company structures its capital impacts control and ownership. Debt financing does not dilute the ownership, as debt holders do not get voting rights in the company. In contrast, issuing more equity results in sharing control, which may lead to reduced decision-making power for the original owners or shareholders. Therefore, the capital structure influences how control is distributed among stakeholders.

• Impact on Profitability:

A well-structured capital mix can enhance profitability by lowering the cost of funds. Debt financing, with its tax-deductible interest, can lead to greater profitability. However, excessive debt may lead to financial distress, undermining profitability. Hence, maintaining an appropriate debt-equity ratio is important for sustaining healthy profits.

• Market Perception:

Capital structure impacts how investors and the market perceive a company. A company with a high level of debt may be viewed as more risky, leading to higher interest rates on new debt issuance and potential declines in stock price. Conversely, a company with too much equity may be seen as inefficient in utilizing capital. Thus, an optimal capital structure enhances the company’s market image and investor confidence.

• Tax Benefits:

One of the significant advantages of using debt in capital structure is the tax-deductible nature of interest payments. This helps reduce a company’s overall tax liability, as interest expenses on debt are deductible from taxable income. This advantage makes debt an attractive option for companies aiming to lower their tax burden.

• Growth and Expansion:

Capital structure plays a crucial role in a company’s ability to grow and expand. Companies with an optimal capital structure can fund large-scale projects or acquisitions through debt without diluting ownership too much. Moreover, a well-managed capital structure can signal financial stability to investors, making it easier to secure funding for future growth initiatives.

Theories of Capital Structure:

• Net Income (NI) Approach:

The Net Income Approach suggests that a company can increase its value by using debt financing because debt is cheaper than equity. The theory asserts that the overall cost of capital decreases as the proportion of debt increases, leading to higher firm value and profitability. According to this approach, companies should maximize the use of debt to reduce their cost of capital and improve shareholders’ wealth. The underlying assumption is that debt does not increase the company’s risk and that the company’s earnings are sufficient to meet the debt obligations.

• Net Operating Income (NOI) Approach:

The Net Operating Income Approach, in contrast to the NI approach, argues that the capital structure has no impact on the overall cost of capital or the value of the firm. According to this theory, changes in the debt-equity ratio do not affect the overall risk of the company. The firm’s value is determined by its operating income (EBIT) and its business risk, rather than its financial structure. The theory suggests that the cost of debt and equity rises proportionally as debt increases, leaving the firm’s total value unchanged.

• Traditional Approach:

The Traditional Approach is a compromise between the NI and NOI approaches. It recognizes that an optimal capital structure exists where the cost of capital is minimized, and the firm’s value is maximized. The theory suggests that moderate levels of debt can reduce the company’s cost of capital by taking advantage of the tax shield on debt. However, beyond a certain point, increasing debt increases the firm’s financial risk, which in turn raises the cost of both debt and equity. The balance between debt and equity at this optimal point minimizes the overall cost of capital.

• Modigliani-Miller (M&M) Proposition I:

Modigliani and Miller’s Proposition I states that in a perfect capital market (no taxes, no bankruptcy costs, and no agency costs), the capital structure of a firm does not affect its overall value. In other words, whether a firm is financed by debt or equity, its total value remains unchanged. The theory assumes that investors can create their own leverage by borrowing or lending on their own, thus making the firm’s financing decisions irrelevant in determining its value.

• Modigliani-Miller Proposition II (with Taxes):

Modigliani and Miller’s Proposition II builds on their first proposition by introducing the concept of taxes. According to this theory, the value of a firm increases as it uses more debt because interest payments on debt are tax-deductible. This creates a tax shield, lowering the company’s effective cost of debt and increasing its total value. Thus, M&M Proposition II suggests that the firm should increase its debt financing to maximize its value, as long as the firm is operating in a tax environment.

• Pecking Order Theory:

The Pecking Order Theory, proposed by Myers and Majluf, argues that companies prioritize their sources of financing according to the principle of least effort, or least resistance. Firms prefer internal financing (retained earnings) over debt, and debt over equity. The rationale is that issuing new equity can signal a company’s weakness to the market, potentially leading to a decrease in stock price. Therefore, firms first use internal funds, then debt, and only issue equity when all other sources are exhausted.

• Market Timing Theory:

Market Timing Theory suggests that firms make capital structure decisions based on market conditions. According to this theory, firms issue equity when their stock prices are high and issue debt when interest rates are low. Essentially, companies “time” the market to take advantage of favorable conditions. This approach assumes that managers can accurately predict market trends and act in the best interests of the company and its shareholders, though such predictions are difficult to make consistently.

• Agency Theory:

Agency Theory focuses on the relationship between the company’s management and its shareholders, as well as the conflict of interest that can arise between the two parties. According to this theory, debt can serve as a monitoring tool to reduce the agency cost of equity. When a company takes on more debt, management is under greater pressure to perform well and meet its obligations, which can align their interests with those of shareholders. However, excessive debt may lead to a situation where managers focus too much on short-term profitability at the expense of long-term shareholder value.

Profit Maximization

Profit Maximization is a fundamental objective of financial management, focusing on increasing a firm’s earnings in the short or long term. It involves making decisions and strategies aimed at maximizing the financial surplus generated by the business. This concept is traditionally viewed as the primary goal of any enterprise, as it ensures the firm’s survival, growth, and ability to reward stakeholders.

Features of Profit Maximization

1. Short-Term Focus: It primarily emphasizes achieving higher profits in the immediate future.
2. Decision-Making Goal: All business decisions, such as pricing, cost control, and investment allocation, are directed toward maximizing returns.
3. Simple and Clear Objective: It provides a straightforward criterion for measuring business success.

Importance of Profit Maximization

1. Survival and Growth: Profits provide the capital necessary for sustaining operations, expanding activities, and exploring new markets.
2. Reward to Stakeholders: Higher profits enable better returns for shareholders and adequate compensation for employees.
3. Business Valuation: Profitability boosts the market value of the firm, attracting investors and enhancing creditworthiness.
4. Economic Development: Increased profits lead to higher tax contributions, investments, and employment opportunities, contributing to overall economic progress.

Limitations of Profit Maximization

1. Neglects Long-Term Goals: A focus solely on profits may lead to short-term strategies that could harm the firm’s sustainability.
2. Ignores Risk and Uncertainty: It does not consider risks associated with financial decisions or the uncertainty of future returns.
3. Lack of Social Responsibility: Profit maximization may lead to unethical practices, such as exploiting labor or harming the environment, to achieve financial gains.
4. No Consideration for Stakeholders’ Interests: It prioritizes profits over the well-being of employees, customers, and society at large.
5. Limited Measurement of Success: Solely focusing on profits may overlook other critical aspects, such as customer satisfaction, innovation, and brand value.

Wealth Maximization:

Wealth Maximization is a modern financial management objective that focuses on increasing the net worth and long-term value of a firm for its shareholders. Unlike profit maximization, which prioritizes short-term earnings, wealth maximization emphasizes sustainable growth by considering risk, time value of money, and broader stakeholder interests. It aligns closely with the goals of value creation and financial stability.

Concepts of Wealth Maximization:

1. Shareholder Value: Wealth maximization is centered around increasing the wealth of shareholders by enhancing the market value of shares.
2. Long-Term Focus: This approach prioritizes the firm’s long-term success over immediate profits.
3. Time Value of Money: It incorporates the concept that the value of money today is different from its value in the future due to inflation and opportunity cost.
4. Risk and Return: Wealth maximization considers the trade-off between risk and expected returns, ensuring optimal financial decisions.

Importance of Wealth Maximization:

1. Sustainable Growth: By focusing on long-term objectives, wealth maximization ensures sustained profitability and business growth.
2. Stakeholder Benefits: It creates value not only for shareholders but also for employees, customers, and society through better products, innovation, and responsible practices.
3. Risk Management: The approach evaluates potential risks in financial decisions, promoting prudent strategies that safeguard the firm’s future.
4. Economic Contribution: Wealth maximization contributes to economic development by driving investments, generating employment, and increasing tax revenues.

Advantages of Wealth Maximization

1. Comprehensive Goal: It encompasses profitability, risk management, and sustainability, offering a holistic view of financial success.
2. Improved Market Reputation: A focus on value creation enhances the firm’s reputation, attracting investors, customers, and talented employees.
3. Better Financial Decisions: By incorporating risk and time value, wealth maximization ensures well-informed and strategic decisions.
4. Alignment with Stakeholder Interests: It balances the interests of shareholders, customers, employees, and society, fostering trust and goodwill.

Limitations of Wealth Maximization

1. Market Fluctuations: Shareholder wealth depends on market conditions, which can be influenced by external factors beyond the firm’s control.
2. Complexity in Measurement: Determining true wealth creation involves assessing market value, risk-adjusted returns, and intangible factors, making it complex.
3. Potential for Short-Termism: Despite its long-term focus, pressure from shareholders or management may lead to short-term strategies to boost share prices temporarily.
4. Neglect of Non-Financial Goals: Although comprehensive, wealth maximization may overlook certain ethical or social responsibilities if not balanced properly.

Key difference between Profit Maximization and Wealth Maximization

Basis of Comparison	Profit Maximization	Wealth Maximization
Definition	Focus on maximizing short-term profit	Focus on maximizing long-term wealth
Objective	Immediate returns	Sustainable growth
Time Horizon	Short-term	Long-term
Scope	Limited	Broader
Risk Consideration	Ignores risk	Considers risk
Decision Basis	Accounting profit	Cash flows
Focus	Revenue and costs	Shareholder value
Sustainability	Less sustainable	More sustainable
Stakeholder Focus	Shareholders only	Shareholders and other stakeholders
Uncertainty Management	Overlooks uncertainty	Includes uncertainty
Market Value Impact	Minimal impact	Enhances market value
Ethics and Responsibility	Secondary	Integral
Measurement	Accounting standards	Market valuation
Objective Clarity	Ambiguous	Clear
Strategic Alignment	Operational	Strategic

Dividend decisions refer to the strategic choices a company makes regarding the distribution of its profits to shareholders in the form of dividends or retaining them for reinvestment in the business. These decisions play a crucial role in financial management as they influence shareholder satisfaction, market perception, and the company’s growth potential. A balanced dividend policy ensures that adequate returns are provided to shareholders while retaining enough earnings for business expansion and stability. Factors such as profitability, cash flow, growth opportunities, and market expectations significantly impact these decisions, highlighting their importance in achieving long-term corporate objectives.

Some of the major different theories of dividend in financial management are as follows: 

1. Walter’s model

2. Gordon’s model

3. Modigliani and Miller’s hypothesis.

1. Walter’s model:

Professor James E. Walter argues that the choice of dividend policies almost always affects the value of the enterprise. His model shows clearly the importance of the relationship between the firm’s internal rate of return (r) and its cost of capital (k) in determining the dividend policy that will maximise the wealth of shareholders.

Walter’s Model Assumptions:

1. The firm finances all investment through retained earnings; that is debt or new equity is not issued;
2. The firm’s internal rate of return (r), and its cost of capital (k) are constant;
3. All earnings are either distributed as dividend or reinvested internally immediately.
4. Beginning earnings and dividends never change. The values of the earnings pershare (E), and the divided per share (D) may be changed in the model to determine results, but any given values of E and D are assumed to remain constant forever in determining a given value.
5. The firm has a very long or infinite life.

Walter’s formula to determine the market price per share (P) is as follows:

P = D/K +r(E-D)/K/K

The above equation clearly reveals that the market price per share is the sum of the present value of two sources of income:

i) The present value of an infinite stream of constant dividends, (D/K) and

ii) The present value of the infinite stream of stream gains.

[r (E-D)/K/K]

Criticism:

1. Walter’s model of share valuation mixes dividend policy with investment policy of the firm. The model assumes that the investment opportunities of the firm are financed by retained earnings only and no external financing debt or equity is used for the purpose when such a situation exists either the firm’s investment or its dividend policy or both will be sub-optimum. The wealth of the owners will maximise only when this optimum investment in made.
2. Walter’s model is based on the assumption that r is constant. In fact decreases as more investment occurs. This reflects the assumption that the most profitable investments are made first and then the poorer investments are made.

The firm should step at a point where r = k. This is clearly an erroneous policy and fall to optimise the wealth of the owners.

3. A firm’s cost of capital or discount rate, K, does not remain constant; it changes directly with the firm’s risk. Thus, the present value of the firm’s income moves inversely with the cost of capital. By assuming that the discount rate, K is constant, Walter’s model abstracts from the effect of risk on the value of the firm.

2. Gordon’s Model:

One very popular model explicitly relating the market value of the firm to dividend policy is developed by Myron Gordon.

Assumptions:

Gordon’s model is based on the following assumptions.

1. The firm is an all Equity firm
2. No external financing is available
3. The internal rate of return (r) of the firm is constant.
4. The appropriate discount rate (K) of the firm remains constant.
5. The firm and its stream of earnings are perpetual
6. The corporate taxes do not exist.
7. The retention ratio (b), once decided upon, is constant. Thus, the growth rate (g) = br is constant forever.
8. K > br = g if this condition is not fulfilled, we cannot get a meaningful value for the share.

According to Gordon’s dividend capitalisation model, the market value of a share (Pq) is equal to the present value of an infinite stream of dividends to be received by the share. Thus:

The above equation explicitly shows the relationship of current earnings (E,), dividend policy, (b), internal profitability (r) and the all-equity firm’s cost of capital (k), in the determination of the value of the share (P₀).

3. Modigliani and Miller’s hypothesis:

According to Modigliani and Miller (M-M), dividend policy of a firm is irrelevant as it does not affect the wealth of the shareholders. They argue that the value of the firm depends on the firm’s earnings which result from its investment policy.

Thus, when investment decision of the firm is given, dividend decision the split of earnings between dividends and retained earnings is of no significance in determining the value of the firm. M – M’s hypothesis of irrelevance is based on the following assumptions.

1. The firm operates in perfect capital market
2. Taxes do not exist
3. The firm has a fixed investment policy
4. Risk of uncertainty does not exist. That is, investors are able to forecast future prices and dividends with certainty and one discount rate is appropriate for all securities and all time periods. Thus, r = K = K_t for all t.

Under M – M assumptions, r will be equal to the discount rate and identical for all shares. As a result, the price of each share must adjust so that the rate of return, which is composed of the rate of dividends and capital gains, on every share will be equal to the discount rate and be identical for all shares.

Thus, the rate of return for a share held for one year may be calculated as follows:

Where P^ is the market or purchase price per share at time 0, P, is the market price per share at time 1 and D is dividend per share at time 1. As hypothesised by M – M, r should be equal for all shares. If it is not so, the low-return yielding shares will be sold by investors who will purchase the high-return yielding shares.

This process will tend to reduce the price of the low-return shares and to increase the prices of the high-return shares. This switching will continue until the differentials in rates of return are eliminated. This discount rate will also be equal for all firms under the M-M assumption since there are no risk differences.

From the above M-M fundamental principle we can derive their valuation model as follows:

Multiplying both sides of equation by the number of shares outstanding (n), we obtain the value of the firm if no new financing exists.

If the firm sells m number of new shares at time 1 at a price of P^, the value of the firm at time 0 will be

The above equation of M – M valuation allows for the issuance of new shares, unlike Walter’s and Gordon’s models. Consequently, a firm can pay dividends and raise funds to undertake the optimum investment policy. Thus, dividend and investment policies are not confounded in M – M model, like waiter’s and Gordon’s models.

Criticism:

Because of the unrealistic nature of the assumption, M-M’s hypothesis lacks practical relevance in the real world situation. Thus, it is being criticised on the following grounds.

1. The assumption that taxes do not exist is far from reality.
2. M-M argue that the internal and external financing are equivalent. This cannot be true if the costs of floating new issues exist.
3. According to M-M’s hypothesis the wealth of a shareholder will be same whether the firm pays dividends or not. But, because of the transactions costs and inconvenience associated with the sale of shares to realise capital gains, shareholders prefer dividends to capital gains.
4. Even under the condition of certainty it is not correct to assume that the discount rate (k) should be same whether firm uses the external or internal financing.

If investors have desire to diversify their port folios, the discount rate for external and internal financing will be different.

5. M-M argues that, even if the assumption of perfect certainty is dropped and uncertainty is considered, dividend policy continues to be irrelevant. But according to number of writers, dividends are relevant under conditions of uncertainty.

Time Value of Money (TVM) is a financial principle that recognizes the value of money changes over time due to its earning potential. A sum of money today is worth more than the same amount in the future because it can be invested to earn interest or generate returns. TVM forms the foundation of various financial decisions, including investment appraisals, loan calculations, and savings growth. It relies on concepts like present value (PV), future value (FV), discounting, and compounding to quantify the impact of time on money’s worth, ensuring sound financial planning and resource allocation.

Need of Time Value of Money (TVM):

• Investment Decision-Making

TVM is critical for evaluating investment opportunities by comparing the present value of future returns. Investors need to determine if the returns from an investment justify the risk and time involved. Concepts like Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) are used to assess the profitability of projects based on future cash flows.

• Loan and Mortgage Calculations

When obtaining loans or mortgages, TVM helps calculate the equated monthly installments (EMIs), interest, and principal repayments over time. Financial institutions use TVM principles to structure loan terms and interest rates that balance affordability and profitability.

• Retirement Planning

Planning for retirement requires estimating how much to save today to meet future financial needs. TVM helps in calculating the future value of current savings and determining the present value of future retirement expenses, ensuring adequate funds are available during retirement.

• Inflation Adjustment

Inflation erodes the purchasing power of money over time. TVM accounts for inflation by discounting future cash flows to reflect their real value. This adjustment ensures accurate financial planning and investment decisions that consider the changing economic environment.

• Business Valuation

TVM is essential for valuing businesses and their assets. Future cash flows generated by a business are discounted to determine their present value, providing insights into the company’s worth. This is crucial for mergers, acquisitions, and investor decision-making.

• Capital Budgeting

Organizations use TVM to assess the feasibility of long-term projects. By discounting future costs and benefits, companies can prioritize projects that offer the highest returns relative to their initial investment, ensuring efficient allocation of resources.

• Savings and Wealth Accumulation

TVM aids individuals in understanding the growth potential of their savings through compounding. By starting to save or invest early, individuals can take advantage of compound interest to maximize wealth accumulation over time.

Discounting or Present Value Method

The current value of an expected amount of money to be received at a future date is known as Present Value. If we expect a certain sum of money after some years at a specific interest rate, then by discounting the Future Value we can calculate the amount to be invested today, i.e., the current or Present Value.

Hence, Discounting Technique is the method that converts Future Value into Present Value. The amount calculated by Discounting Technique is the Present Value and the rate of interest is the discount rate.

Compounding or Future Value Method

Compounding is just the opposite of discounting. The process of converting Present Value into Future Value is known as compounding.

Future Value of a sum of money is the expected value of that sum of money invested after n number of years at a specific compound rate of interest.

Key differences between Compounding and Discounting:

Basis of Comparison	Compounding	Discounting
Definition	Future value (FV)	Present value (PV)
Focus	Value growth	Value reduction
Process	Adding interest	Removing interest
Direction	Present to future	Future to present
Use	Investment growth	Valuation analysis
Formula	FV = PV × (1 + r)^n	PV = FV ÷ (1 + r)^n
Objective	Maximize returns	Evaluate worth today
Application	Savings, investments	Loan, cash flow eval
Time Horizon	Future-oriented	Current-oriented
Example	Bank deposits	Bond valuation