Criticism of Corporate Social Responsibility

Criticism of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) typically falls into two main categories: those who argue that CSR is not necessary or effective, and those who argue that CSR does not go far enough to address systemic issues.

Some common criticisms and potential ways to overcome them:

  • CSR is not necessary or effective:

Some argue that CSR is not necessary because it is not the role of businesses to address social and environmental issues, or that CSR initiatives are not effective in achieving their intended goals. To address this criticism, businesses can focus on integrating sustainability and social responsibility into their core business practices, rather than treating them as separate initiatives. This can include incorporating sustainability into supply chain management, product design, and employee engagement, and measuring the impact of these practices on business performance.

  • CSR is a form of greenwashing:

Some argue that CSR is a form of greenwashing, or that it is used by businesses to distract from negative practices or to improve their public image without making substantive changes. To overcome this criticism, businesses should be transparent and authentic in their CSR initiatives, and ensure that they are aligned with the company’s core values and business practices. This can include engaging stakeholders in the development and implementation of CSR initiatives, and measuring and reporting on the impact of these initiatives.

  • CSR does not address systemic issues:

Some argue that CSR initiatives are not sufficient to address systemic issues, such as income inequality, climate change, or human rights violations. To address this criticism, businesses can focus on advocacy and policy change, in addition to their internal CSR initiatives. This can include engaging in public policy debates, supporting social and environmental causes through philanthropy, and collaborating with other stakeholders to address systemic issues.

  • CSR is a distraction from the need for systemic change:

Some argue that CSR initiatives can distract from the need for systemic change, by focusing on individual company practices rather than addressing broader structural issues. To address this criticism, businesses can collaborate with other stakeholders to address systemic issues, and advocate for policy change at the local, national, and international levels. This can involve engaging with policymakers, civil society organizations, and other businesses to develop collective solutions to social and environmental challenges.

Implementing Corporate governance standards in Emerging countries

Emerging countries often face unique challenges in implementing corporate governance standards due to factors such as weak legal frameworks, political instability, and a lack of awareness among stakeholders. However, there are several steps that can be taken to implement corporate governance standards in emerging countries:

  1. Strengthening legal frameworks: Emerging countries can strengthen their legal frameworks by adopting and enforcing laws and regulations that promote corporate governance. This includes laws related to transparency and disclosure, shareholder rights, board composition, and executive compensation.
  2. Educating stakeholders: Emerging countries can raise awareness of the importance of corporate governance by educating stakeholders, such as investors, regulators, and company directors, on best practices and the benefits of good corporate governance. This can include workshops, training programs, and public awareness campaigns.
  3. Building capacity: Emerging countries can build capacity by developing the skills and knowledge of professionals in the corporate governance field, such as lawyers, accountants, and auditors. This can be done through training programs, certification courses, and professional associations.
  4. Encouraging voluntary adoption: Emerging countries can encourage companies to voluntarily adopt corporate governance standards by providing incentives such as tax breaks, subsidies, and preferential treatment in government procurement. This can help create a culture of good corporate governance and encourage companies to adopt best practices.
  5. Strengthening stakeholder engagement: Emerging countries can strengthen stakeholder engagement by creating forums for dialogue between companies and stakeholders, such as shareholder meetings, public consultations, and stakeholder advisory committees. This can help ensure that the interests of all stakeholders are taken into account in decision-making processes.
  6. Developing partnerships: Emerging countries can develop partnerships with international organizations, such as the World Bank and the International Finance Corporation, that provide technical assistance and support for the development of corporate governance frameworks.
  7. Monitoring and evaluation: Emerging countries can monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of corporate governance frameworks by conducting regular assessments and audits. This can help identify gaps and areas for improvement and ensure that corporate governance practices are being implemented effectively.

Issues in Implementing Corporate governance standards in emerging countries

Implementing corporate governance standards in emerging countries can be challenging due to a range of issues, including:

  1. Weak legal and regulatory frameworks: Many emerging countries have weak legal and regulatory frameworks, which can make it difficult to enforce corporate governance standards and hold companies accountable.
  2. Lack of awareness and understanding: Many stakeholders in emerging countries, including investors, regulators, and company directors, may have limited awareness and understanding of corporate governance principles and practices.
  3. Limited resources and capacity: Companies in emerging countries may have limited resources and capacity to implement corporate governance standards, particularly if they are small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
  4. Cultural and institutional barriers: Corporate governance practices may be at odds with local cultural and institutional norms, which can make it difficult to implement them effectively.
  5. Corruption and political instability: Corruption and political instability can pose significant challenges to the implementation of corporate governance standards, as they can undermine trust in institutions and the rule of law.
  6. Lack of local expertise: There may be a shortage of local experts with the skills and knowledge to support the implementation of corporate governance standards.
  7. Limited access to capital: Companies in emerging countries may face limited access to capital if they are perceived as having weak corporate governance practices, which can undermine their ability to grow and expand.

Implementing Corporate governance standards in European Union countries

Corporate governance standards in European Union (EU) countries are implemented through a combination of legal requirements, industry best practices, and voluntary guidelines.

Some key steps that companies can take to implement corporate governance standards in the EU include:

  1. Establishing a board of directors: EU companies are required to have a board of directors, which is responsible for overseeing the company’s management and ensuring that it operates in the best interests of shareholders. Companies can strengthen their corporate governance by ensuring that their board is independent, diverse, and has appropriate skills and expertise.
  2. Adopting a code of conduct: Companies can adopt a code of conduct that outlines ethical standards and expectations for employees, suppliers, and other stakeholders. The code of conduct should be regularly reviewed and updated to ensure that it reflects changing expectations and best practices.
  3. Implementing internal controls: Companies can implement internal controls to ensure that they are operating in compliance with legal and ethical requirements. This can include processes for financial reporting, risk management, and internal audits.
  4. Disclosure and transparency: EU companies are required to disclose certain information to investors and regulators, such as financial statements, executive compensation, and material risks. Companies can enhance their corporate governance by providing additional information on their sustainability practices, social and environmental impact, and stakeholder engagement.
  5. Engaging with stakeholders: Companies can engage with stakeholders, such as customers, employees, suppliers, and local communities, to understand their needs and expectations and to build trust. This can involve regular communication, consultation, and collaboration with stakeholders to ensure that the company’s activities are aligned with their interests.
  6. Compliance with legal and regulatory requirements: Companies can ensure that they are in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements by regularly reviewing and updating their policies and procedures, and by monitoring and addressing any violations.
  7. Implementing EU directives: The EU has introduced a range of directives that aim to enhance corporate governance practices in member states. Companies can ensure that they are in compliance with these directives by adopting policies and practices that align with the requirements.

Issues in Implementing Corporate governance standards in European Union countries

While European Union (EU) countries generally have a more robust legal and regulatory framework for corporate governance, there are still challenges in implementing corporate governance standards in these countries.

Some of the key issues include:

  1. Diverse legal and regulatory frameworks: While there are EU-wide corporate governance principles and guidelines, the implementation of these principles can vary across member states due to differences in legal and regulatory frameworks.
  2. Lack of enforcement: While there are laws and regulations governing corporate governance in EU countries, there may be insufficient enforcement of these laws, particularly for smaller companies.
  3. Resistance to change: Companies and stakeholders may resist changes to existing corporate governance practices, particularly if they are seen as being too onerous or costly.
  4. Limited shareholder engagement: While shareholder engagement is an important aspect of corporate governance, there may be limited engagement by shareholders in EU countries, particularly if they are dispersed and not well-organized.
  5. Complexity: Corporate governance frameworks in EU countries can be complex and difficult to understand, particularly for smaller companies and non-experts.
  6. Insufficient diversity: Many companies in EU countries have insufficient diversity on their boards and among their management teams, which can undermine the effectiveness of corporate governance practices.
  7. Limited attention to social and environmental issues: While there is growing recognition of the importance of social and environmental issues in corporate governance, there may still be limited attention paid to these issues in EU countries.

To address these issues, it is important to continue to improve legal and regulatory frameworks, promote enforcement of existing regulations, and engage stakeholders in the implementation of corporate governance standards. This may involve promoting greater diversity on boards and management teams, encouraging greater shareholder engagement, and promoting transparency and accountability in corporate decision-making. It may also involve promoting greater attention to social and environmental issues in corporate governance, and promoting greater awareness and understanding of corporate governance practices among non-experts. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a corporate governance framework that promotes sustainable economic development and benefits all stakeholders.

Implementing Corporate governance standards in the United States

Corporate governance standards in the United States are implemented through a combination of legal requirements, industry best practices, and voluntary guidelines.

Some key steps that companies can take to implement corporate governance standards in the US include:

  1. Establishing a board of directors: US companies are required to have a board of directors, which is responsible for overseeing the company’s management and ensuring that it operates in the best interests of shareholders. Companies can strengthen their corporate governance by ensuring that their board is independent, diverse, and has appropriate skills and expertise.
  2. Adopting a code of conduct: Companies can adopt a code of conduct that outlines ethical standards and expectations for employees, suppliers, and other stakeholders. The code of conduct should be regularly reviewed and updated to ensure that it reflects changing expectations and best practices.
  3. Implementing internal controls: Companies can implement internal controls to ensure that they are operating in compliance with legal and ethical requirements. This can include processes for financial reporting, risk management, and internal audits.
  4. Disclosure and transparency: US companies are required to disclose certain information to investors and regulators, such as financial statements, executive compensation, and material risks. Companies can enhance their corporate governance by providing additional information on their sustainability practices, social and environmental impact, and stakeholder engagement.
  5. Engaging with stakeholders: Companies can engage with stakeholders, such as customers, employees, suppliers, and local communities, to understand their needs and expectations and to build trust. This can involve regular communication, consultation, and collaboration with stakeholders to ensure that the company’s activities are aligned with their interests.
  6. Compliance with legal and regulatory requirements: Companies can ensure that they are in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements by regularly reviewing and updating their policies and procedures, and by monitoring and addressing any violations.

Issues in Implementing Corporate governance standards in the United States and how to address them

While the United States has a relatively strong legal and regulatory framework for corporate governance, there are still some challenges in implementing corporate governance standards in the country. Some of the key issues include:

  1. Shareholder activism: While shareholder activism can be an important mechanism for promoting good corporate governance, it can also be disruptive and costly, particularly for smaller companies.
  2. Limited diversity: Many companies in the United States have limited diversity on their boards and among their management teams, which can undermine the effectiveness of corporate governance practices.
  3. Executive compensation: Executive compensation in the United States is often criticized as being excessive and not well-aligned with company performance, which can undermine the effectiveness of corporate governance practices.
  4. Short-termism: Many companies in the United States are criticized for being too focused on short-term results at the expense of long-term sustainability, which can undermine the effectiveness of corporate governance practices.
  5. Regulatory complexity: The legal and regulatory framework for corporate governance in the United States can be complex and difficult to navigate, particularly for smaller companies and non-experts.

To address these issues, it is important to continue to promote transparency and accountability in corporate decision-making, and to encourage greater diversity on boards and management teams. This may involve promoting the adoption of best practices for corporate governance, such as independent board members, regular board evaluations, and clear executive compensation policies. It may also involve promoting greater attention to long-term sustainability and social and environmental issues in corporate decision-making.

To address the issue of regulatory complexity, there could be efforts to simplify the legal and regulatory framework for corporate governance, and to provide more guidance and support for smaller companies and non-experts. Additionally, efforts could be made to reduce the cost and complexity of shareholder activism, while still allowing shareholders to hold companies accountable for their actions.

International Aspects of Corporate Social Responsibility

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is increasingly being recognized as a global issue that requires international cooperation and collaboration. Many multinational corporations operate in multiple countries and therefore have a responsibility to consider the social and environmental impacts of their operations on a global scale.

International aspects of CSR:

  • Global Supply Chains:

Many multinational corporations have complex supply chains that span multiple countries. This can make it difficult to monitor and regulate the social and environmental impacts of their operations. Therefore, it is important for companies to take steps to ensure that their suppliers are also adhering to good CSR practices.

  • Human Rights:

Human rights are a critical aspect of CSR, and many international treaties and conventions have been established to promote and protect human rights on a global scale. Companies have a responsibility to respect human rights in their operations, and this includes respecting the rights of workers, communities, and other stakeholders.

  • Environmental Sustainability:

Environmental sustainability is a global issue that requires international cooperation and collaboration. Many companies have significant environmental impacts that span multiple countries, and therefore have a responsibility to take steps to reduce their environmental footprint and promote sustainability on a global scale.

  • Global Standards:

There are many international standards and guidelines that have been established to promote good CSR practices. For example, the United Nations Global Compact provides a framework for companies to align their operations with ten principles related to human rights, labor rights, environmental sustainability, and anti-corruption.

  • Stakeholder Engagement:

Stakeholder engagement is an important aspect of CSR, and companies have a responsibility to engage with stakeholders on a global scale. This includes engaging with local communities, civil society organizations, and other stakeholders to understand their concerns and perspectives, and to ensure that their operations are aligned with local needs and priorities.

  • International Regulations:

Many international regulations have been established to promote CSR practices, such as the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, which provide recommendations for responsible business conduct. Companies that operate in multiple countries must comply with these regulations and ensure that their operations are aligned with international standards and guidelines.

Stakeholder engagement

Stakeholder engagement refers to the process of engaging with stakeholders in order to understand their perspectives, needs, and concerns, and to involve them in decision-making processes. Stakeholders can include a wide range of individuals and groups that are affected by a company’s operations, including customers, employees, suppliers, local communities, civil society organizations, and government regulators.

Effective stakeholder engagement is an important aspect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate governance. Engaging with stakeholders can help companies to build trust and credibility, identify and address social and environmental risks, and create value for all stakeholders.

There are several steps involved in stakeholder engagement:

  1. Identify stakeholders: Companies must first identify who their stakeholders are and determine how they are affected by the company’s operations. This can involve mapping stakeholders and their interests, concerns, and power.
  2. Understand stakeholder perspectives: Companies must then engage with stakeholders in order to understand their perspectives, needs, and concerns. This can involve conducting surveys, focus groups, and other forms of research.
  3. Involve stakeholders in decision-making: Companies should involve stakeholders in decision-making processes that affect them. This can involve holding public consultations, involving stakeholders in advisory committees, and other forms of engagement.
  4. Communicate with stakeholders: Companies should communicate regularly with stakeholders in order to keep them informed about the company’s activities and to address any concerns they may have. This can involve regular reporting, social media engagement, and other forms of communication.
  5. Monitor and evaluate: Companies should monitor and evaluate their stakeholder engagement activities in order to determine their effectiveness and identify areas for improvement.

Stakeholder engagement can bring a wide range of benefits to companies:

  1. Improved reputation: Engaging with stakeholders can help companies to build trust and credibility with the public, investors, and other stakeholders. This can help to enhance the company’s reputation and brand value.
  2. Better decision-making: By involving stakeholders in decision-making processes, companies can gain valuable insights and perspectives that can help them to make better decisions. This can lead to better outcomes for the company and its stakeholders.
  3. Enhanced risk management: Engaging with stakeholders can help companies to identify and address social and environmental risks, as well as emerging trends and issues that may impact the company’s operations. This can help to reduce the company’s exposure to risk and improve its resilience.
  4. Innovation and creativity: By involving stakeholders in the innovation process, companies can tap into a wide range of ideas and perspectives that can help to drive innovation and creativity.
  5. Improved employee morale: Engaging with employees as stakeholders can help to improve their morale and job satisfaction, which can lead to higher levels of productivity and retention.
  6. Better relationships with suppliers: Engaging with suppliers as stakeholders can help to build stronger relationships, improve supply chain transparency, and promote responsible sourcing practices.
  7. Improved financial performance: By building trust with stakeholders and addressing social and environmental risks, companies can improve their financial performance and create long-term value for shareholders.

Corporate Governance Codes and Practices

Some evidence demonstrates that governance codes can be viewed as mechanisms facilitating governance convergence across countries. Such convergence is the result of several external forces among which the most powerful are globalization, market liberalization and influential foreign investors. Namely, globalization, the internalization of markets and deregulation has led to rapid changes in traditionally grounded models of corporate governance. These external forces ‘lead to pressure on national governments, institutions and companies, to conform to internationally accepted best practices of corporate governance at the international level’, thereby influencing the attractiveness of countries and companies for foreign investors. Countries that are more exposed to other national economic systems experience greater pressure to change governance practice not only to improve efficiency of domestic companies but also ‘to harmonize the national corporate governance system with international best practices’.

Transparency

A principle of good governance is that stakeholders should be informed about the company’s activities regarding its plans in the future and any risks involved in its business strategies.

Transparency means openness by the company willing to provide clear information to shareholders and other stakeholders. For example, it refers to the openness to disclose financial performance figures which are truthful and accurate.

Disclosing materials concerning the organization’s performances and activities should be will timed and accurate to ensure that all investors have access to clear, factual information which reflects the financial, social and environmental position of the organization. A company should clarify the roles and responsibilities of the board and management to provide a level of accountability.

Transparency ensures that stakeholders can have confidence in the decision-making and management processes of a company.

Accountability

Corporate accountability refers to the obligation and responsibility to provide an explanation or reason for the company’s actions and conduct such as:

  • The board should present a balanced and understandable assessment of the company’s position and prospects.
  • The board is responsible for determining the nature and extent of the significant risks the company is willing to take.
  • The board should maintain sound risk management and internal control systems.
  • The board should establish formal and transparent arrangements for corporate reporting and risk management and for maintaining an appropriate relationship with the company’s auditors.

The board should communicate with stakeholders at regular intervals giving a fair, balanced and explicit analysis of how the company is achieving its business purpose.

Responsibility

The Board of Directors are given authority to act on behalf of the company. They should therefore accept full responsibility for the powers that it is given and the authority that it exercises. The Board of Directors are responsible for overseeing the management of the business, affairs of the company, appointing the chief executive and monitoring the performance of the company. In doing so, it is required to act in the best interests of the company.

Accountability goes hand in hand with responsibility. The Board of Directors should be made accountable to the stakeholders for the way in which the company has carried out its responsibilities.

Eight Codes of Corporate Governance

Governance Structure:

All organizations should be headed by an effective board and all the responsibilities and accountabilities within the organisation should be clearly distinguished.

Structure of the Board and its Committees:

The board should consist of appropriate combination of executive directors, independent directors and non-independent non-executive directors to prevent one individual or a small group of individuals from dominating the board’s decision. The board’s size and scale should be in proportion with the level of diversity of the organisation. Appropriate board committees may be formed to assist the board in effective performances to fulfil the duties.

Director’s Appointment Procedure:

There should be a formal, rigorous and transparent process for various activities like appointments, election, re-election of directors etc. Members for the board should be appointment on merit basis fulfilling objective criteria which should include skills, knowledge, experience, and independence for the benefits of the company. The board should ensure that a formal, rigorous and transparent procedure be in place for planning the succession of all key officeholders.

Directors’ duties, remuneration and performance:

Directors should be aware of their legal duties. They must observe and foster high ethical standards and a strong ethical culture in their organisation. Each director must be able to give sufficient time to discharge his or her duties effectively. Conflicts of interest should be disclosed and managed.

The board of members is responsible for the governance of the organisation’s information, information technology and information security. The board, committees and individual directors should be supplied with informations in a timely manner and in an appropriate form and quality. The performances of board members should be evaluated and be held accountable to appropriate stakeholders. The board should be transparent, fair and consistent in determining the remuneration policy for directors and senior executives.

Risk Governance and Internal Control:

The board will be held responsible for risk governance. It must check the development and execution of a comprehensive and powerful system of risk management and also ensures the maintenance of a sound internal control system.

Reporting with Integrity:

The board must present a fair, balanced and understandable assessment of the performances and outlook of organization’s financial, environmental, social and governance position in its annual report and on its website.

Audit:

All the organizations should consider having an effective and independent internal audit function that has the respect, confidence and cooperation of both the board and the management. The board should establish formal and transparent arrangements to appoint organisation’s auditors and maintain an appropriate relationship with them.

Relations with Shareholders and other key Stakeholders:

The board should be responsible for ensuring that an appropriate interchange and disclosure takes place between the organisation, its shareholders and other key stakeholders. The board should respect the interests of its shareholders and other key stakeholders within the context of its fundamental purpose.

Five Pillars of Good Corporate Governance Make Up the Corporate Governance Code

Much like the pillars of good corporate governance in the United States, the Corporate Governance Code in the United Kingdom comprises the pillars of leadership, effectiveness, accountability, remuneration and shareholder relationships.

Leadership

The code requires companies to ensure to shareholders that they have an effective board of directors that’s capable of providing excellence in board leadership. Boards of directors are collectively responsible for the short- and long-term success of the corporations they serve.

Strong leadership requires corporations to have a clear division of the responsibilities between board directors and executives. Boards are responsible for strategic planning and oversight, and the executives are responsible for the day-to-day responsibilities of running the company. The board chair is responsible for the board’s leadership and the chair must ensure that the board operates as efficiently as possible in relation to all of their board duties and responsibilities.

Non-executive board directors should constructively challenge the board and help to develop successful proposals for strategy. The code expressly states that no single person should have total decision-making power on a board.

Effectiveness

The code requires corporate boards to ensure that they have a composition that encompasses the appropriate balance of skills, experience, independence and knowledge of the company so that they’re able to perform their duties and responsibilities effectively:

  • Boards are required to develop a formal, rigorous and transparent process for appointing new board directors.
  • Before accepting a position on a board of directors, nominees should ensure that they have sufficient time to fulfill their board duties and responsibilities.
  • Boards should avail their board directors of a comprehensive board orientation and onboarding process. In addition, boards should provide regular opportunities for board director training and education.
  • Management should provide accurate information to the board that has the appropriate form and quality so that the board can fulfill its duties in a timely manner.
  • Boards should also conduct rigorous annual self-evaluations for the board, individual directors and significant committees, with the goal of improving their performance. All board directors should be subject to regular elections as long as they continue to perform satisfactorily.

Accountability

The board is wholly accountable for the actions and decisions of the company. The board should make annual disclosures to shareholders that represent a fair, accurate and comprehensive assessment of the corporation’s positions and corporate outlook.

The board is additionally responsible for assessing the nature and extent of risks it is willing to take to achieve its strategic plans. Boards should participate in sound risk management and internal control systems.

Boards should also establish formal procedures for corporate reporting, risk management reporting and internal control principles. Procedures should include details of relationships between the company and the internal and external auditors.

Remuneration

The United Kingdom favors remuneration packages that are designed to promote the long-term success of the company and that are directly aligned with performance. Remuneration should sufficiently challenge executives, be transparent and be rigorously applied.

The company should have a formal, transparent process for developing remuneration policies and setting remuneration packages. Directors shouldn’t be involved in setting their own pay.

Shareholder Relationships

Boards should utilize their annual general meetings to communicate and engage with investors on their objectives and strategic planning. The board should ensure that communications with shareholders are satisfactory.

These pillars are considered the minimum for the basics of good governance. Corporations are encouraged to add their own best practices as they develop them and learn from other corporations around the world.

Attendance and participation in Committee meetings

While it is essential for directors to have an indication as to the level of commitment required of them, it is impossible to state with certainty how many man hours would be required of them at the time of taking on such commitments. The level of commitment required of a Director would vary from one company to the other but the average time commitment by global standards is that a Director should be prepared to spend at least four (4) days every quarter of the financial year on the company’s business after the induction phase. This includes time required to prepare for and attend scheduled Board meetings, Annual Board strategy away-day(s), the Annual General Meeting, site visits, committee meetings, meetings with shareholders, trainings and sessions as part of the Board evaluation process. There is always a likelihood of additional time commitment in respect of preparation time and ad hoc matters which may arise from time to time, and particularly when the Company is undergoing a period of increased activity.

In addition to the time commitment, particularly with respect to preparation for and attendance at Board meetings, a Director is required to actively participate at such meetings by bringing his independent judgment, objectivity as well as his expertise and experience to bear on Board deliberations. To be able to participate actively, a Non-Executive Director particularly, who is not involved in the day to day running of the company, will need to spend sufficient time studying Board papers to have a good understanding of the agenda items and be able to ask the right questions and make informed contributions at Board meetings. To facilitate this, it is imperative that Board papers are circulated in good time and in appropriate format. It is good practice to provide executive summaries with respect to lengthy reports and presentations and provide appropriate references and supporting documents. Board papers should also be made available electronically to allow for on-the-go access.

The Chairman of the Board has a key role to play in encouraging Directors’ attendance and participation at Board meetings by ensuring that all the Directors receive accurate, timely and clear information. A proficient and experienced Chairman is able to ensure that Board meetings are properly conducted in a cohesive manner, is able to effectively stimulate participation from all Directors and keep in check a potentially dominant Director. The Chairman is responsible for ensuring that the Board is an effective working group by promoting a culture of openness and debate which encourages Directors with dissenting views to air such views.

To Increase Attendance and/or Participation in Committees

  • Ensure committee chairs understand and can convey the role of the committee to members, and that the chair and members have up-to-date job descriptions.
  • Ensure adequate orientation that describes the organization and its unique services, and how the committee contributes to this mission.
  • Remember that the organization and its committees deserve strong attendance and participation. Don’t fall prey to the perspective that “we’re lucky just get anyone.” Set a standard for the best.
  • Have ground rules that support participation and attendance. Revisit the ground rules every other meeting and post them on the bottom of agendas.
  • Let go of “dead wood.” It often help to decrease the number of committee members rather than increase them.
  • Consider using subcommittees to increase individual responsibilities and focus on goals.
  • Conduct yearly committee evaluations that includes a clear evaluation process and where each committee member evaluates the other members, and each member receives a written report about their strengths and how they can improve their contributions.
  • Attempt to provide individual assignments to the committee members.
  • Have at least one staff member participate in each committee to help with administrative support and providing information.
  • Monitor quorum requirements for the entire board (as set forth usually in ByLaws), or the minimum number of board members who must be present for the board to officially enact business. This quorum, when not met, will serve as a clear indicator, or signal, that the board is in trouble.
  • Develop a committee attendance policy that specifies the number of times a member can be absent in consecutive meetings and in total meetings per time period.
  • Generate minutes for each committee meeting to get closure on items and help members comprehend the progress made by the committee.
  • In committee meeting reports, include noting who is present and who is absent.
  • Consider having low-attendance members involved in some other form of service to the organization, e.g., a “friends of the organization,” or something like that, who attends to special events rather than ongoing activities.
  • Have a “summit meeting” with committee members to discuss the low attendance problem, and use a round-table approach so each person must speak up with their opinions.

MCA has permitted use of video conference facility for Board / Committee meetings subject to following conditions:

  1. The facility shall be capable of allowing all participants to communicate concurrently with each other without any intermediary; Every director must attend at least one Board / Committee meeting personally in each financial year;
  2. Notice of Meeting should provide for the availability of the facility and necessary information to access the same;
  3. The Notice should seek confirmation of director that he would participate through video conference; in the absence of confirmation, it is to be presumed that he would physically participate;
  4. Chairman and Secretary are responsible for integrity, proper functioning of the meeting and ensure participation by director himself / authorized person;
  5. Roll call should be taken of directors participating physically a well as through video conference at the commencement and at conclusion of meeting;
  6. Participation by Director through video conference would be counted for the purpose of quorum;
  7. At the end of meeting the chairman to read out summary of decisions taken against each agenda and details of voting by each director; That part of proceedings shall be recorded and preserved;
  8. In minutes the Chairman shall record the presence of director during last three meetings whether personally or through conference; The Place where Chairman and Secretary are present shall be the place of Board Meeting.
  9. Soft copy of the ‘Draft minutes’ to be circulated within 7 days of the meeting;
  10. This facility is purely optional.

Board Committees Remuneration Committee, Shareholders’ Grievance Committee, Other committees

The board can appoint committees based on its objectives for the year, and these committees can help review and advise on the achievement of those objectives. The committee structure should be reviewed regularly to make sure there are no overlapping responsibilities.

There can also be standing committees, which operate on a more permanent basis, and ad-hoc committees, which are in place for a particular time frame and can then be disbanded once an objective has been achieved. Ad-hoc committees could also be termed task forces. Committee chairs can provide leadership to the committee and help translate the board’s goals into an agenda for committee meetings.

The board can accomplish much of the work through committees, which is an effective way to delegate work. They can focus specifically on areas such as governance, internal affairs, or external affairs.

Committee size will depend on the board’s needs, and it is helpful to recognise that the more committees you set up, the more meetings will need to take place.

Committee members should be selected based on their experience and skills. Each board member should serve on at least one committee, but preferably no more than two.

Essentially, a committee provides expert advice and counselling to the board. However, the committee’s suggestions still need to be approved by the board, and they are not obligated to go with this advice.

Remuneration Committee

The role of a Remuneration Committee is:

  • To decide and approve the terms and conditions for appointment of executive directors and/ or whole time Directors and Remuneration payable to other Directors and matters related thereto.
  • To recommend to the Board, the remuneration packages of the Company’s Managing/Joint Managing/ Deputy Managing/Whole time / Executive Directors, including all elements of remuneration package (i.e. salary, benefits, bonuses, perquisites, commission, incentives, stock options, pension, retirement benefits, details of fixed component and performance linked incentives along with the performance criteria, service contracts, notice period, severance fees etc.);
  • To be authorized at its duly constituted meeting to determine on behalf of the Board of Directors and on behalf of the shareholders with agreed terms of reference, the Company’s policy on specific remuneration packages for Company’s Managing/Joint Managing/ Deputy Managing/ Whole-time/ Executive Directors, including pension rights and any compensation payment;
  • To implement, supervise and administer any share or stock option scheme of the Company.
  • to review the overall compensation policy, service agreements and other employment conditions to Executive Directors and senior executives just below the Board of Directors and make appropriate recommendations to the Board of Directors;
  • to review the overall compensation policy for Non-Executive Directors and Independent Directors and make appropriate recommendations to the Board of Directors;
  • to make recommendations to the Board of Directors on the increments in the remuneration of the Directors;
  • to assist the Board in developing and evaluating potential candidates for senior executive positions and to oversee the development of executive succession plans;
  • to review and approve on annual basis the corporate goals and objectives with respect to compensation for the senior executives and make appropriate recommendations to the Board of Directors;
  • to review and make appropriate recommendations to the Board of Directors on an annual basis the evaluation process and compensation structure for our Company’s officers just below the level of the Board of Directors;
  • to provide oversight of the management’s decisions concerning the performance and compensation of other officers of our Company;

Shareholders’ Grievance Committee

In terms of Clause 49-IV(G)(iii) of the Listing Agreement, a board committee under the chairmanship of a non-executive director shall be formed to specifically look into the redressal of shareholder and investors complaints like transfer of shares, non-receipt of balance sheet, non-receipt of declared dividends etc. This committee shall be designated as “Shareholders/ Investors Grievance Committee”.

  • Efficient transfer of shares; including review of cases for refusal of transfer transmission of shares and debentures;
  • Redressal of shareholder and investor complaints like transfer of shares, non-receipt of balance sheet, non-receipt of declared dividends etc;
  • Issue of duplicate / split / consolidated share certificates;
  • Allotment and listing of shares;
  • Review of cases for refusal of transfer / transmission of shares and debentures;
  • Reference to statutory and regulatory authorities regarding investor grievances; and to otherwise ensure proper and timely attendance and redressal of investor queries and grievances.”

Other committees

Risk Committee

The committee comprises a minimum of three independent non-executive directors, as well as the chief executive and financial director. The chair of the board may not serve as chair of this committee. Members of the committee are individuals with risk management skills and experience. The committee’s responsibilities include:

  • Review and approve for recommendation to the board a risk management policy and plan developed by management. The risk policy and plan are reviewed annually.
  • Monitor implementation of the risk policy and plan, ensuring an appropriate enterprise- wide risk management system is in place with adequate and effective processes that include strategy, ethics, operations, reporting, compliance, IT and sustainability.
  • Make recommendations to the board on risk indicators, levels of risk tolerance and appetite.
  • Monitor that risks are reviewed by management, and that management’s responses to identified risks are within board-approved levels of risk tolerance.
  • Ensure risk management assessments are performed regularly by management.
  • Issue a formal opinion to the board on the effectiveness of the system and process of risk management.
  • Review reporting on risk management that is to be included in the integrated annual report.
  • Review annually the charters of the group’s significant subsidiary companies’ risk committees, and their annual assessment of compliance with these charters to establish if the Naspers committee can rely on the work of these risk committees.
  • Perform an annual self-assessment of the effectiveness of the committee, reporting these indings to the board.

Nomination Committee

The primary role of the Nomination Committee of the board is to assist the board by identifying prospective directors and make recommendations on appointments to the board and the senior most level of executive management below the board. The committee also clears succession plans for these levels. The Nomination Committee is responsible for making recommendations on board appointments and on maintaining a balance of skills and experience on the board and its committees.

Succession planning for the board is a matter which is devolved primarily to the Nomination Committee, although the committee’s deliberations are reported to and debated by the full board. The board itself also regularly reviews more general succession planning for the senior management of the group.

Corporate Governance Committee

Together with the audit and compensation committees, the nominating/corporate governance committee rounds out the three standing committees of a public company’s board of directors. It plays a critical role in overseeing matters of corporate governance for the board, including formulating and recommending governance principles and policies. As its name implies, this committee is charged with enhancing the quality of nominees to the board and ensuring the integrity of the nominating process. Given the recent focus on board composition and diversity, director elections, and proxy access, the role of nominating/corporate governance committee is in the spotlight.

Corporate Compliance Committee

The primary Objective of the Compliance Committee is to review, oversee and monitor:

  • The company’s compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
  • The company’s policies, programs, and procedures to ensure compliance with relevant laws, the company’s code of conduct, and other relevant standards
  • The company’s efforts to implement legal obligations arising from settlement agreements and other similar documents
  • Perform any other duties as are directed by the board of directors of the company.

Disclosures in Annual Report

An annual report is a document that public corporations must provide annually to shareholders that describes their operations and financial conditions. The front part of the report often contains an impressive combination of graphics, photos, and an accompanying narrative, all of which chronicle the company’s activities over the past year and may also make forecasts about the future of the company. The back part of the report contains detailed financial and operational information.

Annual reports became a regulatory requirement for public companies following the stock market crash of 1929 when lawmakers mandated standardized corporate financial reporting.

The intent of the required annual report is to provide public disclosure of a company’s operating and financial activities over the past year. The report is typically issued to shareholders and other stakeholders who use it to evaluate the firm’s financial performance and to make investment decisions.

Typically, an annual report will contain the following sections:

  • General corporate information
  • Operating and financial highlights
  • Letter to the shareholders from the CEO
  • Narrative text, graphics, and photos
  • Management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A)
  • Financial statements, including the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement
  • Notes to the financial statements
  • Auditor’s report
  • Summary of financial data
  • Accounting policies

State of Company’s Affairs [Section 134(3)(i)]:

Board briefing about the Company business operation ,highlights, growth, services of the Company, operating profits, performance growths, overview of the business, new projects introduced during the year or any new services undertaken by the company.

Details of status of acquisition, mergers, expansion, modernization and diversification, and key business developments.

Besides, it points out the problems faced by the company which has affected the Profits and measures that have been taken to improve the working and reduces the costs.

Dividends [Section 134(3)(k):

The amount of Dividend if any, recommended by the board should be paid by way of Dividend, as to the rate under review for the approval of members at the  Annual General Meeting AGM

Details of Subsidiary, Joint Venture and Associate Companies (Rule 8(5)(iv):

Details of company that is ceased to its subsidiaries, Joint Venture or associate company.

Particulars of Loan and Investments Section 134(3)(g):

Disclosure of all particulars of Loans, guarantees or investments under Section 186.

Change in nature of Business, if any:

Details pertaining to change of business of the Company or in the subsidiaries business or in the nature of business carried on by them.

Amounts Transferred to reserves, if any:

The board shall states the amount which it proposes to any reserve in the Balance Sheet like debenture redemption reserve in terms of Section 71(13)etc.

Changes in share Capital, if any:

Change in total Share capital of the company and any increase during the year under review, pursuant to allotment of equity/preference shares /Right issue/ Private Placement/ preferential allotment/ Employee Stock Option scheme of the Company. 10. Web Link of annual return Section 134(3)(a): Web address link where annual return of company shall be published.

Number of Board Meeting Section 134(3)(b):

The number of Board Meetings held during the year and Committee meeting and details of Board meetings attended by each of the Director should be mentioned.

Particulars of Contract and Arrangement with Related Parties Section 188:

Details of all transactions entered along with the justification for entering into such a contract and arrangement by the company during the financial year. 13. Statutory Auditors:

Details about the statutory auditors of the company, any change made during the year, whether existing auditor(s) is/are eligible for reappointment etc. Compliance certificate from either the auditor(s) or practicing company secretaries regarding compliance of conditions of corporate governance shall be annexed with the director’s report.(Para C of Schedule V of Listing Regulations).

Explanation to Auditor’s Remarks Section 134(3)(f): Explanation or comment by the board on every qualification reservation, adverse or disclaimer made by the statutory auditor in his report and /or by the secretarial auditor in the Secretarial Audit Report.

Material changes affecting the Financial position of the company Section 134(3)(l):

Details of any material changes / events, if any occurring after balance sheet date till the date of report to be stated.

Conservation of energy, technology, absorption, foreign exchange earnings and outgo section 134(3)(m):

The board report shall contain the following details:

Conservation of energy:

Impact on the conservation of energy, Company utilization of alternative source, the capital investment on energy conservation types of equipment.

Technology absorption:

Research and development expenditure, Advantages of product improvement, cost reduction, product development or impact substitution.

Foreign Exchange earnings and outgo:

Terms of actual inflows during the year and the Foreign exchange outgo during the year in terms of actual outflows.

Risk Management Policy Section 134(3)(n):

Details of the development and implementation of the risk management policy of the company.

Details of Directors and Key Managerial Personnel Rule 8(5)(iii):

Details of Directors and KMP appointed or resigned during the year.

error: Content is protected !!